Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

 Index 
Texts adopted
Thursday, 5 July 2001 - Strasbourg
DSAB 3/2001(Amendments)
 DSAB 4/2001(Amendments)
 SAB 3 and 4/2001
 EU own resources in 2001
 2002 budget: conciliation procedure
 Management of Community programmes *
 Radio spectrum policy ***I
 Coastal zone management in Europe ***I
 Recreational craft ***I
 Aid to uprooted people in developing countries ***I
 Macro financial assistance to Yugoslavia *
 COM in fruit and vegetables
 Human rights in the world
 Fundamental rights in the EU (2000)
 Death penalty in the world
 Beijing's application to host the 2008 Olympic Games
 Human rights: UNGA special session on the rights of the child
 Human rights: Religious freedom in Vietnam
 Human rights: South Africa
 Human rights: Belarus
 Human rights: situation of refugees from Burundi in Tanzania
 Illegal exploitation of natural resources in Democratic Republic of Congo
 Earthquake in Peru
 Cod stock in the Irish sea *
 Bonn Conference on Climate Change
 Safe operation of mining activities
 Results of the multiannual guidance programmes for fishing fleets

DSAB 3/2001(Amendments)
Draft Supplementary and Amending Budget No 3/2001 of the European Union for the financial year 2001 - Section III - Commission, Section VI - Economic and Social Committee, Section VII - Committee of the Regions (9802/2001 - C5-0271/2001 - 2001/2049(BUD))

Amendment 3

STAFF - SECTION III - COMMISSION

Category and grade

Research and Technological Development - Indirect action

Additional posts
proposed by
DSAB No 3/2001

Total permanent posts DSAB No 3/2001

Amendment to
DSAB No 3/2001

Total permanent posts after amendment to
DSAB No 3/2001

Scientific and technical1

Admini-strative2

Total

Scientific and technical1

Admini-strative2

Total

Scientific and technical 1

Admini-
strative2

Total

Scientific and technical1

Admini-strative2

Total

A 1

1

-

1

1

-

1

A 2

173

2

19

173

2

19

A 3

724

8

80

724

8

80

A 4

+1

+1

282

29

311

-

-

-

282

29

311

A 5

+3

+3

253

27

280

-

-

-

253

27

280

A 6

+5

+2

+7

140

20

160

-

   -
2

   -
2

140

18

158

A 7

+3

+3

+6

82

7

89

-

+1

+1

82

8

90

A 8

+3

+3

9

5

14

-

+1

+1

9

6

15

Total

+12

+8

+20

856

98

954

-

-

-

856

98

954

B 1

45

35

80

45

35

80

B 2

23

39

62

23

39

62

B 3

5

57

62

5

57

62

B 4

+1

+2

+3

8

37

45

   -
1

   -
2

   -
3

7

35

42

B 5

+1

+3

+4

2

22

24

+1

+2

+3

3

24

27

Total

+2

+5

+7

83

190

273

-

-

-

83

190

273

C 1

-

90

90

-

-

-

90

90

C 2

-

93

93

-

-

-

93

93

C 3

-

109

109

-

-

-

109

109

C 4

+1

+1

-

88

88

-

   -
1

   -
1

-

87

87

C 5

+2

+2

-

47

47

-

+1

+1

-

48

48

Total

+3

+3

-

427

427

-

-

-

-

427

427

D 1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

D 2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

D 3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

D 4

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Grand total

+14

+16

+30

9395

715

1 6546

-

-

-

9395

715

1 6546

1 The following are regarded as occupying scientific or technical posts: all staff assigned to scientific or technical departments (including managerial staff).

2 The following are regarded as occupying administrative posts: all staff assigned to administrative and financial departments; all secretaries, whatever the departments to which they have been assigned; and the small number of staff assigned to scientific departments as administrative assistants.

3Of which one official benefiting 100% from the advantages provided for in Article 93 of the Staff Regulations and two A 1 ad personam.

4Of which one A 2 ad personam.

5Of which two posts occupied by staff seconded to national bodies pursuant to Article 6(c) of the Euratom Treaty.

6 Half-time working in certain posts may be offset by the recruitment of other staff within the limit of the number of posts released in each category.

Amendment 4

STAFF - EUROPEAN ANTI-FRAUD OFFICE (OLAF)

Amend the establishment plan as follows :

Budget

DSAB

Amendment

New total

2001

3/2001

Perm-anent

Tempo-rary

Total

Perm-anent

Tempo-rary

Total

Perm-anent

Tempo-rary

Total

Perm-anent

Tempo-rary

Total

A1

1

1

1

1

1

1

A2

4

1

5

21

32

5

21

32

5

A3

4

5

9

6

3

9

   -
1

+1

5

4

9

A4

11

17

28

22

16

38

   -
11

+1

   -
10

11

17

28

A5

12

17

29

213

163

37

   -
9

+1

   -
8

123

173

29

A6

6

6

12

12

12

   -
4

   -
4

8

8

A7

15

15

30

203

19

39

+1

+1

20

203

40

A8

Total A

53

61

114

84

57

141

   -
25

+4

   -
21

59

61

120

B1

8

18

26

8

8

16

+1

+10

+11

9

18

27

B2

10

21

31

6

6

6

6

B3

27

27

54

273

20

47

   -
5

+28

+23

223

48

70

B4

6

6

6

6

6

6

B5

5

5

5

12

17

+2

   -
12

   -
10

7

7

Total B

56

66

122

52

40

92

   -
2

+26

+24

50

66

116

C1

13

13

13

13

   -
7

   -
7

6

6

C2

12

12

12

12

12

12

C3

17

17

173

17

   -
2

   -
2

153

15

C4

11

11

11

11

+2

+2

13

13

C5

7

7

7

7

+7

+7

14

14

Total C

60

60

60

60

0

0

60

60

D1

1

1

1

1

1

1

D2

1

1

1

1

1

1

D3

2

2

2

2

2

2

D4

Total D

4

4

4

4

4

4

173

127

300

200

97

297

   -
27

+30

3

173

127

300

_______________________________________________

   1.
Of which one post for the Director of the Supervisory Committee Secretariat.

2 For the Director of Intelligence and Operational Strategy, the Director of Investigations and Operations and a principal adviser for anti-fraud cooperation in the acceding countries.

3 Of which one post for the Supervisory Committee Secretariat.

SECTION III - COMMISSION - EXPENDITURE - Part A

A-3 6 0

European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF)

Amend figures as follows :

A-3 6 0

2001

DSAB No 3/2001

AMENDMENT

New amount

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Appropriations

34 491 000

34 491 000

34 269 168

34 269 168

   -
3 578 168

   -
3 578 168

30 691 000

30 691 000

Reserve

3 800 000

3 800 000

3 800 000

3 800 000

NOMENCLATURE: Unchanged

REMARKS: Unchanged

SCHEDULE: Automated schedule


DSAB 4/2001(Amendments)
Draft Supplementary and Amending Budget No 4/2001 of the European Union for the financial year 2001 - Section III - Commission (9803/2001 - C5-0272/2001 - 2001/2094(BUD))

Amendment 1

SECTION III - COMMISSION - Part B

B7-541

Assistance for the countries of the western Balkans

B7-548

Macro-economic assistance to the countries of the Western Balkans

Amend figures as follows :

B7-541

2001

DSAB nº 4/2001

AMENDMENT

New amount

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Appropriations

304 000 000

145 500 000

304 000 000

230 500 000

+70 000 000

304 000 000

300 500 000

Reserve

B7-548

2001

DSAB nº 4/2001

AMENDMENT

New amount

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Appropriations

80 000 000

40 000 000

80 000 000

40 000 000

+30 000 000

+30 000 000

110 000 000

70 000 000

Reserve

NOMENCLATURE: Unchanged

REMARKS: Unchanged

SCHEDULE: Automated schedule


SAB 3 and 4/2001
European Parliament resolution on Draft Supplementary and Amending Budget No 3/2001 of the European Union for the financial year 2001 - Section III - Commission, Section VI - Economic and Social Committee, Section VII - Committee of the Regions (9802/2001 - C5-0271/2001 - 2001/2049(BUD)) and on Draft Supplementary and Amending Budget No 4/2001 of the European Union for the financial year 2001 - Section III - Commission (9803/2001 - C5-0272/2001 - 2001/2094(BUD))
P5_TA(2001)0389A5-0239/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to Article 272 of the EC Treaty, Article 78 of the ECSC Treaty, and Article 177 of the EURATOM Treaty,

-  having regard to the Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977 applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as last amended by Regulation (EC, ECSC, EURATOM) No 762/2001(1) ,

-  having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(2) ,

-  having regard to Council Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom of 31 October 1994 on the system of the European Communities" own resources(3) ,

-  having regard to Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities" own resources(4) ,

-  having regard to the general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2001, finally adopted on 14 December 2000(5) ,

-  having regard to Preliminary Draft Supplementary and Amending Budgets No 3/2001 and No 4/2001 of the European Union for the financial year 2001 (SEC(2001) 663 and SEC(2001) 793 ),

-  having regard to Draft Supplementary and Amending Budgets No 3/2001, and No 4/2001 (9802/2001 - C5-0271/2001 and 9803/2001 - C5-0272/2001 ),

-  having regard to Rule 92 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinion of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A5-0239/2001 ),

A.  whereas Draft Supplementary and Amending Budget No 3/2001 amends the establishment plans of the Commission, as regards research and development activities and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), as well as the establishment plans of the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions,

B.  whereas Draft Supplementary and Amending Budget No 4/2001 concerns the balance for the financial year 2000 and an increase in payment appropriations for assistance to the reconstruction of the Western Balkans in 2001,

C.  whereas the Council has adopted at the same time the Draft Supplementary and Amending Budgets No 3/2001 and No 4/2001, therefore it is necessary to merge the two procedures in order to avoid needless administrative burden,

D.  whereas there has been a substantial increase in the number of posts for OLAF agreed by the budgetary authority over the past two years: 224 in the 2000 budget and 300 in the 2001 budget, and whereas the setting up of OLAF's management and operational structures has been subject to considerable Commission delay,

E.  whereas Parliament, the Council and the Commission have established legislative provisions, which confer on the Director-General of OLAF appointing authority powers in relation to OLAF staff in particular establishment of the office's preliminary draft budget which may not be altered by the Commission before it is sent to the budgetary authority,

F.  whereas in the 2001 budget, Parliament significantly amended OLAF's establishment plan, in particular by increasing the number of temporary posts from 13 to 42% and the number of B posts in relation to A posts, and placed the remaining 76 new posts in the reserve until all staff working for OLAF have been reassessed in accordance with the resolution of 16 May 2000 on protecting the Communities' financial interests and the fight against fraud(6) ,

G.  whereas Draft Supplementary and Amending Budget No 3/2001 contains significant changes to the OLAF establishment plan adopted by Parliament in December 2000 in particular regarding the balance between permanent and temporary posts as well as the creation of new specialised units while the 2001 Budget has not been properly implemented yet,

H.  whereas the mid-term strategy to staff OLAF should be presented by the Director of OLAF and approved by OLAF Supervisory Committee by the end of October 2001,

I.  whereas Draft Supplementary and Amending Budget No 3/2001 also covers for the Committee of Regions and the Economic and Social Committee the recruitment of two temporary A grade staff, as well as contract extension for another temporary A grade staff member and one temporary B grade staff member for monitoring the refurbishment of the Belliard building,

J.  whereas the two committees will become owners of the building at the end of the lease contract, and have therefore to monitor all the financial, technical and legal aspects of the refurbishment, involving both the appropriations made available by the Community budget as well as the monies invested by the owner of the building,

K.  whereas the Commission entered the final calculation of the correction of budgetary imbalances in favour of the United Kingdom for 1997 in the PDSAB No 4/2001, as well as updated correction figures for 1999 and 2000 in order to reduce inaccuracies and reduce the need for significant adjustments to the final calculations,

L.  whereas the balance is the difference between revenue and expenditure pursuant to Article 15 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000(7) , and whereas the balance from the 2000 budget presents a surplus of EUR 11.6 billion, which is to be entered as revenue in the 2001 budget through SAB 4/2001,

M.  whereas revenue for 2000 was higher than expected and the level of expenditure under the 2000 budget was one of the lowest in recent years, with a particularly low implementation rate of only 88% of the appropriations made available by the budgetary authority,

N.  whereas the Commission has failed to implement the appropriations decided by the budgetary authority on the basis of the priorities of the Union, thus denying citizens the possibility of benefiting from its budget,

O.  whereas responsibility for this must be shared between the Commission and Council which by adopting the appropriate legal bases late, jeopardises implementation of the available funding,

P.  whereas the budget adopted must be more closely followed up and monitored by the budgetary authority in order to anticipate and prevent under-utilisation of appropriations as far as possible,

1.  Decides to deal with the two Draft Supplementary and Amending Budgets in a single procedure in order to avoid needless administrative costs and to speed up implementation of the proposed changes, adopts, in accordance with the result oon the budget amendments, a single budgetary act, which includes Draft Supplementary and Amending Budgets No 3/2001 and No 4/2001, adopted by the Council;

2.  Welcomes that the Commission has revised through PDSAB No 3/2001 its forecasts on administrative RTD expenditure made in PDB 2001, which will lead to a transfer of EUR 5.6 million from administrative to operational expenditure;

3.  Agrees to set up 27 new posts for shared-cost RTD projects but decides that the 15 posts dedicated for administrative purposes should be placed in the lower levels of the corresponding categories (A7, A8, B5 and C5);

4.  Agrees that payment appropriations must match commitment appropriations as stated in the Financial Regulation, particularly in the case of the Balkans where take-up of appropriations is high and rapid, and therefore stresses the need for supplementary payments to cover the gap between commitments (EUR 839 million) and payments (EUR 515 million) for Chapter B7-54 ;

5.  Takes note that the Commission indicates needs in payment appropriations at EUR 420 million for the Balkans and that an additional EUR 30 million are necessary to finance a grant to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia; considers it necessary, for the time being, to avoid further reductions or redeployment, and welcomes the budgetary authorities' decision to provide EUR 100 million additionally to cover these estimated needs;

6.  Agrees to the additional remarks for Article B7-702 A allowing administrative expenditure for Articles B7-704 and B7-709 to be covered without requiring additional appropriations;

7.  Considers that the adjustments in the OLAF establishment plan in DSAB No 3/2001 do not reflect the objectives that OLAF should achieve according to Parliament's approach;

8.  Agrees to the part of DSAB No 3/2001 that deals with the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions;

9.  Agrees to the part of the DSAB No 4/2001 that deals with the revenue side of the budget;

10.  Is deeply concerned about the budgetary rigour of the Commission and the Council, when the expenditure of the year 2000 was over-estimated by EUR 8.5 billion, or 10.6%;

11.  Amends Draft Supplementary and Amending Budgets No 3/2001 and No 4/2001 concerning the following elements:

   -
Research establishment plan: place 15 posts in the lower levels of the corresponding categories;
   -
OLAF establishment plan:

welcomes the approval of the budgetary amendment to the OLAF establishment plan modifying the breakdown between permanent and temporary posts and restoring the 3 posts deleted by the Council and enters EUR 3.8 billion in reserve until a redeployment of 10 A officials from OLAF to the Commission services is achieved and until a favourable opinion is given by OLAF Supervisory Committee;

   - B7-54
: increase payment appropriations required for the EU assistance in the Balkans;

12.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the other institutions.

(1) OJ L 111, 20.4.2001, p.1.
(2) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p.1.
(3) OJ L 293, 12.11.1994, p. 9.
(4) OJ L 253, 7.10.2000, p. 42.
(5) OJ L 56, 26.2.2001, p. 1.
(6) OJ C 59, 23.2.2001, p. 61.
(7) OJ L 130, 31.5.2000, p. 1.


EU own resources in 2001
European Parliament resolution on the situation concerning the European Union's own resources in 2001 (2001/2019(INI))
P5_TA(2001)0390A5-0238/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 272 thereof, and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 173 thereof,

-  having regard to Council Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom of 31 October 1994 on the European Communities' system of own resources(1) ,

-  having regard to Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities' own resources(2) ,

-  having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the 2001 financial year, finally adopted on 14 December 2000(3) ,

-  having regard to its resolutions of 21 April 1994 on a new system of own resources for the European Union(4) and 22 November 1990 on the future financing of the European Community(5) ,

-  having regard to its resolution of 11 March 1999 on the need to modify and reform the European Union's own resources system(6) ,

-  having regard to its position of 17 November 1999(7) on the proposal for a Council decision on the system of the European Union's own resources (COM(1999) 333 - C5-0092/1999 - 1999/0139 (CNS) )(8) ,

-  having regard to the document entitled 'Financing the European Union - Commission Report on the Operation of the Own Resources System' (COM(1998) 560 - C4-0579/1998 ),

-  having regard to Rule 163 of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A5-0238/2001 ),

A.  whereas the new Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom will replace Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom after ratification in the Member States, coming into force on 1 January 2002,

B.  whereas appropriations for payments of EUR 92.569 billion were entered in the 2001 budget, of which EUR 90.972 billion has to be raised from own resources,

C.  whereas own resources are made up of traditional own resources (TOR), the resource accruing from value-added tax (VAT resource) and the GNP, or fourth resource (the application of a rate to the sum of the Member States" GNP), as laid down in Decision 94/728/EC,

D.  whereas, in the 2001 budget, the GNP resource accounts for the largest share of total Community own resources (47.54%), with the VAT resource accounting for 36.79% and TOR for 15.67%,

E.  whereas customs duties account for by far the largest share of TOR (86.62%), the remainder being derived from agricultural duties and levies, and sugar and isoglucose levies,

F.  whereas the own resources share accounted for by TOR has decreased from 29.1% in the 1988 budget to 15.7% in the 2001 budget, the share accounted for by the VAT resource has fallen from 60% to 36.8%, and the GNP resource has become the most important own resource, increasing from 10.9% to 47.5%,

G.  whereas an estimated EUR 1.597 billion, or 1.73% of the initial 2001 budget, is covered by revenue paid not by the Member States, but directly into the EU budget, representing 0.019% of the Member States" GNP; whereas more than half of this non-own-resources revenue stems from the surplus available from the 2000 budget (EUR 900 million), the other sources being miscellaneous Community taxes, levies and dues (EUR 562.3 million), revenue accruing from the administrative operation of the institutions (EUR 62.0 million), contributions to Community programmes, repayment of expenditure etc. (EUR 45.6 million), borrowing and lending operations (EUR 22.3 million) and miscellaneous revenue (EUR 5.1 million),

H.  whereas the Commission has presented the third report on the operation of the inspection arrangements for traditional own resources (1997-1999) (COM(2001) 32 ), which describes the inspections carried out by the Commission,

I.  whereas the Commission has discovered a considerable number of anomalies, irregularities and instances of fraud; whereas Community claims were submitted for the recovery of unduly unpaid amounts and for late-payment interest, as a result of which, in 1997 to 1999, additional entitlements of EUR 3.04 million and EUR 6.97 million in late-payment interest were paid into Community accounts,

J.  whereas for 1998 customs duties and the EU share of VAT lost to the EU budget through cigarette smuggling are put at EUR 118 million, and the total loss to the EU budget and all Member States" budgets (tax losses) is put at between EUR 1 and 5 billion per year,

K.  whereas the Commission filed a civil action against Philip Morris and RJ Reynolds (Nabisco) before the US District Court of Eastern New York on 3 November 2000 seeking compensation for financial losses the EU has suffered from cigarette smuggling into the Community market and injunctive relief in order to prevent further smuggling,

1.  Takes note of the Commission's estimates of expected 2001 revenues, on which the revenue side of the 2001 budget is based, and urges the Commission to update its estimates for 2001 budget revenues after the 2001 SAB on balances is adopted;

2.  Notes that own resources constitute 98.3% of revenue for the 2001 EU budget, which means that the resources to be collected by the Member States on behalf of the EU and transferred to it are equivalent to 1.06% of their GNP;

3.  Notes that payments under the 2001 EU budget have increased to EUR 93.305 billion (including Supplementary and Amending Budgets 1/2001 and 2/2001), compared to EUR 89.441 billion under the 2000 budget; stresses that this represents 1.09% of the Member States´ GNP in 2001 (January 2001), compared to 1.11% in 2000, confirming the trend for a virtually constant reduction in the share of Community GNP accounted for by the EU budget, which has fallen from 1.20% since 1996;

4.  Recalls that Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom, which will come into force on 1 January 2002, fails to take into account the position Parliament adopted on 17 November 1999;

5.  Recalls its view that the “EU must move steadily away from dependence on transfers from Member States” and that “in the long term, the own resources system must be modified with a view to achieving financial autonomy”; believes that the purpose of the reform should be to provide the Union with an autonomous source of revenue which is sufficient for its needs and directly linked to the taxpayers;

6.  Takes the view that own resources should be developed in order to be more transparent and visible to citizens;

7.  Notes that the GNP resource share has increased steadily and significantly between 1988 and 2001 while TOR and VAT resource shares have decreased over that period;

8.  Notes that the effect of the new Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom will be to heighten this trend further, because of an increase from 10% to 25% in the proportion of TOR to be kept by the Member States, by way of collection costs, and because of the reduction in the maximum call-in rate for the VAT resource, which is currently 1% and has been set at 0.75% for 2002 and 2003 and 0.50% from 2004 onwards;

9.  Deplores the fact that the Council has not exploited the opportunity afforded by the adoption of the new Decision to move towards financial autonomy for the European Union and full involvement of Parliament in the budgetary procedure, notably concerning the revenue side;

10.  Welcomes the announcement by the Belgian Government that it will propose launching a debate on defining a new budgetary framework over the medium term, during the Belgian Presidency, which could lead to discussions on the desirability of a European tax;

11.  Recalls that the new Decision replaces the old European System of Accounts from 1979 (ESA 79) by the new system from 1995 (ESA 95) without changing the amount available under the own resources ceiling; stresses that this will lead to an adjustment to the own resources ceiling percentage, probably reducing it from 1.27% to 1.25%, for which Annexes I and II to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 (financial perspective and financial framework) will have to be adapted; stresses that this unilateral decision by Council was criticised in Parliament´s position of 17 November 1999;

12.  Welcomes the efforts by the Commission and the Court of Auditors to discover anomalies, irregularities and instances of fraud; notes that the Commission carried out 70 inspections during the period 1997-1999, discovering 246 anomalies in the process; insists that the Commission step up efforts to recover a higher volume of costs stemming from anomalies, irregularities and fraud, and finally reduce the scale on which these infringements of rules take place in order to avoid additional costs for the European taxpayer;

13.  Welcomes the Commission's announcement to examine the operational consequences of holding the Member States liable for some of the errors committed by their administrations; invites, however, the Commission to explore all possibilities of including losses to the EU budget because of non-collection of TOR in the Member States payments to the EU budget;

14.  Supports the legal action by the Commission against US tobacco companies for cigarette smuggling, and deplores the fact that not all Member States have become joined to the Commission's suit, which might result in a major loss of taxpayers' money in those Member States;

15.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice and the Court of Auditors.

(1) OJ L 293, 12.11.1994, p. 9.
(2) OJ L 253, 7.10.2000, p. 42.
(3) OJ L 56, 26.2.2001, p. 1.
(4) OJ C 128, 9.5.1994, p. 363.
(5) OJ C 324, 24.12.1990, p. 243.
(6) OJ C 175, 21.6.1999, p. 238.
(7) OJ C 189, 7.7.2000, p. 72.
(8) OJ C 274 E, 28.9.1999, p. 39.


2002 budget: conciliation procedure
European Parliament draft resolution on the 2002 budget in view of the conciliation procedure before the Council's first reading (2001/2063(BUD))
P5_TA(2001)0391A5-0241/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to Article 272 of the EC Treaty, Article 177 of the Euratom Treaty and Article 78 of the ECSC Treaty,

-  having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(1) , and in particular Annex III thereof,

-  having regard to the preliminary draft budget of the Commission for 2002 (C5-0300/2001 )

-  having regard to its resolution of 3 April 2001 on the guidelines for the 2002 budget procedure - Section III - Commission(2) ,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Committee on Fisheries, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy and the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A5-0241/2001 ),

A.  whereas the Commission has presented a preliminary draft budget for 2002 which foresees an increase of 3.49% in commitment appropriations compared to the 2001 budget,

B.  whereas the increase in total payment appropriations is 4.8% compared to the 2001 budget, representing nonetheless only 1.06% of the combined GNP of the Member States which represents an historical low; whereas the ceiling under the financial perspective for 2002 is 1.14% of EU GNP,

C.  whereas the conciliation before Council's first reading aims, in particular, to evaluate the needs and to secure an agreement on the appropriate level of expenditure for agriculture, international fisheries agreements and the common foreign and security policy, now including defence policy; whereas the first reading conciliation is also an occasion to secure agreement on other expenditure,

D.  whereas Parliament in its guidelines set out the following priorities for the 2002 budget: food safety, consumer confidence and sustainable agriculture; improved performance and priority setting in external policies; improved implementation of the budget, and Commission reform; whereas other initiatives announced in the guidelines include the encouragement of "e-learning” and other measures to improve employment and social inclusion, as well as the development of policy on asylum and migration,

Financial framework

1.  Considers that an appreciable margin exists under the overall ceiling for payment appropriations in 2002; underlines that this margin should be used better to implement Community policies, especially under Heading 3 and 4 and to liquidate the continuing large volume in outstanding commitments in various sectors; considers that the payments to be made available for the reserve for agriculture should not prejudice the assessment of needs for payments in Heading 3 and 4; states that this margin represents a one-off opportunity, given the likely evolution of the ceiling in payment appropriations in future years;

Agriculture

2.  Considers that the proposal by the Commission to create a reserve for agriculture earmarked for measures regarding BSE and FMD partly meets the concerns expressed by Parliament on this subject on successive occasions in the past; wonders at the Commission's reasons for proposing such a large reserve at this stage when it still has the opportunity of adjusting the PDB by means of a Letter of Amendment later in the procedure; warns against the creation of excessive reserves whenever it is extremely uncertain if the appropriations will be needed or what kind of measures will have to be covered; expects the Commission to substantiate the need for this reserve in detail in the Letter of Amendment on the most recent estimates for agriculture expenditure, in time for Parliament's first reading;

3.  Notes the Commission's readiness to present a study analysing the different measures taken as part of the 1999 reforms already underway and of the impact of the current crisis measures on Agenda 2000; expects that on the occasion of the presentation of the Letter of Amendment, this study should give the budget authority a clearer and more detailed view of the future course of reform before it takes its final decisions on the 2002 agricultural budget;

4.  Is disappointed that the Commission failed fully to implement appropriations for food safety, consumer confidence and sustainable agriculture which have been entered in the budget by the budgetary authority in recent years; calls on the Commission to seize the opportunities provided by the budgetary authority in this respect, in view of the future orientation of the CAP;

5.  Once more reaffirms its determination that agricultural expenditure should remain within the ceilings laid down in the financial perspective, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 on budgetary discipline; notes that, according to the Commission's budget estimates, a margin of EUR 365 million below the ceiling remains within Titles B1-1 to B1-3 ; calls for it to be made possible, in future, to transfer funding not needed from the compulsory expenditure area to non-compulsory CAP expenditure, in order to give appropriate acknowledgement to the growing importance of Title B1-4 (Rural development) in terms of policy formulation and budgeting;

6.  Asks the Commission to submit a report on the implementation and possible violation of rules relating to animal transport in the Community; suggests that this report should be made available by 15 September 2001 so that it can be taken into account before Parliament's first reading;

Fisheries

7.  Recalls the conclusions of the Fisheries Council of 25 April 2001 that it has not been possible to conclude a fisheries agreement with Morocco; asks the Commission therefore to propose a specific action programme for restructuring the Community fleet which fished in the framework of the former fisheries agreement with Morocco, following the conclusions of the Nice European Council;

8.  Notes that the PDB still includes a provision of EUR 125 million in the reserve for line B7-8000 without further specifying the purpose of the appropriations; considers that an agreement should be reached on the amount which is actually needed in the reserve for international fisheries agreements under discussion; expects any amounts made available under Heading 4 to be used to finance Parliament's priority policies;

Common foreign and security policy

9.  Notes that the Commission in the PDB maintains the allocation for CFSP at the same level as in recent years; expresses doubts that this allocation is really justified given the number of activities previously financed under CFSP which now have their own separate legal base and given the actual implementation record of the last three years; considers also that the inclusion of administrative expenditure related to Special Representatives in the Council budget should lead to savings in the Commission budget;

10.  Notes the Commission's proposed changes in the nomenclature; before taking its final decisions on this nomenclature and on the overall financial allocation for 2002, insists that the use to be made of this appropriations is better specified in the budget remarks, notably by reference to the legal base for the actions;

11.  Supports the Commission's efforts to secure a better planning and evaluation of CFSP actions; urges the Council and Commission to move towards a multiannual programme of actions;

12.  Calls for the further development of actions for the reduction and destruction of weapons of mass destruction, as part of the development of the CFSP;

Administrative expenditure

13.  Considers that its position on further resources for the Commission and other Institutions will be conditioned by the overall situation in Heading 5 and by the progress of the reforms; points out that the current estimates submitted by the other institutions taken together with the Commission's proposals for its own administrative budget already exceed the ceiling in Heading 5, with the increase requested by the Council for its budget being among the largest of all, at 9.10% compared to 2001;

14.  Insists that the cost of the new European security and defence policy is presented in a transparent way in a separate title of Section II of the budget, in line with the Council's undertakings on the occasion of SAB No 2/2001; considers it a sine qua non that the Council presents as well the separate establishment plan relating to its ESDP activities; points out that similar questions are raised in connection with Eurojust, the EC data protection officer and the data protection bodies under Schengen and Europol;

15.  Considers that it is now urgent for the Council to engage with Parliament, as the two arms of the budgetary authority, and Commission in a study both for budget 2002 and of the longer-term needs of the ESDP, enlargement, other expanding budget areas and their implications for Heading 5, suggests that the time has come for the Council to name an overall envelope within Heading 5, which it undertakes to respect;

Improved implementation and Commission reform;

16.  Welcomes the Council's budget guidelines of 12 March 2001, which share Parliament's concern for improving implementation and evaluation; looks forward to developing further with the Council the approach taken in their joint declaration of December 2000 on the basis of the progress report presented by the Commission;

17.  Repeats its broad support for the reform process; will examine closely the effectiveness of the reforms, the progress report, the proposed allocation of the requested posts and the impact of the early retirement scheme as a necessary basis for further decision-making;

18.  Intends to continue linking the evaluation of needs for different programmes with their implementation record; intends in particular to elaborate performance targets for budget implementation and criteria for evaluating outstanding commitments in light of expected implementation; looks forward to developing further the other issues in the joint declaration, especially concerning the role of commitology in implementation and the match between the legislative programme and the budgetary procedure;

Implementation of EP initiatives

19.  Considers that the implementation of the budget as decided by the budgetary authority, is not only a matter of loyal cooperation between the institutions and respect of their obligations under the Treaty, but also a matter of Parliament's confidence in the Commission; would regret if any failure to implement budget decisions were to lead to a re-consideration of the relevant provisions of the IIA or to questions being raised in the discharge procedure;

20.  Expresses its willingness to discuss with the Commission and the Council the pilot projects and preparatory actions that it intends to include in the budget;

E-learning, employment and social inclusion

21.  Stresses the importance of this subject for enhancing employment and increasing the competitiveness of the European economy; notes the statements by the European Council on this subject and the two communications from the Commission; expects that this initiative will lead to a specific proposal of the Commission for appropriate actions at EU level; recalls its intention, as announced in the guidelines, to provide appropriate budgetary support for this initiative;

22.  Urges the Commission and Council to strengthen the measures introduced last year on employment, new technologies and SMEs and to improve their implementation;

External actions

23.  Expresses its concern about the Commission's reductions in commitments in Heading 4, as regards Parliament's traditional priorities;

Policy on migration and asylum

24.  Confirms its intention, as stated in the guidelines, to launch appropriate initiatives related to policy on asylum and migration; notes the needs identified by the Commission, including re-admission policy, the fight against trafficking, cooperation on external border controls, joint measures to do with clandestine immigration, and measures for the social inclusion of migrants; takes note of the Commission proposal on family reunification;

o
o   o

25.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.

