European Parliament resolution on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003 (C5&nbhy;0300/2002 – 2002/2004(BUD)) and Letter of amendment No 1/2003 (12640/2002-C5-0480/2002) to the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003 Section III - Commission
– having regard to Article 272 of the EC Treaty and Article 177 of the Euratom Treaty,
– having regard to Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom, of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities" own resources(1),
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(2),
– having regard to the new Financial Regulation due to enter into force on 1 January 2003(3),
– having regard to the preliminary draft general budget for the financial year 2003 (COM(2002) 300),
– having regard to the draft general budget for the financial year 2003 (C5-0300/2002),
– having regard to its resolution of 2 July 2002 on the 2003 budget in view of the conciliation procedure before the Council's first reading(4),
– having regard to its resolution of 2 July 2002 on the implementation profile and transfers as well as supplementary and amending budgets(5),
– having regard to the maximum rate of increase for non-compulsory expenditure of 3,8% (for 2003 C5-0207/2002),
– having regard to Letter of amendment No 1/2003 (12640/2002 – C5-0480/2002) to the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003,
– having regard to Rule 92 and Annex IV of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the other committees concerned (A5&nbhy;0350/2002),
A. whereas the Council's draft budget represents in appropriations for payments 1.01 % of the EU-GNI compared to the 1.08 % of EU-GNI established by the financial perspective and compared to the 1.03 % of EU-GNI proposed in the Commission's preliminary draft budget,
B. whereas in the draft budget the appropriations for payments amount to EUR 96 991 billion, representing a reduction of EUR 1 215 million (-1,2 %) compared to the PDB, an increase of 1.4 % compared to the 2002 budget, and an increase in compulsory expenditure compared to the 2001 budget of 1.84 % and in non-compulsory expenditure of 2.1 %,
C. whereas the Commission has presented a proposal to mobilise the flexibility instrument according to point 24 of the IIA of 6 May 1999, for a total amount of EUR 125 million of which EUR 66 million is intended to cover the deficit of heading 5 in the PDB, EUR 32 million for the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy and 27 million to finance the second part of the restructuring of the Community fleet,
D. whereas, following the floods during the summer of 2002, the Commission has also presented a proposal for a new interinstitutional agreement in order to set up a mechanism to finance the reconstruction of the damage caused by natural disasters in the Member States and the candidate countries where negotiations are underway,
Results of the Conciliation
1. Underlines that, for the first time before the Council's first reading, the Council and Parliament reached an agreement where the main outcome was to maintain heading 5 below the ceiling fixed by the Financial Perspective, thus rejecting the Commission's request for mobilisation of the flexibility instrument and without jeopardising the preparation of enlargement;
2. Recalls that in addition to the rigour applied to administrative expenditure, the conditions set up by Parliament were fully obtained, in particular the decision to finance the needs for enlargement by means of frontloading, to extend the early retirement scheme to Parliament, including for political group staff, to widen the scope of the use of the Emergency Reserve for civil crisis management and to start a process in order to find an appropriate involvement of Parliament in CFSP in the future;
Implementation and Budgetary Methods
3. Welcomes the outcome of initiatives taken within Parliament, in particular the new type of budgetary debate allowing Parliament to express its concern to the Commission on budgetary issues and creating a new institutional dynamic in relation to the new provisions on the legislative programme and stocktaking procedure; underlines the positive results of the new implementation methods involving the specialised committees in a better quantitative and qualitative monitoring of the budget; welcomes the preparatory work on the future activity based budgeting nomenclature;
Payments and Backlog
4. Underlines that the cut of EUR 1 215 million over the PDB made by the Council in the draft budget, is not in line with the aim to improve the implementation of Community funding as expressed by both arms of the Budgetary Authority in the respective guidelines; notes that the increase remains moderate and fully respects the ceiling of the Financial Perspective;
5. Endorses the responsibility to make the best use of the European "taxpayer's" money; points, in this respect, at the considerable amounts of unspent expenditure which have been returned to Member States over the last years; is also willing to ensure sound management of the EU budget by providing the Commission with the necessary means;
6. Recalls the joint declaration of Parliament, Council and Commission of 14 December 2000 as an important objective of the Commission Reform, on the reduction of the outstanding commitments to normal level by December 2003; notes that the Commission in the 2002 Budget procedure has committed itself to present implementation profiles and action plan to put an end to the abnormal outstanding commitments; regrets that despite the progress made by the Commission allowing to reverse the negative trend for outstanding commitments, in particular in external programmes, in September 2002 nonetheless, the total outstanding commitments still amount to EUR 107 billion; increases payment appropriations on the budget lines where the backlog has been reduced over the past year in view of providing the Commission with the necessary means to continue on the positive trend;
7. Calls on the Commission to submit before Parliament's second reading:
-
a report outlining how the Commission will meet its own objective to reduce the outstanding commitments to a normal level by December 2003;
-
a plan, modelled on the basis of the implementation plan, to clear the outstanding commitments;
-
a commitment to present an implementation plan at a lower level of the nomenclature, at the latest with the PDB and regular reporting about differences by comparison with the original profile, an appropriate account for them plus proposals for improvement;
-
a take-up plan based on a binding timetable to be approved by the budgetary authority;
B...A Lines
8. Is willing to continue the rationalisation of the needs between the operational and administrative expenditure on the basis of an overestimation of the needs for the latter; decides to cut the appropriations of the B...A lines where the implementation at 15 July is lower than 10% and to increase the corresponding operational line by the same amount, and to create a global reserve for the appropriations of the B...A lines where the implementation at July is between 10% and 35%;
Heading 1: Agriculture
9. Expresses its support for the comprehensive further development of the CAP and calls for a fair, just and sustainable agricultural policy both for the Member States and for the candidate countries; reiterates its call in this context for a shift in the balance of agricultural funding by gradually strengthening rural development such as support to young farmers;
10. Takes the decision to use part of the margin, left by the Commission under heading 1a) in the PDB and increased by the Council in the DB (under heading 1a), for financing Parliament's priorities and in particular, measures in the field of veterinary animal welfare, public health and genetic resources; asks the Commission to take them on board in the Letter of Amendment; stresses the importance of reconversion from tobacco growing into other crops and activities, and welcomes the proposed additional financing for studies on possibilities of reconversion;
11. Is critical to the current system of export subsidies for transport of live animals, and to enhance transparency, proposes to change the nomenclatures of the budget lines on export subsidies for B1-210 (beef and veal), B1-2300 (live swine), B1-2311 (poultry) by introducing new budget lines covering the transport of live animals; proposes to reduce the export subsidies for beef and veal in order to reduce transport of live animals;
Heading 2: Structural Funds
12. Considers that the cut of EUR 525 million in payment appropriations made by the Council in its draft budget is unacceptable, as the Member States should be encouraged to implement the structural funds to their full potential; urges the Member States with significant payment backlogs from previous programming periods, to clear them and to avoid further delays; Stresses the need for more simplification in the procedures;
13. Recalls the joint statement made by Parliament and the Council to finance the remaining amount of EUR 27 million for the restructuring programme of the Community fleet that used to fish in Moroccan waters in accordance with the IIA provisions;
14. Takes note of the Letter of amendment No 1/2003 to the PDB presented by the Commission; however, pending Parliament's and the Council's decision on the Reform of the Common Fishery Policy, and in absence of an agreement on the financial requirements for the reform, considers it premature to enter new appropriations in the budget;
Heading 3: Internal Policies
15. Welcomes that the vote on budgetary amendments reflects the Guidelines with a view to reinforcing the contribution of the EU budget to the migration and asylum policy in line with the conclusions of the Seville European Council by entering additional appropriations to policies of this area such as the European Refugee Fund, measures to improve migration policy including through better cooperation with third countries, and the setting up of programmes to facilitate integration and fight social exclusion;
16. Stresses the need to facilitate the preparation of enlargement with increased appropriations for pilot projects and preparatory actions in view of developing Community programmes adjusted to the new geographical and economical dimension of the enlarged Union; creates a new pilot project aiming at developing networks between the SMEs of the present and enlarged Union, and those covered by the TACIS, MEDA and CARDS programmes;
17. Underlines the need to increase the capacity of small and medium-sized enterprises especially craft undertakings and microenterprises, in the evolving economic and geopolitical context of the forthcoming enlargement, and to support measures in the field of vocational training as well as to develop sustainable programmes to improve the level of health and safety and corporate social responsibility;
18. Notes the efforts made by the Commission to improve the follow-up of pilot projects and preparatory actions; asks the Commission to speed up the start of the process, to establish a specific implementation plan for pilot projects and preparatory actions, and to provide the budgetary authority with quarterly, quantitative and qualitative information regarding implementation;
19. Emphasises the need to continue to provide budgetary support through pilot projects and preparatory actions for initiatives which are not covered by the main multiannual programmes, in the field of education, youth policy, including e-learning in line with the conclusions of the Lisbon European Council, and minority languages; in this context, creates a new pilot project for experimental measures to promote technological development and to foster cooperation with universities at regional level with the establishment of regions of knowledge;
20. Welcomes the decision to institute a pilot scheme designated ENEA to promote the mobility and free movement of the elderly at European level in the social, cultural, artistic, educational and sporting spheres; is in favour of further development and implementation of EU social policy through new forms of civil dialogue; urges the Commission to put forward a proposal supporting those organisations taking part in work to develop civil dialogue;
21. Recalls that the efforts developed by Parliament over the past years aimed to set up an information policy of the Union at the service of the citizens with better value for money and new synergies; in this context, asks for a plan of savings in administrative and human resources, in particular at decentralised level, to be presented by the interinstitutional group on information by 30 April 2003; considers that the reduction made on PRINCE, following the introduction of the euro, does not correspond to the initial aim of the programme which was to provide information on the priorities of the Union to the European citizens; therefore, re-establishes part of the appropriations with a breakdown reflecting the new priorities such as enlargement and the future of the Union; reminds the Commission that it should not undermine the principles underlying the PRINCE programme as agreed in the 1996 budget; welcomes the introduction in the budget of appropriations for facilitating access to documents for the European citizens;
22. Follows the Council in its decisions to moderate the increase of subsidies to the decentralised agencies; decides to put 50 % of the appropriations in the reserve for those agencies for which a solution on the location and effective operation is pending; welcomes the priorities of budgetary transparency in the new Financial Regulation due to enter into force on 1 January 2003 while underlining the Council's and Commission's inconsistency to request new tasks from the agencies without additional funding; is willing to give more visibility to the cost of the preparation of enlargement within each agency's budget in view of the calculation of the new FP for the enlarged Union;
23. Welcomes the budget decision to launch a new pilot project meeting the need to invest, within Member States, in Clean Development Mechanisms, as provided for in the Kyoto Protocol; considers that the same measures can be taken in developing countries as part of the 'Environment in the developing countries' action (B7-620);
Heading 4: External Policies
24. Stresses the impossibility of financing all needs in the context of external policies due to the constraints of heading 4, thus jeopardising the credibility of the EU throughout the world; deplores, in particular, the reductions made on budget 2002 for a number of important programmes and budget articles including the MEDA programme for which the commitments will be reduced by 25% compared to the 2000 financial year; urges the Council and the Commission to take it into consideration when proposing new policies and to cooperate in solving the structural problem of the ceiling of heading 4 in the short and medium-term;
25. Considers that the need for greater budgetary transparency, the Financial Perspective should be reviewed in order to transfer the pre-accession aid for Cyprus and Malta from heading 4 to heading 7;
26. Confirms its willingness to support the reconstruction of Afghanistan but recalls that this funding is conditional on maintaining, in global terms, the same level of expenditure related to other EU priorities as defined by the European Parliament; has reduced the assistance for Afghanistan by EUR 63 million compared to the draft budget; is prepared to finance the remaining needs for Afghanistan within the framework of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999; therefore asks the Council to enter into negotiations with the European Parliament in order to mobilise the necessary financial resources;
27. Recognises that the global HIV/AIDS crisis is a major health, development and security issue affecting all nations and reiterates its determination to find a satisfactory solution to the financing of an appropriate EU contribution to the Global Fund;
28. Reaffirms its intention to enter a budget heading for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of the territories administered by the Palestinian Authority, in line with the conclusions of its resolution of 12 March 2002 on the 2003 budget guidelines (Section III - Commission)(6);
29. Emphasises the urgent need to increase EU direct interventions in the fields of basic health and basic education in developing countries, building on the agreement to ensure a minimum 35% allocation to social sector spending; deeply regrets that existing Country Strategy Papers reveal 31% devoted to transport compared to only 10% to all health and education; reiterates that the full implementation and effective operation of agreed targets and indicators to measure performance should be a prerequisite before any consideration of further simplification of the budget;
30. Has decided to increase the budget lines for NGO´s and Human Rights in order to restore the level of the 2002 budget; is concerned about the delays in implementing the EIDHR micro-projects schemes of 2001 and 2002; recalls that Parliament, on several occasions, has asked for a simplification of the rules for small-scale projects and that it has stressed the importance of the deconcentration process in this respect; therefore asks the Commission for a clarification on the internal audit which is currently being carried out within Europe-aid to assess the capacity of Commission delegations to implement the micro-projects schemes;
31. Recalls that at the conciliation of 19 July 2002, no agreement on CFSP figures was reached and therefore enters EUR 30 million into chapter B8, corresponding to Budget 2002, as provided for by point 39 of the IIA; welcomes the EUPM in Bosnia Herzegovina as a contribution for stability and security; indicates its positive approach to find the appropriate funding in parallel with an appropriate involvement of Parliament and the Commission in such measures under CFSP as agreed at the July 2002 conciliation; is of the opinion that to this end an interinstitutional agreement between the Council, Parliament and the Commission should be agreed by the second reading of the 2003 budget; moreover, invites the Council to present its workplan detailing the operational expenditure on CFSP and ESDP 2002-2007;
Heading 5: Administrative Expenditure
32. Welcomes the agreement reached between Parliament and the Council in July 2002 and the common efforts to maintain rigour in the Union's administrative expenditure by maintaining them under the ceiling of heading 5 and by financing the needs by means of frontloading and anticipating expenditure in the 2002 budget; points out that this operation initiates a concrete multiannual approach between two financial years;
33. Confirms its will to give priority to the preparation of enlargement and in particular to provide the necessary appropriations for human resources and the publication of the acquis communautaire; is of the opinion that the outcome of savings and frontloading should contribute to this goal by way of a transfer to part A of the budget;
34. Reaffirms its commitment to equal opportunities for the disabled by entering a reference thereto in the remarks to Chapter A-30 (Community subsidies); asks the Commission, in time for the second reading of the 2003 draft budget, to come forward with a feasibility study as to the financial implications of setting up a day and residential care centre for disabled children of European officials;
35. Urges the Commission to present a proposal for a regulation establishing a pension fund for officials of the institutions and bodies of the European Union; creates the appropriate budgetary structure with a view to giving a positive signal pending the adoption of the decision;
36. Supports the decision not to apply the weighting factor to the salaries of Commissioners from July 2002 and expects this to remain the position for the foreseeable future; looks forward to a decision of the Commission detailing how payments made since 1998 will be repaid;
Commission Reform
37. Reminds the Commission that its key project is the reform of its administration and management which is fully supported by Parliament; states that the successful conclusion and implementation of this reform during the mandate of this Commission is an indispensable cornerstone for the success of enlargement and better acceptance of the EU by its citizens; notes that the public does not have a clear picture of what the reform is about and the efforts being made to better serve citizens and to provide value for money; calls on the Commission to submit to Parliament by 15 November 2002:
-
a detailed report on the conclusions of the second report of the Committee of Independent Experts on reform of the Commission and Parliament's observations in its resolution of 19 January 2000(7) on that report;
-
a table showing the results of the implemented reforms, the reforms under way and the measures which will still have to be taken along with a detailed calendar for implementation;
38. Reiterates its will to ensure the success of the Commission reform through close follow-up of the use of the appropriations made available in the budget, in particular concerning the additional human resources; is determined to continue the efforts to improve the budget execution aiming to reduce the outstanding commitments according to a strict implementation plan;
39. Welcomes that the vote on budgetary amendments reflects the guidelines of the study which will be commissioned to set out potential priorities for EU policy-making in the field of foreign affairs for 2002-2007; calls on the Commission to ensure that this study be submitted to Parliament before 30 September 2003;
Heading 7: Pre-accession
40. Restores the payments reduced by the Council for PHARE, SAPARD and ISPA according to its general strategy on payments which seeks to significantly improve implementation and the will to encourage the preparation of enlargement;
o o o
41. Instructs its President to forward this resolution together with the amendments to the Council, the Commission and the other institutions and bodies concerned.
