Seed of oil and fibre plants * (procedure without report)
4k
23k
Proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 69/208/EEC on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (COM(2002) 232 - C5-0301/2002 - 2002/0105(CNS))
(Consultation procedure)
The proposal was approved.
INTERBUS Agreement *** (procedure without debate)
109k
26k
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the INTERBUS Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (13262/1/2001 – COM(2001) 540 – C5-0087/2002 – 2001/0242(AVC))
− having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2001) 540(1)),
− having regard to the INTERBUS Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (13262/1/2001),
− having regard to the Council's request for Parliament's assent pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 71(1) and 93 of the EC Treaty (C5-0087/2002),
− having regard to Rules 86 and 97(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
− having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (A5-0235/2002),
1. Gives its assent to conclusion of the agreement;
2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and third countries in Central and Eastern Europe which are members of the Conference of Ministers of Transport.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a European Parliament and Council directive amending Directive 97/68/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery (5198/1/2002 – C5-0150/2002 – 2000/0336(COD))
– having regard to the Council common position (5198/1/2002 – C5-0150/2002)(1),
– having regard to its position at first reading(2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2000) 840(3)),
– having regard to the Commission's amended proposal (COM(2001) 626(4)),
– having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,
– having regard to Rule 80 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (A5-0221/2002),
1. Amends the common position as follows;
2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 2 July 2002 with a view to the adoption of European Parliament and Council directive 2002/…/EC amending Directive 97/68/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (5),
Having regard to the Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (6),
Following consultation of the Committee of the Regions,
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty (7),
Whereas:
(1) The Auto Oil II programme was aimed at identifying cost effective strategies to meet the air quality objectives of the Community. The Commission Communication Review on the Auto Oil II programme concluded that there is a need for further measures, especially to address the issues of ozone and particulate emissions. Recent work on the development of national emissions ceilings has shown that further measures are needed to meet the air quality objectives decided upon in the Community legislation.
(2) Stringent standards on emissions from vehicles on highways have been gradually introduced. It has already been decided that those standards should be strengthened. The relative contribution of pollutants from non-road mobile machinery will thus be more predominant in the future.
(3) Directive 97/68/EC (8) introduced emission limit values for gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery.
(4) Although Directive 97/68/EC initially applied only to certain compression ignition engines, recital (5) of that Directive envisages the subsequent extension of its scope to include in particular gasoline engines.
(5) The emissions from small spark ignition engines (gasoline engines) in different types of machinery contribute significantly to identified air quality problems, both current and future, especially ozone formation.
(6) Emissions from small spark ignition engines are subject to strict environmental standards in the USA, showing that it is possible significantly to reduce the emissions.
(7) The absence of Community legislation means it is possible to place on the market engines with old fashioned technology from an environmental point of view, thereby jeopardising the air quality objectives in the Community, or to implement national legislation in this field, with the potential to create barriers to trade.
(8) Directive 97/68/EC is closely aligned with the corresponding US legislation, and continuing alignment will have benefits for industry, as well as for the environment.
(9) A certain lead time is necessary for the European industry, especially for those manufacturers that are not yet operating on a global basis, to be able to meet the emission standards.
(10) A two-step approach is used in Directive 97/68/EC for compression ignition engines as well as in the US regulations on spark ignition engines. Although it might have been possible to adopt a one-step approach in the Community legislation, this would have left the field unregulated for another 4 to 5 years.
(11) To achieve the necessary flexibility for world-wide alignment, a possible derogation, to be made under the comitology procedure, is included.
(12) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Directive should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (9).
(13) Directive 97/68/EC should be amended accordingly,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Article 1
Directive 97/68/EC is hereby amended as follows:
1) In Article 2:
a)
the eighth indent shall be replaced by the following:
"
–
placing on the market shall mean the action of making an engine available for the first time on the market, for payment or free of charge, with a view to distribution and/or use in the Community,
"
b)
the following indents shall be added:
"
-
replacement engines shall mean a newly built engine to replace an engine in a machine, and which has been supplied for this purpose only,
-
handheld engine shall mean an engine that meets at least one of the following requirements:
a)
the engine must be used in a piece of equipment that is carried by the operator throughout the performance of its intended function(s);
b)
the engine must be used in a piece of equipment that must operate multipositionally, such as upside down or sideways, to complete its intended function(s);
c)
the engine must be used in a piece of equipment for which the combined engine and equipment dry weight is under 20 kilograms and at least one of the following attributes is also present:
i)
the operator must alternatively provide support or carry the equipment throughout the performance of its intended function(s);
ii)
the operator must provide support or attitudinal control for the equipment throughout the performance of its intended function(s);
iii)
the engine must be used in a generator or a pump;
-
non-handheld engine shall mean an engine which does not fall under the definition of a handheld engine,
-
professional use multipositional handheld engine shall mean a handheld engine which meets the requirements of both (a) and (b) of the handheld engine definition and in relation to which the engine manufacturer has satisfied an approval authority that a Category 3 Emissions Durability Period (according to section 2.1 of Appendix 4 of Annex IV) would be applicable to the engine,
-
emission durability period shall mean the number of hours indicated in Annex IV Appendix 4 used to determine the deterioration factors,
-
small volume engine family shall mean a spark-ignition (SI) engine family with a total yearly production of less than 5 000 units,
-
small volume engine manufacturer of SI engines shall mean a manufacturer with a total yearly production of less than 25 000 units.
"
2) Article 4 is hereby amended as follows :
(a)
Paragraph 2 shall be amended as follows:
i)
in the first sentence "Annex VI" shall be replaced by "Annex VII";
ii)
in the second sentence "Annex VII" shall be replaced by "Annex VIII";
(b)
Paragraph 4 shall be amended as follows:
i)
in point (a) "Annex VIII" shall be replaced by "Annex IX";
ii)
in point (b) "Annex IX" shall be replaced by "Annex X";
(c)
In paragraph 5, "Annex X" shall be replaced by "Annex XI".
3) Article 7(2) shall be replaced by the following:
"
2. "2. Member States shall accept type-approvals and, where applicable, the pertaining approval marks listed in Annex XII as being in conformity with this Directive."
"
4) Article 9 is hereby amended as follows:
(a)
The heading "Timetable" shall be replaced by the heading "Timetable-Compression ignition engines";
(b)
In paragraph 1, "Annex VI" shall be replaced by "Annex VII";
(c)
Paragraph 2 shall be amended as follows:
i)
"Annex VI" shall be replaced by "Annex VII";
ii)
"section 4.2.1 of Annex I" shall be replaced by "section 4.1.2.1 of Annex I";
(d)
Paragraph 3 shall be amended as follows:
i)
"Annex VI" shall be replaced by "Annex VII";
ii)
"section 4.2.3 of Annex I" shall be replaced by "section 4.1.2.3 of Annex I";
(e)
In the first subparagraph of paragraph 4, the phrase "placing on the market of new engines" shall be replaced by "placing on the market of engines".
5) The following Article shall be inserted:
"
Article 9a
Timetable - Spark ignition engines
1. DIVIDING INTO CLASSES
For the purpose of this Directive, Spark Ignition Engines shall be divided into the following classes.
Main class S: Small engines with a net power ≤19 kW
The main class S shall be divided into two categories
H: Engines for handheld machinery
N: Engines for non-handheld machinery
Class/category
Displacement (cubic cm)
Handheld engines
Class SH:1
< 20
Class SH:2
≥20
< 50
Class SH:3
≥50
Non handheld engines
Class SN:1
< 66
Class SN:2
≥66
< 100
Class SN:3
≥100
< 225
Class SN:4
≥225
2. GRANT OF TYPE APPROVALS
After ........... (10), Member States may not refuse to grant type-approval for an SI engine type or engine family or to issue the document as described in Annex VII, and may not impose any other type-approval requirements with regard to air-polluting emissions for non-road mobile machinery in which an engine is installed, if the engine meets the requirements specified in this Directive as regards the emissions of gaseous pollutants.
3. TYPE-APPROVALS STAGE 1
Member States shall refuse to grant type-approval for an engine type or engine family and to issue the documents as described in Annex VII, and shall refuse to grant any other type-approval for non-road mobile machinery in which an engine is installed after ..............* if the engine fails to meet the requirements specified in this Directive and where the emissions of gaseous pollutants from the engine do not comply with the limit values as set out in the table in section 4.2.2.1 of Annex I.
4. TYPE-APPROVALS STAGE II
Member States shall refuse to grant type-approval for an engine type or engine family and to issue the documents as described in Annex VII, and shall refuse to grant any other type-approval for non-road mobile machinery in which an engine is installed:
after 1 August 2004 for engine classes SN:1 and SN:2
after 1 August 2006 for engine class SN:4
after 1 August 2007 for engine classes SH1, SH 2 and SN:3
after 1 August 2008 for engine class SH:3,
if the engine fails to meet the requirements specified in this Directive and where the emissions of gaseous pollutants from the engine do not comply with the limit values as set out in the table in section 4.2.2.2 of Annex I.
5. PLACING ON THE MARKET:
ENGINE PRODUCTION DATES
Six months after the dates for the relevant category of engine in paragraphs 3 and 4, with the exception of machinery and engines intended for export to third countries, Member States shall permit placing on the market of engines, whether or not already installed in machinery, only if they meet the requirements of this Directive.
6.LABELLING OF EARLY COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF STAGE II
For engine types or engine families complying with the limit values set out in the table in section 4.2.2.2 of Annex I before the dates laid down in paragraph 4 of this Article, Member States shall allow special labelling and marking to that effect.
7.DELAYED IMPLEMENTATION
For the machinery mentioned below, the deadlines for complying with the emission limit values of Stage II shall be extended for a period of 3 years, during which the emission limit values of Stage I shall continue to apply:
-
handheld chainsaw: a handheld device designed to cut wood with a saw chain, designed to be supported with two hands and having an engine capacity in excess of 45cc, according to ISO 11681-1;
-
top handle machine (i.e., handheld drills and tree service chainsaws): a handheld device with the handle on top of the machine designed to drill holes or to cut wood with a saw chain (according to ISO 11681-2);
-
handheld brush cutter with an internal combustion engine: a handheld device with a rotating blade made of metal or plastic intended to cut weeds, brush, small trees and similar vegetation. It must be designed according to ISO 11806 to operate multipositionally, such as upside down or sideways, and have an engine capacity in excess of 40 cc;
-
handheld hedge trimmer: a handheld device designed for trimming hedges and bushes by means of one or more reciprocating cutter blades, according to EN 774;
-
handheld power cutter with an internal combustion engine: a handheld device intended for cutting hard materials such as stone, asphalt, concrete or steel by means of a rotating metal blade with a displacement in excess of 50 cm³, according to EN 1454; and
-
non-handheld, horizontal shaft Class SN:3 engine: only those Class SN:3 non-handheld engines with a horizontal shaft that produce power equal to or less than 2.5 kW and are used mainly for select, industrial purposes, including tillers, reel cutters, lawn aerators and generators.
8. OPTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION DELAY
Member States may in any case for each category postpone the dates in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 for two years in respect of engines with a production date prior to those dates.
"
6) Article 10 is hereby amended as follows:
(a) Paragraph 1 shall be replaced by the following:
"
1. The requirements of Article 8(1) and (2), Article 9(4) and Article 9a (5) shall not apply to:
–
engines for use by the armed services,
–
engines exempted in accordance with paragraphs 1a and 2;
"
(b) The following paragraph shall be inserted:
"
1a. A replacement engine shall comply with the limit values that the engine to be replaced had to meet when originally placed on the market.
The text "REPLACEMENT ENGINE" shall be attached to a label on the engine or inserted into the owner's manual.
"
(c) The following paragraphs shall be added:
"
3. The requirements of Article 9a (4) and (5) shall be postponed by three years for small volume engine manufacturers.
4. The requirements of Article 9a(4) and (5) shall be replaced by the corresponding stage I requirements for a small volume engine family to a maximum of 25 000 units providing that the various engine families involved all have different cylinder displacements.
"
7) Articles 14 and 15 shall be replaced by the following Articles:
"
Article 14
Adaptation to technical progress
Any amendments which are necessary in order to adapt the Annexes to this Directive, with the exception of the requirements specified in section 1, sections 2.1 to 2.8 and section 4 of Annex I, to take account of technical progress shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15(2).
Article 14a
Procedure for derogations
The Commission shall study possible technical difficulties in complying with the Stage II requirements for certain uses of the engines, in particular mobile machinery in which engines of classes SH:2 and SH:3 are installed. If the Commission studies conclude that for technical reasons certain mobile machinery, in particular, professional use, multipositional, handheld engines, cannot meet these deadlines, it shall submit, by 31 December 2003, a report accompanied by appropriate proposals under the procedure laid down in Article 15(2), for extensions of the period referred to in Article 9a(7) and/or further derogations for such machinery, which cannot exceed five years unless in exceptional circumstances.
Article 15
Committee
1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee on Adaptation to Technical Progress of the Directives on the Removal of Technical Barriers to Trade in the Motor Vehicle Sector (hereinafter referred to as "the Committee").
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC * shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.
3. The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.
___________
* OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.
"
8) The following list of Annexes shall be added at the beginning of the Annexes:
"
List of Annexes
ANNEX I: Scope, definitions, SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS, ENGINE MARKINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND TESTS, SPECIFICATION OF CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION ASSESSMENTS, PARAMETERS DEFINING THE ENGINE FAMILY, CHOICE OF THE PARENT ENGINE
Annex II: Information documents
Appendix 1: Essential characteristics of the (parent) engine
Appendix 2: Essential characteristics of the engine family
Appendix 3: Essential characteristics of engine type within family
Annex III: TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF REFERENCE FUEL
Appendix 1: Measurement and sampling procedures
Appendix 2: Calibration of the analytical instruments
Appendix 3: Data evaluation and calculations
Annex IV: Test procedure – spark ignition engines
Appendix 1: Measurement and sampling procedures
Appendix 2: Calibration of the analytical instruments
Appendix 3: Data evaluation and calculations
Appendix 4: Deterioration factors
Annex V: Technical characteristics of reference fuel PRESCRIBED FOR APPROVAL TESTS AND TO VERIFY CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION Test procedure – compression ignition engines
Annex VI: Analytical and sampling system
Annex VII: Type approval certificate
Appendix 1: Test result for CI engines
Appendix 2: Test result for SI engines
Appendix 3: Equipment and auxiliaries to be installed for the test to determine engine power
Annex VIII: Approval certificate numbering system
Annex IX: List of engine/engine family type-approvals issued
Annex X: List of engines produced
Annex XI: Data sheet of type approved engines
ANNEX XII: recognition of alternative type approvals
"
9) The Annexes shall be amended in accordance with the Annex to this Directive.
Article 2
1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by ............. (11). They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.
When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by Member States.
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of the national law which they adopt in the field governed by this Directive.
Article 3
Not later than ............. (12), the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report and, if appropriate, a proposal regarding the potential costs, benefits and feasibility of:
a)
reducing particulate emissions from small spark ignition engines with special attention to two stroke engines. The report shall take into account:
i)
estimates of the contribution of such engines to the emission of particles, and the way proposed emission reduction measures could contribute towards improving air quality and reduced health effects,
ii)
tests, measurement procedures and equipment which could be used to assess particulate emissions from small spark ignition engines at type approval,
iii)
work and conclusion within the Particulate Measurement Programme,
iv)
developments in test procedures, engine technology, exhaust purification as well as enhanced standards for fuel and engine oil and
v)
costs of reducing particulate emissions from small spark ignition engines and the cost effectiveness of any proposed measures;
b)
reducing emissions from those recreational vehicles, including snowmobiles and go-carts, currently not covered;
c)
reducing exhaust gas and particulate emissions from small compression ignition engines under18Kw;
d)
reducing exhaust gas and particulate emissions from locomotive compression ignition engines. A test cycle should be formulated in order to measure such emissions.
Article 4
This Directive shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Article 5
This Directive is addressed to the Member States.
Done at ,
For the European Parliament For the Council
The President The President
ANNEX
1) Annex I is hereby amended as follows:
(a) The first sentence of Section 1 "SCOPE" shall be replaced by the following:
"
This Directive applies to all engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery and to secondary engines fitted into vehicles intended for passenger or goods transport on the road.
"
(b) Paragraphs 1A, B, C, D and E shall be amended as follows:
"
A.
intended and suited, to move, or to be moved on the ground, with or without road, and with either
i)
a C.I. engine having a net power in accordance with section 2.4 that is higher than 18 kW but not more than 560 kW (4) and that is operated under intermittent speed rather than a single constant speed.
Machinery, the engines .......... (remainder unchanged, down to "– mobile cranes;")
or
ii)
a C.I. engine having a net power in accordance with section 2.4 that is higher than 18 kW but not more than 560 kW and that is operated under constant speed.
The limit values only apply from 31 December 2006.
Machinery, the engines of which are covered under this definition, includes but is not limited to:
-
gas compressors,
-
generating sets with intermittent load including refrigerating units and welding sets,
-
water pumps,
-
turf care, chippers, snow removal equipment, sweepers;
or
iii)
a petrol fuelled SI engine having a net power in accordance with section 2.4 of not more than 19 kW.
Machinery, the engines of which are covered under this definition, includes but is not limited to:
-
lawn mowers,
-
chain saws,
-
generators,
-
water pumps,
-
bush cutters.
The Directive is not applicable for the following applications:
B.
ships;
C.
railway locomotives;
D.
aircraft;
E.
recreational vehicles e.g.
-
snow mobiles;
-
off road motorcycles;
-
all-terrain vehicles;
"
(c)
Section 2 shall be amended as follows:
-
The following words shall be added to footnote 2 in section 2.4:
" … except for cooling fans of air cooled engines directly fitted on the crankshaft (see Appendix 3 of Annex VII)."
-
The following indent shall be added to section 2.8:
"
- for engines to be tested on cycle G1, the intermediate speed shall be 85% of the maximum rated speed (see section 3.5.1.2. of Annex IV).
"
-
The following sections shall be added:
"
2.9.
adjustable parameter shall mean any physically adjustable device, system or element of design which may affect emission or engine performance during emission testing or normal operation;
2.10.
after-treatment shall mean the passage of exhaust gases through a device or system whose purpose is chemically or physically to alter the gases prior to release to the atmosphere;
2.11.
spark ignition (S.I.) engine shall mean an engine which works on the spark-ignition principle;
2.12.
auxiliary emission control device shall mean any device that senses engine operation parameters for the purpose of adjusting the operation of any part of the emission control system;
2.13.
emission control system shall mean any device, system or element of design which controls or reduces emissions;
2.14
fuel system shall mean all components involved in the metering and mixture of the fuel;
2.15
secondary engine shall mean an engine installed in or on a motor vehicle, but not providing motive power to the vehicle;
2.16
mode length means the time between leaving the speed and/or torque of the previous mode or the preconditioning phase and the beginning of the following mode. It includes the time during which speed and/or torque are changed and the stabilisation at the beginning of each mode.
"
-
Section 2.9 shall become section 2.17 and current sections 2.9.1 to 2.9.3 shall become sections 2.17.1 to 2.17.3.
(d) Section 3 shall be amended as follows:
-
Section 3.1 shall be replaced by the following:
"
3.1 Compression ignition engines approved in accordance with this Directive must bear:
"
-
Section 3.1.3 shall be amended as follows:
Annex VII shall be replaced by Annex VIII;
-
the following section shall be inserted:
"
3.2 Spark ignition engines approved in accordance with this Directive must bear:
3.2.1
the trade mark or trade name of the manufacturer of the engine;
3.2.2
the EC type-approval number as defined in Annex VIII;
"
- Sections 3.2 to 3.6 shall become sections 3.3 to 3.7;
-
Section 3.7 shall be amended as follows: Annex VI shall be replaced by Annex VII;
(e)
Section 4 shall be amended as follows:
-
The following heading shall be inserted:
" 4.1. ..........."4.1 CI engines.""
-
Current section 4.1 shall become section 4.1.1 and the reference to section 4.2.1 and 4.2.3. shall be replaced by a reference to section 4.1.2.1 and 4.1.2.3.;
-
Current section 4.2 shall become section 4.1.2 and shall be amended as follows: Annex V shall be replaced throughout by Annex VI;
-
Current section 4.2.1 shall become section 4.1.2.1; current section 4.2.2 shall become section 4.1.2.2 and the reference to section 4.2.1 shall be replaced by a reference to section 4.1.2.1; current sections 4.2.3 and 4.2.4 shall become sections 4.1.2.3 and 4.1.2.4.;
(f)
The following paragraph shall be added:
"
4.2. SI engines
4.2.1. General
The components liable to affect the emission of gaseous pollutants shall be so designed, constructed and assembled as to enable the engine, in normal use, despite the vibrations to which it may be subjected, to comply with the provisions of this Directive.
The technical measures taken by the manufacturer must be such as to ensure that the mentioned emissions are effectively limited, pursuant to this Directive, throughout the normal life of the engine and under normal conditions of use in accordance with Annex IV, Appendix 4.
4.2.2. Specifications concerning the emissions of pollutants.
The gaseous components emitted by the engine submitted for testing shall be measured by the methods described in Annex VI (and shall include any after-treatment device).
Other systems or analysers may be accepted if they yield equivalent results to the following reference systems:
-
for gaseous emissions measured in the raw exhaust, the system shown in Figure 2 of Annex VI,
-
for gaseous emissions measured in the dilute exhaust of a full flow dilution system, the system shown in Figure 3 of Annex VI.