(1) OJ C172, 18.6.1999, p 1.
(2) Texts Adopted, Item 9.


Management of Community programmes *
Text
Resolution
Proposal for a Council regulation laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes (COM(2000) 788 - C5-0036/2001 - 2000/0337(CNS) )
P5_TA(2001)0392A5-0216/2001

The proposal was amended as follows:

Text proposed by the Commission (1)   Amendments
Amendment 2
Recital 2
   (2) Implementation of these Community programmes is financed, at least in part, from appropriations entered in the general budget of the European Union. Under Article 274 of the Treaty, the Commission is responsible for executing that budget.
   (2) Implementation of these Community programmes is financed, at least in part, from appropriations entered in the general budget of the European Union.
(2a) Under Article 274 of the Treaty, the Commission is responsible for implementing that budget.
Amendment 3
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) Externalisation of some of the tasks to public implementing bodies must meet a specific objective. With regard to the Commission's public service activities, only tasks which, because of their temporary nature or technical complexity, justify large-scale recourse to persons who are not established Commission officials may be delegated to such agencies.
Amendment 4
Recital 5
   (5) Externalisation should only be used after assessment of a number of factors (such as a cost-benefit analysis that includes the costs for coordination and controls, efficiency and flexibility in the implementation of externalised tasks, simplification of the procedures used, proximity of externalised activities to final beneficiaries, visibility of the Community as promoter of the programme concerned, the need to maintain an adequate level of know-how inside the Commission).
   (5) Externalisation should be used only after assessment of a number of factors (such as identification of the tasks in respect of which externalisation is justified, a cost-benefit analysis that includes the costs for coordination, controls and the impact on human resources, efficiency and flexibility in the implementation of externalised tasks, simplification of the procedures used, proximity of externalised activities to final beneficiaries, visibility of the Community as promoter of the programme concerned, the need to maintain an adequate level of know-how inside the Commission).
Amendment 5
Recital 11
   (11) The activities performed by an executive agency must also fully comply with the programming that the Commission defines for the Community programmes which the agency is involved in managing. The agency's annual work programme must therefore be subject to the Commission's approval.
   (11) The activities performed by an executive agency must also fully comply with the programming that the Commission defines for the Community programmes which the agency is involved in managing. The agency's annual work programme must therefore be subject to the Commission's approval and in accordance with budgetary decisions .
Amendment 6
Recital 15
   (15) It should also be possible to entrust an executive agency with tasks relating to the management of programmes that are financed from sources other than the general budget of the European Union. In such cases, this Regulation should apply, subject to specific provisions in the legal bases of the programmes concerned.
   (15) It might also be possible to entrust an executive agency with tasks relating to the management of programmes that are financed from sources other than the general budget of the European Union, provided that this does not entail, even indirectly, extra administrative costs which would need to be covered by additional appropriations . In such cases, this Regulation should apply, subject to specific provisions in the legal bases of the programmes concerned.
Amendment 7
Recital 18
   (18) The Treaty provides for no powers for the adoption of this Regulation other than those conferred by Article 308,
Deleted
Amendment 8
Article 5
An executive agency shall have its headquarters in one of the places where the Commission departments are located. It may decide to set up branch offices, both inside and outside the territory of the Member States, if this will serve to improve the performance of its tasks in implementing the Community programmes it is called on to manage .
An executive agency shall have its headquarters in one of the places where the Commission departments are located. It shall organise its departments in accordance with the programme management requirements for which it is responsible .
Amendment 9
Article 12, paragraph 1
   1. All revenue and expenditure of an executive agency shall be the subject of forecasts for each financial year (identical with the calendar year) and shall be entered in its operating budget, which shall include the establishment plan submitted to the Budgetary Authority. The establishment plan, consisting exclusively of temporary posts, shall specify the number, grade and category of the staff employed by the executive agency during the financial year concerned.
   1. All revenue and expenditure of an executive agency shall be the subject of forecasts for each financial year (identical with the calendar year) and shall be entered in its operating budget, the estimates of which shall be forwarded to the budgetary authority with the documents of the preliminary draft budget, which shall include the establishment plan which must be approved by the budgetary authority. The establishment plan, consisting exclusively of temporary posts and specifying the number, grade and category of the staff employed by the executive agency during the financial year concerned, shall be adopted by the budgetary authority and published as an annex to the Commission's budget.
Amendment 10
Article 13, paragraph 2
   2. No later than 1 March each year, the steering committee shall adopt the draft operating budget for the following year and submit it to the Commission.
   2. No later than 1 March each year, the steering committee shall adopt the draft operating budget, including the provisional staffing plan, and submit it to the Commission, which shall forward it to the budgetary authority .
Amendment 11
Article 13, paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The final budget may be adopted only after the final adoption of the general budget of the Union.
Amendment 12
Article 13, paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Any modification of the budget, including the staffing plan, must be the subject of a supplementary and amending budget in accordance with the procedure set out in this article.
Amendments 13 and 24
Article 14, paragraph 2
   2. No later than 31 March each year, the director shall submit detailed accounts to the European Parliament, the Court of Auditors, the Commission and the steering committee showing all the revenue and expenditure for the previous budget year.
   2. The Commission's departments responsible for financial control and internal auditing shall assess the efficiency of the system for managing and monitoring the agency and shall verify the regularity of operations. They shall report their findings in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Financial Regulation. The agency shall submit an annual activity report to the authority responsible for giving discharge.
Amendment 26
Article 14, paragraph 3
   3. The European Parliament shall grant discharge to an executive agency for the execution of its budget no later than 30 April of year n+2.
   3. The budget of the executive agencies shall be discharged according to the normal procedure as part of the European Parliament's decision on discharge to the Commission taken no later than 30 April of year n+2
Amendment 14
Article 15
The financial regulation applicable to the operating budget of the executive agency shall be adopted by the Commission, after receiving the opinion of the Court of Auditors, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 23(2) and in compliance with Article 142 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union .
One single financial regulation applicable to the operating budget of all the executive agencies shall be adopted by the Commission, after consultation of the European Parliament and the Council, and after receiving the opinion of the Court of Auditors. That financial regulation may deviate from the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union only in instances where the specific nature of the operation of executive agencies so requires.
Amendment 25
Article 18, paragraph 2
   2. An executive agency's staff shall consist partly of Community officials seconded by the Institutions to the executive agency as temporary officials, and partly of other servants recruited by the executive agency.
   2. An executive agency's staff shall consist partly of Community officials seconded by the Institutions to the executive agency as temporary officials for the purpose of occupying posts of responsibility there. Other servants shall be recruited by the executive agency on renewable contracts. The nature of the contract, governed by either private law or public law, the duration of the obligation binding such servants to the executive agency and the qualification criteria required shall depend on the specific content and duration of the tasks to be performed, in compliance with the applicable national legislation.
Amendment 16
Article 19, paragraphs 2 and 3
   2. As soon as an executive agency is created it shall subscribe to the interinstitutional agreement on internal investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). The steering committee shall formalise this assent and adopt the provisions needed to facilitate OLAF's conduct of its internal inquiries.
   2. The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) shall enjoy the same powers with regard to the executive agency and its entire staff as to the Commission's departments. As soon as an executive agency is created it shall subscribe to the interinstitutional agreement on internal investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). The steering committee shall formalise this assent and adopt the provisions set out in the interinstitutional agreement relating to OLAF's conduct of its internal inquiries. It shall adopt and apply measures to combat fraud and irregularities. Agency staff shall cooperate with OLAF in the fight against fraud.
   3. The Court of Auditors shall scrutinise an executive agency's accounts in accordance with Article 248 of the Treaty.
   3. The Court of Auditors shall scrutinise an executive agency's accounts in accordance with Article 248(1) and (2) of the Treaty.
Amendment 17
Article 20, paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Personal liability of staff towards the agency shall be governed by the provisions of the statute or scheme applicable to them.
Amendment 18
Article 21
The Court of Justice shall monitor the legality of acts of an executive agency intended to have binding legal effect on the same terms and conditions as laid down in Article 230 of the Treaty relating to the control of legality of the acts of the Commission.
The Commission shall be liable in law for the acts of an executive agency intended to have binding legal effect within the meaning of Article 230 of the Treaty.
Amendment 19
Article 22, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2
An agency's steering committee shall adopt any provisions needed to implement such right of access no later than during the first year after the creation of the executive agency.
An agency's steering committee shall adopt any provisions needed to implement such right of access no later than during the first year after the creation of the executive agency. The provisions relating to the forwarding of documents and information between the Commission and the European Parliament shall apply to the executive agencies.
Amendment 20
Article 23
Article 23
Deleted.
Committee procedure
   1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee for Executive Agencies, composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by a representative of the Commission.
   2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, the regulatory procedure provided for in Article 5 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, subject to Article 7 of that Decision.
   3. The period provided for in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be three months.
Amendment 21
Article 23 a (new)
Article 23a
Evaluation
An external assessment report covering the first three years of operation of each executive agency shall be drawn up and submitted to the agency's steering committee, to the Commission and to the European Parliament. Where appropriate, the report shall include recommendations concerning the changes to be made to the current statute.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes (COM(2000) 788 - C5-0036/2001 - 2000/0337(CNS) )
P5_TA(2001)0392A5-0216/2001

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2000) 788 )(2) ,

-  having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 308 of the EC Treaty (C5-0036/2001 ),

-  having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (A5-0216/2001 ),

1.  Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.  Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;

3.  Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

4.  Calls for the conciliation procedure to be initiated should the Council intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

5.  Asks to be consulted again if the Council intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

6.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

(1) OJ C 120 E, 24.4.2001, p. 140.
(2) OJ C 120 E, 24.4.2001, p. 140.


Radio spectrum policy ***I
Text
Resolution
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision on a regulatory framework for radio spectrum policy in the European Community (COM(2000) 407 - C5-0449/2000 - 2000/0187(COD) )
P5_TA(2001)0393A5-0232/2001

The proposal was amended as follows:

Text proposed by the Commission (1)   Amendments by Parliament
Amendment 1
Recital 1
   (1) On 10 November 1999 the Commission presented a communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions proposing the next steps in radio spectrum policy on the basis of the results of the public consultation on the Green Paper on radio spectrum policy in the context of European Community policies such as telecommunications, broadcasting, transport and R&D. This Communication received the support of the European Parliament in a Resolution of 18 May 2000. It underlined the need for action at Community level to achieve a harmonised and balanced approach on the use of radio spectrum in the Community in order to fulfil internal market principles and to protect Community interests at international level.
   (1) On 10 November 1999 the Commission presented a communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions proposing the next steps in radio spectrum policy on the basis of the results of the public consultation on the Green Paper on radio spectrum policy in the context of European Community policies such as telecommunications, broadcasting, transport and R&D. This Communication, which was welcomed by the European Parliament in a Resolution of 18 May 20001 , emphasised that a certain degree of further harmonisation of Community policy on the radio spectrum was desirable, in particular for pan-European services and applications, and that it was necessary to ensure that Member States transposed in a binding way the decisions of the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT).
__________________
1 OJ C 59, 23.2.2001, p. 245.
Amendment 2
Recital 2
   (2) Where necessary, policy principles on the use of radio spectrum need to be defined at Community level with a view to meeting Community policy objectives, in particular in the areas of communications, broadcasting, transport, research which all require, to various extents, the use of radio spectrum, while maintaining a high standard of citizen's health . On the basis of these principles, the use of radio spectrum should be coordinated and harmonised at Community level, where necessary to fulfill these Community objectives. Community coordination and harmonisation may also help achieving harmonisation and coordination of the use of the spectrum at global level in certain cases. At the same time, appropriate technical support can be provided at national level.
   (2) Policy principles on the use of radio spectrum should be defined at Community level with a view to meeting Community policy objectives, in particular in the areas of communications, broadcasting, transport and research which all require, to various extents, the use of radio spectrum. On the basis of these principles, the use of radio spectrum should be coordinated and, where appropriate, harmonised at Community level, in order to fulfill Community policy objectives efficiently . Community coordination and harmonisation may also help in achieving harmonisation and coordination of the use of the spectrum at global level in certain cases. At the same time, appropriate technical support can be provided at national level.
Amendment 3
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) Radio spectrum policy in the Community should guarantee freedom of expression, including freedom of opinion and freedom to receive and disseminate information and ideas without interference by public authorities and irrespective of borders, as well as freedom and plurality of the media.
Amendment 4
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) Member States should ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communication services in their territory. They should ensure that the allocation and assignment of radio spectrum by national regulatory authorities is based on objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria, taking into account the democratic, social and cultural interests linked to the use of their frequencies .
Amendment 5
Recital 4
   (4) In order to define general policy objectives regarding the use of spectrum, an appropriate consultative body should be created which will gather together, under the chairmanship of the Member State holding the Presidency of the Council, senior Member States representatives responsible for the various sectors using or affected by the use of radio spectrum, such as communications, broadcasting, audio-visual, transport, research and development as well as of security policy, military defence and police sectors, which may be indirectly affected. This group should provide guidance to the Commission, both on its own initiative and at the request of the Commission, on the need for harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the general context of Community policy and on regulatory and other issues related to the use of radio spectrum which impact on Community policies, including, for example, methods for granting rights to use spectrum, information availability, availability of spectrum, refarming, relocation, valuation and efficient use of radio spectrum as well as protection of human health. For that purpose, each national delegation should have a coordinated view of all policy aspects affecting spectrum use in its Member State in relation with the issues to be discussed in the group.
   (4) In order to define general policy objectives regarding the use of spectrum, an appropriate consultative body should be created which will gather together, under the chairmanship of the Member State holding the Presidency of the Council, senior Member State representatives responsible for all the sectors using or affected by the use of radio spectrum, such as communications, broadcasting, audio-visual, transport, research and development as well as of security policy, military defence and police sectors, which may be indirectly affected. This group should provide guidance to the Commission, both on its own initiative and at the request of the Commission, on the need for harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the general context of Community policy and on regulatory and other issues related to the use of radio spectrum which affect Community policies, including, for example, methods for granting rights to use spectrum, information availability, availability of spectrum, refarming, relocation, valuation and efficient use of radio spectrum as well as protection of human health. For that purpose, each national delegation should have a position agreed at national level on all policy aspects affecting spectrum use in its Member State in relation to the issues to be discussed in the group.
Amendment 6
Recital 5
   (5) The group will take into account the views of the industry and of all users involved, both commercial and non-commercial, as well as of other interested parties, on technological, market and regulatory developments which may affect the use of radio spectrum. Spectrum users" should be free to provide all input they believe is necessary. The group may decide to hear representatives of the spectrum users communities at group meetings where necessary to illustrate the situation in a particular sector.
   (5) The group should take into account the views of the industry and of all users involved, both commercial and non-commercial, as well as of other interested parties, on technological, market and regulatory developments which may affect the use of radio spectrum. Spectrum users" should be free to provide all input they believe is necessary. The group may decide to hear representatives of the spectrum users communities at group meetings where necessary to illustrate the situation in a particular sector. The activities of the group should be sufficiently transparent to allow all spectrum users to express their views and participate in due time .
Amendment 7
Recital 6
   (6) The Commission should report on a regular basis to the European Parliament and the Council on the results achieved under this Decision, on policy objectives for radio spectrum in the Community as well as on planned future actions. This will allow for the provision of the appropriate political support for the policy objectives.
   (6) The Commission should report on a regular basis to the European Parliament and the Council on the results achieved under this Decision, on policy objectives for radio spectrum in the Community as well as on planned future actions.
Amendment 8
Recital 7
   (7) Radio spectrum technical management includes the harmonisation and allocation of radio spectrum. Such harmonisation should reflect the requirements of general policy principles identified at Community level. Coordinated introduction in the Community of systems using radio spectrum is dependent on the various national approaches to assignment and licensing including with regard to spectrum pricing and license fees. These issues should therefore be discussed and, where appropriate, be harmonised at Community level.
   (7) Radio spectrum technical management includes the harmonisation and allocation of radio spectrum. Such harmonisation should reflect the requirements of general policy principles identified at Community level. Coordinated introduction in the Community of systems using radio spectrum is dependent on the various national approaches to assignment and licensing including with regard to spectrum pricing and license fees. These issues should therefore be discussed, coordinated and, where appropriate, harmonised at Community level.
Amendment 9
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) Proposals should be made to establish clear priorities between, on the one hand, military use of radio spectrum and, on the other hand, civilian use. Member States should observe these priorities in a transparent manner. In order to achieve efficient and effective use of radio spectrum in the Community, Member States, in collaboration with the Commission, the European Parliament and the High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, should explore ways of initiating a discussion on harmonising the military use of radio spectrum and on how to incorporate such use into general radio spectrum use.
Amendment 21
Recital 8
   (8) The Community approach should also benefit from cooperation with radio spectrum experts from national authorities responsible for radio spectrum management. The experience of mandating procedures gained in specific sectors, for example as a result of the application of Decision No 710/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 March 1997 on a coordinated authorisation approach in the field of satellite personal-communication services in the Community (the S-PCS Decision) as amended by Decision No 1215/2000/EC and Decision No 128/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 1998 on the coordinated introduction of a third generation mobile and wireless communications system (UMTS) in the Community (the UMTS Decision), a permanent, stable and uniform framework needs to be created at Community level to ensure harmonised availability of radio spectrum use and to provide adequate legal certainty. Harmonisation measures should be adopted as a result of mandates to national experts acting in appropriate spectrum management bodies including the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications administration (CEPT). Where necessary, the Commission should be able to make the results of such mandates compulsory for Member States and, where the results of such mandates are not acceptable, to propose appropriate alternative action. This will in particular provide for the harmonisation of frequency spectrum necessary for the implementation of Directive ../../EC of the European Parliament and Council [on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services[.
   (8) The Community approach should also benefit from cooperation with radio spectrum experts from national authorities responsible for radio spectrum management. The experience of mandating procedures gained in specific sectors, for example as a result of the application of Decision No 710/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 March 1997 on a coordinated authorisation approach in the field of satellite personal-communication services in the Community (the S-PCS Decision) as amended by Decision No 1215/2000/EC and Decision No 128/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 1998 on the coordinated introduction of a third generation mobile and wireless communications system (UMTS) in the Community (the UMTS Decision), has shown that it may be appropriate to create a permanent, stable and uniform framework at Community level to ensure harmonised availability of radio spectrum for Community activities dependent on radio spectrum and to provide adequate legal certainty. Decisions on harmonisation measures should be adopted under the Community legislative procedure. If technical implementing measures are needed to implement harmonisation measures, the Commission should be authorised to grant mandates to spectrum management bodies, in particular the CEPT, in which experts from the Member States are involved. Such mandates should relate to solving technical problems arising from the implementation of radio spectrum policy in the Community. Where necessary, the Commission should be able to make the results of such mandates compulsory for Member States and, where the results of such mandates are not acceptable, to propose appropriate alternative action. This will in particular provide for the harmonisation of frequency spectrum necessary for the implementation of Directive ../../EC of the European Parliament and Council [on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services[. In order to ensure that political control is maintained in such cases, the Commission should report to, or should submit a regular report to, the European Parliament on specific issues. The European Parliament then should then have three months in which to consider the measures and, if necessary, adopt a resolution stating that the draft measures exceed the implementing powers provided for in this Directive. Where the European Parliament adopts such a resolution, the Commission should re-examine its proposal. Should disagreement on the nature of the proposal persist, the European Parliament should have the right to bring an action before the Court of Justice of the European Communities.
Amendment 11
Recital 9
   (9) Appropriate information on present and future planning, allocation and assignment of radio spectrum, as well as conditions of access to and use of the whole radio spectrum are essential elements for investments and policy-making. So are technological developments which will give rise to new spectrum allocation and management techniques and frequency assignment methods. Development of long-term strategic aspects require proper understanding of the implications of how technology evolves. Such information should therefore be made accessible in the Community, without prejudice to confidential business and personal information protection under Directive 97/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the telecommunications sector. The implementation of a cross-sectoral spectrum policy makes the availability of information on the whole radio spectrum necessary. In view of the general purpose of harmonising spectrum use in the Community and in Europe, such information needs to be aggregated at a European level in a user-friendly manner.
   (9) Appropriate information on present and future planning, allocation and assignment of radio spectrum, as well as conditions of access to and use of the whole radio spectrum are essential elements for investments and policy-making. As are technological developments which will give rise to new spectrum allocation and management techniques and frequency assignment methods. Development of long-term strategic aspects requires proper understanding of the implications of how technology evolves. Such information should therefore be made accessible in the Community, without prejudice to confidential business and personal information protection under Directive 97/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the telecommunications sector. The implementation of a cross-sectoral spectrum policy makes the availability of information on the whole radio spectrum necessary. In view of the general aim of more efficient spectrum use in the Community and in Europe, such information should be aggregated at a European level in a user-friendly manner.
Amendment 12
Recital 13
   (13) Implementation of Community policies may require coordination of radio spectrum use, in particular the provision of communications services including Community-wide roaming facilities. Moreover, certain types of spectrum use entail a geographical coverage which goes beyond the borders of a Member State and allow for transborder services without requiring the movement of persons, such as satellite communications services. It is therefore necessary that the Community be adequately represented in the activities of all relevant international organisations and conferences related to radio spectrum management matters, such as within the International Telecommunications Union and its World Radiocommunications Conferences. In international negotiations, Member States and the Community should develop a common action and closely cooperate during the whole negotiations process so as to safeguard the unity of the international representation of the Community. As a consequence, Member States should support the request by the Community in view of involvement in such negotiations, based in particular on the procedures which had been agreed in the Council conclusions of 3 February 1992 for the World Administrative Radio Conference and as confirmed by the Council conclusions of 22 September 1997 and 2 May 2000. For such international negotiations, the Commission sets out the objectives to be achieved in the context of Community policies, in view of obtaining endorsement by Council on the positions to be taken by Member States at international level. Member States accompany any act of acceptance of any agreement or regulation within international fora in charge of or concerned with spectrum management by a joint declaration stating that they will apply such agreement or regulation in accordance with their obligations under the Treaty.
   (13) Implementation of Community policies may require coordination of radio spectrum use, in particular the provision of communications services including Community-wide roaming facilities. Moreover, certain types of spectrum use entail a geographical coverage which goes beyond the borders of a Member State and allow for transborder services without requiring the movement of persons, such as satellite communications services. The Community should therefore be adequately represented in the activities of all relevant international organisations and conferences related to radio spectrum management matters, such as within the International Telecommunications Union and its World Radiocommunications Conferences. The existing preparation and negotiation mechanisms for ITU World Radiocommunication Conferences have generated excellent results due to willing cooperation within the CEPT, and the Community's interests have been taken into account in the preparations. In international negotiation , Member States and the Community should develop common action and closely cooperate during the whole negotiations process so as to safeguard the unity of the international representation of the Community. As a consequence, Member States should support the request by the Community to be involved in such negotiations, based in particular on the procedures which had been agreed in the Council conclusions of 3 February 1992 for the World Administrative Radio Conference and as confirmed by the Council conclusions of 22 September 1997 and 2 May 2000. For such international negotiations, the Commission proposes to the Council, after consulting the European Parliament, objectives to be achieved in the context of Community policies, in view of obtaining endorsement of the positions which should be taken by Member States at international level. Member States accompany any act of acceptance of any agreement or regulation within international fora in charge of or concerned with spectrum management by a joint declaration stating that they will apply such agreement or regulation in accordance with their obligations under the Treaty.
Amendment 13
Article 1
The aim of this Decision is to:
The aim of this Decision is to:
   (a) create a policy framework to address the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the Community, taking into consideration in particular economic, health, public policy, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of Community policies, as well as the various interests of radio spectrum users" communities, with the aim of optimising the use of spectrum and of avoiding harmful interference;
   (a) create a policy framework to address the strategic planning, coordination and, where necessary, harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum for Community activities dependent on radio spectrum, taking into consideration in particular safety, economic, health, public policy, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of Community policies, as well as the various interests of radio spectrum users" communities, with the aim of optimising the use of spectrum and of avoiding harmful interference;
   (b) establish a procedural framework to ensure the effective implementation of radio spectrum policy in the Community, and in particular establish a general methodology for harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum;
   (b) establish a procedural framework to ensure the effective implementation of radio spectrum policy in the Community, and in particular establish a general methodology for harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum. All technical implementing measures pursuant to this Decision shall be adopted in accordance with the procedures set out in Articles 5 and 6. All legislative proposals shall be subject to the codecision procedure, thus ensuring proper political accountability ;
   (c) ensure the coordinated and timely provision of information on radio spectrum use and availability in the Community;
   (c) ensure the coordinated and timely provision of information on radio spectrum use and availability in the Community;
   (d) safeguard Community interests in international negotiations where radio spectrum use affects Community policies.
   (d) safeguard Community interests in international negotiations where radio spectrum use affects Community policies.
This Decision is without prejudice to the specific rules adopted by Member States or the Community governing the content of audio-visual programmes intended for the general public, to the provisions of Directive 1999/5/EC and to the right of Member States to organise their radio spectrum for public order and public security purposes.
This Decision is without prejudice to the specific rules adopted by Member States or the Community governing the content of audio-visual programmes intended for the general public, to the provisions of Directive 1999/5/EC and to the right of Member States to determine radio spectrum policy themselves, where Community activities dependent on radio spectrum are not affected, and to organise their radio spectrum for public order and public security purposes.
This Decision is without prejudice to freedom of expression, including freedom of opinion and freedom to receive and disseminate information and ideas without interference by public authorities and irrespective of borders, as well as freedom and plurality of the media.
Amendment 14
Article 2, point (b)
   (b) “Allocation of a radio frequeny band” means the entry of a radio frequency band in a table of radio frequency allocations for the purpose of its use by one or more types of services under specified conditions.
   (b) “Allocation of a radio frequeny band” means the entry of a specific radio frequency band in a table of radio frequency allocations for the purpose of its use by one or more types of activities dependent on radio spectrum under specified conditions.
Amendment 15
Article 2, point (c)
   (c) “Assignment of a radio frequency” means the authorisation given by an authority to use a radio frequency under specified conditions.
   (c) “Assignment of a radio frequency” means the authorisation given by an authority or administration to use a radio frequency under specified conditions.
Amendment 16
Article 3, paragraph 2 a (new)
The Commission shall forward to the European Parliament the agenda of the Group's meetings before the meetings take place, the decisions adopted, results of votes and the minutes, as well as the list of participants. The European Parliament shall have the right to send three observers to the Group's meetings who shall report to the European Parliament on the work in progress.
Amendment 17
Article 4, paragraph 2, point (b)
   (b) review current needs and anticipate future needs for radio spectrum for commercial as well as non-commercial applications in the Community, based in particular on strategic, economic, technological , political , health, social and cultural aspects of radio spectrum use, in view of the fulfilment of Community policy objectives; advise the Commission on strategic planning of radio spectrum use and, where necessary, balance the various requirements for radio spectrum of different users;
   (b) review current needs and anticipate future needs for radio spectrum for commercial as well as non-commercial applications in the Community, based in particular on strategic, economic, technical , safety, public policy , health, social and cultural aspects of radio pectrum use, in view of the fulfilment of Community policy objectives; advise the Commission on strategic planning of radio spectrum use and, where necessary, balance the various requirements for radio spectrum of different users, paying due attention to those activities entirely dependent on radio for communication ;
Amendment 24
Article 4, paragraph 2, point (f a) (new)
   (fa) consider the regional aspects of the use of radio spectrum to ensure that the different circumstances that prevail in different parts of the Community are taken into account .
Amendment 18
Article 5, paragraph 1
   1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission (“the Radio Spectrum Committee”).
   1. To implement harmonisation measures, the Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission (“the Radio Spectrum Committee”).
Amendments 19, 23 and 20
Article 6, paragraphs 1 and 2
   1. Where appropriate , and taking into account where possible the advice of the Senior Official Radio Spectrum Policy Committee , the Commission shall propose measures to harmonise the use of the radio spectrum, assignment methods, conditions for such use, as well as the availability of information related to the use of radio spectrum.
   1. With a view to further harmonisation of radio spectrum policy at Community level for Community activities dependent on radio spectrum , and taking into account the advice of the Radio Spectrum Committee , the Commission shall propose to the European Parliament and the Council, where appropriate, measures to harmonise the use of the radio spectrum, assignment methods, conditions for such use, as well as the availability of information related to the use of radio spectrum.
1a. In order to meet the aim of this Decision defined in Article 1(b), the Commission shall propose appropriate technical implementing measures with a view to ensuring harmonised conditions for the availability and efficient use of radio spectrum, as well as the availability of information related to the use of radio spectrum in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 4.
   2. For these purposes , the Commission shall give mandates to the CEPT, setting out the tasks to be performed and the timetable therefor. The Commission shall act in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 5(2) .
   2. For the development of the technical implementing measures referred to in paragraph 1a , the Commission shall give mandates to the CEPT, setting out the tasks to be performed as well as the timetable therefor and including the obligation to consult the appropriate spectrum management bodies . The Commission shall act in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 5(3) .
Amendment 25
Article 7
Member States shall publish without delay the information as defined in the Annex and shall keep this information up to date.
Moreover, Member States shall take measures to develop an appropriate database in order to make such information available to the public in a harmonised way .
Member States shall ensure that their national table of frequency allocations and information on rights, conditions, procedures, charges, availability of frequencies, decisions, where relevant, and usage fees, are published, where appropriate to meet the aim of this Decision as defined in Article 1. They shall keep this information up to date and shall take measures to develop appropriate databases in order to make such information available to the public, where applicable in accordance with the relevant harmonisation measures laid down in Article 6.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision on a regulatory framework for radio spectrum policy in the European Community (COM(2000) 407 - C5-0449/2000 - 2000/0187(COD) )
P5_TA(2001)0393A5-0232/2001

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2000) 407 (2) ),

-  having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5-0449/2000 ),

-  having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism and the Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport (A5-0232/2001 ),

1.  Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.  Asks to be consulted again should the Commission intend to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

(1) OJ C 365 E, 19.12.2000, p. 256.
(2) OJ C 365 E, 19.12.2000, p. 256.