– having regard to Council Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom of 31 October 1994 on the system of the European Communities' own resources(1),
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(2),
– having regard to the new Financial Regulation due to enter into force on 1 January 2003(3),
– having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2002 on the guidelines for the 2003 budgetary procedure(4),
– having regard to its resolution of 14 May 2002 on the estimates of revenue and expenditure of Parliament for the financial year 2003(5),
– having regard to the preliminary draft general budget for the financial year 2003 (COM(2002) 300),
– having regard to the draft general budget for the financial year 2003 (C5&nbhy;0300/2002),
– having regard to Rule 92 and Annex IV of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy and the Committee on Petitions (A5&nbhy;0351/2002),
A. whereas the ceiling for heading 5 ("Administrative expenditure") for the financial year 2003 is fixed at EUR 5 381 000 000 by the financial perspective in force,
B. whereas the ceiling for heading 5 was exceeded by EUR 55 million on the basis of the estimates of expenditure for 2003 as submitted by the institutions,
C. whereas the Council has established a draft budget totalling, for the "other sections", EUR 1 853 737 730, which represents an increase of 3.6% over the 2002 budget allocations, thus reducing the preliminary draft budget in heading 5 by EUR 71 million and leaving a margin of EUR 16.4 million under the ceiling,
General framework
1. Underlines the fact that pressure on the ceiling for heading 5, due to the constraints of the current financial perspective, will be highest in 2003; therefore, welcomes the fact that Parliament and the Council have agreed on a common approach concerning the broad aspects of heading 5 and that a joint statement was adopted at the conciliation meeting of 19 July 2002 in which both sides undertook to observe the existing ceiling for heading 5, not to use the flexibility instrument for this heading, to endeavour to finance the publication of the "acquis communautaire" and other pressing needs in the Commission by means of a frontloading operation and to transfer EUR 29 million entered in specific reserves for the "acquis" to the Commission;
2. Reiterates that providing the institutions with the necessary means to prepare for the forthcoming enlargement remains Parliament's key priority for the 2003 budget; is convinced that, due to the given constraints, bringing forward expenditure to the 2002 budget with a view to creating additional leeway in 2003 remains the best option to make appropriations available for the 2003 budgetary priorities; underlines the fact that the Council has committed itself to facilitating all the necessary procedural steps for the frontloading operation, including mopping-up transfers and an intersection supplementary and amending budget, as proposed by Parliament; stresses that all institutions are called on to make a contribution to solving the difficult situation in heading 5, including Parliament itself and the Council, and to show solidarity with the Commission, which has been hit hardest by the constraints imposed by the financial perspective;
3. Notes that the Council continues to take an across-the board approach to heading 5 and that no options have been examined by that arm of the budgetary authority to solve the specific problems in each institution; points out that the Council's cuts in each section would have an adverse effect not only on the normal functioning of the institution concerned, but also on its capacity to prepare for enlargement, if left unamended; has decided, therefore, to apply a strategy in the "other sections" of re-entering appropriations to cover the most pressing needs in each section and offsetting them by other budgetary measures, thus minimising the budgetary impact on the margin left under the ceiling;
4. Takes note of the second report of the secretaries-general of the institutions on trends in heading 5 and on potential savings from interinstitutional cooperation, which concludes, inter alia, that institutions will, given current parameters, be able to finance enlargement expenditure below the ceilings for heading 5 ("Administrative expenditure") of the financial perspective and heading 8 ("Enlargement") of the annexed financial framework EU-21 over the period 2004-2006; endorses, in principle, the Council's decision to reflect the potential savings from interinstitutional cooperation in the draft budget for 2003; points out, however, that a more in-depth examination of the scope for interinstitutional cooperation needs to take place; considers that the reports on likely movement in heading 5 are a useful tool for the budgetary authority that provide a multiannual setting for the annual budgetary decisions; requests the secretaries-general of all institutions, therefore, to submit such a report by May of each year;
5. Welcomes the establishment of the European Communities Personnel Selection Office as an appropriate interinstitutional measure to help institutions prepare for enlargement more efficiently and agrees, therefore, to the "transfer" of posts from the participating institutions; notes that the office will be responsible on behalf of the institutions for preparing and conducting open competitions and for establishing reserve lists of candidates; underlines the fact that it remains the prerogative of each institution to recruit staff according to its own needs and profiles required;
6. Notes that the European Convention will not have concluded its work by the end of 2002 and agrees, therefore, also with a view to ensuring a fair balance between the institutions, to enter the following amounts in the respective sections for the contributions to cover the Convention's activities until July 2003: EUR 500 000 in the reserve in the Parliament section, EUR 200 000 in the Council section and EUR 750 000 in the Commission section;
7. Underlines the need to swiftly establish a pension fund for officials of the institutions and the bodies of the European Union;
Section I - European Parliament
8. Welcomes the decision of its Bureau to make an amount of EUR 42 690 million available in its 2002 Budget for the frontloading operation to help solve the precarious situation in heading 5; considers that this measure is to be seen as a political gesture towards the Commission and the other institutions in the light of the exceptional situation in administrative expenditure; recalls, however, that these appropriations were earmarked for Parliament's property policy and notes that envisaged measures are now postponed from 2002 to 2003; has decided, therefore, to enter an additional amount of EUR 35 million against Article 209 (Provisonal appropriation to cover the institution's property investments) in its 2003 budget;
9. Underlines the fact that preparing Parliament for the enlargement of the European Union and for welcoming the new Members of Parliament in 2004 is the key priority under its 2003 budget; notes that the Bureau has updated and revised the three-year plan on preparations for enlargement, having been invited to do so by the budgetary authority, and points out that this plan remains an indicative framework for subsequent budgetary procedures, with due regard for the principle of annuality;
10. Remains convinced that negotiations with 10 candidate countries can be concluded by the end of 2002, as provided for in the Commission's road map, and that new Member States could join the Union by 1 January 2004; points out, therefore, that Parliament's 2003 budget must make provision for this scenario and agrees to leave appropriations for this purpose in Chapter 103 ("Enlargement reserve") pending political and administrative decisions to be taken;
11. Remains committed to the principle of "controlled full multilingualism" after enlargement and to maintaining equality between languages; notes that the three-year plan no longer proposes a transition to bi-active interpretation by 2009, but instead endorses the use of a mixed system, according to which current interpretation arrangements would be combined with bi-active interpretation; can agree to the use of the mixed system, as this ensures the best possible use of current resources; expects, however, the proposed reforms to remain within acceptable budgetary limits; endorses also the proposal of the Steering Committee on Enlargement to move towards an externalisation rate of 50% for Parliament's translations;
12. Enters EUR 8 million against Article 250 ("Meetings in general") to welcome up to 147 observers from the candidate countries as of the date when the respective country's accession treaty is signed; notes that, in accordance with the arrangements adopted, observers will be entitled to attend plenary sittings, attend committee and delegation meetings and speak in them, take part in political group activities, be given office facilities, receive the basic flat-rate daily subsistence allowance and be reimbursed for travel expenses actually incurred; notes also that linguistic support can be provided if translators and interpreters have been recruited;
13. Welcomes the adoption of the special early retirement scheme for 125 officials of the European Parliament, including the staff of the political groups, as a budget-neutral measure to improve productivity; has decided, however, to leave a token entry against Item 1218 ("Special retirement scheme for permanent and temporary staff of the European Parliament") pending further internal administrative decisions; takes the view also that specific early retirement arrangements with a view to enlargement will need to be adopted as has been the case with previous enlargements;
14. Has decided to transfer EUR 1 million from Chapter 103 ("Enlargement reserve") to Item 2000 ("Rent and annual lease payments") for the rent of the Montoyer 70 building to provide additional office space on a transitional basis until the D4 and D5 buildings projects have been completed, and to transfer EUR 2.8 million to the same item for the rent of the IPE III building in Strasbourg; has also decided to transfer EUR 5.6 million to Article 206 ("Acquisition of immovable property") for the financing of the Atrium II Building in Brussels; notes that the Bureau has taken a decision, in principle, to build two new conference rooms next to the LOW Building in Strasbourg and that an exploratory mandate has been approved; instructs its Bureau to consult the Committee on Budgets before any legally binding decisions are taken; notes, however, that no impact is expected on the 2003 budget from the Strasbourg measures;
15. Agrees that the recruitment of staff in preparation for enlargement, in addition to the posts made available in the estimates of Parliament, should take place on the basis of auxiliary contracts, as is the case at the Commission; underlines the fact that this is a transitional measure pending ratification of the accession treaties; has decided, however, to leave the appropriations for possible recruitment to fill up to 410 posts (365 for the General Secretariat and 45 for the secretariats of the political groups and non-attached Members) in Chapter 103 ("Enlargement reserve");
16. Recalls that 114 enlargement-related posts were created in the estimates for the General Secretariat and 65 posts for the secretariats of the political groups and non-attached Members; has decided to make appropriations available also for the following measures in the establishment plan:
-
1 A2, 1 A7 and 1 C5 (plus 1 C5 through redeployment) for a new budgetary structure in DG 2;
-
3 A7 and 2 C5 for the Legal Service;
-
1 temporary A7 post in DG 5 for equal opportunities policy duties;
-
releasing 12 posts in the Information Technologies Directorate (2 A7, 9 B3 and 1C5) from the reserve;
-
deletion of 4 C5 posts from Parliament's establishment plan for "transfer" to the European Communities Personnel Selection Office;
-
Conversion of the following posts: 1 A3 to A2 (Legal Service), 1 temporary B3 to temporary A7 (Press Service), 10 B5 to B3 (Information Technologies Directorate), 2 temporary B5 to temporary A7 (non-attached Members), 7 permanent D1 into temporary posts (drivers' service) and 14 C1 to B3 (assistance for Vice-Presidents); requests its Secretary-General to submit precise job descriptions for those posts where assistance has already been agreed together with a report on the options for support to committee chairmen and the respective budgetary implications when Parliament's 2004 preliminary draft estimates are submitted;
-
5 ad personam upgradings (2 A3 to A2, 2 C1 to B3 and 1 D1 to C3); expects that its Bureau will grant the ad personam upgradings in accordance with established procedures;
17. Has decided to reduce appropriations against Chapter 11 ("Staff in active employment") by EUR 9.3 million to reflect the new salary adjustment parameters submitted by the Commission and discontinuation of the adjustment method as a result of the revision of the Staff Regulations;
18. Takes note of the Secretary-General's proposals on improving assistance to Members for their legislative and budgetary responsibilities, which are Parliament's core activities; agrees that human resources in its Administration must be better integrated to improve service to Members and endorses the concept of increasing synergies between DG2 and DG4 in particular; considers also that the problems arising from geographical dispersion remain unresolved; insists, however, that the reform should not lead to new forms of compartmentalisation or add bureaucracy; has decided to amend the remarks against Article 260 ("Limited consultations, studies and surveys, STOA programme") to launch a pilot scheme in the 2003 budget concerning the establishment of budgetary allocations to provide external expertise for parliamentary committees;
19. Takes the view that, while enhancing the democratic legitimacy and quality of EU law-making jointly with the Council and the Commission in the context of the negotiations of an interinsitutional agreement on better law-making, Parliament's rights are safeguarded, full transparency for all stages of the legislation procedure is guaranteed and the Council conducts all its legislative deliberations in public;
20. Recalls that its new Rules of Procedure provide for an improved mechanism to reconcile the decisions of the legislative and the budgetary authority; instructs its Bureau and political authorities, by analogy with the new rules, to consult the Committee on Budgets before any decisions with significant budgetary implications are taken;
21. Has entered EUR 80 000 against Item 3601 ("Cost of meetings and other activities of the European Parliamentary Association"); underlines the fact that the Association should be subject to the same standards of accounting and auditing as the Association of Former Members of the European Parliament and that it should present its estimates of expenditure for the coming year and a balance sheet for the previous year if it requests funding from Parliament's budget in future; considers also that the cost of using Parliament's facilities (for instance rooms and interpretation) should be offset against the grant to the Association;
22. Notes that the Europe House arrangement has been put into practice for most of its information offices and that progress is being made in instances where this is not yet the case; recalls that the aim of Europe Houses is to improve service to the citizen, facilitate access to information, raise the profile of the European Union as a whole and to reduce duplication of effort and resources; is of the opinion, however, that there is scope for further cooperation between Parliament and Commission services; notes also that it is imperative to bring Parliament closer to the citizens it represents and to improve its outreach, in particular with a view to the next elections;
23. Takes note of the proposed measures to enhance the transport service for Members at key times; agrees that it is legitimate to provide Members with the necessary facilities to fulfil their parliamentary responsibilities; notes that the proposed measures will have no significant budgetary impact and that the current level of appropriations is sufficient to cover needs; requests its Secretary-General to present a report, when the preliminary draft estimates for 2004 are submitted, on the various options for Members' transport facilities, together with details of the respective budgetary impact;
24. Agrees to continue making provision for the participation of Members at a conference of parliamentarians from the WTO Member States and for participation at meetings of a WTO Parliamentary Assembly, should such an assembly be established;
25. Has decided to enter a new item 2831 (Internet broadcasting of plenary sittings and meetings) with a token entry; considers that this is an important political initiative aimed at providing more transparency, improving service to the citizen and bringing Parliament closer to its electorate; takes note of the conclusions of the feasibility study and notes that a political decision needs to be taken; invites its political authorities to examine these options and make the necessary proposals in the context of the 2004 estimates;
Section II - Council
26. Has decided to delete EUR 18 million against Chapter 103 ("Provisional appropriations: publication of the acquis communautaire") in accordance with the agreement reached with the Council at the conciliation meeting of 19 July 2002 concerning the frontloading operation to bring expenditure forward; agrees, with due regard for the Gentlemen's Agreement, not to reduce the total amount of EUR 430 million for this section;
27. Takes note of the Council's decision, in view of the pressure on the ceiling for heading 5, to postpone to subsequent years expenditure amounting to EUR 8.5 million for the acquisition of the LEX building, which should provide additional office space to cater for enlargement;
Section IV - Court of Justice
28. Endorses making appropriations available for some of the Court's priorities requested in its estimates, as they appear justified; points out, however, that the cost of these measures can be offset by a further reduction in staff expenditure without undermining the Court's enlargement preparations:
-
creation of 9 temporary posts (1 A2, 1 A3, 3 A4, 3 A5 and 1 A6) for the Judges of the Court of First Instance;
-
creation of 2 B5 posts for the administrative services;
-
authorisation in the establishment plan for 32 upgradings for permanent posts (1 A4 to A3, 1 A5 to A4, 1 A6 to A5, 7 LA5 to LA4, 2 B3 to B2, 3 B4 to B3, 7 C2 to C1 and 10 C3 to C2) and 8 upgradings for temporary posts (1 B3 to B2, 6 B5 to B4 and 1 D3 to D2); has decided, however, not to enter appropriations against Chapter 11 ("Staff in active employment") for this purpose;
-
conversion of 8 permanent C5 into B5 posts for increased specialisation purposes;
29. Has decided to reduce the appropriations made available by Council in the draft budget for the creation of 53 enlargement-related linguistic posts (reducing the period from six to three months), in order to offset the cost of all the above establishment plan measures;
Section V - Court of Auditors
30. Takes the view that the Court of Auditors, on the basis of the appropriations made available by the Council in the draft budget, would be in no position either to prepare for enlargement, or to guarantee the normal functioning of the institution and its Members; recalls also that the Court has already made a considerable contribution towards easing the pressure in heading 5 by rescheduling its construction project and thus reducing its 2003 estimates by EUR 5 million over the 2002 budget;
31. Has decided to authorise the following measures:
-
creation of 17 posts (1 A2, 9 A7, 3 B5 and 4C5), making appropriations available for four months;
-
reduction of the standard abatement from 3.59% to 2.53%;
-
25 upgradings (1 A3 to A2 ad personam, 7 A5 to A4, 1 A6 to A5, 1 LA4 to LA3, 2 LA5 to LA4, 2 LA6 to LA5, 1 LA7 to LA6, 1 B2 to B1, 3 C2 to C1, 5 C3 to C2, 1 C5 to C4); has decided, however, not to enter appropriations in Chapter 11 ("Staff in active employment") for this purpose;
-
EUR 329 000 increase in appropriations against Article 200 ("Rent");
-
EUR 202 000 increase in appropriations against Article 204 (Fitting-out of premises);
32. Has decided to offset the cost of all the above measures by cutting a total of EUR 1.65 million against the following lines: EUR 820 000 against Article 211 ("Computer networks"), EUR 30 000 against Item 2211 ("Replacement of furniture") and EUR 800 000 against Article 270 ("Official Journal"); notes that the Court will be able to bring forward the corresponding expenditure to the 2002 budget;
Section VI - Economic and Social Committee
33. Welcomes the decision of the Economic and Social Committee to postpone the expenditure on the move to the Belliard complex and on vacating the Ravenstein building from 2003 to the 2004 budget; notes that this measure, involving EUR 5.42 million, reduces pressure on the heading; notes, however, that the expenditure is unavoidable and will have to be covered in the 2004 budget;
34. Has decided on the following measures;
-
creation of two posts (1 LA7 and 1 B5); notes that the cost of these posts will be offset by a corresponding cut against Item 2210 ("New purchases of furniture") in accordance with the frontloading operation;
-
authorisation in the establishment plan for 20 upgradings (2 LA5 to LA4, 1 LA6 to LA5, 4 LA7 to LA6, 1 B4 to B3, 3 C2 to C1, 5 C3 to C2, 1 C5 to C4, 1 D3 to D2, 1 B3 to temporary B2 and 1 C3 to temporary C2); has decided to enter no appropriations against Chapter 11 ("Staff in active employment") for this purpose;
Section VII - Committee of the Regions
35. Welcomes the decision of the Committee of the Regions, together with the Economic and Social Committee, to postpone the expenditure on the move to the Belliard complex to the 2004 budget, which, involving EUR 2.59 million, reduces pressure on the 2003 budget; notes in this instance, too, that the expenditure will have to be covered in the 2004 budget;
36. Has decided on the following measures:
-
creation of two temporary B5 posts for the political groups; has decided to offset the cost of this measure by a corresponding cut against Item 2210 ("New purchases of furniture");
-
authorisation in the establishment plan for 12 upgradings (2 LA5 to LA4, 1 LA7 to LA6, 1 B2 to B1, 2 B5 to B4, 1 C3 to C2, 2 C4 to C3, 2 temporary A6 to A5 and 1 temporary C5 to C4) with no budgetary impact;
Section VIII (A) - European Ombudsman
37. Points out that the Ombudsman's budget is too small to make a contribution to the frontloading operation or to be able to bring forward expenditure to offset the cost of the following measures and has therefore decided to enter appropriations for them:
-
creation of three temporary posts (1 A5, 1 B5 and 1 C5);
-
authorisation for three upgradings (1 A7 to A6, 1 B5 to B4 and 1 C5 to C4);
-
EUR 43 000 increase in appropriations against Item A-1175 ("Translations");
Section VIII (B) - European Data Protection Officer
38. Notes that the European Data Protection Officer has not been appointed and that this office is not operational yet; has agreed, therefore, to transfer the appropriations entered in the 2002 budget in the frontloading operation; has decided accordingly not to enter any appropriations in the 2003 budget for the time being;
o o o
39. Instructs its President to forward this resolution, together with the amendments, to the Council, the Commission and the other institutions and bodies concerned.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to adopting a European Parliament and Council regulation on rail transport statistics (8652/2/2002 – C5&nbhy;0311/2002 – 2001/0048(COD))
– having regard to the Council common position (8652/2/2002 – C5&nbhy;0311/2002),
– having regard to its position at first reading(1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2000) 798(2)),
– having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,
– having regard to Rule 78 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (A5&nbhy;0337/2002),
1. Approves the common position;
2. Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position;
3. Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;
4. Instructs its Secretary-General duly to sign the act and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Communities;
5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the common position adopted by the Council with a view to adopting a European Parliament and Council Decision on adopting a Community programme to improve the operation of taxation systems in the internal market (Fiscalis programme 2003-2007) (10612/2/2002 – C5&nbhy;0383/2002 – 2002/0015(COD))
– having regard to the Council common position (10612/2/2002 – C5&nbhy;0383/2002)(1),
– having regard to its position at first reading(2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2002) 10(3)),
– having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,
– having regard to Rule 78 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A5&nbhy;0320/2002),
1. Approves the common position;
2. Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position;
3. Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;
4. Instructs its Secretary-General duly to sign the act and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Communities;
5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to adopting a European Parliament and Council directive on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse) (9359/6/2002 – C5&nbhy;0384/2002 – 2001/0118(COD))
– having regard to the Council common position (9359/6/2002 – C5&nbhy;0384/2002)(1),
– having regard to its position at first reading(2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2001) 281(3)),
– having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,
– having regard to Rule 80 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A5-0343/2002),
1. Amends the common position as follows;
2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 24 October 2002 with a view to the adoption of European Parliament and Council Directive 2002/…/EC on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(4),
Having regard to the Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(5),
Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank(6),
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251(7),
Whereas:
(1) A genuine Single Market for financial services is crucial for economic growth and job creation in the Community.