4.2.2.1. The emissions of carbon monoxide, the emissions of hydrocarbons, the emissions of oxides of nitrogen and the sum of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen obtained shall for stage I not exceed the amount shown in the table below:
Stage I
Class
Carbon monoxide
(CO)
(g/kWh)
Hydrocarbons
(HC)
(g/kWh)
Oxides of nitrogen
(NOx)
(g/kWh)
Sum of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen
(g/kWh)
HC+NOx
SH:1
805
295
5,36
SH:2
805
241
5,36
SH:3
603
161
5,36
SN:1
519
50
SN:2
519
40
SN:3
519
16,1
SN:4
519
13,4
4.2.2.2. The emissions of carbon monoxide and the emissions of the sum of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen obtained shall for stage II not exceed the amount shown in the table below:
Stage II 1
Class
Carbon monoxide
(CO)
(g/kWh)
Sum of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen
(g/kWh)
HC+NOx
SH:1
805
50
SH:2
805
50
SH:3
603
72
SN:1
610
50,0
SN:2
610
40,0
SN:3
610
16,1
SN:4
610
12,1
The NOx emissions for all engine classes must not exceed 10 g/kWh.
4.2.2.3. Notwithstanding the definition of "handheld engine" in Article 2 of this Directive two-stroke engines used to power snowthrowers only have to meet SH:1, SH:2 or SH:3 standards;
_________________
1 See Annex 4, Appendix 4: deterioration factors included.
"
(g)
Sections 6.3 to 6.9 shall be replaced by the following sections:
"
6.3. Individual cylinder displacement, within 85% and 100% of the largest displacement within the engine family.
6.4. Method of air aspiration
6.5. Fuel type
-
diesel
-
petrol
6.6. Combustion chamber type/design
6.7. Valve and porting – configurations, size and number
6.8. Fuel system:
for diesel
-
pump-line injector
-
in-line pump
-
distributor pump
-
single element
-
unit injector
for petrol
-
carburettor
-
port fuel injection
-
direct injection
6.9. Miscellaneous features
- exhaust gas recirculation
- water injection/emulsion
- air injection
- charge cooling system
- ignition type (compression, spark)
6.10. Exhaust after-treatment
- oxidation catalyst
- reduction catalyst
- three way catalyst
- thermal reactor
- particulate trap.
"
2) Annex II is hereby amended as follows:
(a) In Appendix 2 the text in the table shall be amended as follows:
Fuel delivery per stroke (mm 3)" in lines 3 and 6 shall be replaced by "Fuel delivery per stroke (mm 3) for diesel engines, fuel flow (g/h) for petrol engines";
(b) Appendix 3 shall be amended as follows:
-
The heading of section 3 shall be replaced by "FUEL FEED FOR DIESEL ENGINES
-
The following sections shall be inserted:
"
4. FUEL FEED FOR PETROL ENGINES
4.1. Carburettor:
4.1.1. Make(s):
4.1.2. Type(s):
4.2. Port fuel injection: single-point or multi-point:
4.2.1. Make(s):
4.2.2. Type(s):
4.3. Direct injection:
4.3.1. Make(s):
4.3.2. Type(s):
4.4. Fuel flow [g/h] and air/fuel ratio at rated speed and wide open throttle";
"
-
Current section 4 shall become section 5 and the following points shall be added:
"
5.3. "5.3. Variable valve timing system (if applicable and where intake and/or exhaust)
5.3.1. Type: continuous or on/off
5.3.2. Cam phase shift angle";
"
-
The following sections shall be added:
"
6. "6. PORTING CONFIGURATION
6.1. Position, size and number
7. IGNITION SYSTEM
7.1. Ignition coil
7.1.1. Make(s):
7.1.2. Type(s):
7.1.3. Number:
7.2. Spark plug(s):
7.2.1. Make(s):
7.2.2. Type(s):
7.3. Magneto:
7.3.1. Make(s):
7.3.2. Type(s):
7.4. Ignition timing:
7.4.1. Static advance with respect to top dead centre [crank angle degrees]
7.4.2. Advance curve, if applicable: ";
"
3) Annex III shall be amended as follows:
(a) The heading shall be replaced by the following:
"
"TEST PROCEDURE FOR CI ENGINES";
"
(b) Section 2.7 shall be amended as follows:
Annex VI shall be replaced by Annex VII and Annex IV shall be replaced by Annex V;
(c) Section 3.6. shall be amended as follows:
-
Sections 3.6.1 and 3.6.1.1. shall be amended as follows:
"
3.6.1. "3.6.1. Equipment specifications according to Section 1A of Annex I:
3.6.1.1. Specification A: For engines covered by Section 1 A(i) of Annex I, the following 8-mode cycle 1 shall be followed in dynamometer operation on the test engine: (table unchanged);
______________
1 Identical with C1 cycle of draft ISO 8178-4.
"
-
The following section shall be added:
"
3.6.1.2. Specification B. For engines covered by Sections 1A(ii), the following 5-mode cycle 1 shall be followed in dynamometer operation on the test engine:
Mode number
Engine speed
Load %
Weighting factor
1
Rated
100
0,05
2
Rated
75
0,25
3
Rated
50
0,3
4
Rated
25
0,3
5
Rated
10
0,1
The load figures are percentage values of the torque corresponding to the prime power rating defined as the maximum power available during a variable power sequence, which may be run for an unlimited number of hours per year, between stated maintenance intervals and under the stated ambient conditions, the maintenance being carried out as prescribed by the manufacturer. 2;
_________________
1 Identical with D2 cycle of the ISO 8178-4: 1996(E) standard.
2 For a better illustration of the prime power definition, see Figure 2 of ISO 8528-1: 1993(E).
"
-
Section 3.6.3 shall be amended as follows:
"
3.6.3. Test sequence
The test sequence shall be started. The test shall be performed in ascending order of mode numbers as set out above for the test cycles.
During each mode of the given test cycle" (remainder unchanged);
"
(d)
Appendix 1, section 1 shall be amended as follows:
In section 1 and 1.4.3. Annex V shall be replaced by Annex VI throughout.
4) The following Annex shall be added:
"
"ANNEX IV
TEST PROCEDURE FOR SPARK IGNITION ENGINES
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. This Annex describes the method of determining emissions of gaseous pollutants from the engines to be tested.
1.2. The test shall be carried out with the engine mounted on a test bench and connected to a dynamometer.
2. TEST CONDITIONS
2.1. Engine test conditions
The absolute temperature (Ta) of the engine air at the inlet to the engine, expressed in Kelvin, and the dry atmospheric pressure (ps), expressed in kPa, shall be measured and the parameter fa shall be determined according to the following provisions:
2.1.1. Test validity
For a test to be recognised as valid, the parameter fa shall be such that:
2.1.2. Engines with charge air-cooling
The temperature of the cooling medium and the temperature of the charge air have to be recorded.
2.2. Engine air inlet system
The test engine shall be equipped with an air inlet system presenting an air inlet restriction within 10% of the upper limit specified by the manufacturer for a new air cleaner at the engine operating conditions, as specified by the manufacturer, which result in maximum air flow in the respective engine application.
For small spark ignition engines (<1000 cm3 displacement) a system representative of the installed engine shall be used.
2.3. Engine exhaust system
The test engine shall be equipped with an exhaust system presenting an exhaust back pressure within 10% of the upper limit specified by the manufacturer for the engine operating conditions which result in the maximum declared power in the respective engine application.
For small spark ignition engines (<1000 cm3 displacement) a system representative of the installed engine shall be used.
2.4. Cooling system
An engine cooling system with sufficient capacity to maintain the engine at normal operating temperatures prescribed by the manufacturer shall be used. This provision shall apply to units which have to be detached in order to measure the power, such as with a blower where the blower (cooling) fan has to be disassembled to get access to the crankshaft.
2.5. Lubricating oil
Lubricating oil that meets the engine manufacturer's specifications for a particular engine and intended usage shall be used. Manufacturers must use engine lubricants representative of commercially available engine lubricants.
The specifications of the lubricating oil used for the test shall be recorded at section 1.2 of Annex VII, Appendix 2 for SI engines and presented with the results of the test.
2.6. Adjustable carburettors
Engines with limited adjustable carburettors shall be tested at both extremes of the adjustment.
2.7. Test fuel
The fuel shall be the reference fuel specified in Annex V.
The octane number and the density of the reference fuel used for test shall be recorded at section 1.1.1 of Annex VII, Appendix 2 for SI engines.
For two-stroke engines, the fuel/oil mixture ratio must be the ratio which shall be recommended by the manufacturer. The percentage of oil in the fuel/lubricant mixture feeding the two-stroke engines and the resulting density of the fuel shall be recorded at section 1.1.4 of Annex VII, Appendix 2 for SI engines.
2.8. Determination of dynamometer settings
Emissions measurements shall be based on uncorrected brake power. Auxiliaries necessary only for the operation of the machine and which may be mounted on the engine shall be removed for the test. Where auxiliaries have not been removed, the power absorbed by them shall be determined in order to calculate the dynamometer settings except for engines where such auxiliaries form an integral part of the engine (e.g. cooling fans for air cooled engines).
The settings of inlet restriction and exhaust pipe backpressure shall be adjusted, for engines where it shall be possible to perform such an adjustment, to the manufacturer's upper limits, in accordance with sections 2.2 and 2.3. The maximum torque values at the specified test speeds shall be determined by experimentation in order to calculate the torque values for the specified test modes. For engines which are not designed to operate over a speed range on a full load torque curve, the maximum torque at the test speeds shall be declared by the manufacturer. The engine setting for each test mode shall be calculated using the formula:
where:
S is the dynamometer setting [kW]
PM is the maximum observed or declared power at the test speed under the test conditions (see Appendix 2 of Annex VII) [kW]
PAE is the declared total power absorbed by any auxiliary fitted for the test [kW] and not required by Appendix 3 of Annex VII
L is the percent torque specified for the test mode.
If the ratio
the value of PAE may be verified by the technical authority granting type approval.
3. TEST RUN
3.1. Installation of the measuring equipment
The instrumentation and sampling probes shall be installed as required. When using a full flow dilution system for exhaust gas dilution, the tailpipe shall be connected to the system.
3.2. Starting the dilution system and engine
The dilution system and the engine shall be started and warmed up until all temperatures and pressures have stabilised at full load and rated speed (section 3.5.2.).
3.3. Adjustment of the dilution ratio
The total dilution ratio shall not be less than four.
For CO2 or NOx concentration controlled systems, the CO2 or NOx content of the dilution air must be measured at the beginning and at the end of each test. The pre- and post-test background CO2 or NOx concentration measurements of the dilution air must be within 100 ppm or 5 ppm of each other, respectively.
When using a dilute exhaust gas analysis system, the relevant background concentrations shall be determined by sampling dilution air into a sampling bag over the complete test sequence.
Continuous (non-bag) background concentration may be taken at the minimum of three points, at the beginning, at the end, and a point near the middle of the cycle and averaged. At the manufacturer's request background measurements may be omitted.
3.4. Checking the analysers
The emission analysers shall be set at zero and spanned.
3.5. Test cycle
3.5.1. Specification (c) of machinery according to section 1A(iii) of Annex I.
The following test cycles shall be followed in dynamometer operation on the test engine according to the given type of machinery:
cycle D (13): engines with constant speed and intermittent load such as generating sets;
1 The load figures are percentage values of the torque corresponding to the prime power rating defined as the maximum power available during a variable power sequence, which may be run for an unlimited number of hours per year, between stated maintenance intervals and under the stated ambient conditions, the maintenance being carried out as prescribed by the manufacturer. For a better illustration of the prime power definition, see Figure 2 of ISO 8528-1: 1993(E).
2 For Stage I, 0,90 and 0,10 may be used instead of 0,85 and 0,15 respectively.
3.5.1.2. Choosing an appropriate test cycle
If the primary end use of an engine model is known then the test cycle may be chosen based on the examples given in section 3.5.1.3. If the primary end use of an engine is uncertain then the appropriate test cycle should be chosen based upon the engine specification.
3.5.1.3. Examples (the list is not exhaustive):
Typical examples are for:
Cycle D:
Generating sets with intermittent load including generating sets on board ships and trains (not for propulsion), refrigerating units, welding sets;
Gas compressors.
Cycle G1:
Front or rear engines riding lawn mowers;
Golf carts;
Lawn sweepers;
Pedestrian-controlled rotary or cylinder lawn mowers;
Snow removal equipment;
Waste disposers.
Cycle G2:
Portable generators, pumps, welders and air compressors;
May also include lawn and garden equipment, which operate at engine rated speed.
Cycle G3:
Blowers;
Chain saws;
Hedge trimmers;
Portable saw mills;
Rotary tillers;
Sprayers;
String trimmers;
Vacuum equipment.
3.5.2. Conditioning of the engine
Warming up of the engine and the system shall be at maximum speed and torque in order to stabilise the engine parameters according to the recommendations of the manufacturer.
Note: The conditioning period should also prevent the influence of deposits from a former test in the exhaust system. There is also a required period of stabilisation between test points which has been included to minimise point to point influences.
3.5.3. Test sequence
Test cycles G1, G2 or G3 shall be performed in ascending order of mode number of the cycle in question. Each mode sampling time shall be at least 180 s. The exhaust emission concentration values shall be measured and recorded for the last 120 s of the respective sampling time. For each measuring point, the mode length shall be of sufficient duration to achieve thermal stability of the engine prior to the start of sampling. The mode length shall be recorded and reported.
(a) For engines tested with the dynamometer speed control test configuration: During each mode of the test cycle after the initial transition period, the specified speed shall be held to within ± 1% of rated speed or ± 3 min-1 whichever is greater except for low idle which shall be within the tolerances declared by the manufacturer. The specified torque shall be held so that the average over the period during which the measurements are being taken is within ± 2% of the maximum torque at the test speed.
(b) For engines tested with the dynamometer load control test configuration: During each mode of the test cycle after the initial transition period, the specified speed shall be within ± 2% of rated speed or ± 3 min-1 whichever is greater, but shall in any case be held within ± 5%, except for low idle which shall be within the tolerances declared by the manufacturer.
During each mode of the test cycle where the prescribed torque is 50% or greater of the maximum torque at the test speed the specified average torque over the data acquisition period shall be held within ± 5% of the prescribed torque. During modes of the test cycle where the prescribed torque is less than 50% of the maximum torque at the test speed the specified average torque over the data acquisition period shall be held within ± 10% of the prescribed torque or ± 0.5 Nm whichever is greater.
3.5.4. Analyser response
The output of the analysers shall be recorded on a strip chart recorder or measured with an equivalent data acquisition system with the exhaust gas flowing through the analysers at least during the last 180 s of each mode. If bag sampling is applied for the diluted CO and CO2 measurement (see Appendix 1, section 1.4.4), a sample shall be bagged during the last 180 s of each mode, and the bag sample analysed and recorded.
3.5.5. Engine conditions
The engine speed and load, intake air temperature and fuel flow shall be measured for each mode once the engine has been stabilised. Any additional data required for calculation shall be recorded (see Appendix 3, sections 1.1 and 1.2).
3.6. Rechecking the analysers
After the emission test a zero gas and the same span gas shall be used for re-checking. The test shall be considered acceptable if the difference between the two measuring results is less than 2%.
APPENDIX 1
1. MEASUREMENT AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Gaseous components emitted by the engine submitted for testing shall be measured by the methods described in Annex VI. The methods of Annex VI describe the recommended analytical systems for the gaseous emissions (section 1.1).
1.1. Dynamometer specification
An engine dynamometer with adequate characteristics to perform the test cycles described in Annex IV, section 3.5.1 shall be used. The instrumentation for torque and speed measurement shall allow the measurement of the shaft power within the given limits. Additional calculations may be necessary.
The accuracy of the measuring equipment must be such that the maximum tolerances of the figures given in section 1.3 are not exceeded.
1.2. Fuel flow and total diluted flow
Fuel flow meters with the accuracy defined in section 1.3 shall be used to measure the fuel flow that will be used to calculate emissions (Appendix 3). When using a full flow dilution system, the total flow of the dilute exhaust (GTOTW) shall be measured with a PDP or CFV - Annex VI, section 1.2.1.2. The accuracy shall conform to the provisions of Annex III, Appendix 2, section 2.2.
1.3. Accuracy
The calibration of all measuring instruments shall be traceable to national (international) standards and comply with the requirements given in tables 2 and 3.
Table 2‐ Permissible deviations of instruments for engine related parameters
No.
Item
Permissible deviation
1
Engine speed
± 2% of the reading or ± 1% of engine's max value whichever is larger
2
Torque
± 2% of the reading or ± 1% of engine's max value whichever is larger
3
Fuel consumption a
± 2% of engine's max value
4
Air consumption a
± 2% of the reading or ± 1% of engine's max value whichever is larger
The calculations of the exhaust emissions as described in this Directive are, in some cases, based on different measurement and/or calculation methods. Because of limited total tolerances for the exhaust emission calculation, the allowable values for some items, used in the appropriate equations, must be smaller than the allowed tolerances given in ISO 3046-3.
Table 3‐ Permissible deviations of instruments for other essential parameters
No.
Item
Permissible deviation
1
Temperatures ≤ 600 K
± 2 K absolute
2
Temperatures ≥ 600 K
± 1% of reading
3
Exhaust gas pressure
± 0,2 kPa absolute
4
Inlet manifold depressions
± 0,05 kPa absolute
5
Atmospheric pressure
± 0,1 kPa absolute
6
Other pressures
±0,1 kPa absolute
7
Relative humidity
± 3% absolute
8
Absolute humidity
± 5% of reading
9
Dilution air flow
± 2% of reading
10
Diluted exhaust gas flow
± 2% of reading
1.4. Determination of the gaseous components
1.4.1. General analyser specifications
The analysers shall have a measuring range appropriate for the accuracy required for measuring the concentrations of the exhaust gas components (section 1.4.1.1). It is recommended that the analysers be operated such that the measured concentration falls between 15% and 100% of full scale.
If the full scale value is 155 ppm (or ppmC) or less or if read-out systems (computers, data loggers) that provide sufficient accuracy and resolution below 15% of full scale are used concentrations below 15% of full scale are also acceptable. In this case, additional calibrations are to be made to ensure the accuracy of the calibration curves - Appendix 2, section 1.5.5.2 of this Aannex.
The electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of the equipment shall be on a level as to minimise additional errors.
1.4.1.1. Accuracy
The analyser shall not deviate from the nominal calibration point by more than ± 2% of the reading over the whole measurement range except zero, and ± 0,3% of full scale at zero. The accuracy shall be determined according to the calibration requirements laid down in section 1.3.
1.4.1.2. Repeatability
The repeatability, shall be such that 2,5 times the standard deviation of 10 repetitive responses to a given calibration or span gas is not greater than ± 1% of full scale concentration for each range used above 100 ppm (or ppmC) or ± 2% of each range used below 100 ppm (or ppmC).
1.4.1.3. Noise
The analyser peak-to-peak response to zero and calibration or span gases over any 10 s period shall not exceed 2% of full scale on all ranges used.
1.4.1.4. Zero drift
Zero response is defined as the mean response, including noise, to a zero gas during a 30-s time interval. The drift of the zero response during a one-hour period shall be less than 2% of full scale on the lowest range used.
1.4.1.5. Span drift
Span response is defined as the mean response, including noise, to a span gas during a 30-s time interval. The drift of the span response during a one-hour period shall be less than 2% of full scale on the lowest range used.
1.4.2. Gas drying
Exhaust gases may be measured wet or dry. Any gas-drying device, if used, must have a minimal effect on the concentration of the measured gases. Chemical dryers are not an acceptable method of removing water from the sample.
1.4.3. Analysers
Sections 1.4.3.1 to 1.4.3.5 describe the measurement principles to be used. A detailed description of the measurement systems is given in Annex VI.
The gases to be measured shall be analysed with the following instruments. For non-linear analysers, the use of linearising circuits is permitted.
1.4.3.1. Carbon monoxide (CO) analysis
The carbon monoxide analyser shall be of the non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) absorption type.
1.4.3.2. Carbon dioxide (CO2) analysis
The carbon dioxide analyser shall be of the non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) absorption type.
1.4.3.3. Oxygen (O2) analysis
Oxygen analysers shall be of the paramagnetic detector (PMD), zirconium dioxide (ZRDO) or electrochemical sensor (ECS) types.
Note – Zirconium dioxide sensors are not recommended when HC and CO concentrations are high such as for lean burn spark ignited engines. Electrochemical sensors shall be compensated for CO2 and NOX interference.
1.4.3.4. Hydrocarbon (HC) analysis
For direct gas sampling the hydrocarbon analyser shall be of the heated flame ionisation detector (HFID) type with detector, valves, pipework, etc., heated so as to maintain a gas temperature of 463 ± 10 K (190 ± 10 °C).
For diluted gas sampling the hydrocarbon analyser shall be either the heated flame ionisation detector (HFID) type or the flame ionisation detector (FID) type.
1.4.3.5. Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) analysis
The oxides of nitrogen analyser shall be of the chemiluminescent detector (CLD) or heated chemiluminescent detector (HCLD) type with a NO2/NO converter, if measured on a dry basis. If measured on a wet basis, a HCLD with converter maintained above 328 K (55 °C) shall be used, provided the water quench check (Annex III, Appendix 2, section 1.9.2.2) is satisfied. For both CLD and HCLD, the sampling path shall be maintained at a wall temperature of 328 K to 473 K (55 °C to 200 °C) up to the converter for dry measurement, and up to the analyser for wet measurement.
1.4.4. Sampling for gaseous emissions
If the composition of the exhaust gas is influenced by any exhaust after-treatment system, the exhaust sample shall be taken downstream of this device.
The exhaust sampling probe should be in a high pressure side of the muffler, but as far from the exhaust port as possible. To ensure complete mixing of the engine exhaust before sample extraction, a mixing chamber may be optionally inserted between the muffler outlet and the sample probe. The internal volume of the mixing chamber must be not less than 10 times the cylinder displacement of the engine under test and should be roughly equal dimensions in height, width and depth, being similar to a cube. The mixing chamber size should be kept as small as practicable and should be coupled as close as possible to the engine. The exhaust line leaving the mixing chamber of muffler should extend at least 610 mm beyond the sample probe location and be of sufficient size to minimise back pressure. The temperature of the inner surface of the mixing chamber must be maintained above the dew point of the exhaust gases and a minimum temperature of 338 °K (65 °C) is recommended.