Coastal zone management in Europe ***I
Text
Resolution
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council recommendation concerning the implementation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Europe (COM(2000) 545 - C5-0474/2000 - 2000/0227(COD) )
P5_TA(2001)0394A5-0219/2001

The proposal was amended as follows:

Text proposed by the Commission   Amendments by Parliament
Amendment 1
Recital 1
   (1) The coastal zone is of great economic, environmental, social and cultural importance to Europe.
   (1) The coastal zone is of great environmental, economic, social, cultural and recreational importance to Europe.
Amendment 2
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) Coastal zones possess a unique biodiversity in terms of flora and fauna, recognised and protected in Directives 92/43/EEC 1 and 79/409/EEC 2 .
_____________
1 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora; (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7) as last amended by Directive 97/62/EC (OJ L 305, 8.11.1997, p. 42).
2 Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p. 1) as last amended by Directive 97/49/EC (OJ L 223, 13.8.1997, p. 9).
Amendment 3
Recital 2
   (2) The last report of the European Environment Agency indicates a continuing degradation of conditions in the coastal zones of Europe.
   (2) The last report of the European Environment Agency indicates a continuing deterioration of conditions in the coastal zones of Europe as regards both the coasts themselves (e.g. erosion, high population density, waste, deforestation and the retreat of dunes) and the quality of coastal water (oil discharge, rising temperatures and the resulting proliferation of algae).
Amendment 4
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) EU coastal zones are further threatened by the effects of global warming, in particular rising sea levels, changes in storm frequency and strength, and increased coastal erosion and flooding.
Amendment 5
Recital 2 b (new)
(2b) The decline of fishing activity and related employment, which is a fundamental element of the socio-economic fabric of many fisheries-dependent areas, makes these regions particularly vulnerable.
Amendment 6
Recital 2 c (new)
(2c) Population growth and the development of economic activity, including polluting industries, maritime waste, ship-generated waste and general litter, are increasingly threatening the environmental equilibrium of coastal zones.
Amendment 7
Recital 2 d (new)
(2d) Coastal zones are increasingly subject to the effects of climate change.
Amendment 8
Recital 2 e (new)
(2e) The European Union promotes integrated spatial planning on a larger scale by means of horizontal instruments. Integrated spatial planning activities therefore represent an important contribution to integrated coastal zone management.
Amendment 10
Recital 3
   (3) It is essential to implement an environmentally sustainable, economically equitable, socially responsible, and culturally sensitive management of coastal zone , which maintains the integrity of this important resource.
   (3) It is essential to implement an environmentally sustainable, economically equitable, socially responsible, and culturally sensitive management of coastal zones , which respects traditional local activities and customs and maintains the integrity of this important resource.
Amendment 11
Recital 4
   (4) The Commission communications COM(97) 744 and COM(2000)[…[ note that integrated management of the coastal zone requires action at the local and regional level, guided and supported by an appropriate framework at the national level.
   (4) The Commission communications COM(97) 744 and COM(2000) […[ note that integrated management of the coastal zone first requires strategic, coordinated and concerted action at the local and regional level, guided and supported by an appropriate framework at the national level.
Amendment 12
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Further consideration should be given to establishing a Community legal framework for integrated coastal zone management. Member States should see this Recommendation as the first stage in a Community legal development to enable and ensure action on coastal zone management at all levels.
Amendment 13
Recital 4 b (new)
(4b) Existing regional disparities in the European Union affect the management and conservation of each coastal zone in a different way.
Amendment 14
Recital 5
   (5) There is a need to ensure coherent action at the European level, including cooperative action, particularly at the scale of the regional seas, to address cross-border coastal zone problems.
   (5) There is a need to ensure coherent action at the European level, including cooperative action and consultation with the International Maritime Organisation, particularly at the scale of the regional seas, to address cross-border coastal zone problems.
Amendment 15
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Since the Council resolution of 6 May 1994 the European Union has experienced an increase in pressure on coastal resources, an increase in coastal population and an increase in near-shore and on-shore infrastructure.
Amendment 16
Recital 7
   (7) In accordance with the subsidiarity and proportionality principles as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty, and with Protocol 7 to the Amsterdam Treaty on the implementation of subsidiarity and proportionality, and given the diversity of conditions in the coastal zones and the legal and institutional frameworks in the Member States, the objectives of this action can best be achieved by guidance at the Community level.
   (7) In accordance with the subsidiarity and proportionality principles as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty, and with Protocol 7 to the Amsterdam Treaty on the implementation of subsidiarity and proportionality, and given the diversity of conditions in the coastal zones and the legal and institutional frameworks in the Member States, the objectives of this action can best be achieved by guidance at the Community level as a first step, followed by the establishment of a Community legal framework, including the priorities under the existing financial instruments such as Interreg III.
Amendment 17
Chapter I
A Common Vision
A Common Strategy
The Member States should commit to a common vision for the future of their coastal zones, based on:
The Member States should commit themselves to a binding common strategy for the future of their coastal zones, based on the following principles:
   - the protection of the ecosystem as a first priority, and sustainable management of the living and non-living resources of both the marine and terrestrial components of the coastal zone,
   - recognition of the threat to coastal zones posed by continued global warming,
   - durable economic opportunities and employment options,
   - durable economic opportunities and employment options,
   - a functioning social and cultural system in local communities,
   - a functioning social and cultural system in local communities,
   - adequate open land for future enjoyment and aesthetics,
   - adequate open land for future enjoyment and aesthetics,
   - the integrity of the ecosystem, and sustainable management of the living and non-living resources of both the marine and terrestrial components of the coastal zone, and
   - in the case of remote coastal areas, their full incorporation into the European mainstream.
   - in the case of remote coastal areas, their full incorporation into the European mainstream.
Amendment 18
Chapter II, introductory part
Member States should furthermore adopt the principles of good coastal zone management as identified in the Commission's Demonstration Programme on Integrated Coastal Zone Management, namely that coastal zone management should be based on:
Before establishing a Community legal framework, and no later than three years after the adoption of this Recommendation, Member States should adopt binding measures to ensure good coastal zone management as identified in the Commission's Demonstration Programme on Integrated Coastal Zone Management, namely that coastal zone management should be based on:
Amendment 19
Chapter II, point 1
   1. A Broad 'Holistic' Perspective (Thematic and Geographic)
   1. A broad 'holistic' perspective (thematic and geographic) taking into account the interdependence and disparity of the systems with an impact on coastal zones.
Amendment 20
Chapter II, point 1 a (new)
1a. A binding commitment to apply the precautionary principle
Amendment 21
Chapter II, point 2
   2. A Long Term Perspective
   2. A long-term perspective which will guarantee the precautionary principle and take into account the needs of present and future generations.
Amendment 22
Chapter II, point 3
   3. Adaptive Management (responding to new information and conditions) During a Gradual Process
   3. Adaptive management (responding to new information and conditions) during a gradual process which will facilitate adjustment as problems and knowledge develop.
Amendment 23
Chapter II, point 4
   4. Local Specificity
   4. Local specificity and the great diversity of European coastal zones, which will make it possible to respond to their practical needs with specific solutions and flexible measures.
Amendment 24
Chapter II, point 5 a (new)
5a. Protecting coastal settlements and their cultural heritage from the dangers of rising sea levels, the increasing frequency and violence of coastal storms, and changes in wind direction.
Amendment 25
Chapter II, point 6
   6. Participatory Planning
   6. Participatory planning which will involve all the parties concerned (maritime interests, local residents and businesses, users of recreational facilities, holidaymakers, fishing communities and environmental NGOs) in the spatial planning process, by means of agreement and shared responsibility.
Amendment 26
Chapter II, point 7
   7. Support and involvement of all Relevant Administrative Bodies
   7. Support and involvement of all relevant administrative bodies, establishing links between the various levels and sectors of government and the necessary coordination of existing policies.
Amendment 27
Chapter II, point 8
   8. Use of a Combination of Instruments
   8. Use of a combination of instruments to ensure coherence between legal instruments and administrative objectives and between planning and management.
Amendment 28
Chapter II, point 8 a (new)
8a. Coherence between all sectoral plans already in preparation.
Amendment 29
Chapter III, paragraph 1
   1. Member States should conduct a national stocktaking to analyse which actors, laws and institutions influence the planning and management of their coastal zone.
   1. Before a Community legal framework on integrated coastal zone management is established, and before 31 December 2002, Member States, in partnership with the regional authorities, shall conduct a national stocktaking to analyse which actors, laws and institutions influence the planning and management of their coastal zone, and to ensure the convergence of public policies and local initiatives .
Amendment 46
Chapter III, paragraph 2
   2. This stocktaking should cover all administrative levels, as well as describe the role of citizens, NGOs, and the private sector.
   2. This stocktaking should cover all administrative levels, as well as describe the role of citizens, elected members of local authorities, interregional organisations, NGOs, and the private sector.
Amendment 31
Chapter III, paragraph 3
   3. Sectors to be considered in this stockholding include (but are not limited to) fisheries, transport, energy, resource management, species and habitat protection, employment, regional development, tourism and recreation, industry and mining, waste management, agriculture and education.
   3. Sectors to be considered in this stocktaking include (but are not limited to) fisheries, aquaculture , transport, including ports and sea transport , energy, resource management, species and habitat protection, maritime safety , employment, regional development and town planning , tourism and recreation, industry and mining, waste management, agriculture, and education.
Amendment 32
Chapter IV, paragraphs 1 and 2
   1. Based on the results of the stocktaking, Member States should develop a National Strategy to implement the principles for integrated management of the coastal zone.
   2. This strategy might be specific to the coastal zone, or might be in the context of a broader national strategy for promoting integrated planning and management.
Based on the results of the stocktaking, Member States, in partnership with the regional authorities and interregional organisations, shall develop, before 31 December 2004, a National Strategy to implement the principles for integrated management of the coastal zone. This strategy might be specific to the coastal zone, or might be in the context of a broader national strategy for promoting integrated planning and management. The results are to be incorporated in the Community legal framework.
Amendment 33
Chapter IV, paragraph 3, point (a)
   3. This national strategy should:
This national strategy should lead to binding legal instruments to:
   (a) define the relative roles of the different administrative actors within the country whose competence includes activities or resources of the coastal zone, and identify mechanisms for their coordination. This definition of roles should ensure both adequate local control, and also sufficient regional vision and consistency (especially in ensuring that local administrations are not overly influenced by the short-term economic concerns of their constituents and neighbours).
   (a) define the roles of the different administrative actors within the country whose competence includes activities or resources of the coastal zone,
   (aa) identify and, if necessary, set up mechanisms for their coordination. This definition of roles should ensure both adequate local control, and also sufficient regional vision and consistency (especially in ensuring that local administrations are not overly influenced by the short-term economic concerns of their constituents and neighbours).
Amendment 34
Chapter IV, paragraph 3, point (b)
   (b) define the appropriate mix of instruments for implementation of the principles, within the national legal and administrative context. In developing this strategy, the Member States might consider the appropriateness of: developing a national strategic plan for the coast, using spatial or land use planning instruments to promote integrated planning and management (including instruments that give priority to coastal dependent uses in the foreshore area), land purchase mechanisms and declarations of public domain, developing contractual or voluntary agreements with coastal zone users, harnessing economic and fiscal incentives (compatible with Community legislation), and working through regional development planning mechanisms.
   (b) define the appropriate mix of instruments for implementation of the principles, within the national legal and administrative context. In developing this strategy, the Member States shall consider the appropriateness of: developing one or more national strategic plans for the coast, using spatial or land use planning instruments to promote integrated planning and management (including instruments that give priority to coastal dependent uses in the foreshore area), land purchase mechanisms and declarations of public domain, developing contractual or voluntary agreements with coastal zone users, harnessing economic and fiscal incentives (compatible with Community legislation), and working through regional development planning mechanisms.
Amendment 35
Chapter IV, paragraph 3, point (f)
   (f) define mechanisms to ensure full and coordinated implementation and application of existing EU legislation related to coastal zone.
   (f) define mechanisms to ensure full and coordinated implementation and application of existing and future EU legislation related to coastal zones, in particular the reformed Common Fisheries Policy from 2002 which includes the 12-mile fishing limit .
Amendment 36
Chapter IV, paragraph 3, point (g)
   (g) establish adequate, continuous systems for monitoring and diffusing information about their coastal zone. These systems should collect and provide information in appropriate and compatible formats to decision makers at national, regional and local levels to facilitate integrated management. This data should be publicly available at reasonable cost .
   (g) establish adequate, continuous systems for monitoring and diffusing information about their coastal zone, in partnership with the European Environment Agency and regional authorities . These systems should collect and provide information in appropriate and compatible formats to decision makers at national, regional and local levels to facilitate integrated management. This data should be publicly available without charge .
Amendment 37
Chapter IV, paragraph 3, point (h a) (new)
   (ha) establish appropriate procedures to enable ample public participation in the development of coastal zone strategies.
Amendment 38
Chapter IV, paragraph 3 a (new)
Member States shall ensure closely concerted action between the national, regional and local authorities, the different levels of government, the economic and social partners, organisations representing citizens/inhabitants, NGOs and the private sector.
Amendment 39
Chapter V, paragraph 1
   1. Member States should enter into dialogue with neighbouring countries, including non-Member States in the same regional sea, to establish mechanisms for better coordination of responses to cross-border issues.
   1. Member States should enter into dialogue and enforce existing conventions with neighbouring countries, including non-member countries in the same regional sea, to establish mechanisms for better coordination of responses to cross-border issues.
Amendment 40
Chapter VI, title
Reporting
Reporting and Review
Amendment 42
Chapter VI, paragraph 2, point (d a) (new)
   (da) an evaluation of compliance with Community law in coastal zones, particularly with regard to protected zones and species.
Amendment 43
Chapter VI, paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The European Commission should review this Recommendation within three years following the date of its adoption and submit to the European Parliament and Council an evaluation report accompanied by a proposal for a Community legal framework on integrated coastal zone management.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council recommendation concerning the implementation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Europe (COM(2000) 545 - C5-0474/2000 - 2000/0227(COD) )
P5_TA(2001)0394A5-0219/2001

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2000) 545 ),

-  having regard to Articles 251(2) and 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5-0474/2000 ),

-  having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy and the opinions of the Committee on Fisheries and the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (A5-0219/2001 ),

1.  Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.  Asks to be consulted again should the Commission intend to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.


Recreational craft ***I
Text
Resolution
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive modifying Directive 94/25/EC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to recreational craft (COM(2000) 639 - C5-0529/2000 - 2000/0262(COD) )
P5_TA(2001)0395A5-0218/2001

The proposal was amended as follows:

Text proposed by the Commission (1)   Amendments by Parliament
Amendment 43
RECITAL 8
   (8) The harmonisation of national laws is the only way to abolish such barriers to trade and unfair competition found in the internal market. The objective of limiting noise and exhaust emissions cannot be satisfactorily met by the Member States individually. The measures provided for in this Directive lay down only the essential requirements for the free movement of all the types of engines to which it applies.
   (8) The harmonisation of national laws may help to abolish such barriers to trade and unfair competition found in the internal market. The objective of limiting noise and exhaust emissions cannot be satisfactorily met by the Member States individually. The measures provided for in this Directive lay down only minimum requirements for facilitating the free movement of all the types of engines to which it applies. Member States may, subject to compliance with Treaty provisions applicable to certain waters, in particular inland waters that are used, or are to be used, for the abstraction of drinking water, impose more stringent requirements for limiting emissions and protecting the environment.
Amendment 1
RECITAL 10
   (10) The provisions on emissions laid down in this Directive should apply to all engines, whether inboard, outboard or stern drive, and to personal watercraft in order to ensure optimum effectiveness in the protection of human health and the environment. Engines undergoing major alterations should also be included as regards gaseous emissions. Craft or partly completed craft with an inboard or stern drive engine, or one of such types of craft whose engine is undergoing major alterations should also comply with the provisions regarding noise emissions.
   (10) The provisions on emissions laid down in this Directive should apply to all engines, whether inboard, outboard or stern drive, and to personal watercraft in order to ensure optimum effectiveness in the protection of human health and the environment. Engines undergoing major alterations should also be included as regards gaseous emissions. Craft with an inboard or stern drive engine, or one of such types of craft whose engine is undergoing major alterations should also comply with the provisions regarding noise emissions.
Amendment 2
RECITAL 11
   (11) Conformity with the essential requirements for emissions from the engines concerned is essential to protect human health and the environment. Maximum authorised levels should be laid down for exhaust emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and particulate pollutants. As far as noise emissions are concerned, the maximum levels should be broken down as a function of the power of such engines and the number of engines on board. These measures are consistent with all other measures to reduce engine emissions in order to protect human beings and the environment.
   (11) Conformity with the essential requirements for emissions from the engines concerned is essential to protect human health and the environment. Maximum authorised levels should be laid down for exhaust emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and particulate pollutants. As far as noise emissions are concerned, the maximum levels should be broken down as a function of the power of such engines and the number of engines on board. These measures must be consistent with all other measures to reduce engine emissions in order to protect human beings and the environment.
Amendment 3
RECITAL 11 a (new)
(11a) Member States should consider introducing national support policies to encourage the use of synthetic biodegradable lubrication oils to reduce water pollution by the recreational sector. The introduction of EU-wide measures must be considered during the review of this Directive.
Amendment 4
RECITAL 19
   (19) The efficient functioning of legislation requires a mechanism for amending the technical provisions concerning the evolution of exhaust and noise emission limits and of exhaust duty cycles and test fuels in the light of advances in technology; a Regulatory Committee established following the Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(1 ) would be required to advise the Commission on the measures to be taken.
_____________
( 1 ) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.
Deleted
Amendment 5
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1
Article 1, paragraph 1, point (b), point (ii) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   (ii) propulsion engines installed on or in these craft that are subject to a "major engine modification”;
   (ii) propulsion engines installed on or in these craft first put into service after the entry into force of this Directive that are subject to a "major engine modification”;
Amendment 6
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1
Article 1, paragraph 1, point (c), point (i) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   (i) recreational craft and partly completed boats, with stern drive or inboard propulsion engine installations,
   (i) recreational craft with stern drive or inboard propulsion engine installations,
Amendment 7
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1
Article 1, paragraph 1, point (c), point (ii) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   (ii) recreational craft, with stern drive or inboard propulsion engines that are subject to a “major craft conversion”,
   (ii) recreational craft first put into service after the entry into force of this Directive with stern drive or inboard propulsion engines that are subject to a “major craft conversion”,
Amendment 8
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1
Article 1, paragraph 1, point (c), point (iv) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   (iv) outboard engines intended for installation on recreational craft.
   (iv) outboard engines and stern drive engines with integral exhausts intended for installation on recreational craft.
Amendment 9
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1
Article 1, paragraph 2, point (a), point (xi a) (new) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   (xia) steam-powered craft .
Amendment 10
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1
Article 1, paragraph 2, point (b), point (i), indent 3 a (new) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   - craft built for own use, provided that they are not subsequently placed on the Community market during a period of five years;
Amendment 11
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1
Article 1, paragraph 2, point (b), point (ii) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   (ii) Original and individual replicas of historical propulsion engines, which are based on a pre 1960 design, not produced in series and fitted on craft referred to in paragraph 2(a)(v) .
   (ii) Original and individual replicas of historical propulsion engines, which are based on a pre 1960 design.
Amendment 12
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1
Article 1, paragraph 2, point (c) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   (c) With regard to paragraph 1(c):
   (c) With regard to paragraph 1(c):
all craft referred to in point (b) of this paragraph.
   (i) all craft referred to in point (b) of this paragraph,
   (ii) recreational craft with stern drive or inboard propulsion engines that have undergone for own use "major craft conversion" no earlier than five years after being placed on the Community market, provided that such craft are not subsequently placed on the Community market during a period of five years following the conversion.
Amendment 13
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1
Article 1, paragraph 3, point (e), indent 2 (Directive 94/25/EC)
   - involves either a major engine modification or the replacement of the propulsion engine by a different type or size of engine ,
   - involves a major engine modification,
Amendment 15
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2 a (new)
Article 4, paragraph 5 a (new) (Directive 94/25/EC)
The following paragraph 5a is added to Article 4:
“5a. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 to 5 above, and in respect of inland waters,
   - which are actually used, or to be used, for the abstraction of drinking water and therefore must in particular be protected against pollution, or
   - which are in the vicinity of residential areas or protected natural habitats which must be afforded protection in particular from noise,
Member States may lay down stricter environmental protection requirements and prohibit the putting into service of the products specified in Article 1(1) wholly, partly or temporarily if they do not comply with such stricter environmental protection requirements. In so far as Member States make use of this possibility, they shall notify the stricter national environmental protection requirements to the Commission at least one year before they enter into force and have them published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.”
Amendment 16
ARTICLE 1, POINT 3
Article 6 a (Directive 94/25/EC)
The following Article 6a shall be inserted:
Deleted
“Regulatory Committee
Article 6a
   1. Amendments which are necessary, in the light of evolution of technical knowledge and new scientific evidence, to the requirements of Annex I.B.2, concerning limit values of exhaust emissions, duty cycles and reference fuels, and Annex I.C.1, concerning limit values of noise emissions, shall be adopted by the Commission assisted by the Standing Committee set up pursuant to Article 6(3), acting as a regulatory committee in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 6a(2).
   2. Where reference is made to this provision, the regulatory procedure laid down in Article 5 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, in compliance with Article 7(3) and Article 8 thereof.
   3. The period stipulated in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be three months.”
Amendment 14
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5
Article 8, paragraph 2, point (a), point (i) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   (i) for boats of less than 12 m hull length: the internal production control plus tests (module Aa) referred to in Annex VI, or the EC type-examination (module B) as described in Annex VII, supplemented by module C (type conformity) referred to in Annex VIII, or any of the following modules: B+D or G or H.
   (i) for boats from 2.5 m to 12 m hull length: the internal production control plus tests (module Aa) referred to in Annex VI, or the EC type-examination (module B) as described in Annex VII, supplemented by module C (type conformity) referred to in Annex VIII, or any of the following modules: B+D or G or H.
Amendment 17
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5
Article 8, paragraph 2, point (d) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   (d) For personal watercraft:
   (d) For personal watercraft:
the EC type-examination (module B) as described in Annex VII followed by module C (type conformity) referred to in Annex VIII, or any of the following modules: B+D, B+E, B+F, or G, or H.
the internal production control (module A) referred to in Annex V, or the internal production control plus tests (module Aa) referred to in Annex VI, or the EC type-examination (module B) as described in Annex VII followed by module C (type conformity) referred to in Annex VIII, or any of the following modules: B+D, B+E, B+F, or G, or H.
Amendment 18
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5
Article 8, paragraph 4, point (a), point (i a) (new) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   (ia) where the Froude number and power displacement ratio method is used for assessment: either the internal production control (module A) referred to in Annex V, or the internal production control plus tests (module Aa) referred to in Annex VI, or unit verification (module G) referred to in Annex XI, or full quality assurance (module H) referred to in Annex XII.
Amendment 44
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6
Article 10, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 (Directive 94/25/EC)
   2. The CE marking of conformity, as shown in Annex IV, must appear in a visible, legible and indelible form on the craft and the personal watercraft as in point 2.2 of Annex I.A, on components, as referred to in Annex II and/or on their packaging, and on outboard engines and personal watercraft engines as in point 1.1 of Annex I.B.
   2. The CE marking of conformity, as shown in Annex IV, must appear in a visible, legible and indelible form on the craft and the personal watercraft as in point 2.2 of Annex I.A, on components, as referred to in Annex II and/or on their packaging, and on outboard engines as in point 1.1 of Annex I.B.
Amendment 45
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6
Article 10, paragraph 3 (Directive 94/25/EC)
   3. The affixing of markings or inscriptions on the craft, the personal watercraft, and on propulsion engines which are likely to mislead third parties with regard to the meaning or the form of the CE marking shall be prohibited. Any other markings may be affixed to the recreational craft and components as referred to in Annex II and/or on their packaging provided that the visibility and legibility of the CE marking is not thereby reduced.
   3. The affixing of markings or inscriptions on the craft, the personal watercraft, the outboard engine or any component referred to in Annex II which are likely to mislead third parties with regard to the meaning or the form of the CE marking shall be prohibited. Any other markings may be affixed to the recreational craft and components as referred to in Annex II and/or on their packaging provided that the visibility and legibility of the CE marking is not thereby reduced. Inboard and stern drive engines must be accompanied by a declaration of incorporation, indicating compliance with the exhaust requirements, by the engine manufacturer or his authorised representative in the Community. This declaration of incorporation must be affixed to the inboard/stern drive engine in a clear and legible form.
Amendment 20
ARTICLE 2
Two years after the implementation of this Directive by the Member States, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on how to implement a system of in-use compliance testing.
Two years after the implementation of this Directive by the Member States, the Commission shall submit a proposal to the European Parliament and the Council on how and when to implement a system of in-use compliance testing.
In the context of in-use compliance testing, Member States' competent authorities may, in the case of justified suspicion, inspect a representative proportion of craft placed on the market to verify whether emission limit values are being complied with. Such in-use compliance testing shall be free of charge to operators.
The Commission proposal shall take account of further provisions that ensure compliance with emission limit values throughout a craft's entire life cycle.
Amendment 21
ARTICLE 2 a (new)
Article 2a
No later than three years following the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission shall present a proposal for a further stage of requirements and emission limit values from recreational craft engines.
Amendment 22
ANNEX A, POINT 1 A (new)
Annex I, Section 1 A (Directive 94/25/EC)
1a. Section 1A is replaced by the following text:
“A. OCEAN: Designed for extended voyages where conditions may exceed wind force 8 (Beaufort scale) and significant wave heights of 4 m and above, and vessels which are largely self-sufficient under these conditions, but excluding abnormal conditions such as hurricanes.”
Amendment 46
ANNEX A, POINT 1 B (new)
Annex I, Section 1 D (Directive 94/25/EC)
1b. Section 1D is replaced by the following text:
""D. SHELTERED WATERS: Designed for voyages in close coastal waters, small bays, lakes, rivers and canals where conditions up to, and including, wind force 4 and significant maximum wave heights up to, and including, 0.3 m may be experienced.
Crafts in each Category must be designed and constructed to withstand these parameters in respect of stability, buoyancy and other relevant essential requirements listed in Annex I, and to have good handling characteristics.
Amendment 23
ANNEX A, POINT 2 a (new)
Annex I, Section 2.1 (Directive 94/25/EC)
Section 2.1 "Hull identification”, the introduction is replaced by the following text:
“Each craft shall be marked with an identification number including the following information:”
Amendment 24
ANNEX A, POINT 3
Annex I, section 2.2 (Directive 94/25/EC)
“....excluding the weight of the fuel and water tanks when full.”
“....excluding the weight of the fuel and water in fixed tanks when full.”
Amendment 28
ANNEX A, POINT 5 a (new)
Annex I, Section 5.2.2 (Directive 94/25/EC)
5a. Section 5.2.2. "Fuel tanks” is replaced by the following text:
“5.2.2 Fuel tanks
Fuel tanks, lines and hoses shall be secured and separated or protected from any source of significant heat. The material the tanks are made of and their method of construction shall be according to their capacity and the type of fuel. All tank spaces shall be ventilated.
Petrol fuel shall be kept in tanks which do not form part of the hull and are:
   (a) insulated from the engine compartment and from all other source of ignition;
   (b) separated from living quarters.
Diesel fuel may be kept in tanks that are integral with the hull.”
Amendments 29, 30 and 31
ANNEX A, POINT 6
Annex I, Part B, point 2 (Directive 94/25/EC)
Text proposed by the Commission
   2. EXHAUST EMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Propulsion engines shall be designed, constructed and assembled so that when correctly installed and in normal use, emissions shall not exceed the limit values obtained from the following table:
Table 1

Type

Carbon monoxide
CO=A + B/PNn
g/kWh

Hydrocarbons
HC=A + B/PNn
g/kWh

Nitrogen oxides
NOx
g/kWh

Particulates

A

B

n

A

B

n

Two-stroke spark ignition

150.0

600.0

1.0

30.0

100.0

0.75

10.0

Not applicable

Four-stroke spark ignition

150.0

600.0

1.0

6.0

50.0

0.75

15.0

Not applicable

Compression ignition

5.0

0

0

1.5

2.0

0.5

9.8

1.0

Where A, B and n are constants in accordance with the table, PN is the rated engine power in kW and the exhaust emissions are measured in accordance with the harmonised standard.
For engines above 130 kW either E3 (IMO) or E5 (recreational marine) duty cycles may be used.
Reference fuels specified in Directive 98/69/EC shall be used for the emissions tests (Annex XI, Table 2 and Table 3).
Amendment by Parliament
   2. EXHAUST EMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Propulsion engines for engines of recreational craft using the sea, coastal waters and watercourses shall be designed, constructed and assembled so that when correctly installed and in normal use, emissions shall not exceed the limit values obtained from the following table:
Table 1

Type

Carbon monoxide
CO=A + B/PNn
g/kWh

Hydrocarbons
HC=A + B/PNn
g/kWh

Nitrogen oxides
NOx
g/kWh

Particulates
(PT) g/kWh

A

B

n

A

B

n

Two-stroke spark ignition

150.0

600.0

1.0

30.0

100.0

0.75

10.0

Not applicable

Four-stroke spark ignition

150.0

600.0

1.0

6.0

50.0

0.75

15.0

Not applicable

Compression ignition

5.0

0

0

1.5

2.0

0.5

9.8

1.0

Where A, B and n are constants in accordance with the table, PN is the rated engine power in kW and the exhaust emissions are measured in accordance with the harmonised standard.
Propulsion engines for engines of recreational craft using standing inland waters (lakes) shall be designed, constructed and assembled so that, when correctly installed and in normal use, emissions shall not exceed the limit values obtained from the following table:
Table 1 a

Type

Carbon monoxide
CO=A + B/P Nn
g/kWh

Hydrocarbons
HC=A + B/P Nn
g/kWh

Nitrogen oxides
NO x
g/kWh

Particulates
(PT) g/kWh

A

B

n

A

B

n

A

B

n

Two-stroke spark ignition

   150.0

   600.0

   1.0

   0.45

   35.0

   0.75

   4.2

   8.0

   0.5

Not applicable

Four-stroke spark ignition

   150.0

   600.0

   1.0

   0.45

   35.0

   0.75

   4.2

   8.0

   0.5

Not applicable

Compression ignition

   5.0

   600.0

   1.0

   0.45

   35.0

   0.75

   9.8

0

0

   0.14

Where A, B and n are constants in accordance with the table, PN is the rated engine power in kW and the exhaust emissions are measured in accordance with the harmonised standard.
For engines above 130 kW either E3 (IMO) or E5 (recreational marine) duty cycles may be used.
The reference fuels to be used for the emissions test for petrol engines shall be as specified in Directive 98/69/EC (Annex XI, Table 3), and for diesel engines as specified in Directive 97/68/EC (Annex IV) .
Amendment 33
ANNEX A, POINT 6
Annex I, Part C, introductory part (Directive 94/25/EC)
Recreational craft with inboard or stern drive engines, personal watercraft and outboard engines shall comply with the following essential requirements for noise emissions.
Recreational craft with inboard or stern drive engines, personal watercraft and outboard engines and stern drive engines with integral exhausts shall comply with the following essential requirements for noise emissions.
Amendment 34
ANNEX A, POINT 6
Annex I, Part C, point 1.1, introductory part (Directive 94/25/EC)
   1.1. Recreational craft with inboard or stern drive engines, personal watercraft and outboard engines shall be designed, constructed and assembled so that noise emissions measured in accordance with tests defined in the harmonised standard shall not exceed the limit values in the following table:
   1.1. Recreational craft with inboard or stern drive engines, personal watercraft and outboard engines and stern drive engines with integral exhausts shall be designed, constructed and assembled so that noise emissions measured in accordance with tests defined in the harmonised standard shall not exceed the limit values in the following table:
Amendment 48
ANNEX A, POINT 6
Annex I, Part C, point 1.1, Table 2 and last 2 paragraphs (Directive 94/25/EC)

Table 2

Table 2

Engine Power
in kW

Maximum Sound
Pressure Level
= LpASmax
in dB

Engine Power
in kW

Maximum Sound
Pressure Level
= LpAFmax
in dB

PN ≤ 10

67

PN ≤ 10

67

10 <PN ≤40

72

10 <PN ≤40

72

PN >40

75

PN >40

75

Where PN= rated engine power in kW at rated speed and LpASmax = the maximum sound pressure level in dB.