(2) An integrated and efficient financial market requires market integrity. The smooth functioning of securities markets and public confidence in markets are prerequisites for economic growth and wealth. Market abuse harms the integrity of financial markets and public confidence in securities and derivatives.
(3) The Commission Communication of 11 May 1999 entitled "Implementing the framework for financial markets: action plan" identifies a series of actions that are needed in order to complete the single market for financial services. The Lisbon European Council of April 2000 called for the implementation of that action plan by 2005. The action plan stresses the need to draw up a Directive against market manipulation.
(4) At its meeting on 17 July 2000, the Council set up the Committee of Wise Men on the Regulation of European Securities Markets. In its final report, the Committee of Wise Men proposed the introduction of new legislative techniques based on a four&nbhy;level approach, namely framework principles, implementing measures, cooperation and enforcement. Level 1, the Directive, should confine itself to broad general "framework" principles while Level 2 should contain technical implementing measures to be adopted by the Commission with the assistance of a committee.
(5) The Resolution adopted by the Stockholm European Council of March 2001 endorsed the final report of the Committee of Wise Men and the proposed four&nbhy;level approach to make the regulatory process for Community securities legislation more efficient and transparent.
(6) The Resolution of the European Parliament of 5 February 2002 on the implementation of financial services legislation also endorsed the Committee of Wise Men's report, on the basis of the solemn declaration made before Parliament the same day by the Commission and the letter of 2 October 2001 addressed by the Internal Market Commissioner to the chairman of Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs with regard to the safeguards for the European Parliament's role in this process.
(7) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Directive should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(8).
(8) According to the Stockholm European Council, Level 2 implementing measures should be used more frequently to ensure that technical provisions can be kept up to date with market and supervisory developments, and deadlines should be set for all stages of Level 2 work.
(9) The European Parliament should be given a period of three months from the first transmission of draft implementing measures to allow it to examine them and to give its opinion. However, in urgent and duly justified cases, this period may be shortened. If, within that period, a resolution is passed by the European Parliament, the Commission should re&nbhy;examine the draft measures.
(10) New financial and technical developments enhance the incentives, means and opportunities for market abuse: through new products, new technologies, increasing cross-border activities and the Internet.
(11) The existing Community legal framework to protect market integrity is incomplete. Legal requirements vary from one Member State to another, leaving economic actors often uncertain over concepts, definitions and enforcement. In some Member States there is no legislation addressing the issues of price manipulation and the dissemination of misleading information.
(12) Market abuse consists of insider dealing and market manipulation. The objective of legislation against insider dealing is the same as that of legislation against market manipulation: to ensure the integrity of Community financial markets and to enhance investor confidence in those markets. It is therefore advisable to adopt combined rules to combat both insider dealing and market manipulation. A single Directive will ensure throughout the Community the same framework for allocation of responsibilities, enforcement and cooperation.
(13) Given the changes in financial markets and in Community legislation since the adoption of Council Directive 89/592/EEC of 13 November 1989 coordinating regulations on insider dealing (9), that Directive should now be replaced, to ensure consistency with legislation against market manipulation. A new Directive is also needed to avoid loopholes in Community legislation which could be used for wrongful conduct and which would undermine public confidence and therefore prejudice the smooth functioning of the markets.
(14) This Directive meets the concerns expressed by the Member States following the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001 as regards the fight against financing terrorist activities.
(15) Insider dealing and market manipulation prevent full and proper market transparency, which is a prerequisite for trading for all economic actors in integrated financial markets.
(16) Inside information is any information of a precise nature which has not been made public, relating, directly or indirectly, to one or more issuers of financial instruments or to one or more financial instruments. Information which could have a significant effect on the evolution and forming of the prices of a regulated market as such could be considered as information which indirectly relates to one or more issuers of financial instruments or to one or more related derivative financial instruments.
(17) As regards insider dealing, account should be taken of cases where inside information originates not from a profession or function but from criminal activities, the preparation or execution of which could have a significant effect on the prices of one or more financial instruments or on price formation in the regulated market as such.
(18) Use of inside information can consist in the acquisition or disposal of financial instruments by a person who knows, or ought to have known, that the information possessed is inside information. In this respect, the competent authorities should consider what a normal and reasonable person would know or should have known in the circumstances. Moreover, the mere fact that market-makers, bodies authorised to act as counterparties, or persons authorised to execute orders on behalf of third parties with inside information confine themselves, in the first two cases, to pursuing their legitimate business of buying or selling financial instruments or, in the last case, to carrying out an order dutifully, should not in itself be deemed to constitute use of such inside information.
(19) Member States should tackle the practice known as "front running", including "front running" in commodity derivatives, where it constitutes market abuse under the definitions contained in this Directive.
(20) A person who enters into transactions or issues orders to trade which are constitutive of market manipulation may be able to establish that his reasons for entering into such transactions or issuing orders to trade were legitimate and that the transactions and orders to trade were in conformity with accepted practice on the regulated market concerned. A sanction could still be imposed if the competent authority established that there was another, illegitimate, reason behind these transactions or orders to trade.
(21) The competent authority may issue guidance on matters covered by this Directive, e.g. definition of inside information in relation to derivatives on commodities or implementation of the definition of accepted market practices relating to the definition of market manipulation. This guidance should be in conformity with the provisions of the Directive and the implementing measures adopted in accordance with the comitology procedure.
(22) Member States should be able to choose the most appropriate way to regulate persons producing or disseminating research concerning financial instruments or issuers of financial instruments or persons producing or disseminating other information recommending or suggesting investment strategy, including appropriate mechanisms for self-regulation, which should be notified to the Commission.
(23) Posting of inside information by issuers on their internet sites should be in accordance with the rules on transfer of personal data to third countries as laid down in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the movement of such data(10).
(24) Prompt and fair disclosure of information to the public enhances market integrity, whereas selective disclosure by issuers can lead to a loss of investor confidence in the integrity of financial markets. Professional economic actors should contribute to market integrity by various means. Such measures could include, for instance, the creation of "grey lists", the application of "window trading" to sensitive categories of personnel, the application of internal codes of conduct and the establishment of "Chinese walls". Such preventive measures may contribute to combating market abuse only if they are enforced with determination and are dutifully controlled. Adequate enforcement control would imply for instance the designation of compliance officers within the bodies concerned and periodic checks conducted by independent auditors.
(25) Modern communication methods make it possible for financial market professionals and private investors to have more equal access to financial information, but also increase the risk of the spread of false or misleading information.
(26) Greater transparency of transactions conducted by persons discharging managerial responsibilities within issuers and, where applicable, persons closely associated with them, constitutes a preventive measure against market abuse. The publication of those transactions on at least an individual basis can also be a highly valuable source of information to investors.
(27) Market operators should contribute to the prevention of market abuse and adopt structural provisions aimed at preventing and detecting market manipulation practices. Such provisions may include requirements concerning transparency of transactions concluded, total disclosure of price-regularisation agreements, a fair system of order pairing, introduction of an effective atypical-order detection scheme, sufficiently robust financial instrument reference price-fixing schemes and clarity of rules on the suspension of transactions.
(28) This Directive should be interpreted, and implemented by Member States, in a manner consistent with the requirements for effective regulation in order to protect the interests of holders of transferable securities carrying voting rights in a company (or which may carry such rights as a consequence of the exercise of rights or conversion) when the company is subject to a public take-over bid or other proposed change of control. In particular, this Directive does not in any way prevent a Member State from putting or having in place such measures as it sees fit for these purposes.
(29) Having access to inside information relating to another company and using it in the context of a public take-over bid for the purpose of gaining control of that company or proposing a merger with that company should not in itself be deemed to constitute insider dealing.
(30) Since the acquisition or disposal of financial instruments necessarily involves a prior decision to acquire or dispose taken by the person who undertakes one or other of these operations, the carrying out of this acquisition or disposal should not be deemed in itself to constitute the use of inside information.
(31) Research and estimates developed from publicly available data should not be regarded as inside information and, therefore, any transaction carried out on the basis of such research or estimates should not be deemed in itself to constitute insider dealing within the meaning of this Directive.
(32) Member States and the European System of Central Banks, national central banks or any other officially designated body, or any person acting on their behalf, should not be restricted in carrying out monetary, exchange-rate or public debt management policy.
(33) Stabilisation of financial instruments or trading in own shares in buy&nbhy;back programmes can be legitimate, in certain circumstances, for economic reasons and should not, therefore, in themselves be regarded as market abuse. Common standards should be developed to provide practical guidance.
(34) The widening scope of financial markets, the rapid change and the range of new products and developments require a wide application of this Directive to financial instruments and techniques involved, in order to guarantee the integrity of Community financial markets.
(35) Establishing a level playing field in Community financial markets requires wide geographical application of the provisions covered by this Directive. As regards derivative instruments not admitted to trading but falling within the scope of this Directive, each Member State should be competent to sanction actions carried out on its territory or abroad which concern underlying financial instruments admitted to trading on a regulated market situated or operating within its territory or for which a request for admission to trading on such a regulated market has been made. Each Member State should also be competent to sanction actions carried out on its territory which concern underlying financial instruments admitted to trading on a regulated market in a Member State or for which a request for admission to trading on such a market has been made.
(36) A variety of competent authorities in Member States, having different responsibilities, may create confusion among economic actors. A single competent authority should be designated in each Member State to assume at least final responsibility for supervising compliance with the provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive, as well as international collaboration. Such an authority should be of an administrative nature so as to guarantee that it is independent from economic actors and to avoid conflicts of interest. In accordance with national law, Member States should ensure appropriate financing of the competent authority. That authority should have adequate arrangements for consultation concerning possible changes in national legislation such as a consultative committee composed of representatives of issuers, financial services providers and consumers, so as to be fully informed of their views and concerns.
(37) A common minimum set of effective tools and powers for the competent authority of each Member State will guarantee supervisory effectiveness. Market undertakings and all economic actors should also contribute at their level to market integrity. In this sense, the designation of a single competent authority for market abuse does not exclude collaboration links or delegation under the responsibility of the competent authority, between that authority and market undertakings with a view to guaranteeing efficient supervision of compliance with the provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive.
(38) In order to ensure that a Community framework against market abuse is sufficient, any infringement of the prohibitions or requirements laid down pursuant to this Directive will have to be promptly detected and sanctioned. To this end, sanctions should be sufficiently dissuasive and proportionate to the gravity of the infringement and to the gains realised and should be consistently applied.
(39) Member States should remain alert, in determining the administrative measures and sanctions, to the need to ensure a degree of uniformity of regulation from one Member State to another.
(40) Increasing cross&nbhy;border activities requires improved cooperation and a comprehensive set of provisions for the exchange of information between national competent authorities. The organisation of supervision and of investigatory powers in each Member State should not hinder cooperation between the competent national authorities.
(41) Since the objective of the proposed action, namely to prevent market abuse in the form of insider dealing and market manipulation, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the measures, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
(42) Technical guidance and implementing measures for the rules laid down in this Directive may from time to time be necessary to take account of new developments on financial markets. The Commission should accordingly be empowered to adopt implementing measures, provided that these do not modify the essential elements of this Directive and the Commission acts according to the principles set out in this Directive, after consulting the European Securities Committee established by Commission Decision 2001/528/EC(11).
(43) In exercising its implementing powers in accordance with this Directive, the Commission should respect the following principles:
–
the need to ensure confidence in financial markets among investors by promoting high standards of transparency in financial markets;
–
the need to provide investors with a wide range of competing investments and a level of disclosure and protection tailored to their circumstances;
–
the need to ensure that independent regulatory authorities enforce the rules consistently, especially as regards the fight against economic crime;
–
the need for high levels of transparency and consultation with all market participants and with the European Parliament and the Council;
–
the need to encourage innovation in financial markets if they are to be dynamic and efficient;
–
the need to ensure market integrity by close and reactive monitoring of financial innovation;
–
the importance of reducing the cost of, and increasing access to, capital;
–
the balance of costs and benefits to market participants on a long-term basis (including small and medium-sized businesses and small investors) in any implementing measures;
–
the need to foster the international competitiveness of EU financial markets without prejudice to a much-needed extension of international cooperation;
–
the need to achieve a level playing field for all market participants by establishing EU&nbhy;wide regulations every time it is appropriate;
–
the need to respect differences in national markets where these do not unduly impinge on the coherence of the single market;
–
the need to ensure coherence with other EU legislation in this area, as imbalances in information and a lack of transparency may jeopardise the operation of the markets and above all harm consumers and small investors.
(44) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in particular by Article 11 thereof and Article 10 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In this regard, this Directive does not in any way prevent Member States from applying their constitutional rules relating to freedom of the press and freedom of expression in the media,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Article 1
For the purposes of this Directive:
1)
'Inside information" shall mean information of a precise nature which has not been made public, relating, directly or indirectly, to one or more issuers of financial instruments or to one or more financial instruments and which, if it were made public, would be likely to have a significant effect on the prices of those financial instruments or on the price of related derivative financial instruments.
In relation to derivatives on commodities, "inside information" shall mean information of a precise nature which has not been made public, relating, directly or indirectly, to one or more such derivatives and which users of markets on which such derivatives are traded would expect to receive in accordance with accepted market practices on those markets.
For persons charged with the execution of orders concerning financial instruments inside information shall also mean information conveyed by a client and relating to the client's pending orders, which is of a precise nature, which relates directly or indirectly to one or more issuers of financial instruments or to one or more financial instruments, and which, if it were made public, would be likely to have a significant effect on the prices of those financial instruments or on the price of related derivative financial instruments.
2)
'Market manipulation" shall mean:
(a)
Transactions or orders to trade:
–
which give, or are likely to give, false or misleading signals as to the supply of, demand for or price of financial instruments, or
–
which secure, by a person, or persons acting in collaboration, the price of one or several financial instruments at an abnormal or artificial level,
unless the person who entered into the transactions or issued the orders to trade establishes that his reasons for so doing are legitimate and that these transactions or orders to trade conform to accepted market practices on the regulated market concerned.
(b)
Transactions or orders to trade which employ fictitious devices or any other form of deception or contrivance.
(c)
Dissemination of information through the media, including the Internet, or by any other means, which gives, or is likely to give, false or misleading signals as to financial instruments, including the dissemination of rumours and false or misleading news, where the person who made the dissemination knew, or ought to have known, that the information was false or misleading. In respect of journalists when they act in their professional capacity such dissemination of information is to be assessed, without prejudice to Article 11, taking into account the rules governing their profession, unless those persons derive, directly or indirectly, an advantage or profits from the dissemination of the information in question.
In particular, the following instances are derived from the core definition given in points (a), (b) and (c) above:
–
Conduct by a person, or persons acting in collaboration, to secure a dominant position over the supply of or demand for a financial instrument which has the effect of fixing, directly or indirectly, purchase or sale prices or creating other unfair trading conditions;
–
The buying or selling of financial instruments at the close of the market with the effect of misleading investors acting on the basis of closing prices;
–
Taking advantage of occasional or regular access to the traditional or electronic media by voicing an opinion about a financial instrument (or indirectly about its issuer) while having previously taken positions on that financial instrument and profiting subsequently from the impact of the opinions voiced on the price of that instrument, without having simultaneously disclosed that conflict of interest to the public in a proper and effective way.
The definitions of market manipulation shall be adapted so as to ensure that new patterns of activity that in practice constitute market manipulation can be included.
3)
'Financial instrument" shall mean:
–
transferable securities as defined in Council Directive 93/22/EEC of 10 May 1993 on investment services in the securities field(12);
–
units in collective investment undertakings;
–
money-market instruments;
–
financial-futures contracts, including equivalent cash-settled instruments;
–
forward interest-rate agreements;
–
interest-rate, currency and equity swaps;
–
options to acquire or dispose of any instrument falling into these categories, including equivalent cash-settled instruments. This category includes in particular options on currency and on interest rates;
–
derivatives on commodities;
–
any other instrument admitted to trading on a regulated market in a Member State or for which a request for admission to trading on such a market has been made.
4)
'Regulated market" shall mean a market as defined by Article 1(13) of Directive 93/22/EEC.
5)
'Accepted market practices" shall mean practices that are reasonably expected in one or more financial markets and are accepted by the competent authority in accordance with guidelines adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17(2).
6)
'Person" shall mean any natural or legal person.
7)
'Competent authority" shall mean the competent authority designated in accordance with Article 11.
In order to take account of developments on financial markets and to ensure uniform application of this Directive in the Community, the Commission, acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17(2), shall adopt implementing measures concerning points 1, 2 and 3 of this Article.
Article 2
1. Member States shall prohibit any person referred to in the second subparagraph who possesses inside information from using that information by acquiring or disposing of, or by trying to acquire or dispose of, for his own account or for the account of a third party, either directly or indirectly, financial instruments to which that information relates.
The first subparagraph shall apply to any person who possesses that information:
a)
by virtue of his membership of the administrative, management or supervisory bodies of the issuer, or
b)
by virtue of his holding in the capital of the issuer, or
c)
by virtue of his having access to the information through the exercise of his employment, profession or duties, or
d)
by virtue of his criminal activities.
2. Where the person referred to in paragraph 1 is a legal person, the prohibition laid down in that paragraph shall also apply to the natural persons who take part in the decision to carry out the transaction for the account of the legal person concerned.
3. This Article shall not apply to transactions conducted in the discharge of an obligation that has become due to acquire or dispose of financial instruments where that obligation results from an agreement concluded before the person concerned possessed inside information.
Article 3
Member States shall prohibit any person subject to the prohibition laid down in Article 2 from:
a)
disclosing inside information to any other person unless such disclosure is made in the normal course of the exercise of his employment, profession or duties;
b)
recommending or inducing another person, on the basis of inside information, to acquire or dispose of financial instruments to which that information relates.
Article 4
Member States shall ensure that Articles 2 and 3 also apply to any person other than those persons referred to in those Articles who possesses inside information while that person knows, or ought to have known, that it is inside information.
Article 5
Member States shall prohibit any person from engaging in market manipulation.
Article 6
1. Member States shall ensure that issuers of financial instruments inform the public as soon as possible of inside information which directly concerns the said issuers.
Without prejudice to any measures taken to comply with the provisions of the first subparagraph, Member States shall ensure that issuers, for an appropriate period, post on their internet sites all inside information that they are required to disclose publicly.
2. An issuer may under his own responsibility delay the public disclosure of inside information, as referred to in paragraph 1, such as not to prejudice his legitimate interests provided that such omission would not be likely to mislead the public and provided that the issuer is able to ensure the confidentiality of that information. Member States may require that an issuer shall without delay inform the competent authority of the decision to delay the public disclosure of inside information.