All components may optionally be measured directly in the dilution tunnel, or by sampling into a bag and subsequent measurement of the concentration in the sampling bag.
APPENDIX 2
1. CALIBRATION OF THE ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS
1.1. Introduction
Each analyser shall be calibrated as often as necessary to fulfil the accuracy requirements of this standard. The calibration method that shall be used is described in this paragraph for the analysers indicated in Appendix 1, section 1.4.3.
1.2. Calibration gases
The shelf life of all calibration gases must be respected.
The expiry date of the calibration gases stated by the manufacturer shall be recorded.
1.2.1. Pure gases
The required purity of the gases is defined by the contamination limits given below. The following gases must be available for operation:
purified synthetic air (contamination ≤1 ppmC, ≤1 ppm CO, ≤400 ppmCO2, ≤ 0,1 ppm NO (oxygen content between 18 and 21% vol)
1.2.2. Calibration and span gases
Mixture of gases having the following chemical compositions shall be available:
- C3H8 and purified synthetic air (see section 1.2.1.);
-
CO and purified nitrogen;
-
NOx and purified nitrogen (the amount of NO2 contained in this calibration gas must not exceed 5% of the NO content);
-
CO2 and purified nitrogen;
-
CH4 and purified synthetic air;
-
C2H6 and purified synthetic air.
Note: Other gas combinations are allowed provided the gases do not react with one another.
The true concentration of a calibration and span gas shall be within ± 2% of the nominal value. All concentrations of calibration gas shall be given on a volume basis (volume percent or volume ppm).
The gases used for calibration and span may also be obtained by means of precision blending devices (gas dividers), diluting with purified N2 or with purified synthetic air. The accuracy of the mixing device must be such that the concentration of the diluted calibration gases is accurate to within ± 1,5%. This accuracy implies that primary gases used for blending must be known to an accuracy of at least ± 1%, traceable to national or international gas standards. The verification shall be performed at between 15 and 50% of full scale for each calibration incorporating a blending device.
Optionally, the blending device may be checked with an instrument, which by nature is linear, e.g. using NO gas with a CLD. The span value of the instrument shall be adjusted with the span gas directly connected to the instrument. The blending device shall be checked at the used settings and the nominal value shall be compared to the measured concentration of the instrument. This difference shall in each point be within ± 0,5% of the nominal value.
1.2.3. Oxygen interference check
Oxygen interference check gases shall contain propane with 350 ppmC ± 75 ppmC hydrocarbon. The concentration value shall be determined to calibration gas tolerances by chromatographic analysis of total hydrocarbons plus impurities or by dynamic blending. Nitrogen shall be the predominant diluent with the balance oxygen. Blend required for gasoline-fuelled engine testing is as follows:
O2 interference concentration
Balance
10 (9 to 11)
Nitrogen
5 (4 to 6)
Nitrogen
0 (0 to 1)
Nitrogen
1.3. Operating procedure for analysers and sampling system
The operating procedure for analysers shall follow the start-up and operating instructions of the instrument manufacturer. The minimum requirements given in sections 1.4 to 1.9 shall be included. For laboratory instruments such as GC and High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) only section 1.5.4 shall apply.
1.4. Leakage test
A system leakage test shall be performed. The probe shall be disconnected from the exhaust system and the end plugged. The analyser pump shall be switched on. After an initial stabilisation period all flow meters should read zero. If not, the sampling lines shall be checked and the fault corrected.
The maximum allowable leakage rate on the vacuum side shall be 0,5% of the in-use flow rate for the portion of the system being checked. The analyser flows and bypass flows may be used to estimate the in-use flow rates.
Alternatively, the system may be evacuated to a pressure of at least 20 kPa vacuum (80 kPa absolute). After an initial stabilisation period the pressure increase δp (kPa/min) in the system shall not exceed:
Where:
Vsyst = system volume [l]
fr = system flow rate [l/min]
Another method is the introduction of a concentration step change at the beginning of the sampling line by switching from zero to span gas. If after an adequate period of time the reading shows a lower concentration compared to the introduced concentration, this points to calibration or leakage problems.
1.5. Calibration procedure
1.5.1. Instrument assembly
The instrument assembly shall be calibrated and calibration curves checked against standard gases. The same gas flow rates shall be used as when sampling exhaust gas.
1.5.2. Warming-up time
The warming-up time should be according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. If not specified, a minimum of two hours is recommended for warming-up the analysers.
1.5.3. NDIR and HFID analyser
The NDIR analyser shall be tuned, as necessary, and the combustion flame of the HFID analyser shall be optimised (section 1.9.1).
1.5.4. GC and HPCL
Both instruments shall be calibrated according to good laboratory practice and the recommendations of the manufacturer.
1.5.5. Establishment of the calibration curves
1.5.5.1. General guidelines
(a) Each normally used operating range shall be calibrated.
(b) Using purified synthetic air (or nitrogen), the CO, CO2, NOx and HC analysers shall be set at zero.
(c) The appropriate calibration gases shall be introduced to the analysers, the values recorded, and the calibration curves established.
(d) For all instrument ranges except for the lowest range, the calibration curve shall be established by at least 10 calibration points (excluding zero) equally spaced. For the lowest range of the instrument, the calibration curve shall be established by at least 10 calibration points (excluding zero) spaced so that half of the calibration points are placed below 15% of the analyser's full scale and the rest are placed above 15% of full scale. For all ranges the highest nominal concentration must be equal to or higher than 90% of full scale.
(e) The calibration curve shall be calculated by the method of least squares. A best-fit linear or non-linear equation may be used.
(f) The calibration points must not differ from the least-squares best-fit line by more than ± 2% of reading or ± 0,3% of full scale whichever is larger.
(g) The zero setting shall be rechecked and the calibration procedure repeated, if necessary.
1.5.5.2. Alternative methods
If it can be shown that alternative technology (e.g. computer, electronically controlled range switch, etc.) can give equivalent accuracy, then these alternatives may be used.
1.6. Verification of the calibration
Each normally used operating range shall be checked prior to each analysis in accordance with the following procedure.
The calibration is checked by using a zero gas and a span gas whose nominal value is more than 80% of full scale of the measuring range.
If, for the two points considered, the value found does not differ by more than ± 4% of full scale from the declared reference value, the adjustment parameters may be modified. Should this not be the case, the span gas shall be verified or a new calibration curve shall be established in accordance with section 1.5.5.1.
1.7. Calibration of tracer gas analyser for exhaust flow measurement
The analyser for measurement of the tracer gas concentration shall be calibrated using the standard gas.
The calibration curve shall be established by at least 10 calibration points (excluding zero) spaced so that half of the calibration points are placed between 4% to 20% of the analyser's full scale and the rest are in between 20% and 100% of the full scale. The calibration curve shall be calculated by the method of least squares.
The calibration curve must not differ by more than ± 1% of the full scale from the nominal value of each calibration point, in the range from 20% to 100% of the full scale. It also must not differ by more than ± 2% of reading from the nominal value in the range from 4% to 20% of the full scale. The analyser shall be set at zero and spanned prior to the test run using a zero gas and a span gas whose nominal value is more than 80% of the analyser full scale.
1.8. Efficiency test of the NOx converter
The efficiency of the converter used for the conversion of NO2 into NO is tested as given in sections 1.8.1 to 1.8.8 (Figure 1 of Annex III, Appendix 2).
1.8.1. Test set-up
Using the test set-up as shown in Figure 1 of Annex III and the procedure below, the efficiency of converters can be tested by means of an ozonator.
1.8.2. Calibration
The CLD and the HCLD shall be calibrated in the most common operating range following the manufacturer's specifications using zero and span gas (the NO content of which must amount to about 80% of the operating range and the NO2 concentration of the gas mixture to less than 5% of the NO concentration). The NOx analyser must be in the NO mode so that the span gas does not pass through the converter. The indicated concentration has to be recorded.
1.8.3. Calculation
The efficiency of the NOx, converter is calculated as follows:
Where:
a = NOx concentration according to section 1.8.6;
b = NOx concentration according to section 1.8.7;
c = NO concentration according to section 1.8.4;
d = NO concentration according to section 1.8.5.
1.8.4. Adding of oxygen
Via a T-fitting, oxygen or zero air is added continuously to the gas flow until the concentration indicated is about 20% less than the indicated calibration concentration given in section 1.8.2. (The analyser is in the NO mode.)
The indicated concentration (c) shall be recorded. The ozonator is kept deactivated throughout the process.
1.8.5. Activation of the ozonator
The ozonator is now activated to generate enough ozone to bring the NO concentration down to about 20% (minimum 10%) of the calibration concentration given in section 1.8.2. The indicated concentration (d) shall be recorded. (The analyser is in the NO mode.)
1.8.6. NOx mode
The NO analyser is then switched to the NOx mode so that the gas mixture (consisting of NO, NO2, 02 and N2) now passes through the converter. The indicated concentration (a) shall be recorded. (The analyser is in the NOx mode.)
1.8.7. Deactivation of the ozonator
The ozonator is now deactivated. The mixture of gases described in section 1.8.6 passes through the converter into the detector. The indicated concentration (b) shall be recorded. (The analyser is in the NOx mode.)
1.8.8. NO mode
Switched to NO mode with the ozonator deactivated, the flow of oxygen or synthetic air is also shut off. The NOx reading of the analyser shall not deviate by more than ± 5% from the value measured according to section 1.8.2. (The analyser is in the NO mode.)
1.8.9. Test interval
The efficiency of the converter must be checked monthly.
1.8.10. Efficiency requirement
The efficiency of the converter shall not be less than 90%, but a higher efficiency of 95% is strongly recommended.
Note: If, with the analyser in the most common range, the ozonator cannot give a reduction from 80% to 20% according to section 1.8.5, then the highest range which will give the reduction shall be used.
1.9. Adjustment of the FID
1.9.1. Optimisation of the detector response
The HFID must be adjusted as specified by the instrument manufacturer. A propane in air span gas should be used to optimise the response on the most common operating range.
With the fuel and airflow rates set at the manufacturer's recommendations, a 350 ± 75 ppmC span gas shall be introduced to the analyser. The response at a given fuel flow shall be determined from the difference between the span gas response and the zero gas response. The fuel flow shall be incrementally adjusted above and below the manufacturer's specification. The span and zero response at these fuel flows shall be recorded. The difference between the span and zero response shall be plotted and the fuel flow adjusted to the rich side of the curve. This is the initial flow rate setting, which may need further optimisation depending on the results of the hydrocarbon response factor and the oxygen interference check according to sections 1.9.2 and 1.9.3.
If the oxygen interference or the hydrocarbon response factors do not meet the following specifications, the airflow shall be incrementally adjusted above and below the manufacturer's specifications, sections 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 should be repeated for each flow.
1.9.2. Hydrocarbon response factors
The analyser shall be calibrated using propane in air and purified synthetic air, according to section 1.5.
Response factors shall be determined when introducing an analyser into service and after major service intervals. The response factor (Rf) for a particular hydrocarbon species is the ratio of the FID C1 reading to the gas concentration in the cylinder expressed by ppm C1.
The concentration of the test gas must be at a level to give a response of approximately 80% of full scale. The concentration must be known to an accuracy of ± 2% in reference to a gravimetric standard expressed in volume. In addition, the gas cylinder must be preconditioned for 24 hours at a temperature of 298 K (25 °C) ± 5 K.
The test gases to be used and the recommended relative response factor ranges are as follows:
-
methane and purified synthetic air: 1,00 ≤ Rf ≤1,15
-
propylene and purified synthetic air: 0,90 ≤ Rf ≤ 1,1
-
toluene and purified synthetic air: 0,90 ≤ Rf ≤ 1,10
These values are relative to the response factor (Rf) of 1,00 for propane and purified synthetic air.
1.9.3. Oxygen interference check
The oxygen interference check shall be determined when introducing an analyser into service and after major service intervals. A range shall be chosen where the oxygen interference check gases will fall in the upper 50%. The test shall be conducted with the oven temperature set as required. The oxygen interference gases are specified in section 1.2.3.
(a) The analyser shall be zeroed.
(b) The analyser shall be spanned with the 0% oxygen blend for gasoline fuelled engines.
(c) The zero response shall be rechecked. If it has changed more than 0,5% of full scale subsections (a) and (b) of this section shall be repeated.
(d) The 5% and 10% oxygen interference check gases shall be introduced.
(e) The zero response shall be rechecked. If it has changed more than ± 1% of full scale, the test shall be repeated.
(f) The oxygen interference (%O2I) shall be calculated for each mixture in step (d) as follows:
Where:
A = hydrocarbon concentration (ppmC) of the span gas used in subsection (b)
B = hydrocarbon concentration (ppmC) of the oxygen interference check gases used in subsection (d)
C = analyser response
D = percent of full scale analyser response due to A
(g) The % of oxygen interference (%O2I) shall be less than ± 3% for all required oxygen interference check gases prior to testing.
(h) If the oxygen interference is greater than ± 3%, the air flow above and below the manufacturer's specifications shall be incrementally adjusted, repeating section 1.9.1 for each flow.
(i) If the oxygen interference is greater than ± 3%, after adjusting the air flow, the fuel flow and thereafter the sample flow shall be varied, repeating section 1.9.1. for each new setting.
(j) If the oxygen interference is still greater than ± 3%, the analyser, FID fuel, or burner air shall be repaired or replaced prior to testing. This section shall then be repeated with the repaired or replaced equipment or gases.
1.10. Interference effects with CO, CO2, NOX and O2 analysers
Gases other than the one being analysed can interfere with the reading in several ways. Positive interference occurs in NDIR and PMD instruments where the interfering gas gives the same effect as the gas being measured, but to a lesser degree. Negative interference occurs in NDIR instruments by the interfering gas broadening the absorption band of the measured gas, and in CLD instruments by the interfering gas quenching the radiation. The interference checks in sections 1.10.1 and 1.10.2 shall be performed prior to an analyser's initial use and after major service intervals, but at least once per year.
1.10.1. CO analyser interference check
Water and CO2 can interfere with the CO analyser performance. Therefore a CO2 span gas having a concentration of 80 to 100% of full scale of the maximum operating range used during testing shall be bubbled through water at room temperature and the analyser response recorded. The analyser response must not be more than 1% of full scale for ranges equal to or above 300 ppm or more than 3 ppm for ranges below 300 ppm.
1.10.2. NOx analyser quench checks
The two gases of concern for CLD (and HCLD) analysers are CO2 and water vapour. Quench responses of these gases are proportional to their concentrations, and therefore require test techniques to determine the quench at the highest expected concentrations experienced during testing.
1.10.2.1. CO2 quench check
A C02 span gas having a concentration of 80 to 100% of full scale of the maximum operating range shall be passed through the NDIR analyser and the CO2 value recorded as A. It shall then be diluted approximately 50% with NO span gas and passed through the NDIR and (H)CLD with the CO2 and NO values recorded as B and C, respectively. The CO2 shall be shut off and only the NO span gas is passed through the (H)CLD and the NO value recorded as D.
The quench, which shall not be greater than 3% full scale, shall be calculated as follows:
Where:
A. undiluted CO2 concentration measured with NDIR %
B. diluted CO2 concentration measured with NDIR %
C. diluted NO concentration measured with CLD ppm
D. undiluted NO concentration measured with CLD ppm
Alternative methods of diluting and quantifying CO2 and NO span gas values, such as dynamic/mixing/blending, can be used.
1.10.2.2. Water quench check
This check applies to wet gas concentration measurements only. Calculation of water quench must consider dilution of the NO span gas with water vapour and scaling of water vapour concentration of the mixture to that expected during testing.
A NO span gas having a concentration of 80 to 100% of full scale to the normal operating range shall be passed through the (H)CLD and the NO value recorded as D. The NO span gas shall then be bubbled through water at room temperature and passed through the (H)CLD and the NO value recorded as C. The water temperature shall be determined and recorded as F. The mixture's saturation vapour pressure that corresponds to the bubbler water temperature (F) shall be determined and recorded as G. The water vapour concentration (in %) of the mixture shall be calculated as follows:
and recorded as H. The expected diluted NO span gas (in water vapour) concentration shall be calculated as follows:
and recorded as De.
The water quench shall not be greater than 3% and shall be calculated as follows:
Where:
De: expected diluted NO concentration (ppm)
C: diluted NO concentration (ppm)
Hm maximum water vapour concentration
H: actual water vapour concentration (%)
Note: It is important that the NO span gas contains minimal NO2 concentration for this check, since absorption of NO2 in water has not been accounted for in the quench calculations.
1.10.3. O2 analyser interference
Instrument response of a PMD analyser caused by gases other than oxygen is comparatively slight. The oxygen equivalents of the common exhaust gas constituents are shown in Table 1.
Table ‐ Oxygen equivalents
Gas
O2 equivalent
%
Carbon dioxide (CO2)
– 0,623
Carbon monoxide (CO)
– 0,354
Nitrogen oxide (NO)
+ 44,4
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
+ 28,7
Water (H2O)
– 0,381
The observed oxygen concentration shall be corrected by the following formula if high precision measurements are to be done:
1.11. Calibration intervals
The analysers shall be calibrated according to section 1.5 at least every three months or whenever a system repair or change is made that could influence calibration.
APPENDIX 3
1. DATA EVALUATION AND CALCULATIONS
1.1. Gaseous emissions evaluation
For the evaluation of the gaseous emissions, the chart reading for a minimum of the last 120 s of each mode shall be averaged, and the average concentrations (conc) of HC, CO, NOx and CO2 during each mode shall be determined from the average chart readings and the corresponding calibration data. A different type of recording can be used if it ensures an equivalent data acquisition.
The average background concentration (concd) may be determined from the bag readings of the dilution air or from the continuous (non-bag) background reading and the corresponding calibration data.
1.2. Calculation of the gaseous emissions
The finally reported test results shall be derived through the following steps.
1.2.1. Dry/wet correction
The measured concentration, if not already measured on a wet basis, shall be converted to a wet basis:
For the raw exhaust gas:
Where α is the hydrogen to carbon ratio in the fuel.
The H2 concentration in the exhaust shall be calculated:
The factor kw2 shall be calculated:
with Ha = absolute humidity of the intake air as g of water per kg of dry air.
For the diluted exhaust gas:
For wet CO2 measurement:
Or, for dry CO2 measurement:
Where α is the hydrogen to carbon ratio in the fuel.
XXX
Where:
Hd = absolute humidity of the dilution air, g of water per kg of dry air
Ha = absolute humidity of the intake air, g of water per kg of dry air
For the dilution air:
The factor kw1 shall be calculated from the following equations:
Where:
Hd = absolute humidity of the dilution air, g of water per kg of dry air
Ha = absolute humidity of the intake air, g of water per kg of dry air
For the intake air (if different from the dilution air):
XXX
with Ha absolute humidity of the intake air, g of water per kg of dry air.
1.2.2. Humidity correction for NOx
As the NOx emission depends on ambient air conditions, the NOx concentration shall be multiplied by the factor KH taking into account humidity:
with Ha = absolute humidity of the intake air as g of water per kg of dry air
1.2.3. Calculation of emission mass flow rate
The emission mass flow rates Gasmass [g/h] for each mode shall be calculated as follows.
MWGas [kg/kmole] is the molecular weight of the individual gas shown in Table 1;
Table 1 – Molecular weights
Gas
MWGas [kg/kmole]
NOx
46,01
CO
28,01
HC
CO2
44,01
–MWFUEL = 12,011 + α x 1,00794 + ß x 15,9994 [kg/kmole] is the fuel molecular weight with α hydrogen to carbon ratio and ß oxygen to carbon ratio of the fuel (15);
–
CO2AIR is the CO2 concentration in the intake air (that is assumed equal to 0,04% if not measured);
GTOTW [kg/h] is the diluted exhaust gas mass flow rate on wet basis that, when using a full flow dilution system, shall be determined according to Annex III, Appendix 1, section 1.2.4;
– concc is the background corrected concentration:
The u coefficient is shown in Table 2.
Table 2 – Values of u coefficient
Gas
u
conc
NOx
0,001587
ppm
CO
0,000966
ppm
HC
0,000479
ppm
CO2
15,19
%
Values of the u coefficient are based upon a molecular weight of the dilute exhaust gases equal to 29 [kg/kmole]; the value of u for HC is based upon an average carbon to hydrogen ratio of 1:1.85.
1.2.4. Calculation of specific emissions
The specific emission (g/kWh) shall be calculated for all individual components:
Where Pi = PM,i + PAE,i
When auxiliaries, such as cooling fan or blower, are fitted for the test, the power absorbed shall be added to the results except for engines where such auxiliaries are an integral part of the engine. The fan or blower power shall be determined at the speeds used for the tests either by calculation from standard characteristics or by practical tests (Appendix 3 of Annex VII).
The weighting factors and the number of the n modes used in the above calculation are shown in Annex IV, section 3.5.1.1.
2. EXAMPLES
2.1. Raw exhaust gas data from a 4-stroke SI engine
With reference to the experimental data (Table 3), calculations are carried out first for mode #1 and then are extended to other test modes using the same procedure.
Table 3
Experimental data of a 4-stroke SI engine
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
Engine speed
min -1
2550
2550
2550
2550
2550
1480
Power
kW
9,96
7,5
4,88
2,36
0,94
0
Load percent
%
100
75
50
25
10
0
Weighting factors
-
0,090
0,200
0,290
0,300
0,070
0,050
Barometric pressure
kPa
101,0
101,0
101,0
101,0
101,0
101,0
Air temperature
°C
20,5
21,3
22,4
22,4
20,7
21,7
Air relative humidity
%
38,0
38,0
38,0
37,0
37,0
38,0
Air absolute humidity
gH20/kgair
5,696
5,986
6,406
6,236
5,614
6,136
CO dry
ppm
60995
40725
34646
41976
68207
37439
NOx wet
ppm
726
1541
1328
377
127
85
HC wet
ppmC1
1461
1308
1401
2073
3024
9390
CO2 dry
% Vol.