Where PN= rated engine power in kW at rated speed and LpAFmax = the maximum sound pressure level in dB.

For twin-engine and multiple-engine units, an allowance of 3 dB may be applied.

Amendment 35
ANNEX A, POINT 6
Annex I, Part C, point 1.1 a (new) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   1.1 a. As an alternative to sound measurement tests, recreational craft with inboard or stern drive engine configurations shall be deemed to comply with these noise requirements if they have a Froude number of <=>1.1 and a power displacement ratio of <=>40, and where the engine and exhaust system are installed in accordance with the engine manufacturer's specifications.
Amendment 36
ANNEX A, POINT 6
Annex I, Part C, point 1.1 b (new) (Directive 94/25/EC)
   1.1 b. “Froude number” shall be calculated by dividing the maximum boat speed (V, m/s.) by the square root of the waterline length (lwl, m.) multiplied by a given gravitational constant,
(g = 9,8 m/s2 )Fn == V
√(g.lwl)
“Power displacement ratio” shall be calculated by dividing the engine power (P) by the boat's displacement
   (D) P
   D.
Amendment 37
ANNEX A, POINT 6
Annex I, Part C, point 2, subparagraph 2 (Directive 94/25/EC)
For outboard engines, the Owner's Manual required under Annex I.B.4 shall provide instructions necessary to maintain the outboard engine in a condition, that in so far as is practicable, will ensure compliance with the specified noise limit values when in normal use.
For outboard engines and stern drive engines with integral exhausts , the Owner's Manual required under Annex I.B.4 shall provide instructions necessary to maintain the outboard or stern drive engine in a condition, that in so far as is practicable, will ensure compliance with the specified noise limit values when in normal use.
Amendment 38
ANNEX A a (new)
Annex II, point 1 (Directive 94/25/EC)
   Aa. Annex II is amended as follows:
   1. Point 1 is replaced by the following text:
“1. Ignition-protected equipment for petrol inboard and stern drive engines.”
Amendment 39
ANNEX A a (new)
Annex II, point 4 (Directive 94/25/EC)
   2. Point 4 is replaced by the following text:
“4. Permanently installed fuel tanks and fuel hoses.”
Amendment 40
ANNEX A a (new)
Annex II, point 5, Directive 94/25/EC)
   3. The following text is added to point 5:
""Inspection covers and deck plates are not covered by Annex II. They shall comply with Annex IA, point 3.4.”
Amendment 41
Annex B
Annex VI, point B, subheading 2 (Directive 94/25/EC)
For outboard engines:
For outboard engines and stern drive engines with integral exhausts:
Amendment 42
ANNEX D
Annex XV, point 3 (Directive 94/25/EC)
   3. With regard to inboard and stern drive propulsion engines the declaration of conformity shall include in addition to the information of point 2 above, a statement of the manufacturer that the engine will meet the exhaust emission requirements of this Directive, when installed in a recreational craft, in accordance with the manufacturer's supplied instructions and that this engine must not be put into service until the recreational craft into which it is to be installed has been declared in conformity with the relevant provision of the Directive.
   3. With regard to inboard and stern drive propulsion engines the declaration of conformity shall include in addition to the information of point 2 above, a statement of the manufacturer that the engine will meet the exhaust emission requirements of this Directive, when installed in a recreational craft, in accordance with the manufacturer's supplied instructions and that this engine must not be put into service until the recreational craft into which it is to be installed has been declared in conformity with the relevant provision of the Directive. When using the Standard Boat method, the manufacturer of stern drive engines with integral exhausts must also declare that the engine will meet the sound emissions requirements of the Directive when installed in recreational craft in accordance with the instructions supplied by the engine manufacturers.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive modifying Directive 94/25/EC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to recreational craft (COM(2000) 639 - C5-0529/2000 - 2000/0262(COD) )
P5_TA(2001)0395A5-0218/2001

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council and the amended proposal (COM(2000) 639 )(2) ,

-  having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5-0529/2000 ),

-  having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (A5-0218/2001 ),

1.  Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.  Asks to be consulted again should the Commission intend to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

(1) OJ C 62 E, 27.2.2001, p. 139.
(2) OJ C 62 E, 27.2.2001, p. 139.


Aid to uprooted people in developing countries ***I
Text
Resolution
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation on operations to aid uprooted people in Asian and Latin American developing countries (COM(2000) 831 - C5-0758/2000 - 2000/0338(COD) )
P5_TA(2001)0396A5-0228/2001

The proposal was amended as follows:

Text proposed by the Commission (1)   Amendments by Parliament
Amendment 1
Recital 1
   (1) In the context of refugee policy, the United Nations have adopted the Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the Status of Refugees, the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 and many resolutions.
   (1) In the context of refugee policy, the United Nations have adopted the Convention concluded in Geneva on 28 July 1951 relating to the Status of Refugees, the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 and many resolutions in this field and in the fields of human rights and humanitarian law .
Amendment 2
Recital 2
   (2) The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the 1966 International Treaty on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the 1979 Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women and the 1989 Convention on Children's Rights also addresses the issue of refugees.
   (2) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 16 December 1966, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 16 December 1966, the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women of 18 December 1979 and the Convention on Children's Rights of 20 November 1989 also address the issue of refugees.
Amendment 3
Recital 5
   (5) Links and synergies between emergency aid, rehabilitation and development aid must be strengthened to improve complementarity and ensure consistency in the Community's operations.
   (5) An integrated, consistent and effective strategy must be devised for Community action in respect of humanitarian aid, rehabilitation, aid to uprooted people and development cooperation, with a view to pursuing a sustainable European Community development policy.
Amendment 4
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) It is particularly necessary to integrate aid for uprooted peoples with the development strategy of the countries and population groups for whom the aid is destined; Community action should therefore facilitate the move from the emergency stage to that of development, encouraging the socio-economic integration or reintegration of the people affected and, given the need to eliminate the causes of armed conflict, encourage the establishment or strengthening of democratic structures and the role of the population in the development process.
Amendment 5
Recital 6
   (6) Support programmes for uprooted people and demobilised former soldiers are an integral part of an overall rehabilitation strategy for Latin American and Asian developing countries. For the programmes to be effective, aid must be coordinated at Community level and with other donors, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and United Nations bodies.
   (6) Support programmes for uprooted people and demobilised former soldiers are an integral part of an overall rehabilitation strategy for Latin American and Asian developing countries. For the programmes to be effective, aid must be coordinated at Community level and with other donors, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and United Nations bodies, particularly the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) . The Commission should take responsibility both for monitoring and ensuring the visibility of funds channelled through NGOs and the United Nations. The Commission is moreover politically responsible for the ways in which its funds are spent by NGOs and the United Nations.
Amendment 6
Recital 7
   (7) For the countries in question, this type of aid is a necessary pre-condition for development and therefore contributes significantly to the objectives of the Community's cooperation policy.
Deleted
Amendment 7
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The effectiveness and consistency of Community, national and international prevention and intervention mechanisms should be ensured, both in order to prevent conflicts and to encourage all peaceful solutions to political conflicts and wars which result in population displacement.
Amendment 8
Recital 9
   (9) Ideally, action to help uprooted people should form part of an approach that aims to move on from so-called subsistence to a stage in which they become self-sufficient or less dependent. Aid to help them settle or resettle themselves should take the form of measures to develop self-sufficiency through agricultural production, livestock rearing, fish farming, setting up credit facilities, basic education and vocational training, and at ensuring decent levels of health and hygiene.
   (9) Ideally, action to help uprooted people should form part of an approach that aims to move on from so-called subsistence to a stage in which they become self-sufficient or less dependent.
Amendment 9
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Effective, flexible and expeditious procedures need to be guaranteed for aid operations in this sphere; the Community should also ensure maximum transparency in the granting of aid, and strict controls on the use of appropriations.
Amendment 10
Recital 10
   (10) Until 31 December 2000, the legal basis for Community action in this field is Council Regulation (EC) No 443/97 of 3 March 1997 on operations to aid uprooted people in Asian and Latin American developing countries, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1880/2000.
   (10) Until 31 December 2000, the legal basis for Community action in this field was Council Regulation (EC) No 443/97 of 3 March 1997 on operations to aid uprooted people in Asian and Latin American developing countries, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1880/2000. The experience acquired during its application should be reflected in this Regulation.
Amendment 11
Recital 11
   (11) This Regulation should enable the Community to continue its operations in these fields for an indefinite period.
   (11) This Regulation lays down, for its entire duration, a financial framework constituting the prime reference, within the meaning of point 33 of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(1 ), for the budget authority during the annual budgetary procedure.
_____________
(1 ) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1.
Amendment 12
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) The protection of the Community's financial interests and the fight against fraud and irregularities form an integral part of this Regulation,
Amendment 13
Article 1
The Community shall implement a programme of support and assistance to the persons referred to in Article 4 to contribute to their urgent requirements not covered by humanitarian aid and to carry out longer-term projects and programmes aimed at the self-sufficiency and integration or reintegration of such persons. In particular, this programme must provide for the basic needs of those persons from the time a humanitarian emergency subsides to the adoption of a longer-term solution to resolve their status.
The Community shall implement a programme of support and assistance to uprooted people in Asian and Latin-American developing countries. The programme shall apply to the uprooted people and other persons referred to in Article 4 and contribute to their requirements not covered by humanitarian aid and carry out longer-term activities aimed at the self-sufficiency and integration or reintegration of such persons. In particular, this programme must provide for the basic needs of those persons from the time a humanitarian emergency subsides to the adoption of a longer-term solution to resolve their status.
The objectives of the assistance programmes shall include the establishment of democratic structures and the promotion of human rights.
Amendment 14
Article 2
For the purposes of this Regulation:
For the purposes of this Regulation:
   (a) ""uprooted people” are:
   (a) refugees are those persons defined as such in the Convention on the Status of Refugees adopted on 28 July 1951 by the United Nations Conference on the Status of Refugees and Stateless Persons ;
   - refugees, as defined in the Convention on the Status of Refugees concluded in Geneva on 28 July 1951 and the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 ; or
   (b) displaced persons” are persons who have been forced to seek refuge outside their region of origin owing to conflict situations but who do not enjoy refugee status as defined by the 1951 Convention ;
   - displaced persons , who have been forced to seek refuge outside their region of origin owing to conflict situations but who do not enjoy refugee status; or
   (c) “returnees” are former refugees or displaced persons who have returned to their country or region of origin;
   - former refugees or displaced persons who have returned to their country or region of origin;
   (d) “demobilised former soldiers” are former members of armed forces, be they regular or opposition forces, who have agreed to lay down their arms and reintegrate into civilian life.
   (b) “demobilised former soldiers” are former members of armed forces, be they regular or opposition forces, who have agreed to lay down their arms and reintegrate into civilian life.
Amendment 15
Article 3, paragraph 1
   1. The Community shall give financial support to operations aimed in particular at:
   1. The Community shall give financial support to operations aimed in particular at:
   (a) the self-sufficiency and reintegration into the socio-economic fabric of uprooted people as such (refugees, displaced persons and returnees) and demobilised former soldiers;
   (a) the self-sufficiency and reintegration into the socio-economic fabric of uprooted people and demobilised former soldiers; aid to secure their integration or reintegration must have as its objective the promotion of sustainable production processes, and could include actions such as providing food aid, developing self-sufficiency by means of agricultural production, cattle farming, fish farming, developing infrastructure, setting up credit systems, basic education and vocational training and ensuring satisfactory health and hygiene standards;
   (b) aid to local host communities and resettlement areas to foster acceptance and integration of uprooted persons ;
   (b) aid to local host communities and resettlement areas to foster acceptance and integration of uprooted people and demobilised former soldiers ;
   (c) helping those people return to and settle in their countries of origin or third countries ;
   (c) helping those people voluntarily return to and settle in their countries of origin or other countries of their choice, if conditions permit ;
   (d) support, where applicable, for any operation to reconcile parties to a conflict;
   (d) support, where applicable, for any operation to prevent conflict and/or reconcile parties to a conflict;
   (e) operations to help persons recover their belongings or property rights and aid for the legal settlement of human rights violations against the people in question.
   (e) operations to help persons recover their belongings or property rights and aid for the settlement of human rights violations against the people in question.
1a. Particular attention should be paid to especially vulnerable groups such as women and children.
Amendment 16
Article 4, point (a)
   (a) uprooted people as such (refugees, displaced persons and returnees) in Latin American and Asian developing countries and persons from one of these countries provisionally settled in another developing country and, in duly substantiated exceptional cases, in another third country;
   (a) uprooted people in Latin American and Asian developing countries and persons from one of these countries provisionally settled in another developing country and, in duly substantiated exceptional cases, in another country;
Amendment 17
Article 4, point (b)
   (b) demobilised former soldiers of regular armies and armed opposition movements , plus their families and, where appropriate, their local communities;
   (b) demobilised former soldiers, in Asian and Latin American developing countries, plus their families and, where appropriate, their local communities;
Amendment 18
Article 5
Operations carried out under this Regulation shall complement those provided for by other Community instruments governing development cooperation.
Operations carried out under this Regulation shall complement those provided for by other Community instruments governing short-term humanitarian aid and long-term development cooperation.
Amendment 19
Article 6, paragraph 1
   1. In the context of the operations referred to in Article 3, Community support may include the financing of studies (which shall, as far as possible, be carried out by consultants of the host country), technical assistance, training and other services, supplies, works, audits and evaluation and monitoring missions.
   1. In the context of the operations referred to in Article 3, Community support may include the financing of action to provide technical assistance, training and other services, supplies, works, studies (which should, as far as possible, be entrusted to or involve collaboration with consultants either of the host country or stationed there, and involve universities and research institutes), audits and evaluation and monitoring missions.
Amendment 20
Article 6, paragraph 2
   2. Community financing may cover both investment expenditure, excluding the purchase of real estate, and , in duly substantiated cases and taking into account the fact that the project must, as far as possible, aim at medium-term viability, recurring expenditure (including administrative expenditure, maintenance and running costs), so that maximum use is made of the investments referred to in paragraph 1, the operation of which temporarily represents a burden for the partner.
   2. Community financing may cover investment expenditure, including the purchase of real estate, when the latter is necessary for the direct implementation of the operation and provided that ownership is transferred to the beneficiary's local partners or the final beneficiaries of the operation once the latter has come to an end. It may also cover, in duly substantiated cases and taking into account the fact that the project must, as far as possible, aim at medium-term viability, recurring expenditure (including administrative expenditure, maintenance and running costs), so that maximum use is made of the investments referred to in paragraph 1, the operation of which temporarily represents a burden for the partner.
Amendment 21
Article 8, paragraph 1
   1. The Commission shall be responsible for appraising, deciding or administering the operations covered by this Regulation in accordance with the budgetary and other procedures in force, in particular those laid down by the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.
   1. The Commission shall be responsible for appraising, deciding or administering the operations covered by this Regulation in accordance with the budgetary and other procedures in force, in particular those laid down in Articles 2, 116 and 118 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.
Amendment 22
Article 11, point (f)
   (f) its commitment to defending, respecting and promoting human rights and democratic principles.
   (f) its commitment to defending, respecting and promoting human rights, democratic principles and humanitarian law .
Amendment 23
Article 12, paragraph 3
   3. Any financing agreement or contract concluded under this Regulation shall stipulate that the Commission and the Court of Auditors may carry out on-the-spot checks according to the usual arrangements laid down by the Commission under the provisions in force, particularly those in the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.
   3. Any financing agreement or contract concluded under this Regulation shall stipulate that the Commission, the Court of Auditors and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out, if necessary, on-the-spot checks according to the usual arrangements laid down by the Commission under the provisions in force, particularly those in the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.
Amendment 24
Article 13, paragraph 1
   1. Participation in invitations to tender and the award of contracts shall be open on equal terms to all natural and legal persons of the Member States and of the host country. It may be extended to other developing countries and, in duly substantiated exceptional cases, to other third countries.
   1. Participation in invitations to tender and the award of contracts shall be open on equal terms to all natural and legal persons of the Member States and of the host country. It may be extended to operators in other developing countries and, in exceptional cases, to other third countries.
Amendment 25
Article 13, paragraph 2
   2. Supplies shall originate in the Member States, the host country, or other developing countries . In duly substantiated exceptional cases supplies may originate elsewhere.
   2. Supplies shall originate in the host country, other developing countries or the Member States . In exceptional cases supplies may originate elsewhere.
Amendment 26
Article 14, paragraph 1
   1. In order to secure the objectives of consistency and complementarity referred to in the Treaty and to ensure maximum effectiveness of these operations as a whole, the Commission may take all necessary coordination measures, including:
   1. In order to secure the objectives of consistency and complementarity referred to in the Treaty and to ensure maximum effectiveness of the operations provided for in this Regulation, these shall be subject to on-the-spot operational coordination and shall form an integral part of the country strategy process.
   (a) establishing a system for the systematic exchange and analysis of information on the operations financed and those which the Community and the Member States propose to finance;
   (b) on-the-spot coordination of the implementation of operations through regular meetings and exchanges of information between the representatives of the Commission and the Member States in the recipient country.
Amendment 27
Article 15
The budgetary authority shall determine the appropriations available for each financial year taking account of the principles of sound financial management referred to in Article 2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.
   1. The financial framework for the implementing this Regulation for the period from 2001 to 2004 shall be EUR 200 million.
   2. The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective.
Separate vote
Article 17, paragraph 2
   2. Where the supplementary commitment referred to in paragraph 1 is less than 8 million euro, the committee referred to in Article 18(1) shall be informed of the Commission's decision. Where the supplementary commitment is greater than 8 million euro but less than 20%, the committee will be asked to give its opinion.
Deleted
Amendment 28
Article 19, paragraph 1
   1. An exchange of views shall take place once a year on the basis of a presentation by the representative of the Commission of the general guidelines for the operations to be carried out in the year ahead, within the Committee referred to in Article 18(1).
   1. An exchange of views shall take place once a year on the basis of a presentation by the representative of the Commission of the strategic guidelines for the operations to be carried out in the years ahead, within the Committee referred to in Article 18(1). The guidelines shall include, as far as possible, measurable objectives and deadlines for specific actions. These guidelines shall be drawn up following consultation with departments responsible, in the field or at headquarters, for programming, implementation and evaluation.
Amendment 29
Article 19, paragraph 2
   2. After each budget year, the Commission shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament and to the Council, summarising the operations financed in the course of that year and the Commission's conclusions on the implementation of this Regulation over the previous budget year. The summary shall in particular provide information about those with whom contracts have been concluded. The annual report shall also summarise any independent evaluations of specific operations.
   2. After each budget year, the Commission shall submit, in its annual report on Community development policy to the European Parliament and to the Council, information on the operations financed in the course of that year and the Commission's conclusions on the implementation of this Regulation over the previous budget year. The summary shall in particular provide information about the strengths and weaknesses of operations, those with whom contracts have been concluded as well as the results of any independent evaluations of specific operations.
Amendment 30
Article 19, paragraph 3
   3. Every three years, the Commission shall submit an evaluation report on the implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council with a view to establishing whether its objectives have been achieved and providing guidelines for improving the effectiveness of future operations.
   3. After three years, the Commission shall submit an independent overall assessment report on the implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council with a view to establishing whether its objectives have been achieved and providing guidelines for improving the effectiveness of future operations. The report will assess the effectiveness of action taken following performance audits and independent evaluations.
Amendment 31
Article 20, paragraphs 1 a and 1 b (new)
It shall apply until 31 December 2004.
The renewal of this Regulation will be dependent on the results of the independent overall assessment report referred to in Article 19(3), which shall be available at least one year before the expiry of this Regulation, and the possibilities for integrating this Regulation into a single framework Regulation for Asia and Latin America.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation on operations to aid uprooted people in Asian and Latin American developing countries (COM(2000) 831 - C5-0758/2000 - 2000/0338(COD) )
P5_TA(2001)0396A5-0228/2001

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2000) 831 )(2) ,

-  having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 179(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5-0758/2000 ),

-  having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on Development and Cooperation and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Budgetary Control (A5-0228/2001 ),

1.  Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.  Asks to be consulted again should the Commission intend to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

(1) OJ C120 E, 24.4.2001, p. 163.
(2) OJ C120 E, 24.4.2001, p. 163.


Macro financial assistance to Yugoslavia *
Text
Resolution
Proposal for a Council decision providing macro-financial assistance to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (COM(2001) 277 - C5-0231/2001 - 2001/0112(CNS) )
P5_TA(2001)0397A5-0244/2001

The proposal was amended as follows:

Text proposed by the Commission   Amendments by Parliament
Amendment 1
Citation 1 a (new)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2666/2000 of 5 December 2000 on assistance for Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1628/96 and amending Regulations (EEC) No 3906/89 and (EEC) No 1360/90 and Decisions 97/256/EC and 1999/311/EC(1 ) and, in particular, Article 6(4) thereof,
_______________
( 1 ) OJ L 306, 7.12.2000, p. 1.
Amendment 2
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) It should be possible to provide financial assistance to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia provided it continues to take steps to become a properly functioning legal State and cooperates with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the Hague;
Amendment 3
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The Community provided an emergency assistance package of approximately EUR 200 million comprising food aid and medical and energy supplies to provide for the basic needs of the population during the winter of 2000/2001;
Amendment 4
Recital 5
   (5) The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has reached an understanding with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on a comprehensive set of economic stabilisation and reform measures to be supported by a 12-month upper credit tranche stand-by arrangement (SBA) ;
   (5) The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has reached an understanding with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on a comprehensive set of economic stabilisation and reform measures. The IMF approved a one-year stand-by arrangement on 11 June 2001 ;
Amendment 5
Recital 10
(10) A Community macro-financial assistance to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is an appropriate measure to help ease the country's external financial constraints, supporting the balance of payments and strengthening the reserve position;
   (10) Community macro-financial assistance to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is an appropriate measure to help, with other donors, ease the country's external financial constraints, supporting the balance of payments and strengthening the reserve position;
Amendment 6
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) Such assistance, including both the long-term loan and the grant component, is exceptional and should in no way constitute a precedent for the future.
Amendment 7
Recital 12
   (12) Financial assistance from the Community in the form of a combination of a long-term loan and a straight grant is an appropriate measure to support the balance of payments and help ease the country's external financial constraints in the current exceptionally difficult circumstances;
   (12) Concessional financial assistance from the Community in the form of a combination of a long-term loan and a straight grant is an appropriate exceptional and temporary measure to support the balance of payments and help ease the country's external financial constraints in the current exceptionally difficult circumstances;
Amendment 8
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Financial assistance from the Community should be effective and properly implemented and should also conform to the objectives of the reform of external aid.
Amendment 9
Recital 12 b (new)
(12b) The loan component of this assistance should not affect other priorities covered by the Guarantee Fund.
Amendment 10
Recital 13
   (13) The inclusion of a grant component in this assistance is without prejudice to the powers of the budgetary authority;
   (13) Without prejudice to the powers of the budgetary authority, the grant component should be part of the multiannual financial framework of Community assistance and therefore subject to funds being available every year in the general budget ;
Amendment 11
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) The macro-financial assisstance paid from the budget of the European Union should be assessed according to the degree of sound implementation of all aspects of Community assistance during previous years as well as to the progress made in reforming the economy and stabilising the political situation. An evaluation of spending capacities should be carried out.
Amendment 12
Article 1, paragraph 4
   4. The Community financial assistance shall be managed by the Commission in close consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee and in a manner consistent with any agreement reached between the IMF and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
   4. The Community financial assistance shall be managed by the Commission in close consultation with the Political and Security Committee and the Economic and Financial Committee and in a manner consistent with any agreement reached between the IMF and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
Amendment 13
Article 1, paragraph 5
   5. The implementation of this assistance is conditional upon clearance in full by the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia of the outstanding due financial obligations of all public entities towards the Community and the European Investment Bank and upon the acceptance by the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia of responsibility by way of guarantee of those obligations that are not yet due.
   5. The implementation of this assistance is conditional upon clearance in full by the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia of the outstanding financial obligations of all public entities towards the Community and the European Investment Bank, upon the acceptance by the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia of responsibility by way of guarantee of those obligations that are not yet due and, as far as possible, upon the commitments made by the main donors being respected.
Amendment 14
Article 2, paragraph 1
   1. The Commission is empowered to agree with the authorities of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, after consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee, the economic policy conditions attached to the Community macro-financial assistance. These conditions shall be consistent with the agreements referred to in Article 1(4).
   1. The Commission is empowered to agree with the authorities of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, after consultation with the Political and Security Committee and the Economic and Financial Committee, the economic policy conditions attached to the Community macro-financial assistance. These conditions shall be consistent with the agreements referred to in Article 1(4).
Amendment 15
Article 2, paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The economic policy conditions attached to this assistance and referred to in paragraph 1 shall also conform to the monitoring mechanism and economic needs referred to in Council Regulation (EC) No 2666/2000.
Amendment 16
Article 2, paragraph 2
   2. The Commission shall verify at regular intervals, in collaboration with the Economic and Financial Committee and in coordination with the IMF, that economic policies in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia are in accordance with the objectives of this macro-financial assistance and that its conditions are being fulfilled.
   2. The Commission shall verify at regular intervals, in consultation with the Political and Security Committee and the Economic and Financial Committee and in coordination with the IMF, that economic policies in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia are in accordance with the objectives of this macro-financial assistance and that its conditions are being fulfilled. It shall report on this to the budgetary authority.
Amendment 17
Article 3, paragraph 1
   1. The loan and grant components of this assistance shall be made available to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in at least two instalments. Subject to the provisions of Article 2, the first instalment is to be released after the full settlement of the outstanding financial obligations of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia towards the Community and the European Investment Bank and on the basis of an agreement between the FRY and the IMF on a macro-economic programme that is supported by an upper credit tranche arrangement.
   1. The loan and grant components of this assistance shall be made available to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in at least two instalments. Subject to the provisions of Article 2, the first instalment is to be released after the full settlement of the outstanding financial obligations of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia towards the Community and the European Investment Bank and on the basis of an agreement between the FRY and the IMF on a macro-economic programme that is supported by an upper credit tranche arrangement and, if possible, before the 31 December 2001 at the latest .
Amendment 18
Article 3, paragraph 2
   2. Subject to the provisions of Article 2, the second and any further instalments shall be released on the basis of a satisfactory track record in the FRY's adjustment and reform programme and not earlier than three months after the release of the first instalment.
   2. Subject to the provisions of Article 2, the second and any further instalments shall be released on the basis of a satisfactory track record in the FRY's adjustment and reform programme and not earlier than three months after the release of the first instalment and, if possible, before 30 June 2002 at the latest. Before it releases the second instalment, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament on the implementation of the first instalment of assistance .
Amendment 19
Article 5
At least once a year the Commission shall address to the European Parliament and to the Council a report which will include an evaluation on the implementation of this Decision.
At least once a year, and before September , the Commission shall address to the European Parliament and to the Council a report which will include an evaluation on the implementation of this Decision based on the principles stated in recital 15a .
European Parliament resolution on the proposal providing macro-financial assistance to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (COM(2001) 277 - C5-0231/2001 - 2001/0112(CNS) )
P5_TA(2001)0397A5-0244/2001

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Commission proposal for a Council decision on providing macro-financial assistance to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (COM(2001) 277 ),

-  having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 308 of the EC Treaty (C5-0231/2001 ),

-  having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets, and the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (A5-0244/2001 ),

1.  Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.  Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;

3.  Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

4.  Asks to be consulted again if the Council intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

5.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.


COM in fruit and vegetables
European Parliament resolution on the report from the Commission to the Council on the COM in fruit and vegetables
P5_TA(2001)0398B5-0480/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to Articles 34(2) and 192 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,

-  having regard to Article 56 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables(1) ,

-  having regard to the report from the Commission to the Council on the state of implementation of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (COM(2001) 36 ),

-  having regard to its resolution of 16 June 2000 on support measures for nuts and locust beans(2) ,

-  having regard to its position of 26 October 2000 concerning amendments to the COM in processed fruit and vegetables(3) ,

-  having regard to its position of 15 February 2001 on the financing of quality and marketing improvement plans(4) ,

A.  whereas the abovementioned Commission report mentions a number of problems corresponding in general terms to those addressed in its abovementioned position of 26 October 2000,

B.  whereas, during the debates in plenary on the most recent amendments or extensions to certain measures in the fruit and vegetable sector, the Commission has many times undertaken, as part of a possible reform that would take account of the substance of the report currently being drawn up, to take action on the major problems such as the inadequate concentration of supply within producer groups, the adverse effects of concluding trade agreements with third countries and the question of support measures for nuts and locust beans,

C.  whereas, despite the fact that the Commission shows in its report that it is aware of the problems in the sector, it has not deemed it necessary at the present time to submit legislative proposals aimed at improving the functioning of the common organisation of the market,

D.  whereas, following the 1996 reform, producer groups are the main instrument of the common organisation of the market, yet only 40% of Community production is marketed through them; whereas this could infringe Article 34 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which stipulates that the common organisation must exclude any discrimination between producers and attain the objectives set out in Article 33,

E.  whereas, under Article 192 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, the European Parliament may, acting by a majority of its Members, request the Commission to submit legislative proposals for the purpose of implementing the Treaty,

1.  Recalls and reaffirms the principles and conclusions set out in its abovementioned position of 26 October 2000;

2.  Regrets that the Commission's report is incomplete and lacks recommendations and proposals;

3.  Calls, pursuant to Article 192 of the Treaty, on the Commission to submit proposals for improving the functioning of the common organisation of the market which take account of the principles and amendments adopted in connection with its position of 26 October 2000 mentioned above, in particular with the aim of encouraging the concentration of supply within producer groups not only at national but also at Community level, alleviating problems connected with operational programmes and funds, encouraging organic and high-quality production in accordance with standards that exceed those laid down in European directives, limiting the adverse effects of concluding trade agreements with third countries, improving the regulation of the markets and, in particular, establishing a permanent framework of support measures for nuts and locust beans, ensuring a transition by extending current support measures; considers that specific measures are necessary for regions where, for structural reasons, producer organisations are very weak;

4.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States.

(1) OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1.
(2) OJ C 67, 1.3.2001, p. 329.
(3) Texts Adopted, Item 6.
(4) Texts Adopted, Item 7.