3. Member States shall require that, whenever an issuer, or a person acting on his behalf or for his account, discloses any inside information to any third party in the normal exercise of his employment, profession or duties, as referred to in Article 3(a), he must make complete and effective public disclosure of that information, simultaneously in the case of an intentional disclosure and promptly in the case of a non-intentional disclosure.
The provisions of the first subparagraph shall not apply if the person receiving the information owes a duty of confidentiality, regardless of whether such duty is based on a law, on regulations, on articles of association or on a contract.
Member States shall require that issuers, or persons acting on their behalf or for their account, draw up a list of those persons working for them, under a contract of employment or otherwise, who have access to inside information. Issuers and persons acting on their behalf or for their account shall regularly update this list and transmit it to the competent authority whenever the latter requests it.
4. Persons discharging managerial responsibilities within an issuer of financial instruments and, where applicable, persons closely associated with them, shall, at least, notify to the competent authority the existence of transactions conducted on their own account relating to shares of the said issuer, or to derivatives or other financial instruments linked to them. Member States shall ensure that public access to information concerning such transactions, on at least an individual basis, is readily available as soon as possible.
5. Member States shall ensure that there is appropriate regulation in place to ensure that persons who produce or disseminate research concerning financial instruments or issuers of financial instruments and persons who produce or disseminate other information recommending or suggesting investment strategy, intended for distribution channels or for the public, take reasonable care to ensure that such information is fairly presented and disclose their interests or indicate conflicts of interest concerning the financial instruments to which that information relates. Details of such regulation shall be notified to the Commission.
6. Member States shall ensure that market operators adopt structural provisions aimed at preventing and detecting market manipulation practices.
7. With a view to ensuring compliance with paragraphs 1 to 4, the competent authority may take all necessary measures to ensure that the public is correctly informed.
8. Public institutions disseminating statistics liable to have a significant effect on financial markets shall disseminate them in a fair and transparent way.
9. Member States shall require that any person professionally arranging transactions in financial instruments who reasonably suspects that a transaction might constitute insider dealing or market manipulation shall notify the competent authority without delay.
10. In order to take account of technical developments on financial markets and to ensure uniform application of this Directive, the Commission shall adopt, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 17(2), implementing measures concerning:
–
the technical modalities for appropriate public disclosure of inside information as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 3,
–
the technical modalities for delaying the public disclosure of inside information as referred to in paragraph 2,
–
the technical modalities designed to favour a common approach in the implementation of the second sentence of paragraph 2,
–
the conditions under which issuers, or entities acting on their behalf, are to draw up a list of those persons working for them and having access to inside information, as referred to in paragraph 3, together with the conditions under which such lists are to be updated,
–
the categories of persons who are subject to a duty of disclosure as referred to in paragraph 4 and the characteristics of a transaction, including its size, which trigger that duty, and the technical arrangements for disclosure to the competent authority,
–
technical arrangements, for the various categories of person referred to in paragraph 5, for fair presentation of research and other information recommending investment strategy and for disclosure of particular interests or conflicts of interest as referred to in paragraph 5. Such arrangements shall take into account the rules, including self-regulation, governing the profession of journalist,
–
technical arrangements governing notification to the competent authority by the persons referred to in paragraph 9.
Article 7
This Directive shall not apply to transactions carried out in pursuit of monetary, exchange-rate or public debt-management policy by a Member State, by the European System of Central Banks, by a national central bank or by any other officially designated body, or by any person acting on their behalf. Member States may extend this exemption to their federated States or similar local authorities in respect of the management of their public debt.
Article 8
The prohibitions provided for in this Directive shall not apply to trading in own shares in "buy&nbhy;back" programmes or to the stabilisation of a financial instrument provided such trading is carried out in accordance with implementing measures adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17(2).
Article 9
This Directive shall apply to any financial instrument admitted to trading on a regulated market in at least one Member State, or for which a request for admission to trading on such a market has been made, irrespective of whether or not the transaction itself actually takes place on that market.
Articles 2, 3 and 4 shall also apply to any financial instrument not admitted to trading on a regulated market in a Member State, but whose value depends on a financial instrument as referred to in the first paragraph of this Article.
Article 6(1) to (3) shall not apply to issuers who have not requested or approved admission of their financial instruments to trading on a regulated market in a Member State.
Article 10
Each Member State shall apply the prohibitions and requirements provided for in this Directive to:
a)
actions carried out on its territory or abroad concerning financial instruments that are admitted to trading on a regulated market situated or operating within its territory or for which a request for admission to trading on such market has been made,
b)
actions carried out on its territory concerning financial instruments that are admitted to trading on a regulated market in a Member State or for which a request for admission to trading on such market has been made.
Article 11
Without prejudice to the competences of the judicial authorities, each Member State shall designate a single administrative authority competent to ensure that the provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive are applied.
Member States shall establish effective consultative arrangements and procedures with market participants concerning possible changes in national legislation. These arrangements may include consultative committees within each competent authority, the membership of which should reflect as far as possible the diversity of market participants, be they issuers, providers of financial services or consumers.
Article 12
1. The competent authority shall be given all supervisory and investigatory powers that are necessary for the exercise of its functions. It shall exercise such powers:
a)
directly or
b)
in collaboration with other authorities or with the market undertakings, or
c)
under its responsibility by delegation to such authorities or to the market undertakings, or
d)
by application to the competent judicial authorities.
2. Without prejudice to Article 6(7), the powers referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be exercised in conformity with national law and shall include at least the right to:
a)
have access to any document in any form whatsoever, and to receive a copy of it;
b)
demand information from any person, including those who are successively involved in the transmission of orders or conduct of the operations concerned, as well as their principals, and if necessary, to summon and hear any such person;
c)
carry out on-site inspections;
d)
require existing telephone and existing data traffic records;
e)
require the cessation of any practice that is contrary to the provisions adopted in the implementation of this Directive;
f)
suspend trading of the financial instruments concerned;
g)
request the freezing and/or sequestration of assets;
h)
request temporary prohibition of professional activity.
3. This Article shall be without prejudice to national legal provisions on professional secrecy.
Article 13
The obligation of professional secrecy shall apply to all persons who work or who have worked for the competent authority or for any authority or market undertaking to whom the competent authority has delegated its powers, including auditors and experts instructed by the competent authority. Information covered by professional secrecy may not be disclosed to any other person or authority except by virtue of provisions laid down by law.
Article 14
1. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to impose criminal sanctions, Member States shall ensure, in conformity with their national law, that the appropriate administrative measures can be taken or administrative sanctions be imposed against the persons responsible where the provisions adopted in the implementation of this Directive have not been complied with. Member States shall ensure that these measures are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17(2), the Commission shall, for information, draw up a list of the administrative measures and sanctions referred to in paragraph 1.
3. Member States shall determine the sanctions to be applied for failure to cooperate in an investigation covered by Article 12.
4. Member States shall provide that the competent authority may disclose to the public every measure or sanction that will be imposed for infringement of the provisions adopted in the implementation of this Directive, unless such disclosure would seriously jeopardise the financial markets or cause disproportionate damage to the parties involved.
Article 15
Member States shall ensure that an appeal may be brought before a court against the decisions taken by the competent authority.
Article 16
1. Competent authorities shall cooperate with each other whenever necessary for the purpose of carrying out their duties, making use of their powers whether set out in this Directive or in national law. Competent authorities shall render assistance to competent authorities of other Member States. In particular, they shall exchange information and cooperate in investigation activities.
2. Competent authorities shall, on request, immediately supply any information required for the purpose referred to in paragraph 1. Where necessary, the competent authorities receiving any such request shall immediately take the necessary measures in order to gather the required information. If the requested competent authority is not able to supply the required information immediately, it shall notify the requesting competent authority of the reasons. Information thus supplied shall be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy to which the persons employed or formerly employed by the competent authorities receiving the information are subject.
The competent authorities may refuse to act on a request for information where:
–
communication might adversely affect the sovereignty, security or public policy of the Member State addressed;
–
judicial proceedings have already been initiated in respect of the same actions and against the same persons before the authorities of the Member State addressed; or
–
where a final judgment has already been delivered in relation to such persons for the same actions in the Member State addressed.
In any such case, they shall notify the requesting competent authority accordingly, providing as detailed information as possible on those proceedings or the judgment.
Without prejudice to Article 226 of the Treaty, a competent authority whose request for information is not acted upon within a reasonable time or whose request for information is rejected may bring that non-compliance to the attention of the Committee of European Securities Regulators, where discussion will take place in order to reach a rapid and effective solution.
Without prejudice to the obligations to which they are subject in judicial proceedings under criminal law, the competent authorities which receive information pursuant to paragraph 1 may use it only for the exercise of their functions within the scope of this Directive and in the context of administrative or judicial proceedings specifically related to the exercise of those functions. However, where the competent authority communicating information consents thereto, the authority receiving the information may use it for other purposes or forward it to other States' competent authorities.
3. Where a competent authority is convinced that acts contrary to the provisions of this Directive are being, or have been, carried out on the territory of another Member State or that acts are affecting financial instruments traded on a regulated market situated in another Member State, it shall give notice of that fact in as specific a manner as possible to the competent authority of the other Member State. The competent authority of the other Member State shall take appropriate action. It shall inform the notifying competent authority of the outcome and, so far as possible, of significant interim developments. This paragraph shall not prejudice the competences of the competent authority that has forwarded the information. The competent authorities of the various Member States that are competent for the purposes of Article 10 shall consult each other on the proposed follow&nbhy;up to their action.
4. A competent authority of one Member State may request that an investigation be carried out by the competent authority of another Member State, on the latter's territory.
It may further request that members of its own personnel be allowed to accompany the personnel of the competent authority of that other Member State during the course of the investigation.
The investigation shall, however, be subject throughout to the overall control of the Member State on whose territory it is conducted.
The competent authorities may refuse to act on a request for an investigation to be conducted as provided for in the first subparagraph, or on a request for its personnel to be accompanied by personnel of the competent authority of another Member State as provided for in the second subparagraph, where such an investigation might adversely affect the sovereignty, security or public policy of the State addressed, or where judicial proceedings have already been initiated in respect of the same actions and against the same persons before the authorities of the State addressed or where a final judgment has already been delivered in relation to such persons for the same actions in the State addressed. In such case, they shall notify the requesting competent authority accordingly, providing information, as detailed as possible, on those proceedings or judgment.
Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 226 of the Treaty, a competent authority whose application to open an inquiry or whose request for authorisation for its officials to accompany those of the other Member State's competent authority is not acted upon within a reasonable time or is rejected may bring that non-compliance to the attention of the Committee of European Securities Regulators, where discussion will take place in order to reach a rapid and effective solution.
5. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17(2), the Commission shall adopt implementing measures on the procedures for exchange of information and cross-border investigations as referred to in this Article.
Article 17
1. The Commission shall be assisted by the European Securities Committee instituted by Decision 2001/528/EC (hereinafter referred to as the "Committee").
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof, provided that the implementing measures adopted according to this procedure do not modify the essential provisions of this Directive.
The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.
3. The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.
4. Without prejudice to the implementing measures already adopted, on the expiry of a four–year period following the entry into force of this Directive, the application of its provisions requiring the adoption of technical rules and decisions in accordance with paragraph 2 shall be suspended. On a proposal from the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council may renew the provisions concerned in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty and, to that end, they shall review them prior to the expiry of the period referred to above.
Article 18
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later than [...] (13). They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.
When Member States adopt those measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made.
Article 19
Article 11 shall not prejudge the possibility for a Member State to make separate legal and administrative arrangements for overseas European territories for whose external relations that Member State is responsible.
Article 20
Directive 89/592/EEC and Articles 68(1) and 81(1) of Directive 2001/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 May 2001 on the admission of securities to official stock exchange listing and on information to be published on those securities (14) shall be repealed with effect from the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Article 21
This Directive shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Position of the European Parliament of 14 March 2002, Council Common Position of 19 July 2002 (OJ C 228 E, 25.9.2002, p. 19) and Position of the European Parliament of 24 October 2002.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to air passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights (COM(2001) 784 – C5&nbhy;0700/2001 – 2001/0305(COD))
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2001) 784(1)),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 80(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5&nbhy;0700/2001),
– having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (A5&nbhy;0298/2002),
1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
2. Asks to be consulted again should the Commission intend to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 24 October 2002with a view to the adoption of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No …./2002 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to air passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 80 (2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(2),
Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(3),
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(4),
Acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty(5),
Whereas:
(1) Action by the Community in the field of air transport should aim, among other things, at ensuring a high level of protection for passengers; moreover full account should be taken of the requirements of consumer protection.
(2) Denied boarding and cancellation or long delay of flights cause serious trouble and inconvenience to passengers.
(3) The Community should set common minimum standards of protection both to strengthen the rights of passengers and to ensure that air carriers operate under harmonised conditions in a liberalised market.
(4) While Council Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 of 4 February 1991 establishing common rules for a denied boarding compensation system in scheduled air transport(6) created basic protection for passengers, the number of passengers denied boarding against their will remains unacceptably high. This can best be reduced by requiring air carriers to call for volunteers to surrender their reservations, in exchange for benefits, and by deterring carriers from denying passengers boarding against their will through a requirement to pay compensation at a dissuasive level.
(5) Passengers denied boarding against their will should be able either to cancel their journeys, with reimbursement of their tickets, or to continue them under satisfactory conditions, and should be adequately cared for while awaiting a later flight.
(6) Volunteers should also be able to cancel their journeys or continue them under satisfactory conditions, since they face difficulties of travel similar to those experienced by passengers denied boarding.
(7) The trouble and inconvenience to passengers caused by cancellation of flights should also be reduced, except when cancellation occurs due to force majeure and is therefore beyond the responsibility of an air carrier or that of its subcontracting agent. This can best be achieved by requiring air carriers, before the scheduled time of departure, to contact the passengers affected and agree with them the conditions under which they volunteer to surrender their reservations.
(8) Passengers whose flights are cancelled and who do not volunteer to surrender their reservations should be able either to obtain reimbursement of their tickets or to continue their journeys under satisfactory conditions, and should be adequately cared for while awaiting a later flight.
(9) Similarly, passengers whose flights are delayed for a specified time should be able to cancel their journeys or to continue them under satisfactory conditions.
(10) Since the distinction between scheduled and non-scheduled air services is weakening, protection should apply to passengers not only on scheduled but also on non-scheduled flights, including those contained in holidays and tours.
(11) Package travel customers enjoy already a high level of protection through Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package holiday and package tours(7), which holds tour operators responsible for the proper performance of the package, including air transport. The provisions of this Regulation should therefore not apply to package travel customers.
(12) Since paperless tickets are becoming common, this Regulation should cover all forms of tickets to ensure comprehensive protection of passengers.
(13) Passengers should be fully informed of their rights in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, so that they can effectively exercise their rights. Where a flight has been overbooked, the available places shall be allocated under a transparent procedure according to uniform criteria.
(14)Passengers travelling on all modes of transport should be treated equally and distortion of competition should be avoided among different modes of transport. Similar rules should be enacted for rail, ferry, bus and coach transportation.
(15) The Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and ensure that they are implemented. Those penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
(16) Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 should accordingly be repealed,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Subject matter
This Regulation establishes minimum rights for air passengers when:
a)
denied boarding;
b)
their flight is cancelled, except for reasons beyond the responsibility of an air carrier or that of its subcontracting agent which are due to force majeure;
c)
their flight is delayed for a specified time.
Article 2
Definitions
For the purposes of this Regulation:
a)
'air carrier" means an air transport undertaking with a valid operating licence;
b)
'Community carrier" means an air carrier with a valid operating licence granted by a Member State in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92(8);
c)
'tour operator" means an organiser or retailer within the meaning of Article 2(2) and (3) of Directive 90/314/EEC, excluding air carriers;
d)
'package" means those services defined in Article 2(1) of Directive 90/314/EEC;
e)
'ticket" means a valid document giving entitlement to transport, or an equivalent in paperless form, including electronic form, issued or authorised by the air carrier or its authorised agent;
f)
'confirmed reservation" means that the passenger has a ticket, or other proof, which indicates that the reservation has been registered and confirmed by the air carrier or tour operator;
g)
'code-sharing" means a situation in which a passenger has a contract and confirmed reservation with one air carrier, the marketing carrier, but is transported by another, the operating carrier;
h)
'final destination" means the destination on the ticket presented at the check-in counter or, in the case of successive flights, on the last flight coupon of the ticket. Connecting flights which can be carried out without difficulties although a delay has been caused by denied boarding are not taken into account;
i)
'force majeure" means unusual and unforeseeable circumstances beyond the control of the party by whom it is pleaded, the consequences of which could not have been avoided even if all due care had been exercised, for example political instability, extreme meteorological conditions, inadequate security, unexpected flight safety shortcomings and long strikes of essential services;
j)
'denied boarding" means a refusal to accommodate passengers on a flight although they have a valid ticket, in paper or electronic form, and a confirmed reservation on that flight, and have presented themselves at the check-in desk within the required time limit and as stipulated, other than in circumstances where boarding is denied for disruptive behaviour, health and safety reasons or inadequate travel documentation;
k)
'volunteer" means a person who has a valid ticket, in paper or electronic form, and a confirmed reservation on that flight, who presented him/herself at the check-in desk within the required time limit and as stipulated, and who responds positively to the carrier's call for passengers prepared to surrender their confirmed reservation in exchange for compensation;
l)
'cancelled flight" means a flight which is not made, but is listed in the computerised reservation system during the seven days preceding the expected departure;
m)
'person with reduced mobility" means any person whose mobility is reduced due to any physical disability (sensory or locomotory), an intellectual impairment, age, or any other cause of disability when using transport, and whose situation needs special attention or adaptation of services ordinarily made available to all passengers.
Article 3
Scope
1. This Regulation applies to passengers departing from an airport located in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies, and to passengers having a contract with a Community carrier or a tour operator departing from an airport located in a third country to one situated in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies, unless they benefit from compensation and assistance in that third country, when they:
a)
have a confirmed reservation on a flight and present themselves for check-in either as stipulated and at the time indicated in advance by the air carrier, the tour operator or an authorised travel agent, or if no time is indicated, not later than sixty minutes before the published departure time; or
b)
have been transferred by an air carrier or tour operator from the flight for which they held a confirmed reservation to another flight, irrespective of the reason.
2. This Regulation does not apply to passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public or to air passengers on package tours. However, passengers having tickets issued under a Frequent Flyer Programme or other commercial programme by an air carrier or tour operator are covered by this Regulation.
3. This Regulation applies to any air carrier or tour operator with which a passenger referred to in paragraph 1 and the second sentence of paragraph 2 has a contract. The responsibilities and obligations set out therein also apply, however, to the operating air carrier, both in the case of code sharing and where it is logistically impossible for the tour operator to meet the obligations laid down. The tour operator, or in the case of code sharing, the marketing carrier shall have full rights of recourse against the operating carrier whenever denied boarding, cancellation or delay to the flight are the latter's responsibility.