11,4098
12,691
13,058
12,566
10,822
9,516
Fuel mass flow
kg/h
2,985
2,047
1,654
1,183
1,056
0,429
Fuel H/C ratio α
-
1,85
1,85
1,85
1,85
1,85
1,85
Fuel O/C ratio β
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.1.1. Dry/wet correction factor kw
The dry/wet correction factor kw shall be calculated for converting dry CO and CO2 measurements on a wet basis:
Where:
and:
Table 4
CO and CO2 wet values according to different test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
H2 dry
%
2,450
1,499
1,242
1,554
2,834
1,422
kw2
-
0,009
0,010
0,010
0,010
0,009
0,010
kw
-
0,872
0,870
0,869
0,870
0,874
0,894
CO wet
ppm
53198
35424
30111
36518
59631
33481
CO2 wet
%
9,951
11,039
11,348
10,932
9,461
8,510
2.1.2. C emissions
Where:
Table 5 – HC emissions [g/h] according to different test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
HCmass
28,361
18,248
16,026
16,625
20,357
31,578
2.1.3. NOx emissions
At first the humidity correction factor KH of NOx emissions shall be calculated:
Table 6
Humidity correction factor KH of NOx emissions according to different modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
KH
0,850
0,860
0,874
0,868
0,847
0,865
Then NOxmass [g/h] shall be calculated:
Table 7
NOx emissions [g/h] according to the different test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
NOxmass
39,717
61,291
44,013
8,703
2,401
0,820
2.1.4. CO emissions
Table 8
CO emissions [g/h] according to different test modes
Mode:
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
COmass
2084,588
997,638
695,278
591,183
810,334
227,285
2.1.5. CO2 emissions
Table 9
CO2 emissions [g/h] according to different test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
CO2mass
6126,806
4884,739
4117,202
2780,662
2020,061
907,648
2.1.6. Specific emissions
The specific emission (g/kWh) shall be calculated for all individual components:
Table 10
Emissions [g/h] and weighting factors according to the test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
HCmass
g/h
28,361
18,248
16,026
16,625
20,357
31,578
NOxmass
g/h
39,717
61,291
44,013
8,703
2,401
0,820
COmass
g/h
2084,588
997,638
695,278
591,183
810,334
227,285
CO2mass
g/h
6126,806
4884,739
4117,202
2780,662
2020,061
907,648
Power PI
KW
9,96
7,50
4,88
2,36
0,94
0
Weighting factors WFI
-
0,090
0,200
0,290
0,300
0,070
0,050
2.2. Raw exhaust gas data from a 2-stroke SI engine
With reference to the experimental data (Table 11), calculations shall be carried out first for mode #1 and then extended to the other test mode using the same procedure.
Table 11
Experimental data of a 2-stroke SI engine
Mode
#1
#2
Engine speed
min -1
9500
2800
Power
kW
2,31
0
Load percent
%
100
0
Weighting factors
-
0,9
0,1
Barometric pressure
kPa
100,3
100,3
Air temperature
°C
25,4
25
Air relative humidity
%
38,0
38,0
Air absolute humidity
gH20/kgair
7,742
7,558
CO dry
ppm
37086
16150
NOx wet
ppm
183
15
HC wet
ppmC1
14220
13179
CO2 dry
% Vol.
11,986
11,446
Fuel mass flow
kg/h
1,195
0,089
Fuel H/C ratio α
-
1,85
1,85
Fuel O/C ratio β
0
0
2.2.1. Dry/wet correction factor kw
The dry/wet correction factor kw shall be calculated for converting dry CO and CO2 measurements on a wet basis:
Where:
Table 12
CO and CO2 wet values according to different test modes
Mode
#1
#2
H2 dry
%
1,357
0,543
kw2
-
0,012
0,012
kw
-
0,874
0,887
CO wet
ppm
32420
14325
CO2 wet
%
10,478
10,153
2.2.2. HC emissions
Where:
Table 13
HC emissions [g/h] according to test modes
Mode
#1
#2
HCmass
112,520
9,119
2.2.3. NOx emissions
The factor KH for the correction of the NOx emissions is equal to 1 for two-stroke engines:
Table 14
NOx emissions [g/h] according to test modes
Mode
#1
#2
NOxmass
4,800
0,034
2.2.4. CO emissions
Table 15
CO emissions [g/h] according to test modes
Mode
#1
#2
COmass
517,851
20,007
2.2.5. CO2 emissions
Table 16
CO2 emissions [g/h] according to test modes
Mode
#1
#2
CO2mass
2629,658
222,799
2.2.6. Specific emissions
The specific emission (g/kWh) shall be calculated for all individual components in the following way:
Table 17
Emissions [g/h] and weighting factors in two test modes
Mode
#1
#2
HCmass
g/h
112,520
9,119
NOxmass
g/h
4,800
0,034
COmass
g/h
517,851
20,007
CO2mass
g/h
2629,658
222,799
Power PII
kW
2,31
0
Weighting factors WFi
-
0,85
0,15
2.3. Diluted exhaust gas data from a 4-stroke SI engine
With reference to the experimental data (Table 18), calculations shall be carried out first for mode #1 and then extended to other test modes using the same procedure.
Table 18
Experimental data of a 4-stroke SI engine
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
Engine speed
min -1
3060
3060
3060
3060
3060
2100
Power
kW
13,15
9,81
6,52
3,25
1,28
0
Load percent
%
100
75
50
25
10
0
Weighting factors
-
0,090
0,200
0,290
0,300
0,070
0,050
Barometric pressure
kPa
980
980
980
980
980
980
Intake air temperature(1)
°C
25,3
25,1
24,5
23,7
23,5
22,6
Intake air relative humidity(1)
%
19,8
19,8
20,6
21,5
21,9
23,2
Intake air absolute humidity(1)
GH20/kgair
4,08
4,03
4,05
4,03
4,05
4,06
CO dry
ppm
3681
3465
2541
2365
3086
1817
NOx wet
ppm
85,4
49,2
24,3
5,8
2,9
1,2
HC wet
ppmC1
91
92
77
78
119
186
CO2 dry
% Vol.
1,038
0,814
0,649
0,457
0,330
0,208
CO dry (background)
ppm
3
3
3
2
2
3
NOx wet (background)
ppm
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
HC wet (background)
ppmC1
6
6
5
6
6
4
CO2 dry (background)
% Vol.
0,042
0,041
0,041
0,040
0,040
0,040
Dil. exh. gas mass flow GTOTW
kg/h
625,722
627,171
623,549
630,792
627,895
561,267
Fuel H/C ratio α
-
1,85
1,85
1,85
1,85
1,85
1,85
Fuel O/C ratio β
0
0
0
0
0
0
(1) Dilution air conditions equal to intake air conditions.
2.3.1. Dry/wet correction factor kw
The dry/wet correction factor kw shall be calculated for converting dry CO and CO2 measurements on a wet basis.
For the diluted exhaust gas:
Where:
Table 19
CO and CO2 wet values for the diluted exhaust gas according to test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
DF
-
9,465
11,454
14,707
19,100
20,612
32,788
kw1
-
0,007
0,006
0,006
0,006
0,006
0,006
kw
-
0,984
0,986
0,988
0,989
0,991
0,992
CO wet
ppm
3623
3417
2510
2340
3057
1802
CO2 wet
%
1,0219
0,8028
0,6412
0,4524
0,3264
0,2066
For the dilution air:
Where the factor kw1 is the same as that already calculated for the diluted exhaust gas.
Table 20
CO and CO2 wet values for the dilution air according to test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
Kw1
-
0,007
0,006
0,006
0,006
0,006
0,006
Kw
-
0,993
0,994
0,994
0,994
0,994
0,994
CO wet
ppm
3
3
3
2
2
3
CO2 wet
%
0,0421
0,0405
0,0403
0,0398
0,0394
0,0401
2.3.2. HC emissions
Where:
u = 0,000478 from Table 2
Table 21
HC emissions [g/h] according to test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
HCmass
25,666
25,993
21,607
21,850
34,074
48,963
2.3.3. NOx emissions
The factor KH for the correction of the NOx emissions shall be calculated from:
Table 22
Humidity correction factor KH of NOx emissions according to test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
KH
0,793
0,791
0,791
0,790
0,791
0,792
Where:
u = 0,001587 from Table 2
Table 23
NOx emissions [g/h] according to test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
NOxmass
67,168
38,721
19,012
4,621
2,319
0,811
2.3.4. CO emissions
Where:
u = 0,000966 from Table 2
Table 24
CO emissions [g/h] according to test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
COmass
2188,001
2068,760
1510,187
1424,792
1853,109
975,435
2.3.5. CO2 emissions
Where:
u = 15,19 from Table 2
Table 25
CO2 emissions [g/h] according to different test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
CO2mass
9354,488
7295,794
5717,531
3973,503
2756,113
1430,229
2.3.6. Specific emissions
The specific emission (g/kWh) shall be calculated for all individual components:
Table 26
Emissions [g/h] and weighting factors according to different test modes
Mode
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
HCmass
g/h
25,666
25,993
21,607
21,850
34,074
48,963
NOxmass
g/h
67,168
38,721
19,012
4,621
2,319
0,811
COmass
g/h
2188,001
2068,760
1510,187
1424,792
1853,109
975,435
CO2mass
g/h
9354,488
7295,794
5717,531
3973,503
2756,113
1430,229
Power PI
kW
13,15
9,81
6,52
3,25
1,28
0
Weighting factors WFI
-
0,090
0,200
0,290
0,300
0,070
0,050
APPENDIX 4
1. COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION STANDARDS
This appendix shall apply to SI engines Stage II only.
1.1. The exhaust emission standards for Stage 2 engines in Annex I 4.2 apply to the emissions of the engines for their emission durability period EDP as determined in accordance with this Appendix.
1.2. For all Stage II engines, if, when properly tested according to the procedures in this Directive, all test engines representing an engine family have emissions which, when adjusted by multiplication by the deterioration factor (DF) laid down in this Appendix, are less than or equal to each Stage II emission standard (family emission limit (FEL), where applicable) for a given engine class, that family shall be considered to comply with the emission standards for that engine class. If any test engine representing an engine family has emissions which, when adjusted by multiplication by the deterioration factor laid down in this Appendix, are greater than any single emission standard (FEL, where applicable) for a given engine class, that family shall be considered not to comply with the emission standards for that engine class.
1.3. Small volume engine manufacturers may, optionally, take deterioration factors for HC+NOx and CO from Tables 1 or 2 in this section, or they may calculate deterioration factors for HC+NOx and CO according to the process described in section 1.3.1. For technologies not covered by Tables 1 and 2 in this section, the manufacturer must use the process described in section 1.4 in this Appendix.
Table 1:
Handheld Engine HC+NOx and CO Assigned Deterioration Factors
for Small Volume Manufacturer
Engine class
Two-stroke engines
Four-stroke engines
Engines with aftertreatment
HC+NOx
CO
HC+NOx
CO
DFs must be calculated using the formula in para 1.3.1
SH:1
1.1
1.1
1.5
1.1
SH:2
1.1
1.1
1.5
1.1
SH:3
1.1
1.1
1.5
1.1
Table 2:
Non-handheld Engine HC+NOx and CO Assigned Deterioration Factors
for Small Volume Manufacturers
Engine Class
Side Valve Engines
Overhead Valve Engines
Engines with
After treatment
HC+NOx
CO
HC+NOx
CO
DFs must be calculated using the formula in para 1.3.1
SN:1
2.1
1.1
1.5
1.1
SN:2
2.1
1.1
1.5
1.1
SN:3
2.1
1.1
1.5
1.1
SN:4
1.6
1.1
1.4
1.1
1.3.1. Formula for calculating deterioration factors for engines with after treatment:
DF = [(NE * EDF) - (CC * F)]/ (NE - CC)
Where:
DF = deterioration factor
NE = new engine emission levels prior to the catalyst (g/kWh)
EDF = deterioration factor for engines without catalyst as shown in Table 1
CC = amount converted at 0 hours in g/kWh
F = 0,8 for HC and 0,0 for NOx for all classes of engines
F = 0,8 for CO for all classes of engines
1.4. Manufacturers shall obtain an assigned DF or calculate a DF, as appropriate, for each regulated pollutant for all Stage 2 engine families. Such DFs shall be used for type approval and production line testing.
1.4.1. For engines not using assigned DFs from Tables 1 or 2 of this section, DFs shall be determined as follows:
1.4.1.1. On at least one test engine representing the configuration chosen to be the most likely to exceed HC+NOx emission standards, (FELs where applicable), and constructed to be representative of production engines, conduct (full) test procedure emission testing as described in this Directive after the number of hours representing stabilised emissions.
1.4.1.2. If more than one engine is tested, average the results and round to the same number of decimal places contained in the applicable standard, expressed to one additional significant figure.
1.4.1.3. Conduct such emission testing again following ageing of the engine. The ageing procedure should be designed to allow the manufacturer to appropriately predict the in-use emission deterioration expected over the durability period of the engine, taking into account the type of wear and other deterioration mechanisms expected under typical consumer use which could affect emissions performance. If more than one engine is tested, average the results and round to the same number of decimal places contained in the applicable standard, expressed to one additional significant figure.
1.4.1.4. Divide the emissions at the end of the durability period (average emissions, if applicable) for each regulated pollutant by the stabilised emissions (average emissions, if applicable) and round to two significant figures. The resulting number shall be the DF, unless it is less than 1,00, in which case the DF shall be 1,0.
1.4.1.5. At the manufacturer's option additional emission test points can be scheduled between the stabilised emission test point and the Emission Durability Period. If intermediate tests are scheduled, the test points must be evenly spaced over the EDP (plus or minus 2 hours) and one such test point shall be at one-half of full EDP (plus or minus 2 hours).
For each pollutant HC+NOx and CO, a straight line must be fitted to the data points treating the initial test as occurring at hour zero, and using the method of least-squares. The deterioration factor is the calculated emissions at the end of the durability period divided by the calculated emissions at zero hours.
1.4.1.6. Calculated deterioration factors may cover families in addition to the one on which they were generated if the manufacturer submits a justification acceptable to the national type approval authority in advance of type approval that the affected engine families can be reasonably expected to have similar emission deterioration characteristic based on the design and technology used.
A non-exclusive list of design and technology groupings is given below:
–
Conventional two-stroke engines without after treatment system
–
Conventional two-stroke engines with a ceramic catalyst of the same active material and loading, and the same number of cells per cm²
–
Conventional two-stroke engines with a metallic catalyst of the same active material and loading, same substrate and the same number of cells per cm²
–
Two-stroke engines provided with a stratified scavenging system
–
Four-stroke engines with catalyst (defined as above) with same valve technology and identical lubrication system
–
Four-stroke engines without catalyst with the same valve technology and identical lubrication system.
2. EMISSION DURABILITY PERIODS FOR STAGE 2 ENGINES
2.1. Manufacturers shall declare the applicable EDP category for each engine family at the time of type approval. Such category shall be the category which most closely approximates the expected useful lives of the equipment into which the engines are expected to be installed as determined by the engine manufacturer. Manufacturers shall retain data appropriate to support their choice of EDP category for each engine family. Such data shall be supplied to the approval authority upon request.
2.1.1. For handheld engines: Manufacturers shall select a EDP category from Table 1.
Table 1:
EDP categories for Handheld Engines (hours)
Category
1
2
3
Class SH:1
50
125
300
Class SH:2
50
125
300
Class SH:3
50
125
300
2.1.2. For non-handheld engines: Manufacturers shall select an EDP category from Table 2.
Table 2:
EDP categories for Non-handheld Engines (hours)
Category
1
2
3
Class SN:1
50
125
300
Class SN:2
125
250
500
Class SN:3
125
250
500
Class SN:4
250
500
1000
2.1.3. The manufacturer must satisfy the approval authority that the declared useful life is appropriate. Data to support a manufacturer's choice of EDP category, for a given engine family, may include but are not limited to:
–
Surveys of the life spans of the equipment in which the subject engines are installed;
–
Engineering evaluations of field aged engines to ascertain when engine performance deteriorates to the point where usefulness and/or reliability is impacted to a degree sufficient to necessitate overhaul or replacement;
–
Warranty statements and warranty periods;
–
Marketing materials regarding engine life;
–
Failure reports from engine customers; and
–
Engineering evaluations of the durability, in hours, of specific engine technologies, engine materials or engine designs.
"
5) Annex IV shall become Annex V and shall be amended as follows:
The current headings shall be replaced by the following:
"
TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF REFERENCE FUEL PRESCRIBED FOR APPROVAL TESTS AND TO VERIFY CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION
NON-ROAD MOBILE MACHINERY REFERENCE FUEL FOR CI ENGINES(1).
"
In the table in the line on "Neutralisation" the word "Minimum" in column 2 shall be replaced by the word "Maximum". The following new table and new footnotes shall be added:
"
NON-ROAD MOBILE MACHINERY REFERENCE FUEL FOR
SI ENGINES
Note: The fuel for two-stroke engines is a blend of lubricant oil and the petrol specified below. The fuel/oil mixture ratio must be the ratio which is recommended by the manufacturer as specified in Annex IV, section 2.7.
Parameter
Unit
Limits (1)
Test Method
Publication
Minimum
Maximum
Research octane number, RON
Motor octane number, MON
Density at 15°C
Reid vapour pressure
Distillation
Initial boiling point
Evaporated at 100°C
Evaporated at 150°C
Final boiling point
Residue
Hydrocarbon analysis
Olefins
Aromatics
Benzene
Saturates
Carbon/hydrogen ratio
Oxidation stability (2)
Oxygen content
Existent gum
Sulphur content
Copper corrosion at 50 °C
Lead content
Phosphorus content
kg/m3
kPa
°C
% v/v
% v/v
°C
%
-
% v/v
% v/v
% v/v
% v/v
min
% m/m
mg/ml
mg/kg
g/l
g/l
95,0
85,0
748
56,0
24
49,0
81,0
190
-
-
28,0
-
-
report
480
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
762
60,0
-
40
57,0
87,0
215
2
10
40,0
1,0
balance
report
-
2,3
0,04
100
1
0,005
0,0013
EN 25164
EN 25163
ISO 3675
EN 12
ISO 3405
ISO 3405
ISO 3405
ISO 3405
ISO 3405
ASTM D 1319
ASTM D 1319
EN 12177
ASTM D 1319
ISO 7536
EN 1601
ISO 6246
ISO 14596
ISO 2160
EN 237
ASTM D 3231
1993
1993
1995
1993
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
-
1995
1995
1998
1995
1996
1997
1997
1998
1995
1996
1994
(1) The values quoted in the specification are "true values". In establishment of their limit values the terms of ISO 4259 "Petroleum products – Determination and application of precision data in relation to methods of test" have been applied and in fixing a minimum value, a minimum difference of 2R above zero has been taken into account; in fixing a maximum and minimum value, the minimum difference is 4R (R = reproducibility). Notwithstanding this measure, which is necessary for statistical reasons, the manufacturer of fuels should nevertheless aim at a zero value where the stipulated maximum value is 2R and at the mean value in the case of quotations of maximum and minimum limits. Should it be necessary to clarify the question as to whether a fuel meets the requirements of the specifications, the terms of ISO 4259 should be applied.
(2) The fuel may contain oxidation inhibitors and metal deactivators normally used to stabilise refinery gasoline streams, but detergent/dispersive additives and solvent oils must not be added.
"
6) Annex V shall become Annex VI.
7) Annex VI shall become Annex VII and shall be amended as follows:
(a) Appendix 1 shall be amended as follows:
–
The heading shall be replaced by the following:
"
Appendix 1
TEST RESULTS FOR COMPRESSION IGNITION ENGINES
"
– Section 1.3.2 shall be replaced by the following:
"
1.3.2. Power absorbed at indicated engine speed (as specified by the manufacturer):
Power PAE (kW) absorbed at various engine speeds (1), taking into account Appendix 3 of this Annex
Equipment
Intermediate (if applicable)
Rated
Total:
(1) Must not be greater than 10% of the power measured during the test.
"
– Section 1.4.2. shall be replaced by the following:
"
1.4.2. Engine power (1)
Power setting (kW) at various engine speeds
Condition
Intermediate (if applicable)
Rated
Maximum power measured on test (PM)
(kW) (a)
Total power absorbed by engine driven equipment as per section 1.3.2 of this Appendix, or section 2.8 of Annex III (PAE)
(kW) (b)
Net engine power as specified in section 2.4 of Annex I (kW) (c)
c = a + b
_____________
(1) Uncorrected power measured in accordance with the provisions of section 2.4 of Annex I.
"
– Section 1.5 shall be amended as follows:
"
1.5. Emission levels
1.5.1. Dynamometer setting (kW)
Dynamometer setting (kW) at various engine speeds
Percent Load
Intermediate (if applicable)
Rated
10 (if applicable)
25 (if applicable)
50
75
100
1.5.2. Emission results on the test cycle:
"
(b) The following Appendix shall be added:
"
Appendix 2
TEST RESULTS FOR SPARK IGNITION ENGINES
1. Information concerning the conduct of the test(s) (1):
1.1. Reference fuel used for test
1.1.1. Octane number
1.1.2. State percentage of oil in mixture when lubricant and petrol are mixed as in the case of 2-stroke engines
1.1.3. Density of petrol for 4-stroke engines and petrol/oil mixture for 2-stroke engines
1.2. Lubricant
1.2.1. Make(s)
1.2.2. Type(s)
1.3. Engine driven equipment (if applicable)
1.3.1. Enumeration and identifying details
1.3.2. Power absorbed at indicated engine speed (as specified by the manufacturer)
Power PAE (kW) absorbed at various engine speeds *, taking into account Appendix 3 of this Annex
Equipment
Intermediate (if applicable)
Rated
Total:
* Must not be greater than 10% of the power measured during the test.