Human rights in the world
European Parliament resolution on human rights in the world in 2000 and the European Union Human Rights Policy (11317/2000 - C5-0536/2000 and C5-0628/2000 - 2000/2105(INI))
P5_TA(2001)0399A5-0193/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the second EU Annual Report on Human Rights (11317/2000 - C5-0536/2000 ),

-  having regard to the report from the Commission on the implementation of measures intended to promote observance of human rights and democratic principles in external relations for 1996-1999 (COM (2000) 726 - C5-0628/2000 ),

-  having regard to Articles 3, 6, 11 and 19 of the Treaty on European Union and Articles 177 and 300 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,

-  having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its Optional Protocols, in particular Article 19, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Declaration on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (1967) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989),

-  having regard to the European Parliament's annual Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought,

-  having regard to its previous resolutions on human rights in the world, adopted on 16 March 2000(1) , 17 December 1998(2) , 12 December 1996(3) , 26 April 1995(4) , 12 March 1993(5) , 12 September 1991(6) , 18 January 1989(7) , 12 March 1987(8) , 22 October 1985(9) , 22 May 1984(10) and 17 May 1983(11) ,

-  having regard to the proclamation of the Charter of fundamental rights by the European Council in Nice on 7 December 2000,

-  having regard to its previous resolutions on respect for human rights in the European Union, in particular the resolution of 16 March 2000(12) ,

-  having regard to its resolutions of 16 March 2000 on countering racism and xenophobia in the European Union(13) and on the Commission communication: Countering racism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism in the candidate countries (COM(1999) 256 - C5-0094/1999 )(14) ,

-  having regard to its resolution of 15 March 2001 on the Commission communication on EU election assistance and election observation (COM(2000) 191 - C5-0259/2000 )(15) ,

-  having regard to its resolution of 19 December 1997 on the report from the Commission on the implementation of measures intended to promote observance of human rights and democratic principles (for 1995) (COM(1996) 672 - C4-0095/1997 )(16) ,

-  having regard to the Special Report (No 12/2000)(17) of the Court of Auditors on the management by the Commission of EU support for the development of human rights and democracy in third countries together with the Commission's replies,

-  having regard to its resolution of 17 December 1998 on the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on “The European Union and the external dimension of human rights policy: from Rome to Maastricht and beyond” (COM(1995) 567 - C4-0568/1995 )(18) ,

-  having regard to its resolution of 19 December 1997 on setting up a single coordinating structure within the Commission, responsible for human rights and democratisation(19) ,

-  having regard to its resolution of 20 September 1996 on the communication from the Commission on the inclusion of respect for democratic principles and human rights in agreements between the Community and third countries (COM(1995) 216 - C4-0197/1995 )(20) ,

-  having regard to its resolution of 5 September 2000 on a common Community diplomacy(21) and the communication from the Commission on the development of the external service (COM (2000) 456),

-  having regard to the Commission communication on the reform of the management of external aid (SEC (2000) 814),

-  having regard to the new ACP-EC Partnership Agreement signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000(22) ,

-  having regard to its resolution of 1 March 2001 on the Commission communication on the European Community's Development Policy (COM (2000) 212 - C5-0264/2000 )(23) ,

-  having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 381/2001 of 26 February 2001 on creating a rapid-reaction mechanism(24) and its position on the proposal for a Council regulation creating the Rapid Reaction Facility of 17 January 2001(25) ,

-  having regard to the results of the United Nations Conference on Human Rights in Vienna in 1993 and the conclusions of the United Nations Conference on Women and Development in Beijing in 1994,

-  having regard to the results of the 57th session of the UN Human Rights Commission,

-  having regard to Rule 163 of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Development and Cooperation (A5-0193/2001 ),

A.  whereas common values such as the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the rule of law form the foundation of the EU's objectives for peace, development and international cooperation in the framework of EU foreign policy and development policy,

B.  whereas Parliament's commitment to defending respect for human rights and its leading role in pressing for the development of EU human rights policies and in keeping human rights at the forefront of the EU agenda are clearly highlighted by the constant appeals from citizens concerned about violations of human rights, both inside and outside the EU,

C.  whereas, faced with ongoing conflicts, increasing poverty and continuous violations of human rights and democratic principles, in their various forms, in a large number of countries, the EU must conduct a more consistent crisis-prevention policy commensurate with its political and economic strength, and a bilateral and multilateral dialogue on issues concerned with human rights and the development of democracy in all its aspects,

D.  whereas the latest developments showing increasing threats to freedom of expression and the safety of journalists in many countries raise serious concern,

E.  whereas human rights are universal and the principle of national sovereignty should not deny the EU the right to seek to exert influence - and possibly to intervene - with a view to halting gross and systematic violations of human rights with grave humanitarian consequences,

F.  whereas human rights and democratisation in other countries are a matter of European concern, and whereas the Union must back up its policies, declarations and dialogue with cooperation projects that will lead to improvements on the ground,

G.  whereas abovementioned the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement introduces new areas for political dialogue and consultation such as conflict prevention and crisis management, good governance, the fight against corruption, enforced migration and gender equality, and strengthens the role of the Parliamentary Assembly in promoting the process of democracy,

H.  whereas the coherence and consistency of EU policy on human rights and democracy must be ensured by improved cooperation and dialogue between the EU institutions, and the role of Parliament in EU human rights policy should, in the light of the recent development of human rights policy instruments and mechanisms by the Council and the Commission, be targeted more towards controlling the policies of these institutions,

I.  whereas the results of the Human Rights Discussion Forums, and in particular the Conference in Venice held in May 2000 on the theme “The European Union and the central role of human rights and democratic principles in relations with third countries”, underlined the need to ensure the transparency and continuity of all available instruments to deal with human rights situations,

J.  whereas the abovementioned Commission report responds to the call from Parliament, Member States and partners in civil society for more accountability in the deployment of Community funds,

K.  whereas the Commission's reform of the management of external assistance aims to substantially improve the speed of delivery and the quality and profile (visibility) of European Union external assistance, since the exponential growth in the volume of aid has not been matched by appropriate changes in human resources, structures and management tools,

EU strategy for human rights

1.  Underlines the fact that respect for human rights should be an integral element of, and be prioritised in, all EU activities, including EU conflict prevention efforts, and that human rights matters must be addressed openly and efficiently in peace-building dialogues and in agreements with third countries; therefore calls on the Council and the Commission to draw up more focused, thematic common strategies for human rights (for example on children and on impunity), whereby the respective work programmes should systematically include sections on well-defined policies and actions aimed at promoting human rights and democracy;

2.  Welcomes the initiatives and stances taken by the Council under the Swedish Presidency, which led to the adoption, at the session of the UN Human Rights Commission in Geneva, of resolutions, decisions and declarations on issues raised by the European Parliament in its resolution of 18 January 2001(26) ;

3.  Regrets, nevertheless, that the Council did not submit a resolution on human rights in China, as requested by the European Parliament in its resolutions of 18 January and 5 April 2001(27) ;

4.  Considers that a strategy can only be useful if it is conceived in such a way as to add real value to EU policy on human rights and democratisation; is therefore in agreement in demanding: that there should be specific annual priorities which, even if limited, should be clearly defined and verifiable; that the setting of priorities should always go hand in hand with the indication of measures for the actual implementation of such priorities by the various Community institutions and the Member States; that the strategy as a whole should be subject to an annual review; and lastly, that the strategy should ensure that all the relevant policies of the Union are more coherent;

5.  Hopes that the guidelines adopted on 26 February 2001 by the Council will improve the effectiveness of the Union's common strategies, which are an important instrument in promoting in a more coherent manner the Union's interests, including respect for human rights and the strengthening of democracy and the rule of law;

6.  Calls on the Council and future Presidencies to develop a coherent EU approach based on these guidelines;

7.  Stresses the importance of the European Union's strategy and action at the 58th session of the UN Human Rights Commission, which will take place in Geneva in 2002;

8.  Notes that the European Union now has added responsibility owing to the United States' failure to be re-elected as a member of the UN Human Rights Commission;

9.  Stresses, furthermore, that, with a view to a long-term political strategy, the Union's key instruments - whether development cooperation, humanitarian assistance, human rights clauses in partnership and cooperation agreements, or deployment of funding under the Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights - should be informed by one common principle, namely the need to use all instruments in order to elicit the most beneficial changes and in a self-sustaining manner;

10.  Calls, therefore, on the Commission to ascertain systematically whether EU action is likely to promote democratisation and respect for human rights in third countries, on the basis of a sound country assessment and a systematic ex ante analysis of the relevant action, possibly with the support of internationally experienced experts and local and international non-governmental organisations; considers that the strategy and instruments must be adapted in a flexible manner, and mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation of results must be put in place;

11.  Calls, furthermore, on the Commission to include a reference to the need for campaigns for the promotion of human rights and democracy as an integral part of its country strategy papers and to forward these papers systematically to Parliament;

12.  Stresses the need for an efficient Union policy in the field of crisis management, which should be primarily based on the early use of all available tools for conflict prevention, such as the newly established rapid-reaction mechanism, a sustained political dialogue addressing human rights violations, and on close cooperation with the relevant international and regional organisations (UN, OSCE, OAU, etc.);

Conditionality and international diplomacy for human rights

13.  Reiterates its concern about the fact that many international agreements by which the EU is bound and which include human rights clauses do not include implementing rules governing the suspension mechanism, as provided for in the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, and insists, therefore, that adequate regulations should be adopted where necessary;

14.  Notes that, formally, the Commission has the exclusive right of initiative as regards the invocation of the human rights clause, but calls on the Commission to respect Parliament's requests concerning the initiation of consultations foreseen in the suspension process;

15.  Believes that criteria for the implementation of the clause need to be applied in a flexible manner; emphasises, however, that interpreting such clauses positively and flexibly should never become a justification or a pretext for inaction, especially in cases of gross violations of human rights, in cases of torture, which should never be negotiable;

16.  Reiterates that the current policies of "blind" sanctions must be replaced by policies of smart" sanctions more appropriate to the specific circumstances of each country; urges the Council and Commission to develop further tools and mechanisms to target assets illegally expropriated by corrupt heads of governments or their entourages and to promote coordinated international efforts to restore such assets to the country of origin as soon as a genuine process of democratisation has started;

17.  Calls on the Member States to ensure that their actions are consistent with the Union's measures in the field of external relations and, in particular, to suspend their bilateral cooperation with any country with which the Union has suspended its cooperation and to maintain their suspension for the same length of time as the Union;

18.  Believes that the political dialogue should reflect a real partnership in which both sides learn from each other; calls on the Council to come to an agreement with the partner countries in order to address questions concerning human rights and democracy, the rule of law, respect for minorities, good governance and gender equality in its dialogues on a systematic and regular basis;

19.  Calls on the Council to formulate concrete objectives for the human rights dialogue, to ensure that its results are regularly evaluated and that Parliament is systematically informed about the agenda and the results;

20.  Calls on the Council and the Commission to ensure the coherence of their external action, irrespective of the existence or otherwise of agreements and suspensory or implementing clauses on respect for human rights;

European Parliament and interinstitutional cooperation

21.  Decides to launch internal discussions on the way in which its competent bodies, starting with its committee responsible, currently monitor the issue of human rights and democracy, with a view to assessing whether and how these structures need to be improved;

22.  Recommends that procedures should be drawn up to allow a coordinated and coherent follow-up of individual cases of human rights violations raised in plenary resolutions, by the European Parliament's committee responsible and the Working Party on Human Rights and by interparliamentary delegations and joint Parliamentary committees;

23.  Calls on its committee responsible to appoint one or more of its Members to carry out a coordinated and consistent follow-up of individual cases of human rights violations raised in plenary resolutions or by its relevant parliamentary bodies and to guarantee a better coordination with the human rights work of other committees; considers that the representative(s) thus appointed could also act as its official representative for human rights in relation to the outside world, in particular the EU institutions and the international organisations;

24.  Calls on the Presidency to organise, with representatives of Parliament, pre-sessions of the Council's Working Group on Human Rights (COHOM) and meetings, with a view to the annual sessions of the UN Commission on Human Rights;

25.  Reiterates its call on the Council's Secretary-General/High Representative for the CFSP to present an annual report to the Council and Parliament on the results of the coordinating of the positions and policies of the Member States in international organisations, alongside the Union's position and policies on issues concerning human rights and democracy;

26.  Calls on the Council's Secretary-General/High Representative for the CFSP and on the Commission to discuss in advance with Parliament the annual orientations and priorities of the Union in conflict prevention; calls on the Commission to present to the Parliament an overall evaluation report of the implemented actions and projects under the rapid-reaction mechanism, notably by indicating the amounts involved, their nature and the partner concerned;

27.  Recalls that monitoring of human rights situations should be a primary task of the Policy Planning and Early Warning Unit and calls on the Secretary-General of the Council/High Representative for the CFSP to inform Parliament about the activities of the "horizontal issues" task force, which deals with human rights and conflict prevention;

28.  Calls on the Council to appoint a high-level liaison officer for external relations not only to attend, but also to participate as a speaker in the meetings of Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs; calls on the Council to respond in writing to Parliament's annual report on human rights;

29.  Stresses, furthermore, that joint reports to be drawn up by the EU's Missions and the Delegations concerned could substantially improve their coherence when assessing the human rights situation in third countries and should refer to Parliament's recommendations; considers that coordinated working methods should be extended to joint reporting to Member States" capitals and Parliament;

30.  Stresses that training of the EU Mission staff as well as Commission staff in RELEX, Development, ECHO and in particular in Delegations, should include a fundamental grounding in human rights and democracy issues; calls on the Commission to provide a sufficient budget for such training;

31.  Stresses that the second EU Annual Report on Human Rights, while providing broader information about EU activities, does not yet contain information on human rights activities conducted by the Member States (links to national human rights reports and human rights bodies), or on the follow-up to Parliament's initiatives and statements;

32.  Welcomes the effort put into the details and background information but encourages the Council to be more self-critical when reporting on policies and assessing the results, enabling democratic scrutiny, in particular by Parliament;

33.  Deplores the fact that the second EU Human Rights Discussion Forum in December 2000 coincided with Parliament's plenary session and insists on improved coordination between the institutions in order to ensure broad participation by Members of Parliament; calls on the Presidency and the Commission to organise future Human Rights Discussion Forums in Brussels in order to facilitate Parliament's participation;

34.  Calls on the Belgian Presidency and the Commission to focus the attention of the next Human Rights Discussion Forum on the sex trade, asylum, immigration and trafficking in human beings;

35.  Welcomes, in this respect, Commissioner Mr Patten's insistence at the informal Council meeting in Nyköping on 8 May 2001 on the need to apply the same criteria to non-member States as to Member States to implement a coherent human rights policy; also welcomes the Commission proposal submitted on 8 May 2001 on promoting human rights and democratisation in non-member States as a good basis for discussion;

36.  Calls on the Council to set up a website on human rights issues; welcomes, in this context, the progress made by the Commission's Relex DG; emphasises the usefulness of a human rights website run jointly by the EU institutions on the Europa server;

Dialogue with non-governmental organisations defending human rights and democracy

37.  Notes the importance of NGOs as partners of the EU and the governments of the Member States" governments in the debate on human rights and democracy policy and in the implementation of programmes in third countries; calls, therefore, on the Commission to involve the NGOs as partners, who can cooperate in the political dialogue and not simply as actors implementing EU human rights and democracy support actions; at the same time, considers it necessary that the Commission ensures that all the NGOs with whom it cooperates respect the universal standards of transparency and independence;

38.  Recommends establishing dialogue and consultation mechanisms between the NGOs and the EU institutions and looks forward to the Commission communication on strengthening the relationship with NGOs;

39.  Recognises the important contribution of the NGOs in providing Parliament with information for the preparation of its initiatives and statements, and in particular urgency resolutions; welcomes in particular the monthly Human Rights Contact Group meetings;

Cooperation with international organisations

40.  Congratulates the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson, on having given human rights a central role in the UN system by placing the emphasis on understanding human rights in their broadest sense - economic and social as well as civil and political rights;

41.  Subscribes to the target set by the United Nations Secretary-General of placing human rights at the heart of every aspect of United Nations activity and underlines the need for adequate funding for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights;

42.  Calls on the Council and Commission to cooperate with UN Treaty bodies and special mechanisms, to take into account their findings and recommendations, and to contribute further to consistent and cohesive EU action in the framework of international organisations; believes that structures and cooperation have to be developed in a way that guarantees the complementarity and compatibility of the common efforts; encourages EU Member States to accede to the relevant UN conventions as soon as possible;

43.  Reiterates its call on the Council and Member States to support the proposal made at UN level that countries acceding to UN human rights instruments should issue a standing invitation to all relevant UN Special Rapporteurs;

Implementation of human rights budget

44.  Recalls that Article 274 of the Treaty confers the sole responsibility for implementing the budget on the Commission and obliges it to implement the budget as established by the Budgetary Authority;

45.  Emphasises the importance of involving Parliament in laying down guidelines and monitoring the implementation of human rights and democracy programmes; calls on the Commission to discuss with the Parliament's human rights working group the annual policy priorities for human rights budget expenditure formulated within the context of an overall EU strategy;

46.  Welcomes the increase in the human rights budget (Chapter B7-70 ) for 2001 but notes with concern that the implementation figures of the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights are not satisfactory; insists that the European Union must deliver in accordance with its political commitments;

47.  Expects that the Commission's intention to define performance targets for the implementation of the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights will lead to improved results, will facilitate the evaluation process and will contribute to providing value for money for the taxpayer;

48.  Remains convinced that the European Development Fund needs to be integrated into the general budget of the European Union in order to increase transparency and improve the allocation of resources;

49.  Underlines that the management capacity of the programmes needs to be improved and the allocation of human resources reviewed, if necessary; insists that the implementation of the abovementioned Chapter B7-70 must reflect the importance that the European Parliament and the European citizen attach to the promotion of human rights and democracy;

50.  Calls on the Commission to forward to Parliament a progress report on the reform of the management of external assistance and to publish annually and in due time for the budgetary Authority to take it into account the report on the implementation of measures funded through the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights; considers that more progress must be made with regard to thoroughly assessing projects, by establishing guidelines and standards, notably concerning pertinence, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability, cost-effectiveness and the pros and cons of co-financing with other international partners;

51.  Welcomes the Commission efforts to decentralise and devolve the management of external assistance to the Commission delegations (and, where appropriate, the authorities of third countries) in order to improve the speed and quality of EU aid management; believes that the authorities of third countries should not be involved in decision-making regarding the granting of funds under the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights;

52.  Welcomes the efforts of EuropeAid with regard to transparency and customer service; recommends improving the human rights and democracy funding website by including selected projects and evaluation reports;

53.  Stresses the importance of standardising the implementation procedures as well as the symbols used by the organisations involved in providing EU aid;

54.  Recommends that the Commission establish a help-line and e-mail-box for information on the application procedure for grants and that it organise seminars concerning the system of Community grants to local NGOs, linked to the implementation of human rights and democracy micro-projects;

Development

55.  Points out that human rights include social, economic and cultural rights and the right to peace, a healthy environment and development, and that development is in fact the realisation of these rights;

56.  Stresses that human rights also include allowing the countries concerned to choose their own model of development in the context of stable political structures, for a socially and ecologically sustainable development, based on the economic and strategic potential of the country concerned;

57.  Congratulates the governments of the Member States which have unilaterally cancelled or reduced the debt of the poorest countries and encourages those which have not yet done so to follow their example;

58.  Deplores in particular the tragic wars, civil conflicts and inter-ethnic strife which are a major cause of human rights violations;

59.  Stresses the fact that human rights constitute a cornerstone of both the EU's development policy and the Cotonou Agreement;

60.  Stresses the necessity to end discriminatory provisions against women and girls in national legislation, and to ensure equal access for all, regardless of gender, to education (both primary and higher education), the labour market, health care, etc;

61.  Recalls its support for the setting of fair social standards in economic activity and its commitment to take part in efforts to combat the exploitation of labour throughout the world;

Respect for Freedom of Expression and Independent Journalism

62.  Urges the Council and Commission to give priority to press freedom issues and especially the security and independence of journalists;

63.  Calls on the Council and Commission always to take immediate and forceful action in the case of the disappearance, torture and intimidation of journalists anywhere in the world;

64.  Stresses the inalienable right of any journalist in detention to a fair trial and calls for such trials of journalists anywhere in the world to be made open to observers from the international community;

65.  Calls for concrete measures, including devoting sufficient resources to preventing attacks on journalists; calls for rigorous investigations into such attacks, to ensure that those responsible are brought to justice and victims obtain compensation; recalls that States have a positive duty to protect the media from attacks and to ensure that perpetrators do not enjoy impunity;

66.  Calls on the Council and Commission to take all possible measures with a view to ensuring that persons who are the victims of a violation of the freedom of the press do not for that reason suffer any additional obstacles to their movement in the EU or in third countries other than the country in question;

67.  Urges the Council and Commission to assist the media in trouble spots, using the expertise of local professionals and international journalism groups; calls for proposals to establish media help-centres in Colombia and East Timor, for example, providing opportunities for empowerment of local organisations in dealing with their difficulties;

68.  Recommends that the Council and Commission support the adoption and implementation of codes of practice for security in journalism;

69.  Condemns all forms of censorship and recommends that priority be given to promotion of freedom of expression, information and press freedom and public access to public documents; stresses that the principle of conditionality upon respect for human rights including freedom of expression, should be applied in political and economic relations with third countries;

70.  Stresses that there can be no democratic, modern state without a strong civil society and free media, in which every citizen has unrestricted access to information via independent media;

71.  Calls for a thorough analysis of existing obstacles to media freedom, including a review of all laws and regulations affecting access to information and the exercise of journalism, including libel, defamation and sedition laws;

72.  Calls for continued support for the monitoring of the implementation of freedom of expression legislation; in this respect recommends that the Council and Commission take relevant actions aimed at coordination with other international institutions, such as the United Nations, the OSCE Representative on Freedom of Media, NGOs, journalist associations and trade unions, as well as complementary measures;

73.  Calls for governments to provide open access to information and urges them to adopt freedom of information legislation in line with international standards to ensure their implementation;

74.  Deplores the violations of human rights committed by Russian troops in Chechnya; urges the EU Member States and members of the Council of Europe to bring the case before the European Court of Human Rights;

75.  Calls upon governments not to interfere in the media or abuse legal measures to limit media freedom; urges governments to combat excessive media concentration, review draconian and disproportionate defamation laws and ensure a fair and transparent licensing system as well as fair control of the distribution of information;

76.  Urges all countries that have taken measures to control and limit the use of modern technology to guarantee their citizens" right to freely use e-mail and the Internet without censorship;

77.  Requests governments to ensure the freedom of reporting, i.e. protection of whistleblowers who disclose information in the public interest and to guarantee by law the right of journalists everywhere not to reveal confidential sources of information;

78.  Expresses its concern over the gradual concentration of the media and the consequent danger of the disappearance of private and independent media in Russia; expresses the wish, in addition, that the difficult conditions which Ukrainian journalists have faced in the recent past may be resolved soon in order to ensure a free and independent press;

79.  Calls for governments to promote a positive economic and regulatory environment for the media, including actions which guarantee the labour and social rights of journalists, lower the financial burdens on the media (tax, licensing) and encourage the extension of telecommunication lines to rural and other under-serviced areas; recommends that government information should be made available through the Internet;

80.  Calls for appropriate measures to be taken to convert state-controlled broadcasting bodies into free public-service broadcasting bodies so as to reflect a pluralistic society; is therefore particularly concerned at the development in Russia of a tendency to curb reportage that criticises the government;

81.  Recommends that governments ensure open access to information and communication technologies and create the necessary legal, professional, technical and educational infrastructure for their use;

82.  Recommends that governments ensure transparency and fairness in the allocation of technical and financial resources in all public sector areas;

83.  Urges governments to take measures to combat undue commercialisation of media and to adopt anti-trust rules that recognise the special social, cultural and democratic value of information;

84.  Recommends that governments ensure effective access to the media for ethnic, religious, cultural and linguistic minorities and other vulnerable groups, and bear in mind that, under international law, States have a positive duty to promote the plurality and diversity of media sources;

85.  Urges the Commission to implement strategies to reinforce media quality through media training assistance programmes; welcomes and supports the efforts made by independent organisations of media professionals who are developing self-regulation of media for better accountability;

86.  Calls on the Commission to work towards the establishment of an ethical journalists" code at national level, so as to prevent the media being used as a channel of propaganda to promote violence, discrimination, intolerance and hatred;

87.  Stresses that the right to privacy and personal data protection should be meticulously protected, while combating cybercrime and other abuse of new technologies;

Human and minority rights in the context of EU Enlargement

88.  Urges the candidate countries to speed up the improvement of prison systems and the reform of the judiciary, criminal procedure and the penal code, where necessary, to shorten the length of pre-trial detention and to provide for state-guaranteed legal aid; calls upon the Commission to enhance institution-building measures, including training, to strengthen the democratic functioning of law enforcement bodies;

89.  Regrets that the Roma minorities in several candidate states are still subject to serious discrimination on the labour market, in education, contacts with authorities and civil society, and that Roma are subject to police assault and racist violence; considers the change in people's attitudes towards Roma to be of fundamental significance for the emancipation of Roma;

90.  Welcomes the development of action plans for social and political integration of the Roma by the governments of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia, but notes that no significant progress has been made; urges the government of Romania to follow this direction; urges the governments of these countries, the Council and the Commission to allocate adequate financial resources for the implementation of these strategies, and to closely associate the Roma communities and local authorities in the implementation, monitoring and adjustment of programmes and projects;

91.  Welcomes the attempts by the Romanian Government to abolish repressive legislation regarding sexual minorities, and stresses to Romanian legislators that basic human rights will at no point be open to negotiation;

92.  Welcomes the adoption of a National Programme for Social Integration in Latvia, and of similar programmes for the integration of the Russian-speaking population in the other Baltic States; urges the respective authorities to speed up the implementation of the programmes in terms of legal provisions, institutions and financial allocations;

93.  Calls on the Slovak government to improve its policy and cultural subsidies in favour of cultural diversity and the maintenance of national minorities" cultural heritage; calls on the Commission to monitor closely the implementation of the Law on the Use of Minority Languages in Official Communication;

94.  Calls on the Romanian government to implement fully the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child as a prerequisite for accession;

95.  Urges the Commission to explicitly raise human rights violations against the Kurdish population in the context of the Accession Partnership with Turkey; urges the Turkish government to ensure the safe return to south-east Turkey of more than 500 000 expelled Kurdish villagers; welcomes the government's reform intentions and urges their translation into concrete measures; calls on Turkey, as a further positive step, to sign and ratify the European Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities; urges Turkey to end torture and ill-treatment, as well as impunity for these human rights abuses; calls on Turkey to protect human rights defenders against harassment; calls upon Turkey to abolish the death penalty and to adopt, as a matter of urgency, measures to bring about a real improvement in the situation in prisons; calls on the Turkish Government to comply also with the judgement of European Court of Human Rights of 10 May 2001 that condemned Turkey for gross human rights violations in Cyprus;

96.  Calls on the Commission, in the context of political dialogue with Turkey, to insist on the need to take firm action to stop any further deterioration in human rights in the occupied part of Cyprus and particularly press freedom;

97.  Calls on the Turkish Government to repeal all judicial and other bureaucratic obstacles to Christian minorities, whose members are deprived of their legitimate rights to their properties in Turkey; considers it indispensable for minorities once again to have their own religious seminaries to educate their own clergy;

98.  Calls on the Council and the Commission to continue their efforts to improve the effectiveness of programmes concerning respect for democracy and human and minority rights in the candidate countries; asks for steps to be taken to facilitate the participation of social partners, NGOs, local authorities and representatives of national minorities in the programming, implementation and monitoring of these programmes;

Recommendations on other issues requiring urgent international action

99.  Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop a more active policy in the field of corporate social responsibility with regard to human rights, and reiterates its call to promote the comprehensive application of ILO conventions to prevent social exploitation, notably ILO Convention No.182 on the Worst Forms of Child Labour; underlines the need for an ongoing human rights impact assessment of this aspect of EU trade policy; stresses the importance of codes of conduct on human rights for business, such as the OECD guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and ILO Conventions on Labour rights;

100.  Calls on the EU, its Member States and other countries involved, to take adequate multidisciplinary measures against organised trafficking in human beings, in particular with respect to women and children, including the protection of victims, provision of information for potential immigrants on the risk of trafficking and exploitation, and utilisation of programmes such as TACIS;

101.  Urges all States to ratify without reservation and implement the abovementioned Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), including its additional Protocol, and to refrain from expressing reservations concerning the convention; urges States such as Saudi Arabia to halt discrimination after ratification; condemns in particular the practice of "honour killings" in Jordan and Pakistan; urges all governments to formulate legislation against all forms of domestic violence and to refrain from invoking religious or cultural considerations to avoid obligations in this respect;

102.  Denounces the existence of obscurantist regimes which, particularly in Afghanistan, defend archaic forms of mental and physical violence and disregard the most basic human rights, particularly those of women;

103.  Denounces in particular the introduction of a yellow badge to be worn by non-Muslim citizens of Afghanistan and asks for the immediate withdrawal of this order;

104.  Calls upon the Presidency to play an active role in the upcoming UN-mediated peace talks with the Taliban and the other parties to the conflict in Afghanistan; underlines the need to build up international pressure against the regime and the countries supporting it, in particular Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates, by blocking all weapon deliveries and establishing trade embargoes; calls upon the Commission to take all necessary steps to help improve the situation of the Afghan refugees in Pakistan;

105.  Calls for the genital mutilation of women to be fully recognised as a human rights violation; urges the governments concerned to prohibit female genital mutilation and provide for the rehabilitation and treatment of victims; calls for suitable protection to be given to such women where they seek asylum owing to the threat of physical mutilation;

106.  Calls on the EU to put pressure on the UN to undertake a major international study on violence against children, with due regard to institutional and domestic violence, including remedies and rehabilitation; notes that the United States, together with Somalia, is the only country that has not yet ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child;

107.  Welcomes the conclusion and adoption of the Optional Protocol to the abovementioned Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflicts; calls on all EU Member States to ratify this Protocol without reservations and to adopt without reservation legislation preventing the recruitment and abduction of persons under 18 for military purposes, for instance in Sudan and Uganda; calls for the establishment of an effective Special Court in Sierra Leone to try those responsible for the gravest human rights abuses since 1991;

108.  Welcomes the guidelines to EU policy towards third countries on the death penalty; reiterates that the application of the death penalty to persons under 18 years and the mentally retarded contravenes the abovementioned International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as well as customary international law; calls on all States to introduce a moratorium on executions with a view to completely abolishing the death penalty and reiterates firmly its request to the United States, China, Saudi Arabia, Congo, Iran and other States to immediately end all executions;

109.  Calls on the EU to work urgently for a strong Convention on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearances, expresses its deepest concern at the alarming rate of disappearances in Chechnya and Algeria and calls on Colombia to dismantle its paramilitary groups, and end impunity;

110.  Welcomes the adoption of the guidelines to EU policy towards third countries on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, as a decisive step to make the eradication of torture a key objective of the EU human rights policy; encourages Member States and institutions to apply the guidelines strictly; calls on the EU to take measures to guarantee access for the UN rapporteur on torture to countries covered by EU partnership and association agreements;

111.  Urges all States that have not yet done so to ratify the UN Convention Against Torture as a matter of priority; calls on all States to promote the drafting and adoption of a strong Optional Protocol to the UN Convention Against Torture, providing for unlimited inspection of places of detention based on the principle of "any time, any place"; invites all governments to recognise the competence of the UN Committee Against Torture to examine individual complaints and urges them rapidly to establish an effective procedure for the investigation of torture allegations according to UN standards;