4. The provisions of this Regulation shall not affect the rights of passengers under Directive 90/314/EEC.
Article 4
Rules laid down by the air carrier or tour operator
An air carrier or tour operator shall, in accordance with this Regulation, lay down the rules which it will follow when passengers are denied boarding, including those on priorities for passenger embarkation, and shall make them available to the public. They shall form part of the contract or conditions of carriage of the carrier or tour operator.
Article 5
Obligations towards passengers in case of denied boarding
1. When a body with responsibility as laid down in Article 3(3) reasonably expects to deny boarding on a flight, it shall first identify any passenger still awaiting check-in for the flight concerned at the time check-in closes and then call for volunteers to surrender their confirmed reservations in exchange for benefits.
2. Volunteers shall be assisted in accordance with Article 8, such assistance being additional to the benefits mentioned in paragraph 1. If an insufficient number of volunteers comes forward to allow the remaining passengers with confirmed reservations to be accommodated on the flight, the air carrier or tour operator responsible, as laid down in Article 3(3), may then deny boarding to passengers against their will, in accordance with the rules laid down by the air carrier or tour operator pursuant to Article 4.
3. If boarding is denied to passengers the body with responsibility as laid down in Article 3(3) shall immediately compensate volunteers and non-volunteers in accordance with Article 7 and assist them in accordance with Articles 8 and 9.
4. If an air carrier or tour operator places a passenger in a class higher than that for which the ticket was purchased, it may not request any supplement or payment. If an air carrier or tour operator places a passenger in a class lower than that for which the ticket was purchased, it shall reimburse the difference.
5.Where a flight has been overbooked, the available places shall be allocated under a transparent procedure according to uniform criteria.
Article 6
Boarding of disabled and other passengers with special needs
An air carrier or tour operator shall not deny boarding to a disabled passenger and any accompanying person or certified assistance dog, to a passenger whose mobility is otherwise reduced, to an unaccompanied child, or to passengers travelling with small children.
Article 7
Right to compensation
1. In the case of denied boarding passengers shall receive compensation amounting to:
(a)
EUR200 for flights of less than 1 000 kilometres;
(b)
EUR400 for flights of between 1 000 and 3 500 kilometres;
(c)
EUR 600 for flights of over 3 500 kilometres.
In determining the relevant distance, the basis shall be the last destination at which the denial of boarding will delay the passenger's arrival after the scheduled time.
Every three years the Commission may adjust the amount of compensation in line with any rise in the cost of living.
2. When passengers accept re-routing to their final destination on an alternative flight pursuant to Article 8, the arrival time of which does not exceed the scheduled arrival time of the flight originally booked by more than two hours for flights of less than 1 000 kilometres, by more than three hours for flights of between 1 000 and 3 500 kilometres, or by more than four hours for flights of over 3 500 kilometres, an air carrier or tour operator may reduce the compensation provided for in paragraph 1 by 50%. For distances over 1 000 kilometres, if the arrival time of the alternative flight does not exceed the scheduled arrival time by more than one hour, there will be no right to compensation.
3. The compensation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be paid in cash or, with the signed agreement of the passenger, by bank orders, bank cheques, in travel vouchers and/or other services.
4. The distances given in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be measured by the great circle track method (great circle route).
Article 8
Right to assistance
1. In the case of denied boarding passengers shall be offered the choice between:
a)
reimbursement of the full cost of the ticket, under the conditions by which it was paid, for the part or parts of the journey not made and for the part or parts already made, if no longer serving any purpose in relation to the passenger's original travel plan, with a return flight to the first point of departure at the earliest opportunity within the validity of the ticket;
b)
re-routing, under comparable transport conditions and within the validity of the ticket, to their final destination at the earliest opportunity; or
c)
re-routing, under comparable transport conditions and within the validity of the ticket, to their final destination at a later date at the passenger's convenience and subject to scheduling.
The passengers shall also be offered free of charge a telephone call and/or telex or fax message and/or e-mail to the point of final destination and to the point of departure.
2. When, in the case where a town, city or region is served by several airports, an air carrier or tour operator offers a passenger a flight to an alternative airport to that for which the booking was made, the carrier or tour operator shall bear the cost of travelling from that alternative airport either to that for which the booking was made or to another close-by destination, agreed with the passenger.
Article 9
Right to care while awaiting a later flight
In the case of denied boarding passengers shall be offered free of charge:
a)
meals and refreshments in a reasonable relation to the waiting time;
b)
hotel accommodation in cases where a stay of one or more nights, or an additional stay, becomes necessary;
c) free transport or reimbursement of expenses for the journey from the airport to the hotel and back again.
Article 10
Cancellation
1. In the case of cancellation of a flight, the following provisions apply except when the body with responsibility as laid down in Article 3(3) can prove that it was done solely because of force majeure and is therefore beyond its responsibility.
2. When, less than 48 hours before the scheduled time of departure, the body with responsibility as laid down in Article 3(3) cancels or reasonably expects to cancel a flight, it shall make every effort to contact the passengers affected in order to explain to them any possible alternatives and to agree with them the conditions under which they accept to surrender their confirmed reservations. At the very least the passengers shall be offered a choice between:
a)
either reimbursement of the full cost of the ticket, under the conditions by which it was paid, for the part or parts of their journey not made and for the part or parts already made, if no longer serving any purpose in relation to the passenger's original travel plan, with a return flight to the first point of departure at the earliest opportunity; or
b)
rerouting, under comparable transport conditions, to their final destination at the earliest opportunity; or
c)
rerouting, under comparable transport conditions, to their final destination at a later date, at their convenience.
3. Those passengers with whom the body with responsibility as laid down in Article 3(3) does not reach an agreement in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article and which present themselves for check-in in accordance with Article 3(1), shall be offered the compensation and assistance offered in the case of denied boarding, as specified in Articles 7, 8 and 9.
Article 11
Delay
1. When the body with responsibility as laid down in Article 3(3) reasonably expects a flight to be delayed beyond its scheduled time of departure for one hour in the case of flights of less than 1 000 kilometres, for two hours in the case of flights of between 1000 and 3 500 kilometres or for four hours in the case of flights of over 3 500 kilometres, passengers shall be offered the assistance offered in the case of denied boarding as specified in Article 9, except in the case of force majeure .
In any event, that assistance shall be offered within the periods set out in the first subparagraph with respect to each distance bracket. This assistance shall be offered immediately to passengers with reduced mobility, as referred to in Article 2(m), and those accompanying them.
2. Assistance may not apply in situations involving political unrest or long strikes in essential services or other circumstances beyond the air carrier's control. Moreover, assistance should only be provided where local conditions allow for such assistance to be delivered and under the condition that doing so would not further delay departure.
Article 12
Further compensation
1.This Regulation shall apply without prejudice to a passenger's subsequent application to the courts having jurisdiction, with a view to further compensation.
2.This provision does not apply to volunteers as defined in Article 2 (k) who have accepted compensation under the conditions set out in Article 5(1) and (2) and in accordance with Articles 7, 8 and 9.
Article 13
Compensation from a third party
1.In cases where an air carrier or tour operator pays compensation or meets the other obligations incumbent on it under this Regulation, no provision of this Regulation may be interpreted as restricting its right to seek compensation from a third party in accordance with the law applicable.
2.Member States shall ensure that any claim for compensation under the principle that the agency responsible should pay can be made and enforced against any third party, i.e. even State or other authorities with sovereign powers, by the air carrier or tour operator.
Article 14
Obligation to inform passengers of their rights
1. The legal entity responsible for check-in of passengers shall ensure that a clearly legible notice containing the following text is displayed at the check-in area in a manner clearly visible to passengers: "If you are denied boarding or if your flight is cancelled or delayed for at least two hours, ask at the check-in counter or boarding gate for the text stating your rights, particularly with regard to compensation and assistance".
2. An air carrier or tour operator denying boarding or cancelling a flight shall provide each passenger affected with a written notice setting out the rules for compensation and assistance in line with the provisions of this Regulation. It shall also provide each passenger affected by a delay of at least two hours with an equivalent notice. The contact details of the national competent authority as stipulated in Article 19 shall also be given to the passenger in written form.
Article 15
Ranking of user-friendliness
From 1 January 2004 a monthly ranking concerning the quality of services offered by airlines as regards user-friendliness and customer satisfaction shall be published on the basis of the criteria of frequency of denied boarding, loss of luggage, delays, passengers' complaints and an assessment of the quality of the information and services.
Article 16
Exclusion of waiver
1.Obligations vis-à-vis passengers pursuant to this Regulation may not be limited or waived, notably by a derogation or restrictive clause in the contract of carriage.
2.If, nevertheless, such a derogation or restrictive clause is applied in respect of a passenger, and the latter has accepted compensation which is inferior to that provided for in this Regulation, the passenger shall still be entitled to take the necessary legal action in the competent courts in order to obtain additional compensation.
Article 17
Penalties
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all necessary measures to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. The Member States shall notify those provisions to the Commission by 1 January 2004 at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
Article 18
Enforcement
Each Member State shall designate the body responsible for the enforcement of this Regulation and shall make this public. The body shall be responsible for enforcement of the Regulation as regards airports situated on the territory of the Member State and flights from a third country to an airport situated on that territory. It shall be responsible, among other things, for the investigation of complaints concerning compliance with this Regulation and for taking the necessary measures to ensure that the rights of passengers are respected.
Article 19
Complaints
Without prejudice to Article 12, a passenger may complain to any body designated by a Member State about a possible infringement of this Regulation at any airport located in the territory of a Member State [to which the Treaty applies?] or concerning any flight from a third country to an airport located in that territory. If not responsible, the body shall communicate the complaint to the body responsible for enforcement in the case in question. The body responsible shall investigate the complaint and take any necessary measures to ensure that the rights of the passenger are respected.
Article 20
Report
Pursuant to Article 18 the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council no later than five years after the entry into force of the Regulation on the overall operation and results of this Regulation, in particular the incidence of denied boarding and of cancellation of flights. The report shall be accompanied where necessary by legislative proposals.
Article 21
Repeal
Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 is repealed.
Article 22
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision amending Decision No 1254/96/EC laying down a series of guidelines for trans-European energy networks (COM(2001) 775 – C5&nbhy;0111/2002 – 2001/0311(COD))
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2001) 775(1)),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 156 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5&nbhy;0111/2002),
– having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A5&nbhy;0324/2002),
1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
2. Asks to be consulted again should the Commission intend to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 24 October 2002 with a view to the adoption of European Parliament and Council Decision No .../2002/EC amending Decision No 1254/96/EC laying down a series of guidelines for trans&nbhy;European energy networks
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and in particular the first paragraph of Article 156 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(2),
Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(3),
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(4),
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(5),
Whereas:
(1) Since the adoption of European Parliament and Council Decision No 1254/96/EC of 5 June 1996 laying down a series of guidelines for trans-European energy networks(6), the need has arisen to incorporate new priorities, to highlight the projects which are particularly important, to update the list of projects, and to adapt the procedure used for identifying projects.
(2) The new priorities stem from the creation of a more open and competitive internal energy market, as a result of the implementation of Directive 96/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 1996 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity(7) and of Directive 98/30/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 June 1998 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas(8). They follow the conclusions of the Stockholm European Council of March 2001 concerning the development of the infrastuctures needed for the operation of the energy market. A special effort should be undertaken to achieve the objective of making greater use of renewable energy sources as a contribution to furthering a sustainable development policy.
(3)As a rule the construction and maintenance of energy infrastructure should be subject to market principles. This is also in line with the Commission proposals for the completion of the internal market in energy and the common rules on competition law which aim at the creation of a more open and competitive internal energy market.
(4)The creation of a competitive and integrated internal energy market can be achieved much more cost-effectively by revising current competition policy legislation than it can by merely increasing infrastructure capacity, since competition is often hindered not by bottlenecks, but by a lack of contestability in the markets or by oligopolistic concentration.
(5)Energy infrastructure should be constructed and maintained so as to enable the internal energy market to operate efficiently, without detracting from strategic and universal service criteria.
(6) The priorities also stem from the growing importance of the trans&nbhy;European energy networks for diversifying the Community's gas supplies, incorporating the candidate countries' energy networks, and ensuring the coordinated operation of the electricity grids in Europe and the Mediterranean and Black Sea basins.
(7)The need for an efficient integration of the candidate countries' energy networks will make it necessary for the Commission to present a proposal amending Decision No 1254/96/EC in due time before the accession of the first new Member States.
(8) Among the projects relating to trans-European energy networks, it is necessary to highlight the priority projects, which are very important for the operation of the internal energy market or the security of energy supply. The development stage of priority projects on the energy networks should therefore also be able to qualify for higher financial aid without this leading to any increase in the Community funds set aside for energy networks in the 2003-2006 financial perspective. This aid is for priority projects on the energy networks carried out in individual undertakings, which are necessary in the interests of the European economy but unprofitable in business terms and which do not distort competition between undertakings.
(9) It is necessary to adapt the procedure for identifying projects relating to trans-European energy networks in order to ensure the harmonious application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2236/95 of 18 September 1995 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of trans-European networks. The Commission will submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council listing and describing the measures on the energy networks which are likely, in the event of an increase in Community financial aid from 10% to 20%, to lead to more rapid completion of the relevant priority projects(9).
(10)The increase in Community financial aid from 10% to 20% refers only to the developing phase of priority projects(10). Community financial aid for the construction phase should remain very exceptional and should require a special justification.
(11) The procedure for identifying projects relating to trans&nbhy;European energy networks should be adapted by means of action at two levels: a first level identifying a restricted number of thematically defined projects of common interest, and a second level describing projects in detail, referred to as specifications.
(12) Since the project specifications determine the use of significant amounts of public funds, the legislator should, for reasons of supervision and transparency, exercise decision-making competence over the said specifications within the framework of the guidelines and criteria laid down in this Decision.
(13) The provisions of Decision No 1254/96/EC concerning the committee procedure should be adopted to take account of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(11).
(14) The identification of projects of common interest, their specifications and priority projects should be without prejudice to the results of the environmental impact assessment of the projects and of the plans or programmes.
(15) The time-limit within which the Commission has to draw up the periodical report on the implementation of the guidelines under Decision No 1254/96/EC should be extended since, in pursuance of Regulation (EC) No 2236/95, it submits an annual report which contains information on the progress of projects, and in particular that of priority projects.
(16) Decision No 1254/96/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Decision No 1254/96/EC is amended as follows:
(1)In Article 3, the first and second indents are replaced by the following:
"
-
encouraging effective operation of the internal market in general and of the internal energy market in particular, while encouraging the rational production, distribution and utilization of energy resources and the development and connection of renewable energy resources, so as to reduce the cost of energy to the consumer and contribute to the diversification of energy sources;
-
facilitating the development and reducing the isolation of the less-favoured regions and the islands of the Community, thereby helping to strengthen economic and social cohesion;
"
( 2) Article 4 is replaced by the following:
"
Article 4
Priorities
The priorities for action by the Community on trans&nbhy;European energy networks, taking account of the necessity to secure a sustainable development, shall be as follows:
a)
adapting and developing the energy networks so as to support the operation of the internal energy market, and in particular solving the problems of trans&nbhy;frontier and other bottlenecks, congestion and missing links, and taking account of the new needs arising from the liberalisation of the markets for electricity and natural gas;
b)
the connection of renewable energy production;
c)
the establishment of energy networks in insular, isolated, peripheral and ultra&nbhy;peripheral regions while promoting the diversification of energy sources and the use of renewable energy sources, together with the connection of those networks, where necessary;
d)
interoperability of electricity networks within the European Union with those of candidate countries and of other countries in Europe and the Mediterranean and Black Sea basins;
e)
the development of gas networks in order to meet the Community's demand for natural gas, the control of its gas supply systems and the diversification of natural gas sources and supply routes.
"
(3) Article 6 is amended as follows:
(a)
Paragraphs 2 and 3 are replaced by the following:
"
2. The projects of common interest shall be as set out in Annex II.
3. Any modification which changes the description of a project as it appears in Annex II or the indicative specifications contained in Annex III shall be decided upon in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty.
"
(b)Paragraph 4 is deleted.
(c)Paragraph 8 is replaced by the following:
"
8.The evaluation of the economic viability referred to in the third indent of paragraph 1 shall be based upon a cost-benefit analysis which shall take account of all costs and benefits, including those in the medium and/or long term, in connection with environmental aspects, security of supply and the contribution to economic and social cohesion. Such an evaluation is a precondition for projects to be identified as projects of common interest.
"
(4) A new Article 6a is inserted as follows:
"
Article 6a
Priority axes of European interest
1. Priority shall be given to network developments which are compatible with sustainable development and which meet the following criteria:
a)
they must have a significant impact on the competitive operation of the internal market; and/or
b)
they must strengthen security of supply in the Community.
The list of priority axes which meet these criteria shall be as set out in Annex I. All modifications to that Annex shall be decided upon in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty.
2. Projects of common interest identified in accordance with this Decision which are situated on the priority axes shall be declared "priority projects of European interest".
3. The Member States concerned and the Commission shall endeavour, each within its own sphere of competence, to further the carrying-out of priority projects of European interest in particular as far as cross-border projects are concerned.
"
(5)Article 7 shall be replaced by the following:
"
Article 7
When projects are considered, an effort shall be made to take into account the effects on competition. Private financing or financing by the economic operators concerned shall be encouraged. Any competitive distortion between the operators on the market shall be avoided as much as possible.
"
(6) Articles 8, 9 and 10 are replaced by the following:
"
Article 8
Restrictions
1. This Decision shall be without prejudice to any financial commitment by a Member State or the Community.
2. This Decision shall be without prejudice to the results of the environmental impact assessment of projects and of the plans or programmes which define the future authorisation framework for such projects. The results of the environmental impact assessments shall be taken into consideration.
Article 9
Committee
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee, to be called the TEN&nbhy;Energy Committee composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, the regulatory procedure laid down in Article 5 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, in compliance with Articles 7 and 8 thereof.
3. The period provided for in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be three months.
Article 10
Report
Every four years the Commission shall draw up a report on the implementation of this Decision, which it shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
Every two years Member States shall draw up a report on the implementation and progress made in carrying out priority projects of European interest which concern cross-border connections as mentioned in Annex III, projects (a), (b) and (f). This report shall be submitted to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions.
"
(7)After Article 10, the following Article shall be inserted:
"
Article 10a
Candidate countries
The Commission shall present a proposal amending this Decision no later than 3 months before the accession of new Member States.