1.4. Engine performance
1.4.1. Engine speeds:
Idle: min-1
Intermediate: min-1
Rated: min-1
1.4.2. Engine power (2)
Power setting (kW) at various engine speeds
Condition
Intermediate (if applicable)
Rated
Maximum power measured on test (PM)
(kW) (a)
Total power absorbed by engine driven equipment as per section 1.3.2 of this Appendix, or section 2.8 of Annex III (PAE)
(kW) (b)
Net engine power as specified in section 2.4 of Annex I (kW) (c)
c = a + b
1.5 Emission levels
1.5.1. Dynamometer setting (kW)
Dynamometer setting (kW) at various engine speeds
Percent Load
Intermediate (if applicable)
Rated (if applicable)
10 (if applicable)
25 (if applicable)
50
75
100
1.5.2. Emission results on the test cycle:
CO: g/kWh
HC: g/kWh
NOx: g/kWh.
_______________
(1) In case of several parent engines, to be indicated for each of them.
(2) Uncorrected power measured in accordance with the provisions of section 2.4 of Annex I.
"
(c) The following Appendix 3 shall be added:
"
Appendix 3
EQUIPMENT AND AUXILIARIES TO BE INSTALLED FOR THE TEST TO DETERMINE ENGINE POWER
Number
Equipment and auxiliaries
Fitted for emission test
1
Inlet system
Inlet manifold
Yes, standard production equipment
Crankcase emission control system
Yes, standard production equipment
Control devices for dual induction inlet manifold system
Yes, standard production equipment
Air flow meter
Yes, standard production equipment
Air inlet duct work
Yesa)
Air filter
Yesa)
Inlet silencer
Yesa)
Speed-limiting device
Yesa)
2
Induction-heating device of inlet manifold
Yes, standard production equipment. If possible to be set in the most favourable condition
3
Exhaust system
Exhaust purifier
Yes, standard production equipment
Exhaust manifold
Yes, standard production equipment
Connecting pipes
Yesb)
Silencer
Yesb)
Tail pipe
Yesb)
Exhaust brake
Noc)
Pressure charging device
Yes, standard production equipment
4
Fuel supply pump
Yes, standard production equipmentd)
5
Carburation equipment
Carburettor
Yes, standard production equipment
Electronic control system, air flow meter, etc.
Yes, standard production equipment
Equipment for gas engines
Pressure reducer
Yes, standard production equipment
Evaporator
Yes, standard production equipment
Mixer
Yes, standard production equipment
6
Fuel injection equipment (petrol and diesel)
Prefilter
Yes, standard production or test bed equipment
Filter
Yes, standard production or test bed equipment
Pump
Yes, standard production equipment
High-pressure pipe
Yes, standard production equipment
Injector
Yes, standard production equipment
Air inlet valve
Yes, standard production equipmente)
Electronic control system, air flow meter, etc.
Yes, standard production equipment
Governor/control system
Yes, standard production equipment
Automatic full-load stop for the control rack depending on atmospheric conditions
Yes, standard production equipment
7
Liquid-cooling equipment
Radiator
No
Fan
No
Fan cowl
No
Water pump
Yes, standard production equipmentf)
Thermostat
Yes, standard production equipmentg)
8
Air cooling
Cowl
Noh)
Fan or Blower
Noh)
Temperature-regulating device
No
9
Electrical equipment
Generator
Yes, standard production equipmenti)
Spark distribution system
Yes, standard production equipment
Coil or coils
Yes, standard production equipment
Wiring
Yes, standard production equipment
Spark plugs
Yes, standard production equipment
Electronic control system including knock sensor/spark retard system
Yes, standard production equipment
10
Pressure charging equipment
Compressor driven either directly by the engine and/or by the exhaust gases
Yes, standard production equipment
Charge air cooler
Yes, standard production or test bed equipmentj),k)
Coolant pump or fan (engine-driven)
Noh)
Coolant flow control device
Yes, standard production equipment
11
Auxiliary test-bed fan
Yes, if necessary
12
Anti-pollution device
Yes, standard production equipmentl)
13
Starting equipment
Test bed equipment
14
Lubricating oil pump
Yes, standard production equipment
a) The complete inlet system shall be fitted as provided for the intended application:
where there is a risk of an appreciable effect on the engine power; in the case of naturally aspirated spark ignition engines; when the manufacturer requests that this should be done. In other cases, an equivalent system may be used and a check should be made to ascertain that the intake pressure does not differ by more than 100 Pa from the upper limit specified by the manufacturer for a clean air filter.
b) The complete exhaust system shall be fitted as provided for the intended application: where there is a risk of an appreciable effect on the engine power; in the case of naturally aspirated spark ignition engines; when the manufacturer requests that this should be done. In other cases, an equivalent system may be installed provided the pressure measured does not differ by more than 1000 Pa from the upper limit specified by the manufacturer.
c) If an exhaust brake is incorporated in the engine, the throttle valve shall be fixed in the fully open position.
d) The fuel feed pressure may be adjusted, if necessary, to reproduce the pressure existing in the particular engine application (particularly when a "fuel return" system is used).
e) The air intake valve is the control valve for the pneumatic governor of the injection pump. The governor or the fuel injection equipment may contain other devices which may affect the amount of injected fuel.
f) The cooling-liquid circulation shall be operated by the engine water pump only. Cooling of the liquid may be produced by an external circuit, such that the pressure loss of this circuit and the pressure at the pump inlet remain substantially the same as those of the engine cooling system.
g) The thermostat may be fixed in the fully open position.
h) When the cooling fan or blower is fitted for the test, the power absorbed shall be added to the results, except for cooling fans of air cooled engines directly fitted on the crankshaft. The fan or blower power shall be determined at the speeds used for the test either by calculation from standard characteristics or by practical tests.
i) Minimum power of the generator: the electrical power of the generator shall be limited to that necessary for operation of accessories which are indispensable for engine operation. If the connection of a battery is necessary, a fully charged battery in good condition shall be used.
j) Charge air-cooled engines shall be tested with charge air cooling, whether liquid- or air-cooled, but if the manufacturer prefers, a test bench system may replace the air cooler. In either case, the measurement of power at each speed shall be made with the maximum pressure drop and the minimum temperature drop of the engine air across the charge air cooler on the test bench system as specified by the manufacturer.
k) These may include, for example, exhaust-gas recirculation (EGR)-system, catalytic converter, thermal reactor, secondary air-supply system and fuel evaporation protecting system.
l) The power for electrical or other starting systems shall be provided from the test bed.
"
8) Annexes VII to X shall become Annexes VIII to XI.
9) The following Annex XII shall be added:
"
ANNEX XII
RECOGNITION OF ALTERNATIVE TYPE-APPROVALS
1. The following type-approvals and, where applicable, the pertaining approval marks are recognised as being equivalent to an approval to this Directive for engines of categories A, B and C as defined in Article 9 section 2;
1.1.
Directive 2000/25/EC
1.2.
Type-approvals to Directive 88/77/EEC, complying with the requirements of stage A or B regarding Article 2 and Annex I, section 6.2.1 of Directive 88/77/EEC as amended by Directive 91/542/EEC, or UN-ECE Regulation 49.02 series of amendments corrigenda I/2.
1.3.
Certificates of type approvals according to UN-ECE Regulation No 96.
2. For engines categories D, E, F and G (stage II) as defined in Article 9 section 3, the following type-approvals and, where applicable, the pertaining approval marks are recognised as being equivalent to an approval to this Directive;
2.1. Directive 2000/25/EC, stage II approvals
2.2. Type-approvals to Directive 88/77/EEC as amended by Directive 99/96/EC which are in compliance with stages A, B1, B2 or C provided for in Article 2 and section 6.2.1 of Annex I.
2.3. UN-ECE Regulation 49.03 series of amendments.
2.4. UN-ECE Regulation 96 stage B approvals according to paragraph 5.2.1 of the 01 series of amendments of Regulation 96.
Position of the European Parliament of 2 October 2001 (OJ C 87 E, 11.4.2002, p. 37), Council common position of 25 March 2002 (OJ C 145 E, 18.6.2002, p. 17) and position of the European Parliament of 2 July 2002.
In ISO 8178-1 a more complete formula of the fuel molecular weight is quoted (formula 50 of Chapter 13.5.1 (b). The formula takes into account not only the hydrogen to carbon ratio and the oxygen to carbon ratio but also other possible fuel components such as sulphur and nitrogen. However, as the SI engines of the Directive are tested with a petrol (quoted as a reference fuel in Annex V) containing usually only carbon and hydrogen, the simplified formula is considered.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology (COM(2001) 490 – C5&nbhy;0392/2001 – 2001/0197(COD))
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2001) 490(1)),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 285 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5&nbhy;0392/2001),
– having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (A5&nbhy;0236/2002),
1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
2. Asks to be consulted again should the Commission intend to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 2 July 2002 with a view to the adoption of European Parliament and Council Decision No .../2002/EC concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 285 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(2),
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of theTreaty(3),
Whereas :
(1) There is a need for comparable statistics on research and development, technological innovation and science and technology in general in order to support Community policies.
(2) Council Decision 94/78/CE, Euratom of 24 January 1994 establishing a multiannual programme for the development of Community statistics on research, development and innovation(4)for the period 1994-1997, highlighted the objectives to set out a Community reference framework for statistics and to establish a harmonised Community statistical information system in this field.
(3) The final report for the programme period 1994 to 1997 emphasises that the work should be continued and that data should be made available more rapidly, that the regional coverage should be extended and that the comparability of the data must increase.
(4) In accordance with Council Decision 1999/126/EC of 22 December 1998 establishing the Community statistical programme 1998-2002(5), the statistical information system shall support the management of science and technology policies in the Community and assess R&D and innovation capability of regions for administration of structural funds.
(5) In order to ensure their usefulness and comparability, the details of data to be provided by the Member States should be established by the Commission taking into account work carried out by OECD and other international organisations.
(6) Community policy on science, technology and innovation places particular importance on strengthening the scientific and technological basis of European businesses to be more innovative and competitive at international and regional level, realising the benefits of the information society and promoting the transfer of technology, improving activities in the domain of intellectual property rights and the development of mobility of human resources, and promoting equality between men and women in science.
(7) The principle of cost-effectiveness shall apply for the data collection procedures for industry and administrations, while still maintaining the necessary quality of the data.
(8) It is essential that developments in official statistics on science and technology are coordinated to also meet the essential needs of national, regional and local administrations, international organisations, economic operators, professional associations and the general public.
(9) Council Decision 1999/173/EC of 25 January 1999 adopting a specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration on improving the human research potential and the socio-economic knowledge base (1998 to 2002)(6) will be taken into account to avoid overlap of work.
(10) Council Resolution of 20 May 1999 on women and science(7) underlines the need for information on the participation of women in the development of science and technology.
(11) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision, being management measures within the meaning of Article 2 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (8), should be adopted by use of the management procedure provided for in Article 4 of that Decision.
(12) The Statistical Programme Committee established by Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom(9) has been consulted in accordance with Article 3 of that Decision.
(13) The Scientific and Technical Research Committee (Crest) has given its opinion,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The objective of this Decision is to establish a Community statistical information system on science, technology and innovation to support and monitor Community policies.
Article 2
The objective described in Article 1 shall be implemented by individual statistical actions as follows:
-
Delivery of statistics by the Member States on a regular basis and within specified deadlines, in particular statistics on R&D activity in all sectors of performance and on the funding of R&D activity, including the government budget appropriations for R&D, taking into account the regional dimension by producing whenever possible science and technology statistics, based on NUTS classification.
-
Development of new statistical variables to be produced on a permanent basis for the measurement of the output of science and technology activities, the diffusion of knowledge and more generally the performance of innovation needed for the formulation and assessment of science and technology policies in the increasingly knowledge-based economies. The Community shall give priority, in particular, to the following domains :
-
innovation (new and improved products and processes introduced by enterprises in the market),
-
human resources devoted to science and technology,
-
patents (patents statistics to be derived from the databases of the national and European patent offices),
-
high-technology statistics (identification and classification of products and services, measurement of economic performance and contribution to economic growth),
-
gender statistics on science and technology, in cooperation and consultation with the Helsinki group, which is working on the collection of gender-related statistics.
In addition, the Community shall intensify cooperation with the OECD and other international organisations, especially for the purposes of statistics on patents and high-technology activities.
-
Improvement and updating of existing standards and manuals on concepts and methods, with particular regard to concepts in the service sector and coordinated methods for measurement of R&D activity.
-
Improvement of data quality, specifically comparability, accuracy and timeliness
-
Improvement in the dissemination, accessibility and documentation of statistical information.
Available capacities within the Member States for data collection and processing will be taken into account.
Article 3
The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision shall be decided in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 4(2).
Article 4
1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Statistical Programme Committee established by Article 1 of Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, the management procedure laid down in Article 4 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, in compliance with Articles 7(3) and 8 thereof.
3. The period provided for in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be three months.
Article 5
The Commission shall, within four years of the entry into force of this Decision, and again every three years thereafter, present a report to the European Parliament and the Council to evaluate the implementation of the measures provided for in Article 2.
This report shall consider, inter alia, the costs of the actions and the burden on the respondents in relation to the benefits of the availability of the data and user satisfaction.
Following this report, the Commission may propose any measures to improve the operation of this Decision.
Article 6
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Article 7
This Decision shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive amending Council Directive 86/609/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (COM(2001) 703 – C5&nbhy;0605/2001 – 2001/0277(COD))
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive amending Council Directive 86/609/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (COM(2001) 703 – C5&nbhy;0605/2001 – 2001/0277(COD))
(Codecision procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2001) 703(1)),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5&nbhy;0605/2001),
– having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (A5&nbhy;0239/2002),
1. Approves the Commission proposal;
2. Asks to be consulted again should the Commission intend to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental purposes * (procedure without debate)
191k
26k
Legislative resolution>MERGEFORMATEuropean Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of the Protocol of Amendment to the European Convention for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (COM(2001) 704 – C5&nbhy;0037/2002 – 2001/0278(CNS))
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2001) 704(1)),
– having regard to the Protocol of Amendment to the European Convention for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes,
– having regard to Articles 95 and 300(2), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty,
– having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty (C5-0037/2002),
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market on the proposed legal base,
– having regard to Rules 67 and 97(7) of the Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (A5&nbhy;0238/2002),
1. Approves the conclusion of the Protocol;
2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Proposal for a Council decision on the accession, on behalf of the European Community to the Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-Level Ozone (COM(2002) 44 – C5&nbhy;0094/2002 – 2002/0035(CNS))
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the accession, on behalf of the European Community to the Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-Level Ozone (COM(2002) 44 – C5&nbhy;0094/2002 – 2002/0035(CNS))
(Consultation procedure)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2002) 44(1)),
– having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Articles 175(1) and 300(2) subparagraph a1 of the EC Treaty (C5&nbhy;0094/2002),
– having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (A5&nbhy;0240/2002),
1. Approves the Commission proposal;
2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;
3. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to amend the Commission proposal substantially;
4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
− having received a letter from Mr Ilias Koliousis, public prosecutor at the Athens District Court, forwarded on 3 April 2001, and a request for waiver of the immunity of Efstratios Korakas, forwarded by Mikhail Stathopoulos, Minister of Justice of the Greek Republic, on 28 September 2001 and announced in Plenary on 12 November 2001,
− having heard Mr Efstratios Korakas, pursuant to Rule 6(3) of its Rules of Procedure, who requested that his parliamentary immunity not be waived,
− having regard to Article 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965, and to Article 4(2) of the Act concerning the Election of Representatives to the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, of 20 September 1976,
− having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986(1),
− having regard to Rule 6 of its Rules of Procedure,
− having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (A5-0245/2002),
1. Decides to not to waive the immunity of Efstratios Korakas;
2. Instructs its President to forward this Decision and the report of its committee without delay to the appropriate authority of the Republic of Greece.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on a transparent system of harmonised rules for restrictions on heavy goods vehicles involved in international transport on designated roads (COM(2000) 759 – C5&nbhy;0679/2000 – 1998/0096(COD))
– having regard to the Commission proposal and the amended Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(1998) 115(1) and COM(2000) 759(2)),
– having regard to Article 71(1) and Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5&nbhy;0679/2000),
– having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (A5&nbhy;0191/2002),
1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
2. Asks to be consulted again should the Commission intend to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 2 July 2002 with a view to the adoption of European Parliament and Council Decision 2002/…/EC on a transparent system of harmonised rules for restrictions on heavy goods vehicles involved in international transport on designated roads
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community Article 71.1 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(3),
Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(4),
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(5),
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(6),
Whereas:
(1) There are currently no harmonised rules across the Community on driving restrictions for heavy goods vehicles on Sundays and public holidays.
(2) This lack of harmonised rules results in differences as regards the duration of driving restrictions and definitions of vehicles exempt from those restrictions.
(3) This situation has significant negative consequences for the freedom to provide transport services and for the provision of information to road haulage operators and professional drivers in the Community.
(4) The existence of driving bans that differ from Member State to Member State makes it impossible to make round trips over long distances without excessive interruptions. Peripheral regions of the Community are, in particular, highly and disproportionately affected by such driving restrictions because of their geographical situation, while central regions of the Community are highly and disproportionately affected by transit traffic.
(5)In addition, the existence of driving bans that differ from Member State to Member State is a cause of legal uncertainty in relation to the principle of the free movement of goods and Community provisions on guaranteeing freedom to provide transport services. The forthcoming enlargement and the resulting likely increase in heavy goods vehicle traffic can only make the situation more complicated.
(6) In accordance with the subsidiarity and proportionality principles as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty, the objectives of the proposed action, namely to establish a transparent system of harmonised rules for driving restrictions, thereby ensuring that the negative consequences for the freedom to provide transport services are reduced as far as possible, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can, therefore, by reason of the scale of the action be better achieved by the Community. This Directive confines itself to the minimum required in order to achieve those objectives and does not go beyond what is necessary for that purpose.
(7) It is desirable that, in particular for international transport, the negative impact of driving restrictions be minimised; whereas it would be desirable that certain roads, indicated in Annex I, Section 2 of Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the Trans-European transport Network(7), be kept open for international transport. Therefore such roads should only be subject to new driving bans during certain hours on weekends, public holidays and the eve of public holidays. The Commission should be notified of such driving restrictions. Existing driving bans that are longer than the limits proposed shall be permitted to continue.
(8) This maximum permitted duration should be extendible in exceptional cases when such extension can be justified on environmental, road-safety or social grounds. A request for such an extension should be examined without delay by the Commission with the assistance of a committee.
(9) Member States should be able to restrict the circulation during the night of heavy goods vehicles whose noise exceeds Community standards. Member States should also be able to restrict heavy goods vehicles when exceptionally high traffic density is expected, for example during summer holiday periods. The Commission should be notified of such driving restrictions.
(10) Under special environmental or weather conditions Member States should be able to restrict the circulation of heavy goods vehicles on grounds of environmental protection or road safety. For practical reasons, it should be possible to adopt such restrictions without notifying the Commission.
(11) The types of heavy goods vehicles or transport operations which are exempted from bans in all Member States should be harmonised.
(12) The introduction of driving restrictions at national, regional and local level is currently done in an uncoordinated manner. A European road information system which can be accessed in real time by all road haulage operators and professional drivers should therefore be established, enabling reliable information on the timing and extent of these restrictions to be provided to all road transport operators. On the basis of the information collected under this system, the Commission should produce an annual report to the Member States and the European Parliament.
(13)Comparative statistics are needed on the level of use of international routes to give an overall picture of traffic in the European Union and the candidate countries and, on the basis of these statistics, to be able to assess the impact of driving restrictions on policies for the regulation and organisation of road transport.
(14) Since the measures necessary for the implementation of this Directive are measures of general scope within the meaning of Article 2 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(8), they should be adopted by use of the regulatory procedure provided for in Article 5 of that Decision.
(15) Each Member State should determine the penalties to be imposed in the event of an infringement of the provisions adopted for the implementation of this Directive.
(16) For the purposes of transparency, it is desirable to list in an Annex the national public holidays upon which driving bans currently apply. The Commission will amend this Annex at the request of Member States,
(17)In order to ensure that driving bans on heavy goods vehicles do not exacerbate inequalities in respect of social conditions or working conditions for drivers, accompanying social measures should be adopted, taking account in particular of the geographical origin of traffic.
(18)Member States which impose driving bans, forcing drivers to spend a weekend or part of a weekend in lorry parks, should ensure that there are sufficient parking spaces and sanitary facilities available.
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Article 1
This Directive establishes a transparent system of harmonised rules and information concerning driving restrictions applied for certain periods to heavy goods vehicles undertaking international transport on certain roads of the European Community.
Article 2
For the purposes of this Directive:
-
"heavy goods vehicle" shall mean all motor vehicles with a gross weight of 7,5 t. and above, used for the transport of goods, including their component parts (tractors or trailers), where the latter are used separately;
-
"driving restrictions" shall mean a ban on the circulation of heavy goods vehicles for certain periods;
-
"TENs network" shall mean the network of roads as indicated in Annex I, Section 2 of Decision No 1692/96/EC;
-
"international transport" shall mean transport operations with a place of departure and place of arrival in two different Member States;
-
"public holiday" shall mean those public holidays on which a Member State applies a national driving ban;
-
"cars" shall mean motor vehicles in category M1 as defined in Annex II to Council Directive 70/156/EEC(9);
-
"load" shall mean at least 1 tonne of cargo, including packaging;
-
"European road information system" shall mean a system for collecting and disseminating in real time all information relevant to road haulage operators and professional drivers concerning the rules applied to, and the regulation and characteristics of, road traffic on the TENs network, in close coordination with road information centres in the Member States.