112.  Welcomes the fact that 139 States signed the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) before the 31 December 2000 deadline, and that by that time 27 States had ratified; calls upon all States to ratify before the end of this year; and calls upon all States to continue to support the work of the existing International Criminal Tribunals;

113.  Reiterates its call upon all States to end repression and discrimination against peaceful religious and philosophical minorities; urges, in particular, China to end the repression of the Falun Gong as well as its Islamic, Christian and Buddhist population, Russia, Georgia, Syria and many other States to lift their ban on Jehovah´s Witnesses, Ukraine to stop discrimination of Greek-Catholics, Armenia to counter hostility against Muslims and Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan to end discrimination against Christians;

114.  Urges the EU and its Member States to voice its concern regarding caste discrimination and to formulate strategies to counter this widespread practice, which is affecting 260 million people in India, with countries in South Asia and elsewhere, and in particular in the context of the World Conference Against Racism, to urge that caste discrimination and the dehumanising practice of "untouchability" be incorporated into the Declaration and Programme of Action of the World Conference Against Racism;

115.  Calls upon the EU to investigate to what extent its policies contribute to the abolition of caste-discrimination and the practice of untouchability in India;

116.  Stresses that homosexuals are still victims of discrimination, prejudice and denial of their basic human rights in countries all over the world, including some Member States and candidate countries such as Romania; calls upon the eighty countries in the world which still prohibit homosexuality in their domestic law to change this legislation without delay; urges those States which impose the death penalty on homosexuals to stop doing so immediately;

117.  Recognises that disabled people, in particular persons with intellectual impairment and persons with severe and multiple disabilities are particularly vulnerable to human rights abuses and that this matter requires serious attention by the EU institutions and by governments throughout the world;

118.  Asks the Member States to increase their support for the UN International Decade of the World's Indigenous Peoples, and the EU to support the UN/ECOSOC Indigenous Peoples" Permanent Forum so that it can become operational as soon as possible, as well as the rights of indigenous peoples for appropriate intellectual property laws and for an equitable benefit from the commercial use of their ancestral knowledge; urges all Member States to sign and ratify ILO Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples;

119.  Calls on the Member States - in this year of the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance - to take active measures to combat xenophobia and racism against refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants; urges all States to ratify without reservation the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime on Genocide and the Conventions on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination;

120.  Urges Member States to reaffirm their commitments under the 1951 Refugee Convention to protecting refugees and asylum-seekers, and to reverse the current negative policy-trends, signified by increased liability for carriers and stricter visa requirements; urges all states to adopt this Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees without delay; calls on the EU to accede to the 1990 International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families; calls on the EU and the Member States to gear up their asylum policy to the CFSP to ensure that no asylum-seekers will be sent back to their country of origin without sufficient guarantees for their personal security;

121.  Calls for Member States to support the right of genuine conscientious objection from military service and to identify those countries where such objection is not recognised;

122.  Calls upon all Member States to enact legally binding restrictive criteria for arms exports, based on their existing commitments under international law, incorporating as a minimum the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports; calls for restrictions on licensed production arrangements and the activities of arms brokers and shippers, and effective monitoring and verification of end-use undertakings; urges all States to provide for effective parliamentary scrutiny of arms exports and to improve public transparency through the publication of detailed annual reports on arms exports; calls on Member States to encourage others to adopt similar legally binding practices, unilaterally and through regional and international fora;

123.  Urges Member States to consider the fight against the spread of small arms a priority and to advocate the adoption of a comprehensive and effective action programme at the 2001 UN Conference on the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects,

124.  Calls on Member States to ban the manufacture, promotion, trade and use of police and security equipment for cruel, inhuman or degrading purposes or with medical effects that are not fully known;

125.  Condemns the actions of terrorists who, through murder and intimidation, deprive people in many countries of their right to life and to freedom of expression;

126.  Urges all states to take practical steps to protect humanitarian aid workers and human rights defenders against all forms of aggression and, when such acts occur, take steps effectively to investigate them and prosecute the perpetrators; recalls the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders as adopted on 9 December 1999 and stresses that EU embassies and offices in third countries should monitor the activities of local human rights organisations and defenders and intervene to support and protect these whenever necessary; encourages the EU to support legally, politically and financially those NGOs which, through non-violent means, stand up for the protection of human rights defenders in other countries;

127.  With reference to the recent session of the UNCHR in Geneva which was also attended by Members of Parliament, recalls its resolution on the preparation of the meeting, and cannot help but regret the absence of Member State action with regard to co-sponsoring a resolution on China; welcomes the active participation of Member States and the European Commission; congratulates those Member States elected to the UNCHR; notes with regret that the US for the first time failed to be re-elected into the UNCHR; urges the Council and the Commission to ensure that those Member States represented in the UNCHR strictly apply the criteria defined by the EU irrespective of the country concerned;

128.  Calls on the European Union to take on a very much more active leading role on human rights questions - not only in relation to the United Nations, but also in all bilateral talks;

o
o   o

129.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Council of Europe, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the United Nations Organisation, the governments of the accession candidate countries and the governments of the countries referred to in the resolution, as well as the EU offices of the leading non-governmental organisations on human rights.

(1) OJ C 377, 29.12.2000, p. 336.
(2) OJ C 98, 9.4.1999, pp. 267 and 270.
(3) OJ C 20, 20.1.1997, p. 94.
(4) OJ C 126, 22.5.1995, p. 15.
(5) OJ C 115, 26.4.1993, p. 214.
(6) OJ C 267, 14.10.1991, p. 165.
(7) OJ C 47, 27.2.1989, p. 61.
(8) OJ C 99, 13.4.1987, p. 157.
(9) OJ C 343, 31.12.1985, p. 29.
(10) OJ C 172, 2.7.1984, p. 36.
(11) OJ C 161, 10.6.1983, p. 58.
(12) OJ C 377, 29.12.2000, p. 344.
(13) OJ C 377, 29.12.2000, p. 366.
(14) OJ C 377, 29.12.2000, p. 376.
(15) Texts Adopted, Item 8.
(16)OJ C 14, 19.1.1998, p. 399.
(17) OJ C 230, 10.8.2000, p. 1.
(18) OJ C 98, 9.4.1999, p. 267.
(19) OJ C 14, 19.1.1998, p. 402.
(20) OJ C 320, 28.10.1996, p. 261.
(21) Texts Adopted, Item 4.
(22) OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3.
(23) Texts Adopted, Item 12.
(24) OJ L 57, 27.2.2001, p. 5.
(25) OJ C 262, 18.9.2001, p. 141.
(26) OJ C 262, 18.9.2001, p. 233.
(27) Texts Adopted, Item 16.


Fundamental rights in the EU (2000)
European Parliament resolution on the situation as regards fundamental rights in the European Union (2000) (2000/2231(INI))
P5_TA(2001)0400A5-0223/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,

-  having regard to the second annual report of the European Union on human rights (11317/2000 - C5-0536/2000 ),

-  having regard to the motion for a resolution by the following Members: Staes, Jillian Evans, Knörr Borràs, Maes, Bautista Ojeda, Hudghton, Nogueira Román, MacCormick, Ortuondo Larrea and Eurig Wyn on the protection and direct political representation of linguistic minorities in Friuli-Venezia Giulia, a region with a special statute (B5-0034/2001 ),

-  having regard to all relevant international conventions on the subject,

-  having regard to Articles 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union,

-  having regard to the reports drawn up by the specialised bodies of the Council of Europe and the European NGOs concerned,

-  having regard to the public hearing held on 21 March 2001 with the involvement of the national parliaments on the situation as regards fundamental rights in the EU and the establishment of a European area of freedom, security and justice,

-  having regard to Rule 163 of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Petitions (A5-0223/2001 ),

Purpose of the annual report and action to be taken
Purpose

1.  Notes that the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which was proclaimed on 7 December 2000, constitutes a synthesis of the fundamental values upon which the European Union is based and a document to which Articles 6(2), 7 and 29 of the EU Treaty (concerning the establishment of a European area of freedom, security and justice) must in future implicitly and necessarily refer;

2.  Notes that, following the proclamation of the Charter, it is therefore the responsibility of the EU institutions to take whatever initiatives will enable them to exercise their role in monitoring respect for fundamental rights in the Member States, bearing in mind the commitments they made in signing the Treaty of Nice on 27 February 2001, with particular reference to new Article 7(1) thereof;

3.  Notes that it is the particular responsibility of the European Parliament (by virtue of the role conferred on it under the new Article 7(1) of the Treaty of Nice) and of its appropriate committee to ensure (in cooperation with the national parliaments and the parliaments of the candidate countries) that both the EU institutions and the Member States uphold the rights set out in the various Chapters of the Charter;

4.  Notes that, accordingly, this resolution and the report to which it refers constitute an initial attempt (which is of necessity limited and incomplete for lack of adequate resources) to analyse, with reference to the new Article 7(1) of the Treaty of Nice, the situation as regards fundamental rights in the EU in the year 2000 from the perspective of the rights laid down in the Charter;

Action to be taken in the future
European Parliament

5.  Recommends that a permanent dialogue be established between the European Parliament and the Member States" parliaments, which are its natural partners, particularly as regards significant developments in national constitutions, law, policies and practices having an impact on the concept of, and respect for, fundamental rights in the EU;

6.  Recommends that a similar dialogue also be established between the European Parliament and the parliaments of the candidate countries;

7.  Recommends that the appropriate committees of the European Parliament should continuously consider the situation as regards the fundamental rights as listed particularly in the Charter and any infringements of those rights, so that such matters can be taken into account both in legislative activity and in interinstitutional dialogue;

8.  Recommends that the report on respect for fundamental rights in the EU be incorporated into the warning mechanism provided for in Articles 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union in accordance with the following principles:

   -
assignment of the permanent task of monitoring observance of the Charter to the committee responsible, a task in which the other committees concerned (which will forward observations to that committee in the course of the year) will be involved,
   -
the drawing up, on behalf of its competent committee, of an annual report:
   (a)
by a working group including the rapporteurs of the previous, current and following years as well as, for opinion, the rapporteurs of the committee responsible for foreign affairs as regards candidate countries and other committees concerned as regards matters within their competences, and
   (b)
on the basis of the observations gathered by specialist bodies, NGOs and the networks concerned, emphasising in particular the achievements and the failures recorded in the course of the reference year,
   -
consideration of this report at an annual meeting between representatives of the European Parliament and those of the relevant committees of the national parliaments,
   -
the adoption of the annual report each year (at the latest during the July part-session), while allowing only the committee responsible and the committees asked for opinions to amend both the motion for a resolution and the detailed report upon which it is based; Parliament will consider the report and the draft recommendations in plenary, in accordance with a procedure modelled on the assent procedure,
   -
the widest possible dissemination of the report, including on the Internet, and a high profile for the report on Parliament's website and those of the other EU institutions,
   -
the subsequent adaptation of the internal rules of the other EU institutions concerned;

9.  Recommends that a network be set up consisting of legal experts who are authorities on human rights and jurists from each of the Member States, to ensure a high level of expertise and enable Parliament to receive an assessment of the implementation of each of the rights laid down notably in the Charter, taking account of developments in national laws, the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and the European Court of Human Rights and any notable case law of the Member States' national and constitutional courts;

10.  Recommends that pilot projects necessary for this purpose be implemented and financial provision made for them as from 2002 and, in view of the major tasks which Parliament will be required to perform in monitoring compliance with the Charter, that Parliament's Secretary-General, taking account of the Parliament's draft budget for 2002, submit a proposal for providing the European Parliament's competent committee with the requisite administrative support for monitoring fundamental rights in the EU and in the applicant countries with a view to the annual report on the situation as regards those rights, and that the Directorate-General for Research develop the tools needed as quickly as possible;

11.  Recommends that information tools be developed (databases, helplines, legal aid), in agreement with relevant institutions in the Member States and NGOs operating in the field of fundamental rights, enabling all persons to gain access to the information they require, and that appropriate pilot schemes be implemented and funded with effect from 2002;

12.  Recommends that one or more contact networks and a civil society discussion forum be set up, as provided for in the Council Declaration marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;

Council

13.  Recommends that the Council be involved in the above initiatives for the purpose of preparing its annual report on the human rights situation in the European Union;

14.  Recommends that sound practices in the area of fundamental rights be identified in order for a high degree of harmonisation in the protection of these fundamental rights in the EU to be achieved and any threatened infringement of those rights to be prevented;

Commission

15.  Recommends that a European day to be held to commemorate the Union Charter of Fundamental Rights and the text of the Charter distributed to all children;

16.  Recommends that a Commissioner be appointed within the Commission with responsibility for fundamental rights and the implementation of policies linked to the establishment of an area of freedom, security and justice;

17.  Recommends that the Commission reorganise the departments responsible for monitoring the Charter and for ensuring that its principles are observed when defining and implementing Union and Community law;

I. Respect for human dignity (Articles 1 to 5)
Right to life

18.  Recommends that Member States step up the fight against terrorism, using all the instruments available to a country governed by the rule of law, in order to safeguard democracy and protect the freedom and the physical and moral integrity of all citizens;

19.  Recommends that Member States implement the agreements concluded at the Tampere European Council (15-16 October 1999), in particular the agreements concerning the mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters, the simplification of the current extradition procedure and the detention and immediate handing over of persons in respect of whom a warrant for arrest has been issued;

Prohibition of torture and inhuman treatment
police

20.  Recommends that Ireland ratify the UN Convention against Torture and that Belgium, Ireland and the United Kingdom make the necessary declarations under Article 22 of the Convention recognising the United Nations Committee Against Torture as being competent to receive and examine individual complaints;

21.  Recommends that Member States pursue policies for the training and diversification of police staff and the exchange of best practice at European level;

22.  Recommends that Member States ensure that persons arrested and detained at police stations have immediate access to legal and medical assistance and, if necessary, to an interpreter;

23.  Recommends that Member States set up independent authorities to investigate police activities in those Member States where such authorities do not yet exist;

prisons

24.  Recommends that Member States improve living conditions as a matter of urgency, particularly as regards access to medical care and activities (including study and vocational training) in prisons, reaffirm the priority to be given to rehabilitation and improve training of prison staff;

25.  Recommends that Member States identify and introduce alternatives to short prison sentences wherever possible;

26.  Recommends that Member States reduce periods of custody to a minimum and restrict the use of solitary confinement;

27.  Recommends that Member States introduce administrative and/or financial penalties for minor offences, by advocating alternative penalties such as community service and by doing all they can to develop open or semi-open prisons and by granting conditional release;

28.  Recommends that Member States pay special attention to special vulnerable categories of prisoner:

   -
minors, for whom prison must be a last resort, with special accommodation provided;
   -
pregnant women and mothers of very young children, who should enjoy conditions more suited to their needs and to the needs of their young children;
   -
mentally ill prisoners, who should be given special medical supervision;
   -
disabled persons, who should have access to services appropriate to their disability;
   -
persons with drug-addiction problems, who should be able to follow non-compulsory detoxification and treatment programmes;

29.  Recommends that Member States adopt prison laws which ensure that prisoners have a right of appeal in disciplinary matters and can exercise their civil and political rights, and set up external inspection and assessment bodies for prisons with links to the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment;

30.  Recommends that Member States set up a European unit for cooperation and exchange of best practice on prisons in the European Union;

31.  Recommends that Member States limit detention of asylum seekers to exceptional cases and only for the reasons set out in the UNHCR Guidelines on Applicable Criteria and Standards relating to the Detention of Asylum Seekers;

protection of refugee minors

32.  Recommends that Member States provide better protection for unaccompanied minors, including the assistance, from the earliest possible moment, of a guardian or a legal advisor and the presence of staff who are qualified to deal with the specific requirements of minors;

psychiatric internment

33.  Recommends that Member States adjust their legislation and practices, where necessary, so as to ensure strict respect for criteria governing involuntary internment, appeals procedures, use of special treatments and internment conditions in general;

Prohibition of slavery and forced labour
trafficking in human beings

34.  Recommends that Member States ratify, if they have not yet done so:

   -
the Additional Protocol to the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women of 6 October 1999;
   -
the new UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime signed on 15 December 2000;
   -
The Hague Convention of 5 October 1961 concerning the powers of authorities and the law applicable in respect of the protection of minors;
   -
the Additional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography adopted on 25 May 2000;
   -
the ILO Convention on the worst forms of child labour adopted on 17 June 1999;
   -
the European Convention on the Exercise of Children's Rights of 25 January 1996;

35.  Recommends that Member States make trafficking in human beings a specific offence under their criminal law, in connection with the implementation of the forthcoming Council Framework Decision on combating trafficking in human beings(1) ;

36.  Recommends that Member States adopt, in cooperation with the EU and the countries of origin of victims of trafficking:

   -
information and prevention programmes for potential victims of trafficking in human beings and domestic slavery,
   -
national action plans to combat trafficking in human beings and domestic slavery,
   -
measures to introduce a special helpline and to devise rehabilitation programmes to assist victims of trafficking in human beings and domestic slavery;

37.  Recommends that Member States strengthen their controls and judicial cooperation policy through harmonisation of laws;

38.  Recommends that Member States adopt a legally binding instrument designed to ensure suitable protection for the victims of trafficking in human beings, which should be recognised as a ground for "persecution";

39.  Recommends that Member States grant temporary residence permits on humanitarian grounds to victims of trafficking in human beings and domestic slavery for the duration of the inquiry and the judicial procedure to encourage them to cooperate with the authorities and assist in the prosecution of offenders;

40.  Recommends that Member States introduce tighter controls on recruitment in sectors involving children and provide expert medical and psychological support for minors who are victims of sexual abuse;

41.  Recommends that Member States extradite traffickers in human beings and confiscate the proceeds of their criminal activities to finance a European compensation fund for victims;

domestic slavery

42.  Recommends that Member States make domestic slavery a specific offence under their criminal law;

43.  Recommends that Member States grant visas to service staff working in embassies, subject to production of an employment contract, and allow them freely to change employers;

44.  Recommends that Member States amend the Vienna Convention of 18 April 1961 on Diplomatic Relations to provide for diplomatic immunity to be waived in the event of human rights abuses resulting from acts carried out by diplomats in their private lives;

45.  Recommends that Member States combat domestic slavery in connection with the implementation of the forthcoming Council framework decision on combating trafficking in human beings referred to above;

II. Freedoms (Articles 6 to 19)
Protection of privacy and personal data

46.  Recommends that the Council, Commission and Member States take the necessary action to protect the general public against the intrusions of extra-legal communications interception systems such as the Echelon system;

47.  Recommends that the Council and the Member States bear in mind that, with regard to the revision of Directive 97/66/EC, the interception and storage of data concerning traffic and location in electronic communications are entirely exceptional measures which must be based on a specific law which is accessible to the general public, be authorised by the judicial or competent authorities, be of limited duration, and be proportionate and necessary within a democratic society; points out that, under the European Convention on Human Rights and pursuant to rulings issued by the Court of Human Rights, any form of wide-scale general or exploratory electronic surveillance is prohibited;

48.  Recommends that the Member States apply:

   -
the United Nations guidelines for the regulation of computerised personal data files of 14 December 1990, and in particular the principles of lawfulness, fairness, accuracy, access by the persons concerned, non-discrimination, security and sanction;
   -
the Council of Europe Recommendation R(1999) 5 on guidelines for the protection of individuals with regard to the collection and processing of personal data on information highways;

49.  Recommends that Member States transpose European Parliament and Council Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data(2) , so that the EU will have a common legal platform in this area;

50.  Recommends that the Union equip itself with a binding legal instrument which offers, in areas within the second and third pillars, guarantees equivalent to those established under Directive 95/46/EC;

Freedom of thought, conscience and religion

51.  Recommends that the Member States apply, if they have not yet done so:

   -
Council of Europe Recommendation 1202 (1993) on religious tolerance in a democratic society;
   -
Council of Europe Recommendation 1396 (1999) on religion and democracy;

52.  Recommends that the Member States focus in particular on the illegal or criminal activities sometimes carried out by cults, which jeopardise the physical and mental integrity of individuals, in particular by means of:

   -
information and awareness campaigns by specialised independent human rights bodies to ensure that anyone may decide freely whether to join or leave a religious or spiritual movement;
   -
changes to legal, fiscal and criminal law provisions designed to counteract the illegal activities of some cults;

53.  Recommends that Greece should observe strictly the right to conscientious objection, without reference to any religious criteria, and in particular that the Member States concerned should offer an alternative to military service of equal duration, which should not be turned into a punitive form of civilian service;

Freedom of expression and information

54.  Recommends that the Member States ratify the European Convention on Transfrontier Television of 5 May 1989, if they have not yet done so;

55.  Recommends that the Member States apply the Council of Europe recommendations:

   -
of 30 November 1997 on the media and the promotion of a culture of tolerance (R(97)21);
   -
of 22 November 1994 on measures to promote media transparency (R(94)13);

56.  Recommends that the Member States observe scrupulously the right of journalists not to disclose their sources of information, in accordance with the Council of Europe recommendation of 8 March 2000 on the rights of journalists not to disclose their sources of information (R(2000)7);

57.  Recommends that the Member States display particular vigilance as regards quasi-monopolies or extreme concentrations of ownership in the audiovisual and written press, which are barriers to the expression of pluralism, and establish independent regulatory authorities in those Member States where such authorities do not yet exist;

Right to asylum and rights of citizens from third countries

58.  Recommends that the Member States ratify the following international and European conventions, if they have not yet done so:

   -
Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons of 28 September 1954;
   -
Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness of 30 August 1961;
   -
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 10 December 1984;
   -
Protocol No 4 to the European Convention on Human Rights of 16 September 1963;
   -
Protocol No 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights of 22 November 1984;
   -
additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition of 15 October 1975;

59.  Recommends that the Member States adopt promptly a common policy on asylum procedures, reception of asylum seekers and refugee status that strictly respects the rights of asylum seekers and that is based on a non-restrictive interpretation of the Geneva Convention including persecution by non-state agents and gender-related persecution and on UNHCR recommendations and conclusions, while affording those granted the right of asylum a swift, efficient and just administrative procedure and full integration;

60.  Recommends that the Member States consider the possibility of granting subsidiary protection to persons who are not protected by the Geneva Convention but who must not, for humanitarian reasons or because they would be in grave danger, be sent back to their country of origin (victims of trafficking in human beings and domestic slavery);

61.  Recommends that the Member States ensure that their asylum policies as well as their border and entry policies respect the principle of non-refoulement and be aware that at present the combination of the Dublin Convention rules and the “safe third country” and “safe country of origin” concepts, as well as rules on carrier sanctions and the lack of suspensive effect of certain appeal procedures, constitute a threat to this principle;

62.  Recommends an increase in EU financial aid to the UNHCR;

63.  Recommends that the Member States make the naturalisation procedure more flexible, so that residents of foreign origin who so desire may acquire full citizenship;

64.  Recommends that the Council adopt and the Member States implement without delay the draft directive submitted by the Commission and amended by Parliament on family reunification, in the interests of upholding the right to family life;

III. Equality between citizens (Articles 20 to 26)
Discrimination

65.  Recommends that the Member States transpose and implement swiftly the European directives adopted on the basis of Article 13 of the EC Treaty with the aim of combating all discrimination on grounds of sex, race or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation;

Measures to combat racism

66.  Recommends that the Member States ratify the following conventions, if they have not yet done so:

   -
ILO Convention concerning discrimination in respect of employment and occupation of 25 June 1958;
   -
UNESCO Convention against discrimination in education of 14 December 1960;
   -
Protocol No 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights of 4 November 2000;

67.  Recommends that the Member States swiftly adapt their criminal and civil anti-discrimination laws, in accordance with Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin(3) and make racism an aggravating circumstance in connection with sentencing for violent crimes;

68.  Recommends that the Member States set up independent bodies to support and assist victims of racism, where necessary, and introduce strategies to prevent and combat it;

69.  Recommends that the Member States implement jointly the legal and ethical measures necessary to punish use of the Internet for racist purposes and, in particular, sign the EuroISPA memorandum of understanding of 6 August 1997 concluded between European associations of Internet access and service providers;

Rights of national minorities

70.  Recommends:

   (a)
that Belgium, Ireland and Greece, sign and ratify and that Austria, France, Italy, Luxembourg and Portugal, ratify the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages of 5 November 1992,
   (b)
that Belgium and France sign and ratify and that Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Portugal, ratify the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of 1 February 1995;

71.  Recommends that the Member States honour their special duty to the various national minorities among the EU population and give due weight to their economic, social, political and cultural rights, in accordance with the above conventions;

72.  Recommends that the Member States significantly improve the situation of the Roma/Sinti, in particular by:

   -
combating all forms of discrimination against this minority, especially in the field of employment and housing;
   -
introducing educational facilities geared to the needs of Roma/Sinti children;
   -
increasing the number of parking sites available and introducing a European identity card for itinerants;

Equality between men and women

73.  Recommends that the United Kingdom sign and ratify and that Belgium, Germany, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and Sweden, ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women of 6 October 1999;

74.  Recommends that the Commission proceed swiftly with the enhancement and expansion of legislation, particularly by:

   -
updating existing European legislation on equal treatment of men and women on the labour market,
   -
extending this legislation to other areas of the life of society and not only those of employment, occupation and pay, by way of the adoption of a directive on equal treatment in order to guarantee equality between men and women,
   -
introducing appropriate penalties for non-compliance, including Treaty infringement procedures pursuant to Article 226 of the EC Treaty,
   -
mainstreaming the principle of equal treatment in legislation and policy pursuant to Article 3(2) of the EC Treaty,
   -
developing policies (e.g. on parental leave and part-time work) to enable and encourage men to do their share of care tasks;

75.  Recommends that the Member States ratify, if they have not yet done so, the Maternity Protection Convention of 15 June 2000;

76.  Recommends that the Member States introduce special laws on individualised social protection rights for women;

77.  Recommends that the Member States adopt national plans to promote more balanced participation of women and men in political decision-making, inter alia by encouraging political parties to introduce quota systems in their electoral lists;

78.  Recommends that the Member States promote the systematic collection and publication of comparable statistics at national and European level in order to gain a clearer picture of the involvement of men and women in all sectors of economic, social, political and cultural life;

Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation

79.  Recommends that the Member States include sexual orientation in Additional Protocol No 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights as one of the prohibited grounds for discrimination and extend the terms of reference of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance to include homophobia based on sexual orientation;

80.  Recommends that the Member States repeal all remaining discriminatory legislation concerning homosexuality and release from prison all persons jailed under such provisions, and calls in particular on Austria - in accordance with the ruling of the European Commission of Human Rights and the numerous appeals issued by the European Parliament - to revise the provisions concerning the age of consent;

81.  Recommends that the Member States prohibit discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and include it as an offence under the criminal or civil law of all Member States, and adopt appropriate employment-law measures to implement Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation(4) ;

82.  Recommends that the Member States introduce legislation in line with Directive 2000/78/EC, which forbids discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation in access to goods and services, health, housing, education and social protection; notes that to date only eight Member States have equivalent anti-discriminatory legislation;

83.  Repeal discriminatory laws against gays and lesbians in criminal codes of current Member States, as well as assuring that they will not ratify any accession of countries which have discriminatory laws against homosexuality, such as Romania's Article 200;

Non-marital relationships

84.  Recommends that Member States:

   (a)
amend their legislation in order to recognise non-marital relationships between persons of the same or the opposite sex and assign them equal rights,
   (b)
put the issue of mutual recognition of legally recognised non-marital relationships on the EU agenda;

85.  Recommends that the Member States introduce legislation which prohibits discrimination for long term co-habitants and provides the same judicial protection as for legally married couples;

Rights of children

86.  Recommends that the Member States ratify, if they have not yet done so:

   -
Protocol No 7 to the ECHR of 22 November 1984;
   -
the European Convention on the Adoption of Children of 24 April 1967;
   -
the European Convention on the Legal Status of Children born out of Wedlock of 15 October 1975;
   -
the European Convention on the Exercise of Children's Rights of 25 January 1996;

87.  Recommends that the Member States make paedophile acts and child pornography on the Internet specific offences under the criminal law of all Member States, in connection with the implementation of the forthcoming Council Framework Decision on combating the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography(5) ;

88.  Recommends that the Member States create and appoint an Ombudsman for children at European and national level to promote and safeguard the best interests of all children;

89.  Recommends that the Member States support the setting-up and continuing operation (including by means of public funding) of bodies which children may contact directly if they are suffering abuse;

90.  Recommends that the Member States ensure that all children present on their territory have access to education;

91.  Recommends that the Member States launch national information campaigns concerning the conditions governing international adoption aimed at professionals in the sector and applicants for adoption;

Rights of the elderly

92.  Recommends that the Member States ratify the revised European Social Charter of 3 May 1996, if they have not yet done so;

93.  Recommends that the Member States apply the United Nations Principles for Older Persons and include them in their respective national programmes;

94.  Recommends that the Member States adopt measures for the increasing numbers of elderly people in society, entitling older persons to equal participation at all levels and in all fields, whether social, cultural or political; considers that particular attention should be paid to employment, health and social protection;

95.  Recommends that the Member States recognise the right of every worker, at the time of retirement, to be able to enjoy resources affording him or her a decent standard of living, in accordance with the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers of 1989;

96.  Recommends that the Member States take account of ageing in government policies and practices in the field of employment, health and social protection;

Protection of the disabled

97.  Recommends that the Member States ratify, if they have not yet done so, the ILO Convention of 20 November 1983 concerning vocational rehabilitation and employment (disabled persons) and the revised European Social Charter, which guarantees the right to autonomy and social integration;

98.  Recommends that the Member States insert in Additional Protocol No 12 to the ECHR "disability" as one of the grounds for discrimination which must be avoided;

99.  Recommends that the Member States apply the United Nations standard rules on the equalisation of opportunities for persons with disabilities;

100.  Recommends that the Member States sign the revised European Code of Social Security, which guarantees the vocational retraining of invalids;

101.  Recommends that the Member States prepare the European Year of Disabled People in 2003, in line with the Commission proposal, and apply the multiannual action programme to combat discrimination (2001-2006), in order to raise public awareness in the Member States and give a higher profile to questions relating to disabilities;

102.  Recommends that the Member States give due weight to the importance of sign language and Braille for the integration of those who use them;

IV. Solidarity (Articles 27 to 38)
Fair working conditions

103.  Recommends that the Member States ratify the following conventions, if they have not yet done so:

   -
United Nations Convention on the Protection of the Rights of all Migrant Workers and Members of their Families of 18 December 1990;
   -
the revised European Social Charter of 3 May 1996;

104.  Recommends that the Member States comply strictly with the minimum work age of 15 years, particularly as regards family firms, home working and agriculture, and penalise infringements;

105.  Recommends that the Member States apply the criteria laid down by the Council of Europe for the fair remuneration of adult workers or minors;

106.  Recommends that the Member States improve the working conditions and remuneration of temporary or fixed-term contract employees, particularly in the services sector, and take general measures to combat bullying;

107.  Recommends that the Member States comply with the provisions requiring adequate notice of dismissal to be given in accordance with the provisions of the revised European Social Charter;

108.  Recommends that the Member States step up action to combat undeclared work;

Social protection

109.  Recommends that Germany and the Netherlands sign and ratify and that Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Spain, Finland, Greece, Luxembourg, Portugal and the United Kingdom ratify the revised European Social Charter of 3 May 1996;

110.  Recommends that the Member States ensure access to affordable quality health care for all, and in particular people on low incomes;