"
(8) The Annex is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at ,
For the European Parliament For the Council
The President The President
Annex
"ANNEX I
TRANS-EUROPEAN ENERGY NETWORKS
Priority projects of European interest situated on the following priority axes as defined in Article 6a(2)
ELECTRICITY NETWORKS
France – Belgium – Netherlands – Germany: electricity networks reinforcements in order to resolve the frequent problems of congestion through the Benelux.
EL.2. Borders of Italy with France, Austria and Switzerland: increasing electricity interconnection capacities.
EL.3. France – Spain – Portugal : increasing electricity interconnection capacities between these countries and for the Iberian peninsula.
EL.4. Greece – Balkan countries – UCTE System: development of electricity infrastructure to connect Greece to the UCTE System.
EL.5. United Kingdom – continental Europe and Northern Europe establishing/increasing electricity interconnection capacities and the possible integration of offshore wind energy in the North Sea.
EL.6. Ireland – Northern Ireland – United Kingdom establishing/increasing electricity interconnection capacities and the possible integration of offshore wind energy.
NG.1. United Kingdom – Netherlands – Germany – Russia: gas pipelines connecting the main sources of gas in Europe, improving the interoperability of the networks, and increasing the security of supply.
NG.2. Algeria – Spain – France: construction of a new gas pipeline from Algeria to Spain and France, and increasing network capacities in Spain and France.
NG.3. Caspian Sea countries – Middle East – European Union: new gas pipeline networks to the European Union from new sources, including the Greece-Turkey and Italy-Greece gas pipelines.
NG.4. LNG terminals in France, Spain, Portugal, and Italy: diversifying sources of supply and entry points.
NG.5. Underground storage in Spain, Portugal, and Greece: increasing capacity in Spain and construction of the first facilities in Portugal and Greece.
ANNEX II
TRANS-EUROPEAN ENERGY NETWORKS
Projects of common interest
ELECTRICITY NETWORKS
(a) Developing electricity networks in island, isolated, peripheral and ultraperipheral regions while promoting the diversification of energy sources and the use of renewable energies, and connection of the electricity networks of those regions, if appropriate.
(b) Developing electricity connections between the Member States where this is needed for the functioning of the internal market and in order to ensure the reliability and dependability of the operation of electricity networks.
(c) Developing electricity connections within the Member States where this is needed in order to take advantage of the connections between the Member States, for the functioning of the internal electricity market or the connection of renewable energy sources.
(d) Developing electricity connections with third countries, and more particularly with the accession candidate countries, thus contributing towards interoperability, the operational reliability and dependability of the electricity grids or the supply of electricity to the European Community.
(m) Actions for improving the functioning of the interconnected electricity networks within the internal market and, in particular, identifying the bottlenecks and missing links, developing solutions in order to deal with congestion and adapting the methods of forecasting and of operating electricity networks.
GAS NETWORKS
(e) Introducing natural gas into new regions, mainly island, isolated, peripheral and ultraperipheral regions and developing gas networks in these regions.
(f) Developing gas connections in order to meet the needs of the internal market or strengthen the security of supply, including connection of separate gas networks.
(g) Developing capacities for receiving liquefied natural gas (LNG) and for storage of natural gas, needed in order to meet demand, control gas supply systems, and diversify sources and supply routes.
(h) Developing gas transport capacity (gas supply pipelines) needed in order to meet demand and diversify supplies from internal and external sources, as well as supply routes.
(n) Actions for improving the funtioning of the interconnected gas networks within the internal market and, in particular, identifying the bottlenecks and missing links, developing solutions in order to deal with congestion and adapting methods of forecasting and of operating gas networks.
Projet (a) Developing electricity networks in island, isolated, peripheral and ultraperipheral regions while promoting the diversification of energy sources and enhancing the use of renewable energies, and connection of the electricity networks of those regions, if appropriate.
Specifications:
a02 IRELAND – UNITED KINGDOM (Wales)
Connection by submarine cable between the network of Ireland and the network of the United Kingdom (Wales).
a04 GREECE – ITALY
Connection by submarine cable between the Greek network and the Italian network:
Ipiros - Puglia link (strengthening of existing connection)
a09 GREECE
Connections between the islands and between the islands and the mainland:
Connection of the Southern Cyclades.
a10 ULTRAPERIPHERAL REGIONS: FRANCE, SPAIN, PORTUGAL
Connections in ultraperipheral regions.
a11 ITALY (Sardinia) – FRANCE (Corsica) – ITALY (Mainland)
Connection by submarine cable between the network of Sardinia and the network of Italy (mainland).
Strengthening the connection with Corsica.
Project (b) Developing electricity connections between in the Member States needed for the functioning of the internal market and in order to ensure the reliability and dependability of the operation of electricity networks.
Specifications:
b04 FRANCE – BELGIUM – THE NETHERLANDS – GERMANY
Moulaine (F) – Aubange (B) line.
b05 FRANCE – GERMANY
Vigy (F) – Marlenheim (F) line.
Vigy (F) – Uchtelfangen (D) line.
b06 FRANCE – ITALY
Grand île – Piossasco line.
La Praz (F) phase transformer.
b07 FRANCE – SPAIN
Cazaril – Aragón line or alternative route/layout, including connection to the Sallente – Sentmenat line.
Pragneres (F) phase transformer.
Eastern Pyrenees connection.
b10 SPAIN – PORTUGAL
Connections between the two countries through the regions of northern Portugal and north-western Spain.
New connection through the southern region of Portugal and the south-west of Spain:
Balboa-Alqueva-Sines line.
b11 FINLAND – SWEDEN
Connections north of the Gulf of Bothnia: New lines parallel to the existing ones.
b12 AUSTRIA – ITALY
Lienz – Cordignano line.
b13 IRELAND – UNITED KINGDOM (Northern Ireland)
b14 AUSTRIA – GERMANY
St Peter – Isar line.
b15 THE NETHERLANDS – UNITED KINGDOM
Connection by submarine cable between south-eastern England and central Netherlands
(Rotterdam area).
b16 DENMARK – GERMANY
Aerial connections between the two countries: Kasso – Flensburg line.
Project (c) Developing electrical connections within the Member States where this is needed in order to take advantage of the connections between the Member States, the functioning of the internal market or the connection of renewable energy sources
Specifications:
c02 DENMARK
Connections on the North-South axis.
Connections on the East-West axis:
Connections by submarine cable between the country's western (UCTE) and eastern (NORDEL) networks: Fyn – Sjælland link.
c04 FRANCE
Connections in the north of the country, related to the expansion of intra-Community trade in electricity:
Dunkerque – Lille line;
Amiens – Lille line;
Connections in the north-east of the country: Sierrentz – Mulbach line.
c05 ITALY
Connections on the East-West axis:
Vado Ligure – Morigallo line;
Turbigo – Rho line;
Turbigo – Baggio line;
Gorlago – San Fiorano line;
Turbigo – Piedilago line;
Piedilago pumping station;
Chivasso – Magenta line;
Colunga – Calenzano line.
Connections on the North-South axis:
Pietrafitta – Santa Barbara line;
Santa Barbara – Tavarnuzze line;
Matera – Santa Sofia line;
Pian della Speranza/Roma Nord – Montalto/Suvereto line;
Pietrafitta – Villavalle line;
Laino – Rizziconi line.
c06 SPAIN
Connections on the following axes:
North axis;
Mediterranean axis;
Galicia – Centro axis;
Centro – Aragón axis;
Aragón – Levante axis.
Connections in Andalucía.
Connections in the Balearic Islands.
c07 PORTUGAL
Connections needed for the interconnection with Spain:
in the centre of the country: Pego – Rio Maior II line;
in the north of the country: Recarei – Pocinho – Aldeadávila line.
c08 GREECE
Thessaloniki, Lamia and Patras substations and connecting lines.
c09 IRELAND
Connections in the north-west of the country:
Tynagh – Cashla line;
Flagford – East Sligo line.
c10 SPAIN
Connections in the north-east and west of the country, in particular to connect to the network wind-power generation capacities.
Connections in the north-east: in Basque country, Aragón and Navarra.
Connections in the west: in Galicia.
c11 SWEDEN
Connections in central Sweden.
Connections in southern Sweden.
c12 GERMANY
Connections in the north of the country:
Lübeck/Siems – Görries line;
Lübeck/Siems – Krümmel line.
c13 UNITED KINGDOM
Connections in Northern Ireland, in relation to the interconnections with Ireland:
Connections in the north-west.
Connections in Scotland and England, with a view to the greater use of renewable sources in electricity generation.
Project (d) Developing electricity connections with the non&nbhy;Member States, and more particularly with the countries candidates for accession, thus contributing towards interoperability, the operational reliability and dependability of the electricity grids or the supply of electricity within the European Community.
Mostar (Bosnia-Herzegovina) substation and connecting lines;
Ernestinovo (Croatia) substation and connecting lines.
d09 GREECE – TURKEY
Connections between the two countries through north-eastern Greece:
Philippi – Hamidabad line.
d10 UNITED KINGDOM – NORWAY
Connection by submarine cable between the north-east/east England and southern Norway (NORDEL).
d11 THE NETHERLANDS – NORWAY
Connection by submarine cable between the north-eastern Netherlands (UCTE) and southern Norway (NORDEL): Eemshaven – Feda link.
d13 SPAIN – MOROCCO
Connection by submarine cable between south Spain and Morocco (strengthening of existing connection).
d14 BALTIC ELECTRICITY RING: GERMANY – POLAND – RUSSIA – ESTONIA – LATVIA – LITHUANIA – SWEDEN – FINLAND – DENMARK – BELARUS
Connections between the networks of these countries by aerial lines and/or submarine cables:
southern Finland – Russia links;
Germany – Poland – Lithuania – Belarus – Russia link (East-West High Power Link);
Poland – Lithuania link;
Finland – Estonia link (through submarine cable).
d15 SWEDEN – NORWAY
North Sweden – north Norway lines.
Mid Sweden – mid Norway lines.
Borgvik (S) – Hoesle (NO) – Oslo region line.
d16 EU – BELARUS – RUSSIA – UKRAINE
Connections and interface between the (extended) UCTE network and the networks of third countries in Eastern Europe:
connections between the UCTE and CENTREL systems;
connections between the UCTE / CENTREL system and the Balkan countries;
connections and interface between the extended UCTE system and Belarus, Russia and Ukraine, including relocation of HVDC conversion stations operating previously between Austria and Hungary, Austria and the Czech Republic and, Germany and the Czech Republic.
d17 BLACK SEA ELECTRICITY RING: RUSSIA – UKRAINE – ROMANIA – BULGARIA – TURKEY – GEORGIA
Connections in the Black Sea area with a view to interoperability of the extended UCTE system with the networks in the countries concerned.
Connections in the Mediterranean Sea area with a view to interoperability of the extended UCTE system with the networks in the countries concerned:
Connection by submarine cable between south Spain and north-west Algeria.
d19 NORWAY – SWEDEN – FINLAND – RUSSIA
Connections in the Barents Sea area.
d20 ITALY – SLOVENIA
Installation of flexible alternative current transmission systems.
Project (m) Actions improving the functioning of the interconnected electricity networks within the internal market and, in particular, identifying the bottlenecks and missing links, developing solutions in order to deal with congestion and adapting the methods of forecasting and of operating electricity networks.
Specifications:
m1 ELECTRICITY NETWORK BOTTLENECKS AND MISSING LINKS
Identifying the bottlenecks and missing links, especially cross-border, within electricity networks.
Developing solutions for electricity flow management in order to deal with the problems of congestion within electricity networks.
m2 ELECTRICITY NETWORK FORECASTING AND OPERATING METHODS
Adapting the methods of forecasting and of operating electricity networks required by the functioning of the internal market and the use of a high percentage of renewable energy sources.
NATURAL GAS NETWORKS
Project (e) Introducing natural gas into new regions, mainly island, isolated, peripheral and ultraperipheral regions and developing gas networks in these regions.
Specifications:
e01 UNITED KINGDOM (Northern Ireland) – IRELAND
Developing gas network from Belfast towards the north-west region of Northern Ireland and, if appropriate, to the western coast of Ireland.
e04 SPAIN
Developing gas networks, including LNG terminals, in new regions in the mainland and on the islands:
LNG at Huelva (extending existing terminal);
LNG at Cartagena (extending existing terminal);
LNG in Galicia (new terminal);
LNG at Bilbao (new terminal);
LNG in the Valencia Region (new terminal);
Connection between the Balearic Islands and the mainland.
e05 PORTUGAL
Developing gas networks in the country, including an LNG terminal:
LNG in Sines (new terminal).
e06 GREECE
Developing gas networks in the country, including LNG terminals and storage facilities:
high pressure branch to Thrace;
high pressure branch to Corinth;
high pressure branch to north-west Greece;
compression station on the main pipeline;
storage at south Kavala (conversion of an offshore depleted gas field);
LNG at Revithoussa (extending existing terminal);
construction of a second LNG terminal.
e07 ULTRAPERIPHERAL REGIONS: FRANCE, SPAIN, PORTUGAL
Introduction of natural gas into ultraperipheral regions.
Project (f) Developing gas connections in order to meet the needs of the internal market or strengthening of the security of supply, including connection of separate gas networks
Specifications:
f01 IRELAND – UNITED KINGDOM
Additional gas interconnection pipeline between Ireland and Scotland.
north-south interconnection, including Dublin – Belfast pipeline.
f05 FRANCE – SPAIN
Interconnection through the western border.
Compression station on the Lumbier – Calahorra pipeline.
Perpignan – Barcelona pipeline.
f06 PORTUGAL – SPAIN
Increasing transport capacity of gas pipelines supplying Portugal through south Spain and Galicia and Asturias through Portugal.
f08 AUSTRIA – GERMANY
Purchkirchen – Burghausen pipeline.
Andorf – Simbach pipeline.
f09 AUSTRIA – HUNGARY
Wiener Neustadt – Sopron pipeline.
f11 AUSTRIA
Connection between gas pipelines linking Austria to Germany and Italy:
Bad Leonfelden – Linz pipeline;
connection of isolated gas transmission networks.
f12 GREECE – ALBANIA
North-west Greece – Elbasan pipeline.
f13 ITALY – GREECE – OTHER BALKAN COUNTRIES
Interconnection pipeline, initially to supply Greece and other Balkan countries through south Italy.
f14 AUSTRIA – CZECH REPUBLIC
Connection between the networks of the two countries.
f17 AUSTRIA – SLOVENIA – CROATIA
Gas transport corridor to south-east Europe, across these countries.
f18 UNITED KINGDOM – THE NETHERLANDS – GERMANY
Interconnecting pipelines, linking the main sources of north-west Europe.
f19 GERMANY – POLAND
Connection between north-east Germany (Berlin area) and north-west Poland (Szczecin area). Branch from Schmölln to Lubmin (Greifswald area).
f 20 DENMARK – UNITED KINGDOM
Connection between offshore facilities in the North Sea.
Project (g) Developing capacities for receiving liquefied natural gas (LNG) and for storage of natural gas, needed in order to meet demand and control gas supply systems, and diversify sources and supply routes.
Specifications:
g01 IRELAND
Developing underground gas storage facilities.
g03 FRANCE
Developing LNG facilities:
LNG at Le Verdon-sur-mer (new terminal) and pipeline to Lussagnet storage;
LNG at Fos-sur-mer (extending existing terminal).
g07 FRANCE
Developing underground gas storage facilities:
storage at Lussagnet (extending existing site);
storage at Pecorade (conversion of a depleted oil field).
g08 SPAIN
Development of underground gas storage facilities:
storage on the north-south axis (new sites) in: Cantabria, Aragon, Castilla y León, Castilla&nbhy;La Mancha, Andalucia;
storage on the Mediterranean axis (new sites) in: Catalonia, C.A. Valenciana, Murcia.
g09 PORTUGAL
Developing underground gas storage facilities:
storage in Carriço (new site).
g11 BELGIUM
Developing underground gas storage facilities:
storage at Loenhout (extending existing site).
g12 DENMARK
Developing underground gas storage facilities:
storage at Stenlille (extending existing site);
storage at Toender (new site, close to the border with Germany).
g13 AUSTRIA
Developing underground gas storage facilities:
storage at Purchkirchen (extending existing site), including pipeline to the Penta West system near Andorf;
storage at Baumgarten (new site);
storage at Haidach (new site), including pipeline to the European gas grid.
g14 ITALY
Developing LNG facilities:
LNG offshore in the north Adriatic Sea (new terminal);
LNG on the south Adriatic coast (new terminal).
g16 BELGIUM
Developing LNG facilities:
LNG at Zeebrugge/Dudzele (extending existing terminal).
g17 ITALY
Developing underground gas storage facilities
Project (h) Developing gas transport capacity (gas supply pipelines) needed in order to meet demand and diversify supplies from internal and external sources, as well as supply routes.
Specifications:
h03 NORDIC GAS GRID: NORWAY – DENMARK – GERMANY – SWEDEN – FINLAND – RUSSIA – BALTIC STATES – POLAND
Creation and development of connections between the networks of these countries with a view to setting up an integrated gas network:
the Baltic gas interconnector: Germany, Denmark, Sweden;
the Mid-Nordic gas pipeline: Norway, Sweden, Finland;
Nybro – Dragor gas pipeline, including connecting pipeline to the storage at Stenlille: Denmark;
the north European gas pipeline: Russia, Baltic Sea, Germany;
gas pipeline from Russia to Germany, via Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, including developing underground gas storage facilities in Latvia.
h04 ALGERIA – SPAIN – FRANCE
Developing gas pipelines from Algeria to Spain and France and related capacity increase of the internal networks in these countries:
Algeria – Morocco – Spain (up to Córdoba) pipeline : increasing transport capacity;
- extension towards north-east Spain:
Córdoba – Ciudad Real pipeline;
Ciudad Real – Madrid pipeline;
Ciudad Real – Mediterranean coast pipeline;
branches in Castilla – La Mancha;
- extension towards north-west Spain: the western pipeline;
Algeria – Spain submarine pipeline and pipelines for the connection to France.
h06 RUSSIA – UKRAINE – EU
Increasing transport capacity from Russian resources to the European Union, via Ukraine, Slovakia and the Czech Republic:
sections in Czech Republic and Slovakia;
sections in Austria and Italy.
h07 RUSSIA – BELARUS – POLAND – EU
Increasing transport capacity from Russian resources to the European Union, via Belarus and Poland:
section in Germany:
Yagal Sud gas pipeline (between the STEGAL pipeline leading to the D, F, CH triangle);
SUDAL East gas pipeline (between MIDAL pipeline near Heppenheim to Burghausen connection with the PENTA pipeline in Austria).
h09 LIBYA – ITALY
Gas network from Libyan resources to Italy.
h10 CASPIAN SEA COUNTRIES – EU
Gas network from resources in the Caspian Sea countries to the European Union:
Greece – Turkey gas pipeline.
h11 RUSSIA – UKRAINE – MOLDAVIA – ROMANIA – BULGARIA – GREECE – OTHER BALKAN COUNTRIES
Increasing transport capacity from Russian resources to Greece and other Balkan countries, via Ukraine, Romania and Bulgaria:
section in Romania;
section in Bulgaria: St. Zagora – Ihtiman gas pipeline.
h13 GERMANY – CZECH REPUBLIC – AUSTRIA – ITALY
Connecting pipelines between the German, Czech, Austrian and Italian gas networks.