Article 3
1. The scope of this Directive is limited to the TENs network.
2. Member States shall not impose driving restrictions on heavy goods vehicles involved in international transport which are stricter than those applied to heavy goods vehicles involved in national transport.
3. Member States may impose driving restrictions for all heavy goods vehicles
–
from 16 September to 14 June between the hours of 22h00 on Saturday and 22h00 on Sunday, and between the hours of 22h00 on the eve of a public holiday and 22h00 on the day of a public holiday;
–
from 15 June to 15 September between the hours of 07h00 on Saturday and 22h00 on Sunday, and between the hours of 22h00 on the eve of a public holiday and 22h00 on the day of a public holiday.
4. Member States may impose driving restrictions during the night, from 22h00 to 05h00, which apply to all heavy goods vehicles which do not comply with noise emission standards provided by Commission Directive 96/20/EC(10).
5. Member States with driving restrictions in operation as of 1 November 2000 that exceed the limits laid down in paragraph 3 may continue to apply them. Should the Member State concerned modify these driving restrictions, it can only do so in the sense of alignment with the restrictions mentioned in paragraph 3.
6. Member States may only impose driving restrictions additional to those laid down in paragraphs 3 and 4 on condition that heavy goods vehicles involved in international transport are exempted from those additional driving restrictions.
7. Notwithstanding paragraph 6 Member States may in exceptional cases impose driving restrictions extending the time limits laid down in paragraphs 3 and 4 on heavy goods vehicles, including those undertaking international transport provided that they submit evidence indicating that such additional restrictions can be justified on environmental, road-safety or social grounds and after having received prior agreement from the Commission in accordance with the Committee procedure laid down in Article 9.
The evidence shall include an analysis which justifies the restrictions as a proportional measure by comparison with alternative traffic management measures.
The evidence shall quantify the effects of the additional restrictions on the basis of one or more of the following criteria:
a)
relevant statistics and/or estimates, both including and excluding the circulation of heavy goods vehicles, concerning traffic density on weekends during different periods of the year (summer, winter, during holiday periods) and possible effects on congestion;
b)
relevant statistics and/or estimates, both including and excluding the circulation of heavy goods vehicles, concerning rates of accidents both during periods where the additional restrictions would apply and at times when no restrictions are in force;
c)
relevant data and/or estimates concerning the gaseous emissions saved, or noise pollution reduced by additional restrictions, including the negative effect that bans may have on the emissions of traffic that has been diverted and on traffic concentrated on periods of the week where no restrictions apply;
d)
a social analysis of the impact of additional restrictions on the average working conditions of drivers of heavy goods vehicles registered both in Member States where these restrictions apply and in the other Member States, taking into account existing Community legislation in this field.
8. Notwithstanding paragraph 6, Member States may impose special driving restrictions on heavy goods vehicles, including those undertaking international transport on the TENs network, on those days and roads where:
a)
exceptionally high traffic density is expected, for example during public holidays and holiday outward and return journey periods or peak times;
b)
circulation bans for limited periods of time apply to cars, notably for environmental reasons;
c)
restrictions for maintenance of infrastructure are considered necessary;
d)
restrictions are required under special weather conditions, in the event of natural disasters or for urgent reasons of public safety.
Article 4
Heavy goods vehicles and/or particular transport operations as defined in Annex I shall be exempted from the driving restrictions which are laid down in accordance with Articles 3(3), 3(6), 3(7) and point (a) of 3(8).
Article 5
1. Member States wishing to impose extended driving restrictions in accordance with Article 3(7) shall present a request to the Commission.
The Commission shall decide on such request in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 9(2) within two months of receiving it.
2. Member States wishing to impose driving restrictions in accordance with Article 3(3), 3(4), or point (a) of 3(8) shall notify the Commission at least 60 days in advance, giving details of the extent of those restrictions.
3. Member States wishing to amend any of the dates listed in Annex II as their national public holidays on which driving bans apply shall notify the Commission at least 60 days in advance. The Commission shall amend Annex II accordingly.
Article 6
A European road information system shall be set up under the Commission, the task of which shall be to
-
collect, with the support of road information centres in the Member States, all data concerning the rules applied to, and the regulation and characteristics of, traffic on the TENs network;
-
process and disseminate such data in real time to road haulage operators and professional drivers within the territory of the Union;
-
create a monitoring centre for traffic on the TENs network for statistical and analytical purposes.
Article 7
On the basis of the information provided for in Articles 5 and 6, the Commission shall prepare annually by 30 November a report on driving restrictions permitted under Articles 3(3), 3(4) 3(7) and point (a) of 3(8) for heavy goods vehicles performing international operations on the TENs network for the forthcoming year. The Commission shall also prepare a list of infringements of this Directive in each of the Member States and of the penalties applied by the Member States in respect thereof pursuant to Article 10. This information shall be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council.
Article 8
The Commission shall adopt any amendments necessary to adapt Annex I in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 9.
Article 9
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee, composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, the regulatory procedure laid down in Article 5 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, in compliance with Article 7(3) and Article 8 thereof.
3. The period provided for in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be [3] months.
Article 10
Member States shall determine the penalties applicable to infringements of this Directive and shall take all necessary measures to ensure that they are enforced. The penalties they provide for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall notify the Commission of those measures no later than the date specified in the first subparagraph of Article 11 and shall notify it of amendments to them without delay.
Article 11
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December 2004 at the latest. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.
When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made.
Member States shall apply these provisions from 1 July 2005.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the texts of the provisions of national law which they adopt in the field governed by this Directive.
Article 12
This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Article 13
This Directive is addressed to the Member States.
Done at,
For the European Parliament For the Council
The President The President
ANNEX I
Transport operations/types of vehicles exempt from driving restrictions
Vehicles performing combined transport operations as defined in Council Directive 92/106/EEC(11);
Certified ATP vehicles(12) transporting a load of ATP-defined perishable foodstuffs;
Certified ATP tankers for the transportation of liquid milk at controlled temperatures ;
Vehicles transporting a load of perishable fruits or vegetables;
Vehicles transporting exceptional loads as defined by Article 4(3) of Council Directive 96/53/EC(13);
Vehicles transporting a load of fresh flowers or horticultural products.
ANNEX II
National public holidays on which Member States apply driving bans
As defined in the UN-ECE Agreement on the international carriage of perishable foodstuffs and the special equipment to be used for such carriage (ATP).
European Parliament legislative resolution on the amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2236/95 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of trans-European networks (COM(2002) 134 - C5-0130/2002 - 2001/0226 (COD))
– having regard to the Commission amended proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2002) 134),
– having regard to Articles 156(1) and 251(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the amended proposal to Parliament (C5&nbhy;0130/2002),
– having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy and the Committee Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (A5-0188/2002),
1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
2. Considers that the financial consequences of the proposal are compatible with the current ceiling under heading 3 of the financial perspective, with no restriction being placed on other currently funded programmes under the same heading;
3. Asks to be consulted again should the Commission intend to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 2 July 2002 with a view to the adoption of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No .../2002 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2236/95 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of trans-European networks
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 156 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),
Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(2),
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(3),
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(4),
Whereas:
(1)The accumulated backlog in the financing of the trans-European transport network amounts to 60% of overall project support. Major problems remain to be solved in the 14 priority projects approved at the Essen European Council, whereby an increase in the level of Community co-financing is considered necessary.
(2)The Commission should prepare an evaluation of the Member States' responsibilities in the implementation of the projects. Based on this assessment, the Commission should present a proposal to improve cross-border cooperation between Member States.
(3) Traffic growth over the past decade - in particular heavy lorry traffic - has led to increased congestion and pollution throughout the territory of the Community. The current capacity of the road network as well as of rail infrastructure is far from optimal and the weakest points are the cross-border sections. The major delays in implementation of the trans-European network relate to cross-border rail projects requiring the construction of infrastructure such as tunnels or bridges of significant length. Owing to these constraints, the financial viability of such projects is often extremely low. This is in particular the case for cross-border rail projects located in areas characterised by natural barriers such as the Alps and the Pyrenees.
(4) Cross-border connections between energy networks are important for ensuring smooth operation of the internal market, security of supply and optimum use of energy infrastructure. The development stage of priority projects on the energy networks should therefore also be able to qualify for higher financial aid without this leading to any increase in the Community funds set aside for energy networks in the 2003-2006 financial perspective. This aid is for priority projects on the energy networks carried out in individual undertakings, which are necessary in the interests of the European economy but unprofitable in business terms and which do not distort competition between undertakings.
(5) Provision should be made for an increased level of support of up to 20% of total investment cost for projects concerning cross-border bottlenecks and projects at borders with candidate countries which contribute strongly to the improvement of the trans-European network, as established by Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network(5).
(6) Since cross-border projects with candidate countries may prove difficult to implement due to financial constraints, additional funding, including private capital, should be made available for the most urgently needed improvements related to transport infrastructure at borders with candidate countries. The potential economic viability and the social and economic added value of the projects and their compatibility with the objectives of sustainable mobility should be assessed. The funds devoted to these specific projects should cover the whole financing period 2003-2006 irrespective of the date of accession of the new Member States.
(7)The Transport Council reached an agreement on 26 March 2002 on the legal aspects of the GALILEO Joint Undertaking, whereby an amount of EUR 450 million is to be released for the financing of the development phase and these funds should be allocated to the GALILEO Joint Undertaking.
(8) The provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 2236/95(6) should be adapted to take account of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(7).
(9) The financial framework for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 2236/95 should be increased in order to fund the most urgently needed improvements related to transport infrastructure at borders with candidate countries. Such an increase should be compatible with the ceiling under heading 3 of the financial perspective, with no restriction being placed on other currently funded programmes under the same heading. Pursuant to paragraph 33 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(8) which concerns multiannual programmes adopted under the co-decision procedure, the Commission should give precise reasons for departing from the approved financial framework, with due account being taken of the results obtained from implementing the programme. Prior to the reallocation of funds among the transport projects, the Commission should consult the budgetary authority to make sure that this complies with the priorities set by the European Parliament. In order to do justice to the objectives of the trans-European transport network and the transport policy challenges of enlargement, a substantial increase in appropriations for the transport projects will be required in the next financial perspective.
(10) Regulation (EC) No 2236/95 should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Regulation (EC) No 2236/95 is amended as follows:
1. In Article 5, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
"
3. Regardless of the form of intervention chosen, the total amount of Community aid under this Regulation shall not exceed 10% of the total investment cost. However, the total amount of Community aid may exceptionally reach 20% of the total investment cost in the following cases:
a)
projects to eliminate cross-border rail bottlenecks and/or which concern missing links located in areas where natural barriers represent obstacles to the free circulation of goods and passengers, which promote safety and which strongly contribute to the reduction of imbalance between modes of transport and to the improvement of rail, road and waterway intermodality within the trans-European transport network as established by Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network*;
b)
other projects which concern bottlenecks at borders with candidate countries where added value is particularly high in terms of safety improvement and congestion reduction within the trans-European transport network;
c)
projects concerning satellite positioning and navigation systems as provided for in Article 17 of Decision No 1692/96/EC;
d)
certain priority projects on the energy networks listed in European Parliament and Council Decision .../.../EC of ... [amending Decision No 1254/96/EC laying down a series of guidelines for trans-European energy networks]**. In order to define these priority projects on the energy networks, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council listing and describing the measures on the energy networks which are likely, in the event of an increase in Community support from 10% to 20%, to lead to more rapid completion of the relevant priority projects; and
e)
trans-European telecommunication networks projects, without increasing the overall level of appropriations.
_________________
* OJ L 228, 9.9.1996, p. 1.
** OJ L ...
"
2.In Article 13, the following paragraph is inserted:
"
2b. If an action is not completed within ten years of financial aid being allocated to it, the Commission shall demand reimbursement of the aid allocated. If the project is of an unusually large scale, or the delay could not reasonably have been foreseen, the Commission may depart from that deadline.
"
3. Article 17 is replaced by the following:
"
Article 17
Committee
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of one representative of each Member State, and a representative of the European Investment Bank, who shall not vote. Candidate countries can participate in committee proceedings as observers if a specific point on the agenda concerns them.
The Committee shall be chaired by the representative of the Commission.
2. Where reference is made to this Article, the advisory procedure laid down in Article 3 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC* shall apply, in compliance with Article 7 and Article 8 thereof.
___________________
* OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.
"
4. In Article 18, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:
"
The financial framework for the implementation of this Regulation for the period 2000 to 2006 shall be EUR 4700 million and shall be subject to a mid-term review based on the implementation of this Regulation.
The allocation of funds shall be linked to the qualitative and quantitative level of implementation, including the contribution to the reduction of traffic growth and air pollution. Commitment appropriations shall be cancelled after n+2 years if funds are not utilised.
"
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
OJ L 228, 23.9.1995, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1655/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 197, 29.7.1999, p. 1).
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 92/81/EEC with regard to the possibility of applying a reduced rate of excise duty on certain mineral oils containing biofuels and on biofuels (COM(2001) 547 – C5-0030/2002 – 2001/0266(CNS))
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2001) 547(1)),
– having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 93 of the EC Treaty (C5-0030/2002),
– having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy and the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (A5-0218/2002),
1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
2. Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;
3. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;
4. Asks to be consulted again if the Council intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;
5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendments by Parliament
Amendment 1 RECITAL 2 a (new)
(2a) The Commission White Paper on European transport policy for 2010: time to decide(1) expects CO2 emissions from transport to rise by 50% between 1990 and 2010, to around 1113 billion tonnes, the main responsibility resting with road transport, which accounts for 84% of transport-related CO2 emissions. From an ecological point of view, the White Paper therefore calls for dependence on oil (currently 98%) in the transport sector to be reduced by using alternative fuels such as biofuels. _____________ (1) COM(2001) 370.
Amendment 2 RECITAL 4
(4) The Communication of the Commission entitled 'A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development', highlights the important role of alternative fuels, including biofuels, in tackling climate change and in the development of clean energies.
(4) The Communication of the Commission entitled 'A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development', highlights the important role of alternative fuels, including biofuels, in tackling climate change and in the development of clean energies. In this connection, consideration should also be given to pure, cold-pressed vegetable oil, such as rapeseed oil, which does not undergo any chemical change and can thus be produced in an environmentally friendly way, and whose by-products also contain protein and can be used as animal feed.
Amendment 3 RECITAL 4 a (new)
(4a) With a view to fulfilling the objectives in respect of sustainable development and environmental protection, the policy choices made with regard to the promotion of biofuels should minimise the harmful effects on agriculture, employment and land use.
Amendment 4 RECITAL 4 b (new)
(4b) It is estimated that world oil consumption will be around 115 million barrels a day in 2020, as compared with around 77 million barrels a day in 2000. The transport sector will account for 71% of final demand for oil in 2020. The Commission, in its communication on the European Union's oil supply(1), stated that it expects the European Union"s dependence on oil imports to rise from its current rate of 75% to over 85% in 2020. _____________ (1) COM(2000) 631.
Amendment 21 RECITAL 5 a (new)
(5a) The increased use of biofuels should be accompanied by a careful analysis of the environmental impact in relation to the cultivation, processing and consumption of raw materials. The increased use of such fuels appears desirable only if the environmental impact presents clear advantages by comparison with the use of traditional fuels. In particular, a study should be carried out into land use, more intensive agriculture, the relationship with alternative sustainable land use, the protection of water courses, energy efficiency, greenhouse gas potential, combustion characteristics and particle formation.
Amendment 22 RECITAL 6 a (new)
(6a) With a view to achieving sustainable development objectives and, in particular, to slow down climate change, there is a need for differentiated pricing for fuels, in order to internalise their ecological, social and economic cost. This long-term change should be supported by a review in the short term of the existing legal framework.
Amendment 5 RECITAL 7
(7) It is therefore desirable to establish a Community framework for reducing excise duties so as to promote biofuels, thereby contributing to the better functioning of the internal market and affording Member States and economic operators a sufficient degree of legal certainty.
(7) It is therefore desirable to establish a Community framework for reducing and providing an exemption from excise duties so as to promote biofuels, thereby complying with the objectives of promoting the use of biofuels, contributing to the better functioning of the internal market and affording Member States and economic operators a sufficient degree of legal certainty.
Amendment 6 RECITAL 7 a (new)
(7a) Where more favourable national taxation framework conditions already exist in Member States or have already been submitted before 1 January 2003, these should be kept in place until the quantitative objectives for biofuels produced in the EU proposed in this Directive have been achieved.
Amendment 7 RECITAL 10 a (new)
(10a) At present not all the biofuels available on the market meet strict environmental efficiency criteria. In some cases their production is linked to very high energy input and greenhouse gas emissions. However, technological advances in this area can only lead to improvements. Consequently research and technological development in the field of the sustainability of biofuels should be promoted.
Amendment 8 RECITAL 16 a (new)
(16a) Article 4(3) of Directive 92/81/EEC provides that 'the consumption of mineral oils within the curtilage of an establishment producing mineral oils shall not be considered a chargeable event giving rise to excise duty as long as the consumption is for the purpose of such production'. For reasons of equity, it should therefore be stipulated that the consumption of biofuels within the curtilage of an agricultural holding producing biofuels should not be regarded as a chargeable event giving rise to excise duty as long as the consumption is for the purpose of such production.
Amendment 9 ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 a (new) Article 4, paragraph 3 (Directive 92/81/EEC)
3a. Article 4(3) is replaced by the following:
"3. The consumption of mineral oils within the curtilage of an establishment producing mineral oils shall not be considered a chargeable event giving rise to excise duty as long as the consumption is for the purpose of such production.
Similarly, the consumption of biofuels within the curtilage of agricultural holdings and agricultural trade organisations producing biofuels shall not be considered a chargeable event giving rise to excise duty as long as the consumption is for the purpose of such production.
However, where such consumption is for purposes not related to that production and in particular for the propulsion of vehicles, this shall be considered a chargeable event giving rise to excise duty."
Amendments 10, 11 and 12 ARTICLE 1, POINT 4 Article 8 c, paragraph 2, subparagraphs 1 and 2 (Directive 92/81/EEC)
2. The levels of taxation applied by Member States on the products made up of or containing biofuels referred to in Article 8b may be lower than the minimum rates specified in Directive 92/82/EEC. However, the level of taxation of these products, if intended for use, offered for sale or used as motor fuel, may not be lower than 50 %of the normal rate of excise duty applied by the Member State on corresponding fuels.
2. The levels of taxation applied by Member States on the products made up of or containing biofuels referred to in Article 8b may be lower than the minimum rates specified in Directive 92/82/EEC. Particularly low tax rates shall be set for those fuels which meet particularly stringent environmental efficiency criteria and a total tax exemption may be applied for unblended biofuels.
3.The Member States, which on 1 January 2001 totally exempted products solely made up of biofuels, may continue totally to exempt those products until 31 December 2003.
1. Products made up of or containing biofuels referred to in Article 8b, used by local public passenger transport, including taxis, and by vehicles operated under the responsibility of a public authority may qualify, under fiscal control, for an additional reduction of a value equivalent to the reduction provided for Article 8b.
1. Products made up of or containing biofuels referred to in Article 8b, used by public passenger transport, including taxis, and by vehicles operated under the responsibility of a public authority may qualify, under fiscal control, for an additional reduction of a value equivalent to the reduction provided for Article 8b.
Amendment 15 ARTICLE 1, POINT 4 Article 8 g (Directive 92/81/EEC)
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the schedule of excise duty reductions applied in accordance with point IIa by 31 December 2002 and every twelve months thereafter.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission and to the European Parliament the schedule of excise duty reductions applied in accordance with point IIa by 31 December 2002 and every twelve months thereafter.
Amendment 16 ARTICLE 1, POINT 4 Article 8 h (Directive 92/81/EEC)
No later than 31 December 2007 the Commission shall report to the Council on the fiscal, economic, agricultural, energy, industrial and environmental aspects of the reductions granted in accordance with this point IIa. Additional exemptions or reductions granted in favour of biofuels according to the procedure of Article 8(4)of Directive 92/81/EEC shall also be reviewed. The Commission shall, if necessary, put forward proposals for their abolition, amendment or extension.
No later 31 December 2007 the Commission shall report to the Council and to the European Parliament on the fiscal, economic, agricultural, energy, industrial and environmental aspects of the reductions granted in accordance with this point IIa. Additional exemptions or reductions granted in favour of biofuels according to the procedure of Article 8(4) of Directive 92/81/EEC shall also be reviewed. The Commission shall, if necessary, put forward proposals for their abolition, amendment or extension.
Amendment 24 ARTICLE 1, POINT 4 Article 8 h a (new) (Directive 92/81/EEC)
Article 8 ha No later than 31 December 2007 the Commission shall submit a communication to the European Parliament and the Council on differentiated pricing for fuels in order to internalise their ecological, social and economic cost. The Commission shall, if necessary, bring forward proposals for this purpose.