111.  Recommends that the Member States ensure that everybody who is living on their territory has access to health care;

112.  Recommends that the Member States comply strictly with, and penalise infringements of, the provisions of the revised European Social Charter and the European directive concerning the right to maternity leave as regards duration and payment, while also prohibiting dismissals during this period, including in the domestic work sector;

Combating exclusion

113.  Recommends that the Member States guarantee to meet the basic material needs of persons living in extreme poverty, penalise practices which lead to the marginalisation of such persons and vigorously pursue a strategy to reduce large-scale poverty in the EU;

114.  Recommends that the Member States adopt the policies necessary to provide decent housing for all those who do not have adequate resources, since lack of housing is one of the main causes of exclusion, and renovate run-down areas by encouraging high-quality architecture;

Consumer protection

115.  Recommends that the Council adopt a resolution defining the concept of the precautionary principle so as to arrive at a legal definition of this principle and the conditions under which it should be applied that is as precise and predictable as possible;

116.  Recommends that the European Union and its Member States adopt the measures necessary to step up scientific research in sectors which generate serious public concern, ensure the transparency and traceability of products, and provide consumer information;

V. European citizenship (Articles 39 to 46)
Right to vote and to stand as a candidate at elections to the European Parliament and municipal elections

117.  Recommends that the Member States ratify the following European conventions, if they have not yet done so:

   -
European Convention on the Participation of Foreigners in Public Life at Local Level of 5 February 1992;
   -
European Convention on Nationality of 6 November 1997;

118.  Recommends that the Member States introduce more transparent and more effective "governance" of European affairs, together with a genuine public information policy, in order to combat the growing public indifference reflected in the inadequate turnout at European elections;

119.  Recommends that the Member States provide better information about elections to citizens of the European Union, so that they can vote in European and local elections in their place of residence;

120.  Recommends that the Member States take all possible measures to improve participation in political life by third-country nationals legally resident in EU territory;

121.  Recommends that the Member States extend voting rights to citizens of third countries who are long-term residents of the European Union;

122.  Recommends that the Member States extend the right to vote and to stand in municipal and European elections, which Article 19 of the EC Treaty grants to citizens of the European Union, to all non-Union citizens who have been legally resident on their territory for at least three years;

Freedom of movement and of residence

123.  Recommends that the Commission, the Council and the Member States take all action necessary pursuant to Article 14 of the EC Treaty to ensure that free movement of persons is fully achieved;

124.  The new Italian Parliament honour the promise of the previous Italian Government swiftly to repeal the transitional Article XIII of the Italian Constitution;

125.  Recommends that the Member States abolish any restrictions (including ones of a constitutional nature) which prevent the free movement of citizens within their own country; individual laws which impose such restrictions (such as those relating to the members of former reigning families) must be regarded as illegal and as contrary to EU legislation and case law;

126.  Recommends that the Commission rapidly revise existing rules, inter alia so as to:

   -
make it easier for students, researchers and retired persons to enjoy the right of residence;
   -
overcome the difficulties regarding freedom of residence and movement faced by migrant workers, with particular regard to social security benefits and the acquisition of pension rights;
   -
ensure protection of family life for members of the families of Union citizens;
   -
extend the right of freedom of movement and residence to third-country nationals who have been legally resident on the territory of a Member State for at least three years;

127.  Recommends that the Member States coordinate more closely their policies on expulsion on grounds of public order or public health, with due regard for the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities;

128.  Recommends that the Member States draw up a European Constitution, to be devised by a Convention and adopted by citizens, with the Charter as a preamble and serving as a genuine social contract that will guarantee the vital requirements of efficiency, transparency and democracy and will make the European Union more accessible;

129.  Recommends that in addition to making the Charter into a binding instrument and in order to guarantee a coherent system for protecting fundamental rights throughout Europe, the Member States take the measures necessary to enable the EU to obtain legal personality and to become party to the European Convention on Human Rights;

Right to good administration

130.  Recommends that codes similar to the Code of Good Administrative Conduct proposed by the European Ombudsman be adopted in the near future by all EU Institutions and decentralised bodies;

131.  Recommends that the principle of public service neutrality be included in the codes of good conduct adopted by the Member States and European Institutions, together with the principles of fairness and impartiality which should guide any administration;

Right of access to documents

132.  Recommends that the Member States strictly implement European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents(6) ;

VI. Justice (Articles 47 to 50)
Right to a fair trial

133.  Recommends that the Member States implement Council of Europe Recommendation on the freedom to exercise the profession of lawyer of 25 October 2000 (R(2000) 21);

134.  Recommends that the Member States speed up legal proceedings, which are too lengthy in some Member States, as stressed by the European Court of Human Rights, and increase the general efficiency of the public administration of justice, in particular by using new information technologies;

135.  Recommends that the Member States monitor and, if necessary, penalise delays or intransigence on the part of national administrations in complying with judgments handed down;

136.  Recommends that the Member States ensure that judgments of the European Court of Human Rights are implemented without delay by the national courts and that national laws are brought into line with both the ECHR and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights;

137.  Recommends that the Member States reform the procedures for gaining access to legal aid in all sectors and for all persons without adequate resources, without restrictions of nationality or place of residence, and significantly improve conditions for access to competent interpreting services free of charge;

Presumption of innocence and right of defence

138.  Recommends that the Member States guarantee the principle of the presumption of innocence, including in matters relating to the prevention of terrorism and, in general, adopt all measures to restrict detention in custody to a minimum;

139.  Recommends that the Member States agree common minimum standards for certain aspects of procedural law, in particular rules covering pre-trial orders and the rights of the defence, in order to guarantee a common level of fundamental rights protection throughout the EU;

o
o   o

140.  Expresses the intention that the substance of this resolution should not in any way limit the future interpretation and development of the rights, freedoms and principles for citizens within the European Union and the obligations and responsibilities of the Member States as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;

141.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Communities, the European Court of Human Rights, the European Ombudsman, the Council of Europe and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the candidate countries.

(1) 2001/0024(CNS) , Position of the European Parliament of 12 June 2001, Texts Adopted, Item 5.
(2) OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, p. 22.
(4) OJ L 303, 2.12.2000, p. 16.
(5) 2001/0025(CNS) , Position of the European Parliament of 12 June 2001, Texts Adopted, Item 4.
(6) OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.


Death penalty in the world
European Parliament resolution on the death penalty in the world and the introduction of a European Day against the Death Penalty
P5_TA(2001)0401RC-B5-0484/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to its previous resolutions on the death penalty,

-  having regard to its resolution of 14 May 1998(1) on the trade of human organs transplanted from executed people in the People's Republic of China,

-  having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed on 10 December 1948, and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed on 4 November 1950,

-  having regard to Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union,

-  having regard to the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights which was proclaimed at the Nice European Council on 7 December 2000 and, in particular, Articles 2 and 19 thereof,

-  having regard to the call by the presidents of national and international parliaments for the abolition of the death penalty signed at the World Congress against the Death Penalty on 22 June 2001 in Strasbourg,

-  having regard to its resolution of 5 July 2001 on Human Rights in the World(2) in 2000 and the European Union's policy on human rights,

-  having regard to the previous resolutions of the UN Commission on Human Rights,

A.  reiterating that the abolition of the death penalty, which is iniquitous, degrading and contrary to the universal principles of justice, is essential to the affirmation of human dignity and for the progressive development of human rights, the first of which is the right to life,

B.  whereas the death penalty is carried out in thirty-eight of the US States, often unfairly against the innocent, the poor, minorities, the mentally ill, the mentally retarded and juveniles,

C.  congratulating the Swedish Presidency on its excellent and exemplary efforts to implement the EU guidelines on the death penalty, and underlining that this question should continue to be one of the highest human rights priorities under the Belgian Presidency,

D.  regretting, nevertheless, that according to Amnesty International during the year 2000 at least 1,475 prisoners were executed and 3,058 individuals were sentenced to death; stressing that 88% of these executions took place in only four countries: China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United States of America; regretting also that amongst those executed there were many who had not reached the age of majority at the time of their crime or were mentally handicapped,

E.  stressing in this light the importance of the first World Congress Against the Death Penalty, which took place in Strasbourg on 21, 22 and 23 June 2001,

F.  concerned at the high number of miscarriages of justice leading to the application of the death penalty, as exemplified by the case of Joaquín José Martínez, who was recently acquitted after spending several years awaiting execution,

1.  Supports the "Strasbourg Appeal" of 22 June 2001 for the abolition of the death penalty and for a worldwide moratorium on executions to be implemented without delay;

2.  Once more strongly condemns the use of the death penalty - which currently continues to be applied in 87 countries -, particularly in the case of executions of minors or mentally handicapped people;

3.  Proposes that a European Day against the Death Penalty be introduced, as the ultimate means of exerting pressure for the death penalty to be abolished in those countries where it continues to exist;

4.  Commits the Belgian Presidency of the Council to reintroducing and this time bringing to a vote in the United Nations General Assembly of September 2001 a resolution on the abolition of the death penalty and to taking all steps necessary to obtain its adoption;

5.  Regrets the resumption of executions under federal law in the United States after a de facto moratorium of 38 years; calls on the USA to suspend any further executions and to respect the prohibition of the death penalty, as enumerated in several international instruments, against juvenile defendants, as well as the mentally handicapped; calls on the USA to withdraw forthwith its reservation concerning Article 6 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights;

6.  Calls on the Commission and the Council to make full use of the items in the 2001 budget set aside for the promotion of democracy and human rights, treating as a matter of priority and urgency any Community initiative aimed at achieving a moratorium on, and repeal of, the death penalty and giving practical support to all non-governmental organisations acting to this end;

7.  Calls on the Commission to present to Parliament regular reports on the implementation of all the resolutions so far adopted;

8.  Calls on the Russian Federation, Turkey and Armenia to fulfil their obligations as members of the Council of Europe and to abolish the death penalty without further delay;

9.  Is deeply concerned by the recent massive recourse to execution for common crimes and ideological and religious dissent, as a supposed instrument of social control, in thePeople's Republic of China, and the inhumanity and secrecy which characterise the executions by hanging in Japan,

10.  Calls on the Commission to consider the abolition of the death penalty and a universal moratorium on executions as an essential element in relations between the European Union and third countries, and to take this issue into account in concluding agreements with third countries;

11.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, the Parliaments of the Member State, the governments of the countries referred to in this resolution which apply the death penalty, the UN Secretary-General and the Chairman of the UN Commission on Human Rights.

(1) OJ C 167, 1.6.1998, p. 224.
(2) Texts Adopted, Item 13.


Beijing's application to host the 2008 Olympic Games
European Parliament resolution on Beijing's bid to host the 2008 Olympic Games
P5_TA(2001)0402RC-B5-0487/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in the People's Republic of China (PRC),

-  having regard to the conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 19 March 2001, in which the Council expressed its concern at the serious human rights violations in the PRC,

-  recalling the city of Beijing's bid to host the 2008 Olympic Games,

-  recalling that the Charter of the Olympic Games states that Olympism has as a goal 'to place sport at the service of the harmonious development of humankind, with the objective of creating a peaceful society with the preservation of human dignity',

A.  whereas freedom of opinion and freedom to hold demonstrations in favour of democracy have been repressed for decades and are still being repressed, despite international protests,

B.  having regard to the repression of religious, ethnic and other minorities, in particular Tibetans, Uighurs and Mongolians and the Falun Gong movement,

C.  having regard to the frequent imposition of capital punishment, leading to over a thousand reported executions in China every year, as well as the widespread use of torture by the Chinese police and military forces,

D.  recalling that the PRC has still not ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,

E.  whereas the Chinese authorities have taken no significant initiatives on respect for human rights, despite the ongoing political dialogue between the EU and the PRC,

F.  concerned with regard to environmental and animal welfare issues in the PRC,

G.  stressing that the plans relating to Beijing's bid to host the 2008 Olympic Games would involve the destruction of a large part of the old city and the obligatory transfer of the inhabitants to the surrounding areas,

H.  recalling that the International Olympic Committee is due to designate, on 13 July 2001 in Moscow, the city that will host the 2008 Olympic Games,

1.  Invites the International Olympic Committee to establish guidelines to include respect for human rights and democratic principles to be applied as a general rule to host countries of Olympic Games,

2.  Regrets that the PRC clearly fails to uphold universal human, civil and political rights, including freedom of religion; believes therefore that this negative record and the repression in Tibet, in Uighuristan and South Mongolia, make it inappropriate to award the 2008 Olympic Games to Beijing;

3.  Urges the International Olympic Committee in any case to make a thorough environmental impact assessment with regard in particular to the recurrent water shortages, the impact of mass tourism and the social repercussions in the region surrounding Beijing;

4.  Invites the International Olympic Committee to reconsider Beijing's candidacy when the authorities of the PRC have made a fundamental change in their policy on human rights, and the promotion of democracy and the rule of law;

5.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Presidents of the parliaments of the Member States, and to the International Olympic Committee.


Human rights: UNGA special session on the rights of the child
European Parliament resolution on the EU positions in the Special Session on Children of the UN General Assembly
P5_TA(2001)0403RC-B5-0483/2001

The European Parliament,

-  recalling its previous resolutions on children's rights, in particular the resolution of 17 December 1998 on child soldiers(1) , the resolution of 28 January 1999 on the protection of families and children(2) and the resolution of 17 May 2001 on forced labour by African children(3) ,

-  having regard to the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which was ratified by 191 countries,

-  having regard to the EU-sponsored resolution on the rights of the child, which was adopted by the UN Commission on the Rights of the Child on 25 April 2001 (UNCHR resolution 2001/75),

-  having regard to the UN General Assembly's Special Session on the rights of the child to be held in New York in September 2001,

-  having regard to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which was proclaimed at the European Council at Nice on 7 December 2000, in particular Article 24 thereof, the Charter being a breakthrough for children's rights in the EU,

A.  whereas at the World Summit for Children in 1990 world leaders adopted a plan of action on behalf of the children of the world which contained far-reaching goals aimed at improving the health and development of children, including reducing mortality rates and malnutrition, and improving access to safe drinking water and sanitation,

B.  whereas new international standards and instruments enhancing child protection have been adopted, such as the Mine Ban Treaty of Ottawa, the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court, the Optional Protocols to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on (1) the involvement of children in armed conflict and (2) the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, and ILO Convention 182 on the Prohibition and Immediate Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labour,

C.  whereas, although the Convention on the Rights of the Child is almost universally ratified, its implementation leaves a great deal to be desired,

D.  whereas demographic, sociological, technological and scientific changes are creating problems which affect social and human development, such as poverty, social exclusion and the breakdown of family life, of which children are always the main victims,

E.  whereas, in spite of the International Convention, the situation of children continues to deteriorate in many countries, including certain countries in the EU,

F.  whereas 10 million children under five years of age die every year of preventable diseases and malnutrition, and whereas sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, affect millions of children, especially adolescent girls,

G.  whereas over 110 million children of primary school age, the majority of them girls, are not enrolled in school, millions are taught by untrained and underpaid teachers in overcrowded, unhealthy and poorly equipped schools, and one third of all children fail to complete five years of schooling,

H.  whereas millions of girls are victims of female genital mutilation,

I.  whereas UNICEF estimates that two hundred thousand children are sold yearly in Western and Central Africa, to be employed as unpaid labourers in households, on cocoa and cotton estates or in the sex industry,

J.  deeply concerned at the growth of sexual exploitation of children, prostitution and child pornography,

K.  whereas on 25 May 2000 the UN General Assembly adopted an Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict,

L.  whereas the new Protocol establishes 18 as the minimum age for participation in armed conflict, for compulsory recruitment and for any recruitment or use in armed conflict by armed groups,

M.  whereas, while to date 79 countries have signed the Optional Protocol, including all 15 Member States, it has only been ratified by 4 countries - Andorra, Bangladesh, Canada and Sri Lanka - and whereas the Protocol cannot come into force until it has been ratified by 10 countries,

N.  recalling the number of cases of missing children in the world and the anguish of their parents who do not know what has happened to them, including the case of Simón Riquelo, who was captured together with his mohter Sara Mendez in June 1976 in Uruguay,

O.  whereas millions of children have been killed in wars over the last ten years and tens of thousands of children continue to be involved in armed conflict,

P.  whereas the Special Session of the UN General Assembly on Children, which will take place in New York in September 2001, provides a good opportunity to find ways and mechanisms for the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child,

Q.  whereas a wide range of children's rights - including civil rights and freedoms and the right to protection from abuse, economic and sexual exploitation and violence - have become widely recognised and should be reflected in the Action Plan of the Special Session,

1.  Calls on the EU and its Member States to work actively together to ensure that the outcome of the Special Session:

   -
reinforces the Convention on the Rights of the Child and hastens the full implementation of the Convention, by placing children and families at the centre of the decision-making process, particularly as regards policies on education, health, social questions and matters of justice;
   -
supports universal ratification and implementation of the key new treaties developed during the past decade which strengthen the protection of children's rights;
   -
reflects in its goals the importance of the critical rights of children to protection from violence, exploitation and abuse, as well as to health, education and nutrition;
   -
supports the view that the "family is the fundamental unit of society and holds the primary responsibility for the protection, upbringing and development of children", as stated in UNICEF's draft outcome document under preparation for the Special Session;
   -
ensures that strong mechanisms are put in place to monitor government obligations and commitments, including meaningful participation by non-governmental organisations and civil society;

2.  Suggests, therefore, that a "world fit for children" - the title of the Special Session - has to be at the same time a world fit for the family, in line with subsidiarity; considers, therefore, that government policies have to be devised accordingly in order to achieve the best human and social environment for children and to provide those that are deprived of natural family protection and support with the best possible family-like social responses;

3.  Expresses its support for the proposal to adopt a Common Strategy on the Rights of the Child and calls on the Council to work on this common strategy as a priority;

4.  Calls on the EU and its Member States to insist that the outcome document proposes measures to protect developing countries from the negative impact of globalisation, including the development of global trade rules that work for the benefit of all children and encouragement of greater corporate social responsibility for children by multinational companies;

5.  Calls on the Member States to make the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the ratification and implementation of key new treaties developed during the past decade which strengthen the protection of children's rights and the implementation of the commitments agreed during the 2001 Special Session a national and European priority, in the light of Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights;

6.  Urges the Council and Member States to ensure that strong and meaningful mechanisms are put in place to monitor government obligations and commitments made at the Special Session;

7.  Calls on the Council to nominate an EU Special Envoy charged with coordinating EU activities in the area of children's rights and ensuring full respect for and implementation of a future EU common strategy on children's rights;

8.  Calls on the Member States to establish an independent body to monitor the implementation of the outcome document of the Special Session and to adopt a comprehensive national action plan, with specific, time-bound and measurable objectives;

9.  Calls on the Council to make the ratification of the new treaties by third countries a priority in its political dialogue with these countries, and to make the ratification and implementation of theses treaties an important element in talks with candidate countries;

10.  Calls on the Commission to ensure that EU policies and programmes contain a children's rights and protection perspective and are subjected to child-impact analyses in order to assess their potential implications for children;

11.  Calls on the Member States at the next Intergovernmental Conference to include a legal base in the Treaties for the promotion of a child perspective and compliance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child;

12.  Asks the Council and Commission to ensure that the rights of the child are part of the negotiating process on human rights in accordance with the Copenhagen criteria for accession and calls on the Commission to make an assessment of all the candidate countries from the point of view of children's rights in the annual progress reports;

13.  Calls on the Presidency to report to Parliament on EU efforts and priorities for the 2001 Special Session as expressed during the UNGASS Prepcom;

14.  Calls on the bodies and governments concerned to do everything in their power to solve the cases of missing children;

15.  Calls on the Member States and other countries to do everything possible to speed up the universal ratification of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict, so that substantial progress regarding the early entry into force of the Optional Protocol, which lays the basis for a global ban on the use of child soldiers, can be announced at the UN Special Session on Children;

16.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Co-Presidents of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly, the national parliaments of the EU Member States, the UNGASS secretariat, UNICEF and the national delegations at the UN General Assembly's Special Session on Children.

(1) OJ C 98, 9.4.1999, p. 297.
(2) OJ C 128, 7.5.1999, p. 79.
(3) Texts Adopted, Item 16.


Human rights: Religious freedom in Vietnam
European Parliament resolution on religious freedom in Vietnam
P5_TA(2001)0404RC-B5-0482/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Vietnam of 19 January 1995, 15 May 1997, 16 March 1998 and 16 November 2000,

A.  whereas Vietnam as a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) must uphold freedom of religious belief and worship as enshrined in its Article 18,

B.  whereas Article 70 of Vietnam's constitution guarantees freedom of faith and religion,

C.  concerned at the further increase in tension between the government and the religious communities in Vietnam as well as the many instances of persecution of religious leaders, following the ninth Congress of the Vietnamese Communist Party from 19 to 22 April 2001,

D.  concerned at the criticism expressed in March 1999 on religious persecution in Vietnam by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance, Mr Abdelfattah Amor,

E.  having regard to the persecution of leaders of the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam, including its Patriarch, the Very Venerable Thich Huyen Quang, detained without charge or trial for 20 years, set free in 1997, but still not allowed to leave his place of detention, and the Venerable Thich Quang Do, amnestied in 1998 after 20 years of detention, but sentenced to two years of administrative detention after he tried to arrange for medical attention for the ailing Patriarch,

F.  having regard to the persecution suffered by Catholics, in particular the imprisonment of Father Nguyen Van Ly on 17 May 2001 for having practised his religion following a ban issued by the Vietnamese authorities,

G.  having regard to the persecution of all followers of so-called non-recognised churches, notably the Cao Dai Church, the Hoa Hao Church and Protestant Churches,

H.  having regard to the violent State repression in February 2001 of a massive protest by ethnic minorities of the high plains of central Vietnam, who were protesting against the confiscation of their ancestral lands, religious persecution and the ban on their conversion to Protestantism,

I.  whereas respect for human rights and democratic principles is an essential element in the 1995 cooperation agreement between the European Union and Vietnam,

1.  Calls on the Government of Vietnam to implement the recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance, and in particular to guarantee the right of all people in Vietnam to practise the religion of their choice, including the right to freedom of worship and the right of assembly;

2.  Calls for the release of all prisoners of conscience, especially the Very Venerable Thich Huyen Quang, the Venerable Thich Quang Do and Father Nguyen Van Ly, and for them to be granted freedom of movement;

3.  Calls on the Vietnamese authorities to respect the religious freedoms of Buddhists, Catholics, Protestants as well as all other so-called non-recognised churches and to stop all anti-religious campaigns throughout the country;

4.  Calls on the Vietnamese Government to ensure the "safe, dignified and voluntary” return of those who fled from the high plains of central Vietnam to Cambodia, as agreed with the UNHCR, while guaranteeing freedom of faith and worship;

5.  Calls on the ambassadors to Vietnam of the Member States and the European Union to follow developments in this connection with the closest attention and to report to Parliament in the framework of relations between the Council, Commission and Parliament;

6.  Asks its Delegation for relations with the Member States of Asean, South-East Asia and the Republic of Korea to plan a visit to Vietnam to meet religious leaders of all confessions, especially those who have been imprisoned;

7.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the representatives of the Vietnamese Unified Buddhist Church, the Cao Dai Church, the Hoa Hao Church, the Catholic Church and the Protestant Churches.


Human rights: South Africa
European Parliament resolution on the situation in South Africa
P5_TA(2001)0405RC-B5-0489/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to its previous resolutions on South Africa,

-  having regard to its resolution of 15 March 2001 on access to pharmaceutical products for AIDS victims in the Third World(1) ,

-  having regard to its delegation's report on the 6th EP/South Africa Interparliamentary Meeting,

A.  whereas the new, democratic South Africa, which is free of institutionalised racial segregation, is a crucial element in the political stability and economic development of the African continent and of southern Africa in particular, standing as it does as proof that there is an alternative to underdevelopment, war, despotism, corruption and bad government,

B.  whereas South Africa is currently experiencing a number of very grave problems, to which the EU and the international community cannot remain indifferent, ranging from the AIDS epidemic (4.5 million people with HIV/AIDS), which affects mostly young people and therefore a significant part of the active population, alarming unemployment levels and economic stagnation to extremely worrying levels of violent crime,

C.  whereas the second democratic elections organised on an all-race, multi-party basis were successful and largely peaceful,

D.  whereas, despite the successful completion of the political changeover, the task of consolidation must address the problems of poverty, unemployment and inequality,

E.  whereas the poorest 20% of the population receives 3.3% of GDP and the richest 10% receive 47.3% of GDP, and the level of unemployment is almost 30%,

F.  whereas the tragic impact of the alarming crime levels is felt not only by the South African people themselves but also by the European immigrant communities in the country, who find themselves even more exposed to the impact of crime due to their involvement in economic activities linked to trade,

G.  whereas these communities make a decisive contribution to economic development and job creation in South Africa,

H.  whereas, although figures for certain types of crime have fallen slightly in the last year, crime in general is tending to become a standard feature of city life,

I.  whereas the prevailing climate of insecurity is having a very negative effect on the process of economic recovery, which is essential to the stability of the new, democratic South Africa of the post-apartheid era, particularly the inflow of foreign capital and the development of tourism,

J.  whereas, as a result of apartheid, the Republic of South Africa had developed a largely self-sufficient economy and must now face the challenges of the globalisation of trade,

K.  whereas South Africa must under no circumstances be allowed to become caught in a vicious circle in which growing insecurity means less economic development, thus engendering more poverty and more insecurity,

L.  alarmed that violence against women in South African society is widely recognised as having reached one of the highest levels in the world,

M.  appalled in particular by the problems of sexual violence in schools,

N.  whereas South Africa would have serious difficulties in overcoming these problems without the support and solidarity of the international community, in which the role of the European Union is crucial in so far as the Union and its Member States account for 70% of international aid to the country (EU cooperation with South Africa is scheduled at EUR 885 million to 2006, plus EIB funding of EUR 135 million per annum),

O.  whereas the South African President, Thabo Mbeki, has called on corporations to do more to foster economic growth and black empowerment within the country's economy,

1.  Calls on the South African Government to make the necessary efforts to enhance sustainable development and raise the living standard of the majority of the black population;

2.  Fully supports the South African Government in its efforts, together with the Zimbabwean authorities, to find a solution to those conflicts which could influence the economic attractiveness of the whole region;

3.  Calls on the South African Government for an even greater, straightforward policy commitment to fighting poverty and social inequalities and to creating jobs, since poverty, inequality, poor education and unemployment are all factors working against the consolidation of democracy;

4.  Calls on the South African Government to speed up the land reform in favour of the landless and the poor by due process of law;

5.  Urges the South African Government to face up to its responsibility and do everything in its power to combat the HIV/AIDS problem; calls therefore for a clearly defined project to be set up to deal with prevention, care and treatment of HIV/AIDS;

6.  Calls on the relevant authorities to step up their efforts in fighting crime and insecurity, while ensuring that the fight against crime does not jeopardise respect for human rights;

7.  Calls on the South African Government to adopt a national plan of action, to issue guidelines to schools on procedures to deal with sexual violence and to adopt methods to prevent such behaviour, as well as protecting girls;

8.  Recalls that, apart from reducing poverty, one of the other main priorities of the European Programme for Reconstruction and Development (EPRD) in South Africa is "to consolidate the foundations laid for a democratic society and a state governed by the rule of law, in which human rights and fundamental freedoms are fully respected";

9.  Calls on the Member States, the Commission, the European Investment Bank and the international community to offer their assistance to the South African Government within their respective established programmes with South Africa, to devise new measures to prevent and combat crime, and step up existing measures with a view to promoting the climate of greater security required for economic development and a peaceful society;

10.  Believes that in the context of the budgetary debate particular attention should be paid to forms of cooperation which are directly linked to combating HIV/AIDS and eradicating poverty and unemployment, and to measures for reforming the judiciary and the police system and for training policemen;

11.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Government of the Republic of South Africa, the OAU and the Co-Presidents of the ACP-EU Joint-Parliamentary Assembly.

(1) Texts Adopted, Item 13.


Human rights: Belarus
European Parliament resolution on Belarus
P5_TA(2001)0406RC-B5-0481/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to its previous resolutions on the political situation in Belarus,

-  having regard to the Council's declaration of 11 June 2001 on the upcoming presidential elections in Belarus, which are scheduled for 9 September 2001,

-  having regard to the meeting between the Chairman-in-Office of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the Romanian Foreign Minister Mircea Geoana, and Ambassador Hans-Georg Wieck, Head of the OSCE Advisory and Monitoring Group (AMG) in Belarus on 22 May 2001, when the successful work of the AMG was emphasised and there was a call for sustained and continued efforts towards improving dialogue with the Belarus authorities, other political forces and civil society in Belarus,

-  having regard to the activities and reports of the Parliamentary Troika on Belarus of the European Parliament, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly,

-  having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with Belarus, which was signed in March 1995, but could not enter into force, because of the lack of basic democratic structures in Belarus,

A.  recalling that the European Parliament and the other parliamentary institutions had to conclude that the October 2000 parliamentary elections could not be considered as free and fair because insufficient progress had been made by the Belarus authorities on the criteria regarding transparency of the electoral process, the registration of candidates, access to the media, meaningful powers for the newly elected Parliament and the observance of a "peace period” in relations with the opposition,

B.  recalling that the Parliamentary Troika for Belarus has formulated similar criteria with regard to the presidential elections,

C.  noting that serious discussions are still taking place between representatives of the three institutions of the Parliamentary Troika, regarding the preparations for the presidential elections and the possibility of carrying out an observer mission on that occasion,

D.  noting the important role being carried out by the OSCE's AMG in Belarus, in particular with regard to creating the necessary conditions for the process of democratisation in Belarus and the establishment of a system for democratic monitoring of the presidential elections by local observers, and supporting this work and the availability of financial aid provided by the EU for the training of local election observers,

E.  noting that opposition politicians continue to be denied access to the State-controlled press and electronic media,

F.  deeply concerned about the ongoing cases of media harassment in Belarus, leading to the cancellation of the visit by Freimut Duve, the OSCE Representative for Freedom of the Media, scheduled for 25 April 2001,

G.  stressing the need to continue the talks held by the European institutions and the OSCE AMG with Belarus authorities on improving the framework conditions for the forthcoming presidential elections,

H.  emphasising once again that the European Union, via the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with Belarus, has sought to strengthen its relations with Belarus and to give its full support to the necessary process of economic and democratic reform in that country,

I.  considering the case of the contested trial of Professor Bandazhevsky as symptomatic of the problems and deficiencies in the normalisation of the political and judicial spheres, as well as social and health issues in Belarus,

J.  considering that numerous violations of the Penal Code were noted during the investigation into this case, as well as during the trial,

1.  Calls on the President and the Government of Belarus to create the necessary conditions for free and democratic elections for the presidency of the country;

2.  Stresses that the following criteria must be fulfilled if the presidential elections are to be recognised as free and democratic:

   -
full transparency of the electoral process in all its aspects, in particular as regards the process of registering candidates, the composition of the electoral commissions and the counting of the votes,
   -
equal conditions for all candidates in particular as regards access to the mass media, especially electronic media, and other possibilities for organising their election campaign,
   -
all State and Government bodies to refrain completely from any act that may be considered as harassment of candidates, their relatives or their supporters,
   -
the guarantee that all those engaged in (especially non-candidate related) presidential election observation and the recruitment and training for these activities will be completely free to carry out their work, also in cooperation with international institutions, which constitutes an essential element in the transparency and verifiability of the electoral process;

3.  Calls upon the Belarus authorities to stop hindering the activities of the OSCE AMG aimed at strengthening of the democratic process in the country;

4.  Calls on the Belarus authorities to restore international standards in the fields of human rights and freedom of the press and of speech, as laid down by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as well as the Paris Charter for a new Europe, to which Belarus is a signatory, and which is also the basis for the Partnership Agreement between Belarus and the EU;

5.  Calls on the Parliamentary Troika for Belarus to put forward a coordinated and united proposal regarding the observation of the presidential elections in Belarus;

6.  Expresses its growing concern about the persistent obstruction of the investigations into the disappearance of political opponents and the continuing imprisonment of citizens without any charges being brought;

7.  Calls on the Russian Government and President Putin to support, within the political union between Russia and Belarus, a democratic multi-party system and pluralistic development in Belarus;

8.  Calls on President Loukachenko to ensure that the cases of disappeared persons are cleared up as soon as possible, to investigate the allegations made by the public prosecutors concerning the case of Mr Zavadsky that official representatives of the State are implicated in these cases, and to create an atmosphere within the country in which persons who express criticism no longer have to fear for their lives and those of their families;

9.  Welcomes the commitment of the Polish authorities to preventing the emergence of a "Brussels-curtain" along its eastern borders, upon accession to the EU, by planning for easily available, multi-entry and low-cost visas, through the establishment of a dense network of consulates in Belarus, Ukraine and Russia;

10.  Calls for the preparation of an action programme for Belarus, based on those already benefiting the former Republics of Eastern Europe, taking into account the unique environmental situation of this republic;

11.  Calls on President Loukachenko to grant a presidential pardon to Professor Bandazhevsky and to reconsider the Belarus government's policy of returning evacuated people to the polluted territories; demands that aid be granted by the EU for Professor Bandazhevsky to continue his work;

12.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Government of Belarus, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly.