Gas pipeline from Russian resources to Italy, via Ukraine, Slovakia, Hungary and Slovenia.
h15 THE NETHERLANDS – GERMANY – SWITZERLAND – ITALY
Increasing transport capacity of the TENP gas pipeline running from the Netherlands through Germany to Italy.
h16 BELGIUM – FRANCE – SWITZERLAND – ITALY
Increasing transport capacity from North-western Europe through France to Italy:
Taisnieres (F) – Oltingue (CH) gas pipeline.
h17 DENMARK – POLAND
Gas pipeline through Denmark to Poland: Denmark – Poland submarine pipeline.
h18 NORWAY – RUSSIA – EU
Gas network from the Barents Sea resources to the European Union, via Sweden and Finland.
h19 IRELAND
Gas pipeline from the Corrib field (offshore).
h20 ALGERIA – ITALY – FRANCE
Gas pipeline from Algerian resources to Italy, via Sardinia. Branch to Corsica.
h21 MIDDLE EAST – EU
Gas network from resources in the Middle East to the European Union.
Project (n) Actions improving the functioning of the interconnected gas networks within the internal market and, in particular, identifying the bottlenecks and missing links, developing solutions in order to deal with congestion and adapting methods of forecasting and of operating gas networks.
Specifications:
n1 NATURAL GAS NETWORK BOTTLENECKS AND MISSING LINKS
Identifying the bottlenecks and missing links, especially cross-border, within the gas networks.
Developing solutions for natural gas flow management in order to deal with the problems of congestion within the gas networks.
n2 NATURAL GAS NETWORK FORECASTING AND OPERATING METHODS
Adapting the methods of forecasting and operating natural gas networks required by the functioning of the internal market."
Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council Regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2236/95 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of trans-European networks (COM(2002) 134), see opinion of the industry committee of 21 May 2002.
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals (COM(2001) 803 – C5&nbhy;0320/2002 – 2002/0026(CNS))
(Consultation procedure - codecision procedure: first reading 2002/0026(COD))
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2001) 803(1)),
– having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 133 of the EC Treaty (C5&nbhy;0320/2002),
– having regard to Council letters of 23 May 2002 and 4 July 2002 on the proposed change of the legal basis and its procedural implications,
– having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market on the proposed legal basis,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (A5&nbhy;0291/2002),
1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
2. Calls on the Council and the Commission to consider this position as its first reading under the codecision procedure pursuant to the amended legal basis;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 24 October 2002 with a view to the adoption of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No .../2002 concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 175(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(2),
Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(3),
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(4),
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(5),
Whereas,
(1) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2455/92 of 23 July 1992 concerning the export and import of certain dangerous chemicals(6) establishes inter alia a common system of notification and information for exports to third countries of chemicals which are banned or severely restricted in the Community on account of their effects on human health and the environment. The Regulation applies on a mandatory basis the international "prior informed consent" (PIC) procedure under the non-binding provisions of the London Guidelines for the Exchange of Information on Chemicals in International Trade (London Guidelines) of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), as amended in 1989, and under the International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides, as amended in 1990, of the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).
(2) On 10 September 1998, the Community signed the Rotterdam Convention on the prior informed consent procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade (the PIC Convention). At the same time, a Resolution on interim arrangements laid down in the Final Act of the Diplomatic Conference was adopted, setting up an interim PIC procedure based on the Convention text.
(3) It is appropriate that the Community should act to implement the rules of the Convention, including, until such time as it enters into force, the interim PIC procedure, without in any way weakening the level of protection afforded to the environment and the general public of importing countries under Regulation (EEC) No 2455/92.
(4) With the same objective in mind, it is also necessary and appropriate to go further than the provisions of the Convention in certain respects. Article 15(4) of the Convention allows Parties the right to take action that is more stringently protective of human health and the environment than that called for in the Convention, provided that such action is consistent with the provisions of the Convention and is in accordance with international law.
(5) As regards the participation of the Community in the Convention, it is essential to have a single contact point for Community interaction with the Secretariat and other Parties to the Convention as well as with other countries. The Commission should act as this contact point.
(6) Exports of dangerous chemicals that are banned or severely restricted within the Community should continue to be subject to a common export notification procedure. Accordingly, dangerous chemicals, whether in the form of a substance by itself or in a preparation, which have been banned or severely restricted by the Community as plant protection products, as other forms of pesticides, or as industrial chemicals for use by professional users or by the public, should be subject to similar export notification rules to those applicable to such chemicals when they are banned or severely restricted within one or more of the use categories laid down in the Convention,namely as pesticides or chemicals for industrial use. In addition, chemicals subject to the international PIC procedure should also be subject to the same rules. This export notification procedure should apply to Community exports to all third countries, whether or not they are Parties to the Convention or participate in its provisions. Member States should be permitted to charge administrative fees, in order to cover their costs in carrying out this procedure.
(7) Exporters and importers should be obliged to provide information about the quantities of chemicals in international trade covered by this Regulation in order that the impact and effectiveness of the arrangements laid down therein can be monitored and assessed.
(8) Notifications to the Secretariat of the Convention of Community or Member State regulatory actions banning or severely restricting chemicals, with a view to their inclusion in the international PIC procedure, should be submitted by the Commission and should relate to those cases meeting the criteria laid down in the Convention in this regard. Additional information to support such notifications should be sought where necessary.
(9) In cases where Community or Member State regulatory actions do not qualify for notification because they do not meet the criteria, information about the actions should nevertheless be conveyed to the Convention Secretariat and other Parties to the Convention in the interests of information exchange.
(10) It is also necessary to ensure that the Community takes decisions with regard to the import into the Community of chemicals that are subject to the international PIC procedure. These decisions should be based on applicable Community legislation and take into account bans or severe restrictions by Member States. Where justified, modifications of Community legislation should be prepared.
(11) Arrangements are needed to ensure that Member States and exporters are aware of the decisions of importing countries as regards chemicals that are subject to the international PIC procedure, and that exporters comply with these decisions. Furthermore, in order to prevent undesired exports, for example because of failures by importing countries to provide such import decisions or to react to export notifications, no chemicals banned or severely restricted within the Community that meet the Convention criteria or that are covered under the international PIC procedure should be exported without the explicit consent of the importing country concerned, whether or not that country is a party to the Convention.
(12) It is also important that all exported chemicals have an adequate shelf-life so that they may be used effectively and safely. In particular as regards pesticides, and especially those exported to developing countries, it is essential that information about appropriate storage conditions is provided and that suitable packaging and sizes of containers are used to avoid creating obsolete stocks.
(13) Articles containing chemicals are not within the scope of the Convention. Nevertheless, it seems appropriate that articles containing chemicals that could be released under conditions of use or disposal and that are banned or severely restricted in the Community within one or more of the use categories laid down in the Convention or are subject to the international PIC procedure should also be subject to the export notification rules. Furthermore, certain chemicals and articles containing specific chemicals falling outside the scope of the Convention but giving rise to particular concern should not be exported at all. Decisions as to which chemicals should be subject to such a strict control should be decided by the Council by a qualified majority.
(14) In accordance with the Convention, information on transit movements of chemicals subject to the international PIC procedure should be provided to Parties to the Convention requesting such information.
(15) Community rules on packaging and labelling and other safety information should apply to all dangerous chemicals when intended for export to all other countries unless these provisions would conflict with any specific requirements of those countries taking into account relevant international standards.
(16) In order to ensure effective control and enforcement of the rules, the Member States should designate authorities such as customs authorities that shall have the responsibility of controlling imports and exports of chemicals covered by this Regulation. The Commission and the Member States have a key role to play and should act in a targeted and co-ordinated way. Member States should provide for appropriate sanctions in the event of infringements.
(17) Information exchange, shared responsibility and co-operative efforts between the Community and its Member States and third countries should be promoted with a view to ensuring a sound management of chemicals, whether or not those third countries are Parties to the Convention. In particular, technical assistance to developing countries and countries with economies in transition should be provided directly by the Commission and the Member States, or indirectly via support for projects by non-governmental organisations (NGOs), especially assistance seeking to enable those countries to implement the Convention.
(18) There should be regular monitoring of the operation of the procedures if they are to be effective. To this end, Member States should regularly submit reports to the Commission, which will in turn regularly report to the European Parliament and the Council.
(19) Since the measures necessary for the implementation of this Regulation are measures of general scope within the meaning of Article 2 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission,(7) they should be adopted by use of the advisory procedure provided for in Article 3 or the regulatory procedure provided for in Article 5 of that Decision, as appropriate.
(20) In the light of the above, Regulation (EEC) No 2455/92 should be repealed and replaced,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Objectives
1. The objectives of this Regulation are:
a)
to implement the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade;
b)
to promote shared responsibility and co-operative efforts in the international movement of hazardous chemicals in order to protect human health and the environment from potential harm; and
c)
to contribute to their environmentally sound use.
They shall be achieved by facilitating information exchange about the characteristics of such chemicals, by providing for a decision-making process within the Community on their import and export and by disseminating decisions to Parties and other countries as appropriate.
2. The objective of this Regulation is also to ensure that the provisions of Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances(8), and Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 31 May 1999 concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations(9) regarding the classification, packaging and labelling of chemicals dangerous to man or the environment when they are placed on the market in the European Community shall also apply to all such chemicals when they are exported from the Member States to other parties or other countries, unless these provisions would conflict with any specific requirements of those parties or other countries.
Article 2
Scope
1. This Regulation applies to:
a)
certain hazardous chemicals that are subject to the prior informed consent procedure under the Rotterdam Convention;
b)
certain hazardous chemicals that are banned or severely restricted within the Community or a Member State; and
c)
all chemicals when exported in so far as their classification, packaging and labelling are concerned.
2. This Regulation shall not apply to:
a)
narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances covered by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3677/90 of 13 December 1990 laying down measures to be taken to discourage the diversion of certain substances to the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances(10);
b)
radioactive materials and substances covered by Council Directive 96/29/Euratom of 13 May 1996 laying down basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiation(11);
c)
wastes covered by Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste(12) and Council Directive 91/689/EEC of 12 December 1991 on hazardous waste(13);
d)
chemical weapons covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 of 22 June 2000 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports of dual&nbhy;use items and technology(14);
e)
food and food additives covered by Council Directive 89/397/EEC of 14 June 1989 on the official control of foodstuffs(15);
f)
feedingstuffs covered by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety(16) including additives, whether processed, partially processed or unprocessed, intended to be used for oral feeding to animals;
g)
genetically modified organisms as covered by Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC(17);
h)
save to the extent covered by Article 3(4)(b), proprietary medicinal products and veterinary medicinal products covered by Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use(18) and Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products(19);
i)
chemicals in quantities not likely to affect health or the environment, and in any event not more than 10 kg, provided that they are imported for the purpose of research or analysis.
Article 3
Definitions
For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:
1)
'chemical" means a substance as defined in Directive 67/548/EEC - whether by itself or in a preparation, and whether manufactured or obtained from nature - or a preparation, but not including living organisms. It consists of two categories: pesticides, including severely hazardous pesticide formulations; and industrial chemicals;
2)
'preparation" means a mixture or a solution composed of two or more substances as defined in Directive 1999/45/EC if the preparation is subject to compulsory labelling under Community legislation, on account of the presence of any of those substances;
3)
'article" means a finished product containing or including a chemical, the use of which has been banned or severely restricted by Community legislation in that particular product;
4)
'pesticides" means chemicals in either of the following two sub-categories:
a)
pesticides used as plant protection products as covered by Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market(20);
b)
other pesticides, such as biocidal products under Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market(21) and such as disinfectants, insecticides and parasiticides under Directive 2001/82/EC and Directive 2001/83/EC;
5)
'industrial chemicals" means chemicals in either of the following two sub-categories:
a)
chemicals for use by professionals;
b)
chemicals for use by the public;
6)
'chemical subject to export notification " means any chemical that is banned or severely restricted within the Community within one or more categories or sub&nbhy;categories, and any chemical that is subject to the PIC procedure listed in Part 1 of Annex I;
7)
'chemical qualifying for PIC notification' means any chemical that is banned or severely restricted within the Community or a Member State within one or more categories. Chemicals banned or severely restricted in the Community within one or more categories are listed in Part 2 of Annex I;
8)
'chemical subject to the PIC procedure" means any chemical listed in Annex III to the Convention or, before its entry into force under the interim PIC procedure. These chemicals are listed in Part 3 of Annex I to this Regulation;
9)
'banned chemical" means:
a)
a chemical all uses of which within one or more categories or sub-categories have been prohibited by final regulatory action by the Community, in order to protect human health or the environment; or
b)
a chemical that has been refused approval for first&nbhy;time use or has been withdrawn by industry either from the Community market or from further consideration in a notification, registration or approval process and where there is evidence that the chemical raises concerns for human health or the environment;
10)
'severely restricted chemical" means:
a)
a chemical virtually all use of which within one or more categories or sub-categories has been prohibited by final regulatory action in order to protect human health or the environment, but for which certain specific uses remain allowed; or
b)
a chemical that has, for virtually all use, been refused for approval or been withdrawn by industry either from the Community market or from further consideration in a notification, registration or approval process, and where there is evidence that the chemical raises concern for human health or the environment;
11)
'chemical banned or severely restricted by a Member State" means any chemical that is banned or severely restricted by national regulatory action of a Member State;
(
12) 'final regulatory action" means a legislative act, the purpose of which is to ban or severely restrict a chemical;
(
13) 'convention" means the Rotterdam Convention of 10 September 1998 on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade;
(
14) 'PIC procedure" means the Prior Informed Consent Procedure established by the Convention;
(
15) 'severely hazardous pesticide formulation" means a chemical formulated for pesticidal use that produces severe health or environmental effects observable within a short period of time after single or multiple exposure, under conditions of use;
(
16) 'export" means:
a)
the permanent or temporary export of a chemical meeting the conditions of Article 23 (2) of the Treaty;
b)
the re-export of a chemical not meeting the conditions referred to in (a) which are placed under a customs procedure other than transit procedure;
(
17) 'import" means the physical introduction into the customs territory of the Community of a chemical which is placed under a customs procedure other than transit procedure;
(
18) 'exporter" means any natural or legal person on whose behalf an export declaration is made, that is to say the person who, at the time when the declaration is accepted, holds the contract with the consignee in a party or other country and has the power for determining the sending of the chemical out of the customs territory of the Community. If no export contract has been concluded or if the holder of the contract does not act on its own behalf, the power for determining the sending of the chemical out of the customs territory of the Community shall be decisive;
(
19) 'importer" means any natural or legal person who at the time of import into the customs territory of the Community is the consignee for the chemical;
(
20) 'Party to the Convention" means a State or a Regional economic integration organisation that has consented to be bound by the Convention and for which the Convention is in force;
(
21) 'Party" means:
a)
a party to the Convention;
b)
any country which has not ratified the Convention but which participates in the PIC procedure during a period to be established by the Conference of Parties;
c)
before the entry into force of the Convention, any country participating in the interim PIC procedure established by the Resolution on interim arrangements adopted in Rotterdam on 10 September 1998;
(
22) 'other country" means any country that is not a Party as defined in point (21);
(
23) 'the Conference of the Parties" means the body established by Article 18 of the Convention to perform certain functions linked to implementation of the Convention;
(
24) 'chemical Review Committee" means the subsidiary body established by the Conference of the Parties in accordance with Article 18(6) of the Convention or, before its entry into force, the interim Chemical Review Committee established by the resolution on interim arrangements;
(
25) 'the Secretariat" means the Secretariat of the Convention or, before its entry into force, the interim Secretariat established by the resolution on interim arrangements;
(
26) 'Decision Guidance Document" means the technical document prepared by the Chemical Review Committee for chemicals subject to the PIC procedure.
Article 4
Designated National Authorities
Each Member State shall designate the authority or authorities, hereinafter referred to as the "Designated National Authority" or "Designated National Authorities", to act for the performance of the administrative functions required by this Regulation.
It shall inform the Commission of such designation at the latest three months after the entry into force of this Regulation.
Article 5
Participation of the Community in the Convention
The participation of the Community in the Convention shall be a joint responsibility of the Commission and the Member States in particular for technical assistance, information exchange and matters relating to dispute settlement, participation in subsidiary bodies and voting.
As far as the participation of the Community in the Convention is concerned, for the administrative functions of the Convention with reference to the PIC procedure and the export notification, the Commission shall act as a common designated authority on behalf of all the Designated National Authorities in close co-operation and consultation with the Designated National Authorities of the Member States.
In particular, it shall be responsible for the transmission of Community export notifications to parties and other countries pursuant to Article 7, the submission to the Secretariat of notifications of relevant final regulatory actions pursuant to Article 10, the transmission of information about other final regulatory actions not qualifying for PIC notification in accordance with Article 11, as well as for receiving information from the Secretariat more generally. The Commission shall also provide the Secretariat with Community import responses for chemicals subject to the PIC procedure pursuant to Article 12.
In addition, the Commission shall co-ordinate the Community input on all technical issues related to the Convention, the preparation of the Conference of the Parties, the Chemical Review Committee and other subsidiary bodies. A network of Member State rapporteurs shall be established, as appropriate, to deal with the preparation of technical documents such as Decision Guidance Documents.
The Commission and the Member States shall take the necessary initiatives to ensure appropriate representation of the Community in the different bodies implementing the Convention.
Article 6
Chemicals subject to export notification, qualifying for PIC notification,
1. and subject to the PIC procedure 1. The chemicals covered by the provisions of this Regulation relating to export notification, PIC notification and the PIC procedure respectively shall be as listed in Annex I.
2. Chemicals in Annex I shall be assignable to one or more of three groups of chemicals, set out respectively as Parts 1, 2 and 3 of that Annex.
The chemicals listed in Part 1 shall be subject to export notification as laid down in Article 7, with detailed information on the identity of the substance, on the use category and/or sub-category subject to restriction, the type of restriction and, where appropriate, additional information, in particular on exemptions to requirements for export notification.
The chemicals listed in Part 2 shall, in addition to being subject to the export notification procedure under Article 7, qualify for the PIC notification procedure laid down in Article 10, with detailed information on the identity of the substance and on the use category.
The chemicals listed in Part 3 shall be subject to the PIC procedure with the use category and, where appropriate, additional information, in particular on any requirements for export notification.