European Parliament resolution on the Commission report to the European Parliament and the Council: Operation of the Euratom Safeguards Office 1999-2000 (COM(2001) 436 – C5&nbhy;0535/2001 – 2001/2214(COS))
– having regard to the Commission report (COM(2001) 436 – C5&nbhy;0535/2001),
– having regard to Articles 30, 33, Chapter VII and Article 107 of the Euratom Treaty,
– having regard to the Commission Statement "Nuclear safety fifteen years after Chernobyl", during the plenary on 2 May 2001,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Cologne European Council which, in connection with the enlargement of the Union, stressed the urgent need to adopt high European safety standards in the nuclear field and called on the Commission to report on progress in this field,
– having regard to the Commission replies during the EP plenary of 5 February 2002(1),
– having regard to the Commission replies during the EP plenary of 12 March 2002(2),
– having regard to the Council Decision concerning the Sixth Framework Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) for nuclear research and training activities, also contributing to the creation of the European Research Area (2002-2006)(3),
– having regard to Rule 47(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (A5–0196/2002),
A. whereas the Euratom Treaty refers to the need for protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiations and entitles the Commission to make appropriate recommendations for harmonising the provisions applicable in the Member States in the field of nuclear safety,
B. whereas in its 2000 Annual report, the European Court of Auditors deplored the lack of a definition of a European safety standard, and whereas the Council has still not yet taken any action on the matter,
C. whereas the Euratom Treaty, in Article 107, entitles the European Parliament to submit any appropriate proposal concerning matters on which it considers that a Community act is required for the purpose of implementing the Treaty,
D. whereas the European Community is supporting research on safety of nuclear reactors and nuclear material by means of the Energy Framework Programme and the Research Framework Programme,
E. whereas the general public is concerned about the risk of accidents and the release of radioactivity from one of the very many nuclear installations in the Member States and in the candidate countries,
F. whereas there is a much greater risk of attack of nuclear installations by criminal organisations or terrorist groups since the events of 11 September 2001,
G. whereas there is no Euratom Directive establishing safety and security standards for the design, construction and operation of nuclear installations in the EU; this competence remains with the Member States,
H. whereas it would be important to fix clear standards, requirements for uniform training, responsibilities and controls at Community level also in the field of nuclear safety and security, beside nuclear safeguards,
I. whereas continuous training of inspectors and of those who work with radioactive material and are responsible for nuclear safeguards is particularly important in view of the EU enlargement; whereas such training must be comprehensive and must provide information on the risks involved in the way such material is handled and how to act in the event of an incident or accident;
J. whereas ESO should extend its high standards in nuclear safeguards to candidate countries; whereas the ESO must be provided with increased resources to allow inspectors to carry out their activities at a greater number of nuclear installations with the same high quality of results as has been the case in the past,
K. whereas the fundamental standards laying down threshold values for exposure of workers and the general public, adopted by the IAEA and the European Union, must be regularly reviewed so that they are based on the most recent scientific findings,
1. Greatly appreciates the quality and the results of ESO activities in the period 1999-2000;
2. Regards it as very positive that the ESO has found no indication that nuclear materials have been diverted from their peaceful use in the European Union during the period 1999-2000;
3. Considers it very positive that the ESO has not detected any serious case involving illicit trafficking in nuclear materials in the European Union during the period 1999-2000;
4. Considers it necessary that safeguard activities should remain under the direct responsibility of ESO after the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe join the Community;
5. Stresses the need to allocate sufficient budgetary resources to the ESO to enable it to give its inspectors adequate training in the light of the office"s increased workload in the run-up to the enlargement of the European Union;
6. Calls for an increase in the ESO"s general budget in order to deal with the constant increase in the quantity and nature of nuclear material under the ESO"s control, particularly with a view to the enlargement of the European Union;
7. Calls for an improved collaboration between ESO, JRC and IAEA, in the fields of data security, training of personnel, setting up of new instruments and techniques;
8. Calls for the Commission to define a regulatory framework in the fields of data security and secured data transmission;
9. Calls for reinforced protection of data at ESO headquarters against cyber-crime; to this purpose, recommends that the possibility be considered of keeping the ESO data network physically isolated from the outside world, besides making use of software firewall;
10. Emphasises the need for the Commission to set key requirements for the physical protection of nuclear sites, nuclear materials, and transport intended for such materials;
11. Urges the Commission to propose a directive regulating, and guaranteeing a high level of, security during transport, including during loading and unloading, of nuclear materials, on the basis of the IAEA Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material;
12. Calls on the Commission to prepare a detailed report on existing legislation in force on nuclear safety and the security and safeguarding of nuclear materials;
13. Calls for greater clarification from the ESO of cases where discrepancies were found during inspections or material balance evaluations; furthermore, calls for the ESO to give further explanations and justifications for the margin of error built into the "material unaccounted for" – MUF – figures and calls for these margins to be significantly reduced over time to increase the accuracy of accounting for fissile material;
14. Encourages the Commission to propose a directive to fix a reference framework for all activities of auditing and certification in the field of nuclear safety, security and safeguard;
15. Proposes that the creation, within the Commission, of an independent nuclear safety and security office be considered, which should directly supervise, in close collaboration with the IAEA, the operators in the Member States, as the ESO is doing in the field of nuclear safeguards;
16. Calls for the European Convention to modify the Euratom Treaty in order to bring nuclear safety and security under the responsibility of a Community authority, as the issue of nuclear safeguards is under the responsibility of ESO;
17. Considers that the European Convention might give thought to the role of the Euratom Treaty in the context of the forthcoming reform of the Community institutions;
18. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Committee of the Regions, the Economic and Social Committee, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the candidate countries.
European Parliament resolution on the the Commission communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on certain legal aspects relating to cinematographic and other audiovisual works (COM(2001) 534 – C5&nbhy;0078/2002 – 2002/2035(COS))
– having regard to the Commission communication (COM(2001) 534 – C5&nbhy;0078/2002(1)),
– having regard to Articles 151 and 157 of the EC Treaty,
– having regard to European Parliament and Council Decision No 163/2001/EC of 19 January 2001 on the implementation of a training programme for professionals in the European audiovisual programme industry (MEDIA-Training) (2001-2005)(2),
– having regard to Council Decision 2000/821/EC of 20 December 2000 on the implementation of a programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (MEDIA Plus - Development, Distribution and Promotion) (2001-2005)(3),
– having regard to the European Investment Bank"s i2i initiative,
– having regard to its resolution of 6 September 2000 on audiovisual policy: media and digital technology(4),
– having regard to the Council resolution of 12 February 2001 on national aid to the film and audiovisual industries(5),
– having regard to its resolution of 4 October 2001 on Television without Frontiers: application of Directive 89/552/EEC(6),
– having regard to its resolution of 13 November 2001 on achieving better circulation of European films in the internal market and the candidate countries(7),
– having regard to Rule 47(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (A5&nbhy;0222/2002),
A. whereas the Commission communication is complementary to the European Parliament"s abovementioned resolution of 13 November 2001,
B. whereas the Commission"s position on State aid for the audiovisual sector is of extreme importance,
C. whereas the sector has both an industrial and cultural nature,
D. whereas it is important to safeguard our cinematographic heritage,
E. whereas digital film poses a challenge for the future of the sector,
F. whereas the Commission has announced studies on the following subjects: the rating of audiovisual works, financial measures, financial flows, the protection of heritage and registration schemes,
G. whereas tax concessions and special financial instruments are of fundamental importance for the undercapitalised European audiovisual sector,
H. whereas the Commission intends to examine the definitions of "European work" and "independent producer",
I. whereas the Commission is to set up two groups of experts, one comprising professionals and the other made up of individuals from the institutional realm,
1. Welcomes the Commission communication and urges that the proposed timetable for action be strictly adhered to;
2. Urges the Commission to do everything possible to ensure that audiovisual works can move freely within the internal market by 2005; would also like to see initiatives taken on the basis of its abovementioned resolution of 13 November 2001, which is complementary to the communication under consideration;
State aid for the audiovisual sector
3. Supports the Commission"s moves to make the criteria it uses when examining aid to the audiovisual sector in the Member States more transparent; regrets the fact that certain parts of its communication of September 2001 on this topic, however, remain vague or are incomplete;
4. Calls on the Commission, in assessing the funding of cinema films, other audiovisual works and public-service radio from the point of view of aid legislation, to take account of the relevant judgments of the European Court of Justice e.g. the Preussen-Elektra judgment of March 2001;
5. Calls on the Commission to amend, where necessary, the legislative provisions that deal with State aid in order to take account of the fact that the audiovisual sector is both cultural and industrial in nature;
6. Notes that the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund can also have an important role to play in protecting audiovisual heritage and supporting the European audiovisual sector in general, without this being included under the heading of State aid;
7. Points out that there is no real competition and only limited distribution between the EU national audiovisual industries, and that the European market is largely dominated by the United States industry; emphasises that the European Union must adopt a proactive policy designed to foster the production and distribution of cinematographic works;
8. Urges that legal certainty, which the Commission wishes to generate in the audiovisual sector with respect to State aid, should be guaranteed and should continue over coming years and takes the view that, if a re-examination of this issue is considered necessary in June 2004, this should lead to increased flexibility rather than a stricter application of the aid rules of EU competition law, and genuine consideration of the cultural and industrial needs of the cinematographic and audiovisual sector;
Protection of heritage and exploitation of audiovisual works
9. Stresses the need for compulsory legal deposit of works by the Member States, in line with the European Convention for the protection of the Audiovisual Heritage and the Additional Protocol on TV productions; calls on the public support funds for the audiovisual sector, as a transitional measure, to make it compulsory for their beneficiaries to deposit copies of any of their works which have received State aid through these funds;
10. Calls on the Commission and the Council to create an instrument to cofinance work to digitise archives, through a specific measure, for instance, in the next version of the MEDIA programme, based on a MEDIA Plus pilot project;
11. Supports the Commission's aim of carrying out a complementary study on registration schemes and databases, before expressing an opinion as to the need for legislative measures, and welcomes in principle the establishment of a public national film register (without copyright law implications);
12. Agrees with the Commission that the detail concerning right-holders databases should be held over for consideration as part of work on intellectual property;
13. Strongly encourages cooperation between the parties involved (right-holders and broadcasters) with a view to resolving the specific problems which may be encountered in new use of old works, while complying with the rights guaranteed by European Parliament and Council Directive 2001/29/EC of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society(8);
E-cinema
14. Confirms that it seems desirable to entrust the definition of digital film standards to the market, but that in order to avoid undesirable developments, the audiovisual industries in the EU and the USA should cooperate to that end;
15. Urges that specific research on digital film should be included in the sixth Framework Programme for Research and Development; deplores the lack of specific provisions to support the introduction of digital platforms (video on demand);
16. Calls on the Commission, the EIB and the Council to examine the possibility of contributing to the funding of extremely expensive digital projection equipment for European cinemas;
Tax issues
17. Believes that it is important to reduce the VAT rates applicable to audiovisual cultural products and services, in the review of Annex H of the sixth VAT directive, by analogy with the reduced rates applied to other cultural sectors;
18. Urges the Member States to use the measures already available to them, including the option to apply a reduced rate to cinema tickets;
19. Is disappointed that the Commission, in its communication, does not encourage the Member States to introduce tax incentives in their territories to attract investment in film;
Rating
20. Supports the Commission"s initiative to organise an external study on the way in which rating is organised in the EEA, the reasons for differences and their impact on the marketing of films;
21. Considers it desirable, however, to take account of differing cultural traditions and peculiarities, while appreciating the need for a uniform evaluation as regards measures to protect human rights;
Other measures to improve the circulation of films
22. Calls on the Commission to encourage the Member States to foster the creation of financial institutions specialising in the audiovisual sector, and to facilitate the creation of a risk capital fund, so as to be better able to respond to the i2i audiovisual initiative by the EIB and the Commission; notes, however, that this must not result in small and medium-sized enterprises in the film sector being disadvantaged;
23. Hopes that the EIB is able to process the files submitted to it efficiently; on this point, believes that it is essential for the EIB to set up a special section for audiovisual matters, to centralise applications and to be made up of staff with the relevant skills for evaluating such projects;
24. Welcomes the Commission"s intention to investigate appropriate financial measures for promoting the production and circulation of European audiovisual works, and to analyse financial flows in the sector;
25. Notes in that context that an in-depth analysis of European film audiences and the way in which they relate to American and European films could give an insight into the marketing impact of the films within the audiovisual sector;
26. Welcomes the inclusion of "image education" in the eLearning programme;
27. Considers that the idea of creating a television channel devoted to European film entails the risk that this initiative will lead to a reduction in the broadcasting of European works on other TV channels;
28. Notes that a European-wide network of broadcasters offering channels for children would be a good instrument for supporting the production and distribution of better European children's films;
Questions to be considered in the review of the Television without Frontiers Directive
29. Calls for the issue of producing definitions of "European work" and "independent producer" to be analysed within the context of a revision of the Television without Frontiers Directive or, at least, for a thorough study of the issue to be undertaken by the end of 2002 at the latest, with a view to determining whether new or harmonised definitions are necessary and whether they would make procedures more transparent and simpler for the professionals;
30. Refers also to the practice, current in some Member States, of "buy-out" contracts, which considerably restrict contractual freedom at producer level;
31. Draws attention to paragraph 8 of the abovementioned resolution of 13 November 2001 on achieving better circulation of European films in the internal market and the candidate countries, particularly with regard to the text in point (c) regarding investment in production;
32. Shares the Commission"s opinion on the issue of media chronology and on-line rights;
33. Hopes that, as part of the revision of the abovementioned Directive, general rules can be laid down on new audiovisual services, together with a method for regulating media ownership which will provide a better guarantee of cultural pluralism;
Next steps
34. Urges the Commission and the Council to take the recommendations of the groups of experts into account as far as possible, to boost the European audiovisual sector;
35. Welcomes any consideration by the Convention on the future of Europe and calls for Article 151 of the EC Treaty to be changed to operate under qualified majority rules;
Other issues
36. Points out that, within the scope of the internal market, the Member States" audiovisual sector industries are facing difficulties and complaining about the extra cost of ensuring that the services they supply comply with national requirements, and there is thus a need to do everything possible to facilitate the free movement of audiovisual works within the internal market between now and 2005;
37. Draws attention to the absence of a proper competitive system in the audiovisual sector, and points out that the law on State aids needs adapting, so that the twofold cultural and industrial nature of the audiovisual sector is taken into account;
38. Supports the Commission"s objective of providing operators in the audiovisual sector with a clear and predictable strategic context in the form of a reliable legislative framework;
39. Supports the Commission initiative of providing for a review of the "Television without Frontiers" directive by the end of 2002, to amend the current provisions and clarify the concepts of "European work" and "independent producer", without prejudice to initiating infringement proceedings against Member States that have not correctly transposed the "Television without Frontiers" directive;
40. Considers that undertakings must have a central and decisive role in the development of the audiovisual system and hence that their growth potential must be maximised;
41. Considers that, in order to revive production, there needs to be some prospect of a system that provides better incentives and public funding for the private sector, and more tax concessions for television and film producers; points out that such a scheme will stimulate the growth of smaller businesses and encourage genuine competition;
42. Takes the view that there is a need to consider the legal bases for promoting the European film production industry, so that the expectations being vested in e-cinema can be fulfilled;
o o o
43. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission and the parliaments of the Member States.
– having regard to Article 272 of the EC Treaty, Article 177 of the Euratom Treaty and Article 78 of the ECSC Treaty;
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(1) and in particular Annex III thereof;
– having regard to the preliminary draft budget of the Commission for 2003;
– having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2002 on the guidelines for the 2003 budget procedure - Section III - Commission(2);
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the Committee on Fisheries (A5-0247/2002),
A. whereas the Commission has presented a preliminary draft budget (PDB) for 2003 which provides for an increase of 1.4% in commitment appropriations compared to the 2002 budget,
B. whereas the increase in total payment appropriations is 2.7% in budget 2002, compared to the average growth rate of the Member States' budgets (3.4%) which represents 1.03% of Community GNP, the lowest level over the last years, while the 2002 budget represented 1.05% of Community GNP and whereas the ceiling of the financial perspective for 2003 is 1.08% of Community GNP,
C. whereas the level of commitment and payment appropriations leaves a margin of EUR 2.308 billion and EUR 4.720 billion respectively, below the ceiling set by the financial perspective 2000-2006,
D. whereas the maximum rate of increase (MRI) for non-compulsory expenditure, established on the basis of Article 272(9) of the EC Treaty, is 3.8%, which represents a total of EUR 59 517 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 56 352 m in payment appropriations, i.e. EUR 1 244 m in commitments and EUR 65 m in payments more than is permitted by the financial perspective,
E. whereas the objective of the first reading conciliation between Parliament and Council is to evaluate the needs assessed by the Commission in the PDB and to secure an agreement on the appropriate level of expenditure in particular for agriculture, international fisheries agreements and the common foreign and security policy but is also an opportunity to prepare an agreement on other expenditure,
F. whereas Parliament's priorities set out in the guidelines for the 2003 budget aimed at optimising the preparation of enlargement, focusing on internal security, stressing the need for reform of administration as well as CAP, and strengthening the role of the Union's external responsibilities;
Financial Framework
1. Recalls that the current financial framework 2000-2006 which was adopted by Parliament and the Council in the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) of 6 May 1999, includes an Annex II which, on an indicative basis, allocates appropriations to a heading 8 from 2002 onwards; points out that an adjustment to the financial perspective is needed in order to adapt it to the situation of a Community enlarged by up to ten candidate countries; repeats its call for the pre-accession appropriations for Cyprus and Malta to be transferred to heading 7 following a technical adjustment to the financial perspective;
2. Notes that the PDB calls for the use of the flexibility instrument foreseen by paragraph 24 of the IIA for a total amount of EUR 93 million shared between heading 2 (EUR 27 million for the restructuring of the Community fleet which used to fish under the EU-Morrocco agreement) and heading 5 (EUR 66 million to cover the cost of enlargement preparations); notes that the cost of the CFP reform for 2003-06 could represent a global amount of EUR 272 million of which the Commission will propose that EUR 240 million will have to be reprogrammed within heading 2 if Member States agree; also notes that the Commission proposes to cover part of these measures (more than EUR 30 million) by way of the flexibility instrument;
3. Is worried about the limited margin left under heading 4 in respect of the needs appeared over the past years for financing external actions, considering that EUR 400 million have been added to the initial ceiling through the flexibility instrument; considers that most of the margin left under heading 3 could be consumed only to finance the pilot projects and preparatory actions allowed by paragraph 37 of the IIA, leaving no margin for increasing other programmes;
4. Recalls that the financial programming which accompanies the PDB is only an indicative reference and that according to the joint declaration of 20 July 2000, the launching of new programmes in the PDB should not entail a reduction of the current policies;
Payments
5. Stresses that EUR 4.7 billion is left under the overall ceiling of the Financial Perspective; is concerned that the margins left for payments will not allow the improvement of the implementation of common policies nor or a reduction of the RAL; deplores that the Commission seems to link the problem of RAL with the lowest level of payments after having declared in March 2002 that the PDB for 2003 could exceed the payments ceilings;
6. Recalls that due to poor implementation, the balance recovered by the Member States has amounted to EUR 14 billion for the 2001 financial year representing a considerable unspent amount of payments which is becoming a significant political problem especially in regions affected by insufficient payments from structural funds;
7. Insists that the volume of payment appropriations for the financial year 2003 should be realistically assessed in the light of the level of outstanding commitments, so as to redefine an appropriate schedule of payments that will ensure a significant reduction in outstanding commitments and payments in the current year; also questions the reduced margin for manoeuvre so as to ensure that, in 2003, payment appropriations do not exceed the ceiling laid down by the financial perspective; will assess payment requirements on the basis of the report called for from the Commission, under Supplementary and Amending Budget (SAB) 2/2002, by 30 September 2002;
8. Urges that the use of new instruments be expanded (performance reserve, activity-based budgeting, assessment of the economic and social impact of projects) and that the application, authorisation and payment procedures be reviewed for unnecessary rigidity, preferably by an external group of management experts and parties concerned, since the present situation is not the result of temporary malfunctioning of the system, but is most definitely a structural problem; points up the political dimension of this question, given the economic and social importance of structural operations; points out that they represent 34% of the Community budget;
Agriculture
9. Takes note of the favourable situation observed for agricultural markets and the stability of the USD-EUR exchange rate which minimises the risks of increase and therefore should strictly limit the use of the available margin to unforeseen events; therefore asks the Commission to provide justification for the level of expenditure foreseen for sub-heading 1a) in relation with a context of stable trend; asks the Commission to improve its forecasting methods in order to be able to fix the necessary appropriations in May on the basis of realistic elements instead of postponing important decisions to the Autumn Letter of Amendment;
10. Recalls, however, that the monetary reserve will cease to exist on 31 December 2002, whereby a sufficient margin has to be made available under heading 1 to counter unexpected changes in the USD/EUR exchange rate and that past experience has shown that outbreaks of animal disease can have disastrous consequences which require major financial and technical interventions by the Community;
11. Expresses its support for the comprehensive further development of the CAP and calls for a fair, just and sustainable agricultural policy both for the Member States and for the candidate countries; reiterates its support in this context for the Commission's efforts to revise the Common Agricultural Policy so as to shift the balance of agricultural funding by gradually strengthening rural development; urges the Commission to come forward with a proposal to significantly increase funding for rural development and to reduce direct payments respectively; is aware that these needs imply an adjustment within heading 1;
12. Considers courageous action on sustainable rural development to be necessary in the budget also, and calls for it to be made easier for the Member States to use appropriations released through cross-compliance and modulation;
13. Expects that the mid-term review will place increased emphasis on multifunctional practices, while enhancing food safety, afforestation, animal welfare, small-scale family farming, and the production of non-intensive quality goods and local products and all measures which help to create new jobs without adversely affecting the rural environment; considers that in the future direct payments should be linked with tight environmental criteria;
14. Calls on the Commission, against the background of the enlargement negotiations and bearing in mind international competition conditions, to take account, as far as possible, of the initial results of the mid-term review of Agenda 2000 in the agricultural sector when it submits the letter of amendment in October;
15. Reiterates that adequate funds need to be allocated to heading B1-332 (Emergency fund for veterinary complaints and other diseases of animal contaminations which are a risk to public health) to counter new outbreaks of animal disease; considers that the Commission's proposal to reduce funding for veterinary measures by 90% is contrary to the Parliament's guidelines; notes that the Commission is proposing an increase of EUR 274 million to the beef and veal sector despite the fact that the market situation has improved remarkably since late 2001; urges the Commission to continue the development of marker vaccines and testing methods for Foot and Mouth Disease and Classical Swine Fever; furthermore, asks the Commission, on the basis of the study requested by the budgetary authority in 2002, to consider proposals for insurance schemes for the costs of the eradication of animal diseases;
16. Notes the increase of EUR 1242 million in the sheepmeat and goatmeat sector deriving from the agreement reached within the Council of Ministers for Agriculture to switch from a price support system to a system of income as stated by the Commission; recalls Regulation (EC) No 2529/2001 should entail only a minor increase in funding; considers that the market situation in the sheep and goat sector is improving after the latest FMD crisis; therefore asks the Commission to provide further information on the reasons for such a discrepancy in funding and, if necessary, to adjust the market organisation accordingly; expresses its concern about the amounts proposed by the Commission for budget lines B1-401 (setting-up of young farmers), B1-404 (Less-favoured regions), B1-4050 (Agri-environment - new system) and B1-4072 (Afforestation); calls for the budget 2002 amounts to be entered in budget lines B1-330 (Animal disease eradication and monitoring programmes and monitoring of the physical conditions of animals that could pose a public-health risk linked to an external factor) and B1-382 (Enhancing public awareness of the common agricultural policy) of budget 2002;
Fisheries
17. Takes note of the new Commission proposal on a global restructuring of the Community fleet to solve the problems of over-capacity of which the total cost amounts to EUR 272 million; notes that the appropriations entered in the PDB for the International Fisheries Agreements are maintained at the level of the 2002 budget and include a reserve of EUR 38 million; more detailed information is needed to be able to decide whether this amount is realistic to cover the possible conclusion of new agreements;
18. Considers it necessary to have quick and substantial information on the Fisheries reform costs in view of evaluating, at the July conciliation, the possible consequences for the 2003 budget including for the international Fisheries agreements;
19. Takes the view that international relations should be developed by financing fisheries agreements, which means that adequate funding must be maintained for line B7-8000, bearing in mind the importance of some of the agreements signed over the past year, particularly with Mauritania and Greenland;
Common Foreign and Security Policy
20. Notes the proposal in the preliminary draft budget to increase appropriations under Sub-Section B8 by 33%; welcomes the post-conflict solution of a Community Police Force in Bosnia as a clear signal of stability and security and is, in principle, prepared to make funds available from the Community budget for this and similar operations; must insist, however, given the responsibility commitments entered into elsewhere in the context of external operations and in the light of new requirements after 11 September 2001, that provision is made for adequate financial resources and appropriate involvement of Parliament in respect of such measures under the common foreign, security and defence policy;
21. Takes note of the Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament concerning the need for a specific flexibility instrument to finance civil crisis-management measures within the Community budget; considers that this proposal should rather aim for a wider use of the emergency reserve for structural interventions in external crises under heading 4; underlines the indispensable need to find an agreement to compensate the increase of new policies without reducing EU's traditional priorities; considers it necessary to maintain a political and geographical balance by ensuring global security and poverty reduction through improved effectiveness, before appropriations and acute measures in favour of the Middle East and Afghanistan can be made available; invites the Commission to provide further information and evaluation regarding the implementation of the pledges made for Afghanistan and more background information in order to decide on the future appropriations for the Balkans;
22. Intends to look for possibilities to create new B7 lines as replacement for parts of or whole B8 lines, with a view to promoting efficiency and reducing the inconveniencies caused by the pillar structure;
Administrative Expenditure
23. Notes that the level of administrative expenditure increases by 5.2% on budget 2002, including the cost of enlargement and pensions, thus exceeding the ceiling of heading 5 in 2003 by 66 million; considers that the proposal to use the flexibility instrument to cover the deficit runs counter to both the spirit and letter behind its creation and that a more detailed evaluation should be made of all the institutions' needs including all possibilities for frontloading 2003 expenditure and a common approach towards the controlled development of Agencies, in order to ease the pressure on the 2003 budget as this could provide an alternative solution under the ceiling of heading 5; urges the Council with reference to the EP's position to voluntarily to restrict itself to one fifth of heading 5, to revise the rate of increase of its administrative expenditure; calls for an agreement with Council at the July conciliation on the procedure to be followed in view of achieving an agreement before Council's second reading at the latest;
24. Recalls EP's will expressed in the guidelines to optimise the preparation of enlargement including that at administrative level but recalls also that in the context of the last trialogues on administrative expenditure, EP and Council have agreed to ask all the institutions to define core activities and to propose structural savings and negative priorities without putting in danger the functioning and the independence of the institutions; expects them to make useful proposals in particular concerning interinstitutional co-operation;
25. Emphasises once again its guidelines on administrative expenditure (heading 5); expects he budgetary and institutional problems posed by incorporating new activities under heading 5 and transferring new activities from heading 5 to different headings and the as yet unconcluded discussion of the scope for interinstitutional cooperation and the financing of expenditure relating to enlargement under heading 5 to be tackled as a whole in the context of conciliation;
26. Asks the Commission to justify the increase of part A of which the growth rate reaches 4.8% over budget 2002; recalls that over the past two years the budgetary authority has allocated 717 new posts to the Commission in the context of the administrative reform; calls on the Commission to provide detailed information on additional staff requirements in due time before Parliament's first reading;
New programmes
27. Invites the Council and the Commission, who have similar global priorities for 2003, to make efforts, in the context of the conciliation, to secure agreements on major issues such as economic development, SMEs, especially craft undertakings and micro-enterprises, health and safety, e-learning, justice and home affairs, common immigration and asylum policy and strengthening of control of external borders of EU;
28. Insists that the border regions programmes should focus on SME-cooperation and facilitate cross-border exchanges so as to consolidate sustainable economic development on both sides of borders; considers it necessary to extend the scope of the border regions programmes in cooperation with countries eligible for support under the TACIS, CARDS and MEDA programmes; in this respect, suggests that more responsive and flexible management methods be used for the coordination of the Interreg and Phare instruments; takes the view that new measures should be set up for the regions at the border of the enlarged Union;
29. Considers that, a part of the preparations for enlargement and the general debate on the future of the Union, information and communication campaigns aimed at the general public and at businesses should be considerably stepped up, as should all activities involving exchanges between citizens;
30. Notices that three important multi-annual programmes will be launched in 2003 (Research, Energy and Transport), however reminds the Commission that according to the common declaration of 20 July 2000, new programmes should not jeopardise the financing of existing actions, nor limit the powers of the budgetary authority within the annual procedure, in particular regarding EP's priorities reflected in pilot projects and preparatory actions;
o o o
31. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission the Court of Auditors and all the other institutions.