Human rights: situation of refugees from Burundi in Tanzania
European Parliament resolution on the situation of Burundian refugees in Tanzania
P5_TA(2001)0407B5-0494/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in the Great Lakes area in general, and Burundi in particular,

-  having regard to the Arusha agreements,

-  having regard to the Geneva Convention of 1951, in particular Article 33 thereof,

-  having regard to the Convention against Torture, in particular Article 3 thereof,

A.  whereas more than half a million Burundians have been surviving in refugee camps on Tanzanian territory for more than eight years,

B.  whereas in Burundi no solution has been found to the causes of this exodus, the current situation does not ensure respect for even the most basic human rights, and there are thousands of displaced persons inside Burundi, for whose situation no solution has yet been found,

C.  having regard to the statement made by the President of Tanzania, Mr Mkapa, on 24 May 2001, in which he said that the international community should relocate all the Burundian refugees residing in Tanzania to safe places in Burundi,

D.  having regard to the last meeting of the Burundian and Tanzanian Defence Ministers held on 24 June 2001, in which, to judge by the joint declaration issued following the meeting, they agreed to start a process of relocating or repatriating the Burundian refugees currently in Tanzania,

E.  having regard to past experience in 1996 when, after statements to this effect were made by the Tanzanian Government, thousands of Rwandan refugees were repatriated from Tanzania, which demonstrated that untimely repatriation carried out in the wrong conditions merely causes more distress,

F.  having regard to the latest visit by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Ruud Lubbers, to the Mtabila refugee camp, when the various NGOs conveyed to him the refugees" reservations concerning their possible repatriation, and bearing in mind the problems involved in implementing the Arusha Agreements,

G.  whereas many of the refugees who spontaneously returned to Burundi after the peace agreements were signed are now returning to Tanzania because of the violence and famine,

H.  whereas in Burundi alone there are more than 580 000 displaced persons living in refugee camps, because of the insecure situation in which the civilian population of Burundi is living,

I.  whereas international observers have drawn attention to the considerable increase in the number of military forces in the last few weeks and have noticed that contingents of Burundian guerrillas have returned to Burundi across the border with the Democratic Republic of the Congo,

J.  having regard to the serious concern expressed by the various NGOs working in the Burundian camps in Tanzania regarding the international community's silence in response to the possibility of the Burundians being forcibly repatriated in the near future,

1.  Reminds the Tanzanian Government that to repatriate the refugees at this point would constitute a an infringement of Article 33 of the Geneva Convention of 1951, to which it is a signatory, and Article 3 of the Convention against Torture;

2.  Supports and welcomes the steps taken by the Tanzanian Government so far with regard to the Burundian refugees on its territory and recognises that the solution to the problem of refugees and displaced persons depends on the parties involved in the conflict in Burundi and their ability to engage in dialogue, in the interests of bringing the war to an end;

3.  Agrees with a number of NGOs who consider the Burundian Government to be exaggerating when it accuses Tanzania of allowing militias to prepare military actions in the refugee camps with a view to carrying them out in Burundi;

4.  Expresses solidarity with all those who are working to bring peace to Burundi and stability to the Great Lakes region;

5.  Encourages the mediator in the peace process in Burundi, Mr Nelson Mandela, to continue his efforts to gather all those involved in the conflict around one table and welcomes the convening of a summit meeting in Tanzania next month, to which the nineteen signatories to the Arusha Agreements have been invited;

6.  Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the governments of the Great Lakes region to take the measures they deem appropriate to assist the Tanzanian Government in its task of helping the Burundian refugees;

7.  Points out that the UNHCR has issued a statement to the effect that at present the Burundian refugees in Tanzania cannot be repatriated owing to the situation still prevailing in Burundi;

8.  Calls on the Commission and the Council to take all diplomatic steps possible vis-à-vis the Tanzanian Government to ensure that the Burundian refugees in Tanzania are not repatriated until the political situation in Burundi changes;

9.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the heads of governments of Tanzania and Burundi, the Secretary-General of the United Nations and the signatories to the Arusha Agreeements.


Illegal exploitation of natural resources in Democratic Republic of Congo
European Parliament resolution on the illegal exploitation of natural resources in the Democratic Republic of Congo
P5_TA(2001)0408RC-B5-0485/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to its previous resolutions on the Congo and the Great Lakes region,

-  having regard to the report of the panel of experts of 12 April 2001 on the illegal exploitation of natural resources and other forms of wealth in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC),

-  whereas the UN report did not include the exploitation and looting of natural resources and other forms of wealth by foreign armies in government-controlled territories,

-  whereas this report concludes that the main reasons for the conflict in the DRC are now access to five vital mineral resources - colombo tantalite (coltan), cobalt, diamonds, copper and gold and the control of and trade in these minerals,

-  whereas aeronautical, computer, telecommunications and armaments industries support the mining of coltan because of its high resistance to high and low temperature,

-  whereas the UN report considers that these activities go beyond what can be qualified as "illegal exploitation" and amount to "systematic looting',

A.  whereas the overwhelming majority of the Congolese people are living in abject poverty although the country has vast natural resources,

B.  whereas since independence the vast majority of the population has not benefited from the exploitation of these natural resources,

C.  whereas rebel groups and foreign armies are involved, according to this report, in large-scale looting of the DRC's natural resources,

D.  whereas plundering, looting, racketeering and criminal cartels are commonplace,

E.  whereas the revenue from this looting is used to fund the war effort and is resulting in the personal enrichment of senior echelons of the military and politicians in several African countries,

F.  whereas some western companies have benefited from the looting by importing these natural resources and using them in their activities without verifying the original sources,

G.  whereas, according to the UN report, two Member States of the European Union are among the three most important final destinations of this looting,

H.  whereas there is a clear link between this exploitation and the continued conflict, as this looting helps finance armies and fuels the war,

I.  whereas the cessation of this illegal exploitation will help bring about an end to hostilities,

J.  whereas the illegal exploitation has had devastating effects on the Congolese people and on the country's flora, fauna and natural parks,

K.  whereas it is essential for the development and rebuilding of the DRC that the country can exploit its mineral resources itself in a sustainable, transparent and properly administered manner,

L.  whereas all nations and organisations involved in the so-called "Kimberley Process" to curb the illegal trade in diamonds must redouble efforts to stop such trading,

M.  whereas the only viable solution to the three-year old civil war in the DRC remains the full implementation of the 1999 Lusaka Agreement,

N.  whereas the Lusaka Agreement is also the basis for inter-Congolese dialogue with a view to establishing peace, democracy and the rule of law,

1.  Reaffirms its commitment to the sovereignty of the DRC, including sovereignty over its natural resources, and the integrity of its territory;

2.  Strongly condemns the systematic and large-scale looting of the natural resources and wealth of the DRC;

3.  Urges all states, companies and persons involved to stop this looting forthwith;

4.  Calls on the World Bank and the IMF to stop shoring up the budgets of the parties to the conflict until the end of hostilities;

5.  Calls on the governments named in the report to give full consideration to the panel's findings; calls on the governments named in the report and other nations that have troops in the DRC to conduct their own inquiries and take immediate steps to end illegal exploitation of the natural resources by their nationals or others under their control;

6.  Calls on the Council to take into consideration the recommendations made by the panel of experts, in particular the sanctions to be applied to the parties to the conflict and firms involved in the illegal exploitation of the natural resources of the DRC;

7.  Welcomes the decision of the UN Security Council to extend the panel's mandate and stresses the importance of an addendum to the UN report that should provide an update of relevant data, an analysis of further information, a response to the reactions on the report, and an assessment of whether progress has been made;

8.  Strongly condemns the murder of the six staff of the ICRC and urges all parties to the conflict to ensure full and secure access to vulnerable populations;

9.  Supports the UN's deployment of MONUC observers and liaison officers;

10.  Urges all countries involved in the war in the DRC to withdraw their troops from the territory of the DRC, in accordance with the Lusaka Agreement;

11.  Welcomes the announcement of the start of the inter-Congolese dialogue provided for in the Lusaka Agreement;

12.  Considers that the participation of civil society and non-armed political forces in the inter-Congolese dialogue is an important factor in establishing a lasting peace, participatory democracy and sustainable development in the process of construction of the country;

13.  Urges the Kabila government to embark upon the reconciliation and democratisation process without delay, in order to enable the European Union to fully resume structural aid to the Congo;

14.  Calls on the Council and the Commission to take all appropriate measures to tackle the humanitarian crisis;

15.  Supports the Belgian Presidency initiative to give the DRC a priority status on its agenda and urges the European Council to encourage the inter-Congolese dialogue in order to create effective governance and the re-establishment of the rule of law;

16.  Calls on the European Union to respond favourably to any request from the Congolese authorities seeking to ensure nuclear safety (extraction, exploitation, reprocessing) in the territory of the DRC;

17.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the United Nations Organisation, the OAU, the Government of the DRC and the governments of Congo, Angola, Chad, Kenya, Namibia, Zimbabwe, Rwanda, Uganda, Tanzania, Gabon and the Central African Republic, the World Bank, the IMF and the Co-Presidents of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly.


Earthquake in Peru
European Parliament resolution on the earthquake of 23 June 2001 in Peru
P5_TA(2001)0409RC-B5-0493/2001

The European Parliament,

A.  shocked at the dramatic emergency in Peru, caused by the earthquake of 23 June 2001, the devastating effects of which have left more than one hundred people dead and more than one thousand injured, destroyed more than 10 000 homes and left more than 40 000 people homeless in the provinces of Arequipa, Moquegua and Tacna ,

B.  whereas the earthquake destroyed part of the economic infrastructure and structures of the provinces affected and also caused serious damage in the north of Chile and Bolivia,

C.  whereas tremors are still occurring throughout the region, affecting Peru, Chile and Bolivia, and the total cost of the damage has not yet been assessed,

D.  aware of the scale of the disaster and the enormous rebuilding and rehabilitation efforts which will have to be made in the areas affected by the earthquake,

E.  having regard to the enormously adverse effects on institutions and the profound economic crisis left by the dictatorship of Alberto Fujimori and aggravated by the current recession,

1.  Expresses its deep concern and sympathy with the families of the victims and the people of Peru;

2.  Expresses its moral support for the governments of the countries affected and congratulates the Commission and the Member States on their swift response to the disaster;

3.  Calls on the Commission to consider the possibility of adapting Community aid to actual needs as the full extent of the damage is revealed, and stresses that the rebuilding and rehabilitation work to be carried out must improve living conditions, especially for the most disadvantaged sections of the population;

4.  Calls on the governments of the Member States to lay down appropriate criteria for coordination, to enable them to carry out their humanitarian work more effectively;

5.  Fully supports the strategic plans for national development drawn up by the Concertation Board for Combating Poverty, involving social investment in the context of the 2002 budget, on the basis of the decentralisation and transparency of public expenditure;

6.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments of Peru, Chile and Bolivia.


Cod stock in the Irish sea *
Text
Resolution
Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2549/2000 establishing additional technical measures for the recovery of the stock of cod in the Irish Sea (ICES Division VIIa) (COM(2001) 165 - C5-0140/2001 - 2001/0083(CNS) )
P5_TA(2001)0410A5-0213/2001

The proposal was approved.

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2549/2000 establishing additional technical measures for the recovery of the stock of cod in the Irish Sea (ICES Division VIIa) (COM(2001) 165 - C5-0140/2001 - 2001/0083(CNS) )
P5_TA(2001)0410A5-0213/2001

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2001) 165 ),

-  having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 37 of the EC Treaty (C5-0140/2001 ),

-  having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries (A5-0213/2001 ),

1.  Approves the Commission proposal;

2.  Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3.  Asks to be consulted again if the Council intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

4.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.


Bonn Conference on Climate Change
European Parliament resolution on the European Union's strategy for the Bonn Conference on Climate Change (COP-6, part 2)
P5_TA(2001)0411B5-0473/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) of December 1997(1) , the Sixth Conference of the Parties (COP-6) in The Hague on 13-24 November 2000, and the forthcoming resumed Sixth Conference of the Parties (COP-6, part 2) to be held in Bonn on 16-27 July 2001,

-  having regard to its resolutions relating to climate change, notably that of 26 October 2000 on the Commission's strategy for The Hague Conference on climate change (COP-6)(2) and that of 5 April 2001 on the Kyoto Conference objectives(3) ,

-  having regard to oral questions B5-0327/2001 and B5-0328/2001 by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy pursuant to Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure and having regard to the statements by the Commission and the Council,

A.  whereas, according to a recent report by the International Climate Change Panel (ICCP) so provided by broadcasts, the Earth's temperature is due to increase in the course of this century by between 1.4 and 5.8ºC, largely on account of human activities; whereas the report emphasises the disastrous consequences of such a phenomenon,

B.  whereas, before it can enter into force, the Kyoto Protocol must be ratified by over 55 of its 84 signatories whose emissions account for at least 55% of total greenhouse gas emissions,

C.  whereas full ratification and implementation, as well as further reinforcement of the Kyoto Protocol, are of fundamental importance in tackling the key problem of climate change and for the future of the world's environment,

D.  whereas the breakdown of The Hague Conference was a significant setback in this respect, and whereas the situation has since deteriorated sharply as a result of President Bush's repudiation of the Kyoto Protocol,

E.  whereas it is essential that there be a successful outcome of the Bonn Conference if the current adverse trends in climate change are to be reversed,

F.  whereas the European Union and its Member States have a responsibility to proceed with the work required under the Kyoto Protocol and to encourage other parties to follow suit; whereas Japan and Russia should continue as constructive partners to fulfil this objective and the aim must be to bring the USA back into the process,

G.  whereas the EU delegation will have to play a major role in this process, and the European Parliament members of this delegation should be involved in the work of the delegation to a greater extent than in the past,

1.  Calls on the Bonn Conference to maintain the central place of the Kyoto Protocol as the driving force in the fight to concentrate attention on, and find ways of combating, climate change;

2.  Believes that the central task of the Bonn Conference will be to settle the key unresolved issues left over from The Hague, notably as regards the scope for sinks, supplementarity and the flexible mechanisms, and compliance mechanisms, as well as assistance for developing countries affected by climate change, in order to prepare the way for full ratification and implementation of the Kyoto Protocol;

3.  Believes the Kyoto Protocol to be the basis of, although only a first step in, a world strategy to combat global warming and considers that the negotiations to be held in Bonn should be conducted in complete accordance with the integrity of the Protocol; accordingly, states once again that:

   -
the industrialised countries should take the lead in initiatives intended to mitigate climate change;
   -
a positive list of CDM (Clean Development Mechanism) projects and technologies must be drawn up which excludes nuclear energy, the large-scale use of fossil fuels and the use of carbon sinks;
   -
internal-action policies and measures are a priority in the strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, for which reason the use of flexible mechanisms must be restricted to no more than 50% of the total effort;
   -
the use of carbon sinks must be restricted and controlled until the necessary scientific information is available and a supervisory scheme has been set up;
   -
a stringent monitoring structure linked to a system of fines for non-compliance must be set up, together with a monitoring fund which will enable the effects of non-compliance with the Kyoto Protocol to be minimised;

4.  Reiterates its criticism of the unilateral US decision to reject the Kyoto Protocol as a way forward and stresses that, after nine years of international negotiations, the Kyoto Protocol remains the only effective instrument for combating global warming; notes the fact that the US government has not challenged the science of climate change; hopes that the current US policy review will lead to a reassessment by the US administration of its position and calls for further strenuous efforts by all parties to bring it back into the Kyoto Protocol;

5.  Underlines the contradiction which exists between the fact that in 1998 the US Presidency signed the Kyoto Protocol and the latest official US statements which withdraw all commitments relating to the fight against global warming and are clearly opposed to this Protocol;

6.  Urges the European Union to take the lead in careful discussions with the other members of the umbrella group, the developing countries and other parties, in order to devise an appropriate strategy for further progress in the absence of a renewed US commitment to the Kyoto Protocol and in order to ensure sufficient participation to meet the thresholds for entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol before the Rio + 10 Conference; urges the European Union and the other Annex I parties to plan a quick ratification and entry into force of the Protocol, even without the USA, in the run-up to COP-6, part 2, before the Rio + 10 Conference in 2002;

7.  Welcomes the unanimous statement by the Environment Council in June 2001 that the European Union continues to regret the position of the USA rejecting the Kyoto Protocol and strongly urges the new Italian government to stick to its earlier position on climate change;

8.  Notwithstanding the importance of all initiatives which endeavour to reverse the US decision to abandon the Kyoto Protocol, considers that the European Union should give priority to negotiating the final shape of the Kyoto Protocol with those countries which agree to ratify it;

9.  Considers that, within supranational structures (in particular the World Trade Organisation), the European Union should launch initiatives which are designed to prevent countries which do not ratify the Kyoto Protocol from obtaining unfair competitive advantages, particularly where energy products are concerned;

10.  Calls again on the EU to lead by example, by publicly restating its commitment to early implementation of policies and measures to achieve domestic emission reductions in order to make it possible to reverse the sharp increase in greenhouse gas emissions which is currently in evidence in most of the Member States, as well as its commitment to the rapid implementation of the European Climate Change Programme, including the EU emissions trading regime (and policy measures on, for instance, transport emissions and non-CO2 greenhouse gases); also recommends prompt adoption of national greenhouse gas emission-reduction plans;

11.  Notes that the EU delegation will have a key role to play at the Bonn Conference, and believes that the European Parliament members of the delegation will have a valuable complementary role to play, notably in working with fellow parliamentarians from other countries, especially in view of the broad support right across the political spectrum for the EU's negotiating position;

12.  Underlines the particular importance of research in any strategy against climate change; considers that it is essential that research leads to the development of new technologies in the field of renewable energy, energy efficiency and energy savings; takes the view that environmental R&D should therefore be promoted and adequately funded within the scope of the 6th Framework Programme, thereby boosting efforts to catch up with the European research backlog;

13.  Believes that, in order for the European Parliament participants to best support and advance the EU's negotiating position, they need to develop, in advance and in cooperation with the other participants in the EU delegation, a strategy for their approaches to fellow parliamentarians; considers that, for the European Parliament participants to be most effective in this task, they need to be fully involved in the EU delegation, in particular by attending the EU coordination meetings;

14.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, and to the government of the United States of America.

(1) FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1
(2) Texts Adopted, Item 13.
(3) Texts Adopted, Item 17.


Safe operation of mining activities
European Parliament resolution on the Commission communication on safe operation of mining activities: a follow-up to recent mining accidents (COM(2000) 664 - C5-0013/2001 - 2001/2005(COS) )
P5_TA(2001)0412A5-0214/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Commission communication (COM(2000) 664 ),

-  having regard to the 1991 Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context,

-  having regard to the 1992 Helsinki Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents,

-  having regard to the 1992 Helsinki Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes,

-  having regard to the 1998 Aarhus Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters,

-  having regard to Article 174 of the EC Treaty,

-  having regard to Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste(1) ,

-  having regard to Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of certain public and private projects on the environment (EIA Directive)(2) ,

-  having regard to Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC Directive)(3) ,

-  having regard to Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances (Seveso II Directive)(4) ,

-  having regard to Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste(5) ,

-  having regard to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy(6) ,

-  having regard to the European Parliament and Council Directive on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (SEA Directive),

-  having regard to the Report of the International Task Force for assessing the Baia Mare accident (December 2000),

-  having regard to the White Paper on environmental liability (COM(2000) 66 ),

-  having regard to Rule 47(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (A5-0214/2001 ),

A.  whereas the recent mining accidents in Doñana (Spain), Baia Mare and Baia Borsa (Romania) have highlighted the inadequacy of rules and monitoring requirements governing the mining industry in present and future Members States of the Community and the need for a review of Community environmental policy in order to take due account of the mining sector,

B.  whereas climatic and operational conditions leading to the Doñana, Baia Mare and Baia Borsa accidents where exceptional but not unpredictable,

C.  whereas, especially, the Baia Mare and Baia Borsa catastrophes underline the transboundary effects of mining accidents,

D.  whereas poor management of mining operations and disposal of mining waste is a global problem; whereas most mining companies operate on a global scale,

E.  whereas mining accidents are usually caused by a combination of mining companies not taking sufficient environmental concern, inadequate legislation and poor monitoring and control by the permitting authorities,

F.  whereas mining waste is one of the largest waste streams in the Community and is responsible for 18% of overall waste generation (OSCE data 1998),

G.  whereas there are large quantities of mining waste unaccounted for - frequently hazardous and leaking - in the territory of the Community and the candidate countries,

H.  whereas the Community lacks a coherent and comprehensive legislative framework governing the mining industry and mining waste,

General conclusions

1.  Welcomes the communication and supports the Commission's general approach to modify EU environmental legislation and instruments in order to create a transparent and coherent framework for the safe operation of mining activities; believes that voluntary agreements may complement but may never substitute legislation within the mining sector;

2.  Welcomes the recent amendment to the EU hazardous waste list to include certain types of mining waste, thereby laying down stricter requirements concerning their management and disposal;

3.  Underlines that the future directive on environmental liability must incorporate provisions relevant to the special configuration of mining activities and mining waste;

4.  Stresses the importance of reinforced R&D into mining processing techniques in order to limit the use of dangerous substances, decreasing waste streams and improving waste disposal; believes that EU research programmes could serve as one vehicle for developing and disseminating more sustainable operation and disposal techniques in mining;

5.  States that mining companies should operate according to the same basic guidelines and rules independently of where they operate; encourages the mining industry, in cooperation with relevant NGOs and stakeholders, to develop a code of conduct including public participation and independent third party verification as two of its essential components, based on the improved EU practice resulting from forthcoming modifications of EU environmental legislation and instruments;

6.  States that EU development aid and EIB financing should only be granted to mining projects that operate in accordance with EU regulations and practice;

7.  Welcomes the clarification that the Framework Directive on waste also currently covers mining waste;

8.  Believes that it is not sufficient to regulate mining activities through the IPPC Directive due to the expected diverging interpretation of that Directive's principles for determining BAT and the fact that neither core extraction activities nor abandoned mining operations and waste disposals are covered by that Directive; welcomes the establishment of BAT reference documents in order to clarify the principles of the Directive; believes furthermore that the landfill of waste Directive does not constitute an appropriate framework for regulating mining waste and therefore urges the Commission to put forward a proposal for a specific directive on mining waste;

9.  Encourages the Commission to strengthen the dialogue with the European mining industry in order to profit from its experience and identify the best available technologies;

10.  Recalls the need for training programmes for all types of staff dealing with mining activities in order to ensure that the existing legal instruments are implemented properly;

Changes to the Seveso II Directive

11.  Welcomes the Commission's recent proposal to extend the Seveso II Directive to also cover risks arising from storage and processing activities in mining;

12.  Notes that this modification will require that a whole set of measures are put in place to prevent major mining tailings spills, including emergency plans and reinforced public information and consultation requirements;

13.  Urges the Commission to propose, and the Member States to introduce, changes ensuring that any emergency plans under this Directive include an outline of possible short and long-term impacts and measures for the restoration of the affected environment;

Inventory

14.  Supports the establishment of an inventory, based on a common risk assessment method, of all active and abandoned mines and mining waste disposals with a view to securing the necessary funding to render these sites environmentally safe; states that such an inventory should also include the accession countries;

15.  Welcomes the identification of 21 risks sites (hot spots) by the Baia Mare Task Force; supports further identification of "hot spots”, both sites in operation and abandoned sites; proposes that action programs be immediately put in place for remediation and environmental rehabilitation of such sites, in particular to prevent future accidents similar to Doñana and Baia Mare;

A future directive on mining waste

16.  Strongly supports the need for a directive on mining waste covering both operational and abandoned sites and disposals; believes that such a directive should contain provisions for mining waste actions programs as well as provisions to facilitate more sustainable extraction, site cleaning and waste reduction, including dry tailings disposal in the case of metal mining waste;

17.  Urges the Commission to propose, and the Member States to introduce, legislation that requires the responsible mining company to establish decommissioning plans for new and existing mines and tailings ponds and to set aside sufficient funds for closure, restoration and after-care measures as well as safe and sustainable disposal of mining waste in order to avoid the problem of abandoned mining sites in the future;

18.  States that the company responsible shall bear the full responsibility for restoration and other connected costs in the case of an accident;

19.  Underlines that Member States and the Community have a responsibility for restoring abandoned mines and tailings ponds; believes therefore that it should be possible to use the Structural Funds and other EU funding to help in cleaning up contaminated land;

20.  Supports legislation prescribing in-plant removal of cyanide and other hazardous substances before the tailings are deposited in the tailings pond;

21.  Supports the establishment of common minimum rules concerning the siting, design, construction, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of tailings ponds, taking into account the likely effects of climate change on meteorological conditions;

o
o   o

22.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the parliaments of the Member States.

(1) OJ L 194, 25.7.1975, p. 39.
(2) OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p. 40.
(3) OJ L 257, 10.10.1996, p. 26.
(4) OJ L 10, 14.1.1997, p. 13.
(5)OJ L 182, 16.7.1999, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1.


Results of the multiannual guidance programmes for fishing fleets
European Parliament resolution on the annual report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the results of the multiannual guidance programmes for the fishing fleets at the end of 1999 (COM(2000) 738 - C5-0107/2001 - 2001/2056(COS) )
P5_TA(2001)0413A5-0188/2001

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to the Commission report (COM(2000) 738 - C5-0107/2001 ),

-  having regard to its resolution of 20 January 2000 on the annual report to the Council and to the European Parliament on the results of the multiannual guidance programmes for the fishing fleets at the end of 1997 (COM(1999) 175 - C5-0109/1999 - 1999/2112(COS) )(1) ,

-  having regard to Rule 47(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

-  having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries (A5-0188/2001 ),

A.  whereas an appropriate policy for the conservation of fisheries resources is a prerequisite for a Community fishing industry which is sustainable, profitable and competitive,

B.  whereas the main objective of the multiannual guidance programmes (MAGP) is to create a balance between the available fisheries resources and the fishing effort of the Community fishing fleet,

C.  stressing that a reduction in the catch capacity of the Member States" fishing fleets within the various categories is a prerequisite for ensuring sustainable development within the industry,

D.  whereas a reduction of the capacity of the fishing fleet should be implemented in all Member States in order to ensure the understanding and acceptance of the other actors in the fisheries sector,

E.  whereas the effectiveness of the MAGP is dependent on compliance by all Member States with the objectives of the programme,

F.  whereas the failure of some Member States" fishing fleets to comply with the objectives of the MAGP within particular categories leads to a distortion of competition which harms professional fishermen in these sectors in countries which have carried out a reduction in fishing effort in accordance with the MAGP,

G.  whereas, in this regard, the European Parliament has always advocated that a genuinely effective system of penalties be sought and introduced both for Member States which do not comply with the objectives of the MAGP and for those which do not supply data on their fleet or do so in an unsatisfactory manner,

H.  regretting that there has as yet been no harmonisation of the measurement of vessels" capacity in all Member States,

I.  recognising that the alteration of the criteria for the various categories of fleets in the transition from MAGP III to MAGP IV has made it more difficult to compare existing data,

J.  stressing, in the light of this increased complexity, how vital it is that the Commission should improve its annual report by adding comments on the reliability of the Member States" reported data, should state clearly which Member States fail to fulfil their obligations, in which areas and to what extent, and should provide all data and tables with an explanation of terms to make the annual report readable by non-experts,

K.  welcoming the direct access which the Member States now have to data through the internet programme FRONT (“Fleet Register On the Net”),

L.  noting that the existing penalties seeking to guarantee compliance with the objectives of the MAGP, e.g. the initiation of proceedings for failure to comply with Treaty obligations, or the refusal of aid to renew or modernise fleets, have evidently been ineffective because they have not succeeded in inciting the Member States to comply with the objectives of the MAGP,

M.  welcoming the Commission's reinforced powers to withhold aid for the renewal or modernisation of fleets (see Articles 6 and 10 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999(2) ) if a Member State does not comply with the MAGP objectives assigned to it, does not supply information about its fleet in accordance with Community regulations or if details of entry and exit regimes are not supplied or are inadequate,

1.  Calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt precise and clear criteria for the measurement of vessels and the categories of fishing fleets, so that the development of the respective fleets and the content of the Community register of fishing vessels for each MAGP can be monitored;

2.  Urges the Commission once again to make a determined effort to ensure that the Member States" criteria for the measurement of tonnage and vessels" engine power are comparable, so that a uniform reduction in the capacity of the various Community fishing fleets can be achieved;

3.  Urges the Member States without delay to carry out measurements of their fishing fleets" capacities in accordance with the criteria set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 3259/94(3) and Commission Decision 95/84/EC(4) , which should have been fully implemented as far back as 1995;

4.  Calls on the Commission to apply those instruments which can compel the Member States to comply with the provisions requiring them to reduce their fishing fleets under the MAGPs, and once again urges the Council and Commission to strengthen those instruments by studying measures such as those already outlined by the European Parliament in its abovementioned resolution of 20 January 2000, which are also reflected in the Commission's Green Paper on the reform of the CFP (COM(2001) 135 );

5.  Calls on the Commission to inform the Committee on Fisheries as soon as it has taken a decision to apply the instruments referred to in paragraph 4, so that the Committee on Fisheries can to follow up the Member States" failure to implement Community rules, as quickly as possible;

6.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

(1) OJ C 304, 24.10.2000, p. 203.
(2) OJ L 337, 30.12.1999, p. 10.
(3) OJ L 339, 29.12.1994, p.11.
(4) OJ L 67, 25.3.1995, p. 33.

Legal notice - Privacy policy