– having regard to Articles 272 and 274 of the EC Treaty,
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(1),
– having regard to its resolution of 13 December 2001 on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2002 as modified by Council (all sections) and Letter of Amendment No 2/2002 to the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2002(2) and to the joint declarations by the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission annexed thereto, which concern the implementation profile for the 2002 budget and an action plan to put an end to abnormal outstanding commitments,
– having regard to its resolutions of 28 February(3) and 30 May 2002(4) on Supplementary and Amending Budgets (SABs) 1 and 2 for the financial year 2002,
– having regard to transfers Nos 1-17 for the financial year 2002,
– having regard to Rule 92 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A5-0246/2002),
A. whereas it establishes, as one of the two arms of the budgetary authority, the general budget of the European Union, according to Article 272 of the Treaty,
B. whereas the Commission implements the budget voted by the Budget Authority according to Article 274 of the Treaty,
C. whereas during the period of the current financial perspective, 2000-2006, no increase of the own resources ceiling is foreseen for the first time since the establishment of financial perspectives, allowing the financing of new political priorities only by reorganising existing policies and making it even more necessary to evaluate existing priorities and policies and to guarantee the sound and efficient management of available resources,
D. whereas the structure of the financial perspective does not fit easily together with the structure of the programme cycles, and whereas a progressive financial perspective would be better suited to the Union's true legislative set-up,
E. whereas, according to the common declaration of 20 July 2000, the budgetary authority is entitled to assess the compatibility with the financial perspective of the new programmes proposed by the Commission so that they do not inevitably lead to a reduction of the current policies,
F. whereas it decides, in cooperation with the Council, on modifications to the adopted budget proposed by the Commission through supplementary and/or amending budgets and transfers between chapters,
G. whereas point 37 of the Interinstitutional Agreement provides for the possibility of entering in the budget appropriations without legal bases for pilot projects and preparatory actions,
H. whereas it has decided to reinforce the monitoring of the implementation of the current budget and, to that end, joint initiatives have been taken by the committee responsible and the spending committees to scrutinise closer the implementation of parts of the budget which are of particular political importance,
I. whereas the Commission has presented two preliminary draft supplementary and amending budgets in the course of the current financial year concerning the financing of the European Convention, the balance of the 2001 budget and the adjustment of the calculation of the revenue side of the budget to Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities' own resources(5),
J. whereas the Commission has so far presented 17 transfers during the 2002 financial year, with a total volume of EUR 250 million, some of which were presented to unblock appropriations in reserve, following the adoption of a legal base, whereas others shifted appropriations between chapters,
1. Expects the Commission to implement the budget, both figures and remarks, as adopted by the budgetary authority and takes the view that deviations from the decisions of the budgetary authority could only be justified through new developments which could not be foreseen when the budget was adopted and with detailed reasons given;
2. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all the administrative measures required for the launch of programmes - particularly new ones - are initiated immediately after Parliament's first reading and not - as is often the case - at the end of the year, so as to enable the budgetary authority to conduct at least a partial assessment of their impact when the following year's budget is being drawn up;
3. Expects the Commission to follow the commitments it has made in the budgetary procedure 2002, in particular the joint declarations concerning the implementation profile for the 2002 budget and concerning the action plan to put an end to abnormal outstanding commitments agreed in the conciliation between the three institutions before second reading;
4. Notes that the date for forwarding the report on implementation profiles agreed to by Parliament in connection with the 2002 budget could not be fitted into Parliament's work schedule, and therefore proposes that the dates laid down by the joint declaration be amended and that programming profiles be broken down in greater detail;
5. Notes that, for December 2002, the Commission is forecasting an average implementation rate of 100% for commitments and 97% for payments; hopes that these are realistic forecasts, in particular as regards payments, given that the implementation rate for them was only 72% in 2001; invites the Commission to submit, by 30 September 2002, the list of lines and chapters where there is a risk of divergence from that profile;
6. Recalls that one of the major objectives of the reform of the Commission aimed to improve the implementation of Community programmes through new methods of management such as deconcentration and decentralisation of the external service, new types of externalisation, significant requests for human resources, and redeployment of staff towards political priorities; therefore expects concrete and visible results;
7. Asks the Commission to inform Parliament by 30 September 2002 of the measures taken with a view to implementing Parliament's demand to simplify the rules for and management of small-scale projects;
Supplementary and amending budgets
8. Reiterates its satisfaction that a solution for the financing of the European Convention was found (SAB 1/2002) which assures that the Convention can function properly and that the budgetary powers of Parliament are guaranteed;
9. Emphasises that SAB 2/2002 has returned to Member States a preliminary amount of EUR 10 billion of payment appropriations that were not spent in the previous year; considers this to be an extremely high figure and expects to receive a further analysis, by September 2002, of why these funds could not be implemented under the EU budget in 2001; points out that a less restrictive approach to payments could obviate the need for many transfers, particularly in cases where the Commission finds it difficult to demonstrate that it is unable to use all the appropriations entered; considers it important to receive a quarterly payments schedule from the Commission, before the first reading, for more efficient implementation of payments;
10. Restates its utmost concern over the poor implementation of payment appropriations; considers that it is necessary to improve the track record and image of the EU in this respect, to accelerate payments on old commitments or to decommit those and cancel the payment appropriations; calls on the Commission to present, for the conciliation meeting on 19 July 2002, a plan of how the payments cancelled in the 2001 budget can be rescheduled, also taking into account decommitments, and to present by 30 September a proper assessment of payments in 2002 and, where appropriate, for 2003, in order to take the appropriate measures;
11. Points out that, although the Commission has final responsibility for implementation of the Community budget, the national authorities play a significant role in the implementation of much of it; calls, accordingly, on the Member States to show the utmost diligence and not to delay the implementation of payment appropriations for domestic political reasons;
12. Reiterates its concern that, due to the rigidity of the system, unspent appropriations in one area cannot be used to finance needs in another and asks the Commission to present proposals that would increase flexibility in this respect;
13. Reiterates its will to support the reconstruction of Afghanistan and is ready to use the margin of heading 4, reserved for this purpose, on condition that the Commission can demonstrate that appropriations already entered under the budget lines for Asia and for humanitarian aid are spent properly, with the right being reserved to assess the contributions of other donors on the basis of the commitments given at the ministerial meeting in Tokyo (January 2002), and that the new appropriations can be spent in an efficient way to help the Afghan people; expects the Commission to present a supplementary and amending budget when these conditions are met;
14. Hopes that the political situation in the Middle East develops in the direction of peace and conciliation between Israel and the Palestinian Authority and expects the European Commission to submit, by 1 September 2002, proposals to support this process and precise information concerning the use that both partners in the peace process make of funds received from the European Union, what control mechanisms are in operation and what penalties should apply in the event of misuse of those funds;
Transfers
15. Points out that, with the exception of those made from the reserve, transfers entail an alteration to what was initially adopted by the budgetary authorities, and must be duly motivated;
16. Notices that a great number of transfers, mainly concerning payment appropriations, are due to delays caused by heavy comitology procedures; reminds the Commission of its undertaking to simplify the comitology procedure when launching new legislative programmes in order to accelerate implementation, and expects the Commission to replace the inefficient comitology procedure as soon as possible;
17. Considers that transfers can be a powerful tool to facilitate political, as well as financial, responses to situations arising after the adoption of the budget, notably unforeseeable major international events, and to optimise the use of financial resources;
18. Emphasises, however, that transfers must not simply be used to shift budgetary funds from one area to another so that the final budget would contradict the priorities voted by the budgetary authority; points out that more than EUR 2 billion in payment appropriations were transferred during the 2001 budgetary procedure;
19. Reiterates its request that the Commission should present a schedule for the transfers it intends to request from one chapter to the other, in particular during the last quarter, in order to allow Parliament and Council a sound and adequate evaluation of these and to provide a clear picture of how the initial budget would be finally modified;
20. Stresses that it will, in principle, not accept any transfer request that reduces budget lines voted by Parliament unless convincing justifications can be provided and adequate proposals are presented to improve the implementation of the donor line;
21. Underlines that it can accept the increase of budget lines through transfers, in principle, if:
–
a justified need, which could not be foreseen during the budgetary procedure, appears,
–
under multiannual programmes agreed by the Council and the Parliament, the amount can be reduced in following years so as not to breach the established overall financial framework,
–
the transfer corresponds to a political priority of the budgetary authority.
22. States that additional needs could be covered by the mobilisation of the emergency reserve (heading 6), and asks the Commission to consider this possibility in particular if natural disasters, wars or crises make EU aid important for the population concerned by these situations;
Implementation under various headings
23. Underlines that it will continue to monitor closely the implementation of the 2002 budget as adopted by Parliament so that sufficient appropriations are provided for areas of particular political importance;
24. Notes with satisfaction that, as at 31 May 2002, the commitments implementation level for headings 2, 3 and 4 was higher than on the same date in 2001, though it was lower than the original implementation profile; voices its concern at the potential political repercussions, in the context of preparing for enlargement, of the very low implementation level for heading 7; also notes that, as at 31 May 2002, the payments implementation level was lower than on the same date in 2001, thus sowing doubt as to keeping to the original profile;
25. Deplores the fact that most of the programmes where the Commission is forecasting about 10% divergence from the budgetary authority's decision, in terms of commitments or payments, represent political priorities for Parliament (e-learning, information and communication, social dimension and employment, justice and home affairs, cooperation with Latin America, cooperation measures, etc.); calls on the Commission to give more detailed reasons for this failure to implement and to take the necessary action with due regard for Article 26 of the Financial Regulation and the budgetary authority's decisions;
26. Notes that, as at 6 May 2002, total outstanding commitments were EUR 110.447 billion, more than the annual budget of the European Union;
27. Notes that 624 items with outstanding commitments were examined between 1 January and 30 April 2002, representing 25% of total items pending and EUR 147 million in payment appropriations; welcomes the fact that the Commission has cancelled EUR 97 million of 'potentially abnormal' commitments totalling EUR 3.5 billion; calls on the Commission to draw up a plan, modelled on the implementation plan, to clear these abnormal outstanding commitments;
Heading 1
28. Points out that, according to the latest Early Warning System report (No 5/2002) on expenditure in the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the uptake of appropriations under subheading 1a (market support) was EUR 1 592.4 million below the indicator in May 2002, whereas the implementation of subheading 1b (rural development) was proceeding as foreseen; believes that such a discrepancy cannot be attributed only to delays in payments and calls on the Commission to investigate the reasons and make known its conclusions so that, if structural shortcomings are the cause, they are taken into account when the Commission presents the mid-term review of Agenda 2000;
Heading 2
29. Notes that the rate of payment implementation, which was already poor at the close of the financial year 2000, has deteriorated further, amounting to no more than 67.9% of payment appropriations at 31 December 2001 and only 14% at 6 May 2002, down by half over the same date in the previous year (27%);
30. Voices its concern at the increasing volume of outstanding commitments, which rose from EUR 38 418 million to EUR 56 765 million between 1 January and 31 December 2001 and totalled EUR 82 710 million as at 6 May 2002;
31. Points out that speeding up implementation is an abiding concern of the budgetary authority and one of the increasing objectives of revising the rules on the Structural Funds; stresses the importance of introducing new project management systems geared to best practice and procedural simplification; calls for the application, authorisation and payment procedures to be reviewed for unnecessary rigidity and obstacles, and for proposals for simplification to be made;
32. Presses for the development and use, without delay, of new control instruments in order to ensure effective quarterly monitoring and thus improve implementation of structural operations: surveillance and early warning indicators and performance indicators for an assessment of economic, social and environmental impact on beneficiary regions;
33. Urges the Commission, by 30 September 2002, to provide, on the basis of the latest implementation profile, information on the appropriations and regions affected by the "n+2 rule" in 2003;
Heading 3
34. Notes that the backlog of payments in the Trans-European Networks (TENs) amounted to EUR 1,131 million for the period 1989-2001, out of which EUR 490 million concerned the 14 priority projects approved at the Essen European Council in 1994; supports the Commission's proposal to increase Community co-financing from 10% to 20% in transport and energy TENs so as to improve implementation and reduce bottlenecks in cross-border regions; considers, however, that this does not solve the lack of common procedures between Member States, which has been the main cause for delays since the introduction of TENs; urges the Member States to reinforce their commitment and cooperation in order to improve implementation in transport TENs; encourages the Commission to impose fixed deadlines for the future implementation of TEN projects; considers it essential for priority to be given to projects that will help overcome the problem of cross-border geographical barriers;
35. Welcomes the fact that the pilot project on enlargement, which was introduced by Parliament in the 2001 budget and reinforced in the 2002 budget, is being implemented by the Commission to the benefit of SMEs in the regions bordering the candidate countries;
36. Notices that in parallel to the launch of a new multiannual programme in the field of energy in the Preliminary draft budget for 2003, which represents a significant increase of EUR 13 million over the existing programmes, the implementation percentage for the latter was between 0% and 3 % at the end of May 2002; asks the Commission to clarify why programmes in a terminating phase cannot be implemented more rapidly;
37. Is concerned that Life, the launch of which was already delayed by the late adoption of the legal basis, was still at a very low level of implementation at the end of May; invites the Commission to take urgent and appropriate measures to eliminate all administrative or bureaucratic bottlenecks in view to accelerate the implementation of both commitments and payments;
38. Is concerned about the low implementation rate for pilot projects and preparatory actions at the end of May 2002 (less than 5 %); does not accept that objections to implementation raised by the Commission, which have already been considered by the budgetary authority, continue to be invoked by the Commission after the budget has been established; intends to follow up closely the evolution over the coming months and evaluate the efforts made by the Commission in view of the budgetary decisions to be taken for 2003; is not ready to accept the discontinuation of some of them for reasons of poor levels of implementation;
Heading 4
39. Stresses that the low implementation over the first five months of 2002 of a number of budget lines under heading 4 in the 2002 budget is worrying and, therefore, the Commission should modify its implementation schedule for these lines to arrive at a more balanced implementation over the year;
40. Notes that the implementation of the budget line for political, economic and cultural support for Asian developing countries (B7-303) was at only 13 % in terms of commitments at the end of May, which is surprising given the needs for financial support in this area demonstrated by the situation in Afghanistan and the conflict between India and Pakistan;
41. Deplores that, at the end of May, no operational expenditure had been committed for the European programme for reconstruction and development in South Africa (B7-320) or for assistance to partner countries in eastern Europe and central Asia (Chapter B7-52);
42. Notes that as of May no commitments had been made for most of the BA lines under heading 4 and asks the Commission to review its approach to propose BA lines for most of the operational lines under heading 4 without concrete evidence of the needs;
Heading 5
43. Recalls that a margin of EUR 2.2 million exists under heading 5 in the 2002 budget and that, according to the estimates of the institutions for 2003, the needs for enlargement preparations cannot be financed under the current ceiling for 2003; therefore considers that a front-loading from 2003 to 2002, using all available margins, should be looked at in a context of sound management; calls on all institutions to assess the feasibility of using transfers and amending budgets to bring forward to 2002 appropriations which can help scale down the requirements for 2003;
44. Asks the Commission to explain why budget line A-3046 (Women's organisations) has apparently been restricted to only one field of action when the original intention of the budgetary authority was to open it to a wide range of women's organisations not covered by the European Women's Lobby;
Heading 7
45. Underlines that the SAPARD and ISPA pre-accession instruments have to gain speed in 2002 to be implemented as much as possible, and in the most efficient way, to prepare the enlargement of up to 8 candidate countries in 2004 and of more candidate countries at a later date;
46. Notes that the implementation of commitments under the three pre-accession instruments has worsened compared to last year and that, concerning payments, the only improvement is an increase of implementation to 20% for ISPA at the end of May;
o o o
47. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, the European Ombudsman, and the other institutions and bodies concerned.