3. The lists shall be made available to the public by electronic means.
Article 7
Export Notifications forwarded to Parties and other countries
1. When an exporter is due to export a chemical listed in Part 1 of Annex I from the Community to a party or other country for the first time following the date as of which it becomes subject to the provisions of this Regulation, the exporter shall notify the Designated National Authority of the Member State in which he is established, no later than 30 days before the export of the chemical is due to take place. Thereafter the exporter shall notify the first export of the chemical each calendar year to the Designated National Authority 15 days before the export of the chemical takes place. The notification shall comply with the requirements set out in Annex III.
The Designated National Authority shall check compliance of the information with Annex III and promptly forward the notification received from the exporter to the Commission.
The Commission shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the appropriate authorities of the importing party or other country receive notification at least 15 days prior to the first intended export of the chemical and thereafter before the first export of the chemical in any subsequent calendar year. This shall apply regardless of the expected use of the chemical in the importing party or other country.
Each export notification shall be registered in a database at the Commission and an updated list of the chemicals concerned and the importing Parties and other countries for each calendar year shall be kept available to the public, and distributed to the Designated National Authorities of the Member States as appropriate.
2. If the Commission does not receive from the importing party or other country an acknowledgement of receipt of the first export notification made after the chemical is included in Part 1 of Annex I within 30 days of the dispatch of the notification, it shall submit a second notification. The Commission shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the appropriate authority in the importing party or other country receives the second notification.
3. A new export notification according to paragraph 1 shall be given for exports which take place subsequent to changes to Community legislation concerning the marketing, use or labelling of substances in question or whenever the composition of the preparation in question changes so that the labelling of such preparation is altered. The new notification shall comply with the requirements set out in Annex III and shall indicate that it is a revision of a previous notification.
4. Where the export of a chemical relates to an emergency situation in which any delay may endanger public health or the environment in the importing party or other country, the provisions referred to above may be waived wholly or partly at the discretion of the Designated National Authority of the exporting Member State, in consultation with the Commission.
5. The obligations set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall cease when:
a)
the chemical has become a chemical subject to the PIC procedure; and
b)
the importing country being a party to the Convention has provided a response in accordance with Article 10(2) of the Convention to the Secretariat whether to consent or not to consent to importation of the chemical; and
c)
the Commission has received this information from the Secretariat and has forwarded it to Member States.
That rule shall not apply where the importing country being party to the Convention explicitly requires continued export notification by exporting Parties, for example through its import decision or otherwise.
The obligations set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall also cease when:
a)
the appropriate authority of the importing party or other country has waived the requirement to be notified before the export of the chemical; and
b)
the Commission has received the information from the Secretariat or from the appropriate Authority of the importing party or other country and has forwarded it to Member States and made it available on the internet.
6. The Commission, the relevant Designated National Authorities of the Member States and the exporters shall provide importing Parties and other countries with available additional information on the exported chemicals, when requested.
7. Member States may establish systems obliging the exporter to pay an administrative fee for each export notification made, corresponding to their costs in carrying out the procedures associated with the provisions of this Article.
Article 8
Export Notifications received from Parties and other countries
1. Export notifications received by the Commission from the Designated National Authority of a party or another country concerning the export to the Community of a chemical the manufacture, use, handling, consumption, transport and/or sale of which is subject to prohibition or severe restriction under that party's or other country's legislation shall be made available by electronic means through the database maintained by the Commission.
The Commission shall acknowledge receipt of the first export notification received for each chemical from each party or other country.
The Designated National Authority of the Member State receiving that import shall receive a copy of any notification received together with all available information. Other Member States shall be entitled to receive copies on request.
2. Should the Designated National Authorities of the Member States receive any export notifications either directly or indirectly from the Designated National Authorities of Parties or relevant authorities of other countries, they shall forthwith forward these notifications to the Commission together with all available information.
Article 9
Information on trade in chemicals
1. Each exporter of a chemical listed in Annex I shall, during the first quarter each year, inform the Designated National Authority of its Member State on the quantity of the chemical (as a substance and as contained in preparations) shipped to each party or other country during the preceding year. This information shall be given together with a list of the names and addresses of each importer to which shipment took place during the same time period.
Each importer within the Community shall provide the same information for the quantities imported into Community.
2. Upon request from the Commission or the Designated National Authority, the exporter or importer shall provide any additional information related to chemicals that is necessary to implement this Regulation.
3. Each Member State shall provide the Commission with aggregated information in accordance with Annex IV each year. The Commission shall summarise this information at Community level and shall make the non-confidential information publicly available on its database/internet.
Article 10
Participation in the notification of banned or severely restricted chemicals
1. under the Convention1. Unless it has already done so prior to the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall notify the Secretariat in writing of the chemicals that qualify for PIC notification.
2. As and when further chemicals qualify for PIC notification and are added to Part 2 of Annex I, the Commission shall notify the Secretariat. The notification shall be submitted as soon as possible after adoption of the relevant final Community regulatory action banning or severely restricting the chemical, and no later than ninety days after the date on which the final regulatory action has to be applied.
It shall provide all relevant information as required in Annex II.
3. In determining priorities for notifications, the Commission shall take into account whether the chemical is already listed in Part 3 of Annex I, to what extent the information requirements laid down in Annex II can be met, and the severity of the risks presented by the chemical, in particular for developing countries.
When a chemical qualifies for PIC notification, but the information is insufficient to meet the requirements of Annex II, identified exporters and/or importers shall, upon request by the Commission, provide all relevant information available to them, including that from other national or international chemical control programmes.
4. The Commission shall notify the Secretariat in writing when a final regulatory action notified under paragraphs 1 or 2 is modified as soon as possible after adoption of the new final regulatory action, and no later than 60 days after the date on which the new final regulatory action has to be applied.
It shall provide all relevant information that was not available at the time when the initial notification was made under paragraphs 1 or 2 respectively.
5. Upon request from any party or from the Secretariat, the Commission shall provide additional information on the chemical or on the regulatory action, as far as practicable. The Member States shall, upon request, assist the Commission as necessary in compiling the information.
6. The Commission shall forward forthwith to the Member States information that it receives from the Secretariat regarding chemicals notified as banned or severely restricted by other Parties.
The Commission shall evaluate, in close co-operation with the Member States, the need to propose measures at Community level in order to prevent any unacceptable risks for human health and the environment within the Community.
7. In cases where a Member State takes national regulatory action in accordance with the relevant EC legislation to ban or severely restrict a chemical, it shall provide the Commission with relevant information. The Commission shall make this information available to the Member States.
Within four weeks Member States may send comments on a possible PIC notification, including in particular relevant information about their national regulatory position in respect of the chemical, to the Commission and the Member State which submitted a national regulatory action. After consideration of the comments, the submitting Member State shall inform the Commission whether it must:
-
notify the Secretariat, pursuant to this Article; or
-
provide the information to the Secretariat, pursuant to Article 11.
Article 11
Information to be transmitted to the Secretariat about banned or severely restricted chemicals not qualifying for PIC notification
When a chemical is listed only in Part 1 of Annex I or following a request by a Member State pursuant to Article 10(7), second subparagraph, second indent, the Commission shall provide the Secretariat with information about the relevant regulatory actions, so that this information can be disseminated to other Parties to the Convention as appropriate.
Article 12
Obligations in relation to imports of chemicals
1. The Commission shall forward forthwith to the Member States Decision Guidance Documents which it receives from the Secretariat. The Commission shall take an import decision, in the form of a final or interim import response on behalf of the Community, concerning the future importation into the Community of the chemical concerned: it shall do so in accordance with existing Community legislation and the procedure referred to in Article 24(2). It shall then communicate the decision to the Secretariat as soon as possible, and no later than nine months after the date of dispatch of the Decision Guidance Document by the Secretariat.
If any chemical is subject to additional or modified restrictions under Community legislation, the Commission shall revise the import decision in accordance with the same procedure and communicate it to the Secretariat.
In the case of a chemical that is banned or severely restricted by legislation in one or more Member States, the Commission shall, at the written request of the Member State(s) concerned, take that information into account in its import decision.
2. An import decision under paragraph 1 shall relate to the category or categories specified for the chemical in the Decision Guidance Document.
3. When communicating the import decision to the Secretariat, the Commission shall provide a description of the legislative or administrative measure upon which it is based.
4. Each Designated National Authority within the Community shall make the import decisions under paragraph 1 available to those concerned within its competence, in accordance with its legislative or administrative measures.
5. Where appropriate, the Commission shall evaluate, in close co-operation with the Member States, the need to propose measures at Community level in order to prevent any unacceptable risks for human health and the environment within the Community, taking into account the information contained in the Decision Guidance Document.
Article 13
Obligations in relation to exports of chemicals other than export notification requirements
1. The Commission shall forward forthwith to the Member States and European industry associations, information which it receives, whether in the form of circulars or otherwise, from the Secretariat regarding chemicals subject to the PIC procedure and the decisions of importing Parties regarding import conditions on these chemicals. It shall also forward forthwith to the Member States information on any cases of failure to transmit a response. The Commission shall keep all information regarding import decisions available in its database, which will be publicly available on the internet, and provide anyone with the information upon request.
2. For each chemical listed in Annex I the Commission shall assign a classification in the European Community's Combined Nomenclature. These classifications shall be revised as necessary in the light of any changes effected by the World Customs Organisation to the Harmonised System nomenclature for the chemicals concerned.
3. Each Member State shall communicate the responses forwarded by the Commission under paragraph 1 to those concerned within its jurisdiction.
4. Exporters shall comply with decisions in each import response no later than six months after the Secretariat has first informed the Commission of such response under paragraph 1.
5. The Commission and the Member States shall advise and assist importing Parties, upon request and as appropriate, to obtain further information to help them to make a response to the Secretariat concerning importation of a given chemical.
6. No chemicals listed in Parts 2 or 3 of Annex I shall be exported unless:
a)
explicit consent to the importation has been sought and received by the exporter through his Designated National Authority and the Designated National Authority of the importing party or an appropriate authority in an importing other country; or
b)
in the case of chemicals listed in Part 3 of Annex I, the latest circular issued by the Secretariat pursuant to paragraph 1 indicates that the importing party has given consent to importation.
7. No chemical shall be exported later than six months before the expiry date, when such a date exists or can be inferred from the production date, unless the intrinsic properties of the chemical render this impracticable. In particular, in the case of pesticides exporters shall ensure that the size and packaging of pesticide containers is optimised so as to minimise the risks of creating obsolete stocks.
8. When exporting pesticides, exporters shall ensure that the label contains specific information about storage conditions and storage stability under the climatic conditions of the importing party or other country. In addition, they shall ensure that the exported pesticides comply with the purity specification established by Community legislation.
Article 14
Controls on export of certain chemicals and articles containing chemicals
1. Articles containing chemicals listed in Parts 2 or 3 of Annex I in unreacted form shall be subject to the export notification procedure laid down in Article 7.
2. Chemicals and articles the use of which is prohibited in the Community for the protection of human health or the environment, as listed in Annex V, shall not be exported.
Article 15
Information on transit movements
1. Parties to the Convention requiring information on transit movements of chemicals subject to the PIC procedure together with the information required for each party to the Convention having expressed such need through the Secretariat shall be as listed in Annex VI.
2. When a chemical listed in Part 3 of Annex I is transported through the territory of a party to the Convention listed in Annex VI, the exporter shall, as far as practicable, provide the Designated National Authority of the Member State in which he is established with the information required by the party to the Convention in accordance with Annex VI 30 days before the first transit takes place and 8 days before each subsequent transit movement.
3. The Designated National Authority of the Member State shall forward to the Commission the information received from the exporter under paragraph 2 together with any available additional information.
4. The Commission shall forward the information received under paragraph 3 to the Designated National Authorities of Parties to the Convention which requested such information, together with any available additional information, 15 days before first transit movement and prior to any subsequent transit movement.
Article 16
Information to accompany exported chemicals
1. Chemicals that are intended for export shall be subject to the measures on packaging and labelling established in, or pursuant to, Directive 67/548/EEC, Directive 1999/45/EC, Directive 91/414/EEC and Directive 98/8/EC, or any other specific Community legislation. This obligation shall be without prejudice to any specific requirements of the importing party or other country taking into account relevant international standards.
2. Where appropriate, the expiry date and the production date of chemicals referred to in paragraph 1 or listed in Annex I shall be indicated on the label, and if necessary such expiry dates shall be given for different climate zones.
3. A safety data sheet in accordance with Commission Directive 91/155/EEC of 5 March 1991 defining and laying down the detailed arrangements for the system of specific information relating to dangerous preparations in implementation of Article 10 of Council Directive 88/379/EEC(22) shall accompany chemicals referred to in paragraph 1, when exported. The exporter shall send such a safety data sheet to each importer.
4. The information on the label and on the safety data sheet shall as far as practicable be given in the official language(s), or in one or more of the principal languages, of the country of destination or of the area of intended use.
Article 17
Obligations of the authorities of the Member States for controlling import and export
Each Member State shall designate authorities such as customs authorities that shall have the responsibility of controlling the import and export of chemicals listed in Annex I.
The Commission and the Member States shall act in a targeted and co-ordinated way in controlling compliance of exporters with this Regulation.
Each Member State shall, in its regular reports on the operation of procedures pursuant to Article 21(1), include details of the activities of its authorities in this regard.
Article 18
Penalties
Member States shall determine the penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and take all necessary measures to ensure correct implementation of these provisions. The penalties must be effective, proportional and dissuasive. Member States shall notify these measures to the Commission not later than twelve months after the adoption of this Regulation and shall also notify any further modifications as soon as possible after their adoption.
Article 19
Information exchange
1. The Commission and the Member States shall, as appropriate, facilitate the provision of scientific, technical, economic and legal information concerning chemicals subject to this Regulation, including toxicological, ecotoxicological and safety information.
The Commission, with the support of the Member States as necessary, shall, as appropriate, ensure:
a)
the provision of publicly available information on regulatory actions relevant to the objectives of the Convention; and
b)
the provision of information to Parties and other countries directly or through the Secretariat on those actions which substantially restrict one or more uses of a chemical.
2. The Commission and the Member States shall protect any confidential information received from another party or another country as mutually agreed.
3. As regards the transmission of information under this Regulation, and without prejudice to Council Directive 90/313/EEC of 7 June 1990 on the freedom of access to information on the environment(23), the following shall not be regarded as confidential:
a)
the information in Annex II and Annex III;
b)
the information contained in safety data sheets referred to in Article 16(3);
c)
the expiry date of the chemical;
d)
the production date of the chemical;
e)
information on precautionary measures, including hazard classification, the nature of the risk and the relevant safety advice; and
f)
the summary results of the toxicological and ecotoxicological tests.
A compilation of these activities shall be prepared regularly by the Commission on the basis of the contributions of Member States.
Article 20
Technical assistance
The Commission and the Designated National Authorities of the Member States shall, taking into account in particular the needs of developing countries and countries with economies in transition, co-operate in promoting technical assistance, including training, for the development of the infrastructure, the capacity and the expertise necessary to manage chemicals properly throughout their life cycle.
In particular, and with a view to enabling these countries to implement the Convention, technical assistance shall be promoted by providing technical information on chemicals, by promoting the exchange of experts, by giving support for the establishment or maintenance of Designated National Authorities, by providing technical expertise for the identification of hazardous pesticides formulations and for the preparation of notifications to the Secretariat.
The Commission and the Member States should actively participate in the Information Network on capacity building set up by the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety, by providing information on the projects they are supporting or financing to improve the management of chemicals in developing countries and countries with economies in transition.
The Commission and the Member States shall also consider giving support to Non-Governmental Organisations.
Article 21
Monitoring and Reporting
1. Member States shall regularly forward to the Commission information on the operation of the procedures provided for in this Regulation, including the customs controls, infringements, penalties, and remedial action.
2. The Commission shall regularly compile a report on the performance of the functions provided for in this Regulation for which it is responsible and shall integrate it in a synthesis report compiling the information provided by the Member States under paragraph 1. A summary of the report, which will be published on the internet, shall be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council.
3. As regards the information supplied pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2, the Member States and the Commission shall comply with relevant obligations to protect the confidentiality of data and ownership.
Article 22
Updating Annexes
1. The list of chemicals in Annex I shall be reviewed by the Commission at least every year, on the basis of developments under Community legislation and under the Convention.
2. In determining whether a final regulatory action under Community legislation constitutes a ban or a severe restriction, the effect of the action shall be assessed at the level of the sub-categories within the categories "pesticides" and "industrial chemicals". If the regulatory action bans or severely restricts a chemical in any one of the sub-categories it shall be included in Part 1 of Annex I.
In determining whether a final regulatory action under Community legislation constitutes a ban or a severe restriction such that the chemical concerned qualifies for PIC notification under Article 10, the effect of the action shall be assessed at the level of the categories "pesticides" and "industrial chemicals". If the regulatory action bans or severely restricts the use of a chemical within either of the categories it shall also be included in Part 2 of Annex I.
3. The Commission shall take a decision to include chemicals in Annex I, or to modify their entry where appropriate, without undue delay.
4. Inclusion of a chemical in Parts 1 or 2 of Annex I pursuant to paragraph 2 following regulatory action under Community legislation shall be decided in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 24(3).
5. All other amendments to Annex I, including modifications to existing entries, and amendments to Annexes II, III, IV and VI, shall be adopted by the procedure referred to in Article 24(2).
Article 23
Technical notes for guidance
The Commission, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 24(2), shall draw up technical notes for guidance to facilitate the day-to-day application of this Regulation.
These technical notes shall be published in the "C" series of the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Article 24
Committee
1. The Commission shall be assisted by the committee established by Article 29 of Directive 67/548/EEC.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.
Article 25
Repeal
Regulation (EEC) No 2455/92 is hereby repealed.
Article 26
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on [1 January 2003].
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at ,
For the European Parliament For the Council
The President The President
ANNEX I
PART 1: LIST OF CHEMICALS SUBJECT TO EXPORT NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE
(Article 7)
It should be noted that where chemicals listed in this part of the Annex are subject to the PIC procedure, the export notification obligations set out in paragraphs 1 to 3 of Article 7 shall not apply provided that the conditions laid down in subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 5 of the same Article have been fulfilled. Such chemicals, which are identified by the symbol # in the list below, are listed again in Part 3 of this Annex for ease of reference.
It should also be noted that where the chemicals listed in this part of the Annex qualify for PIC notification because of the nature of the Community's final regulatory action, these chemicals are also listed in Part 2 of this Annex. Such chemicals are identified by the symbol + in the list below.
CHEMICAL
CAS No.
EC No
CN
SUB-CATE-GORY*
USE LIMITA-TION**
COUNTRIES FOR
WHICH NO
NOTIFICATION
IS REQUIRED
1,1,1- Trichloroethane
71-55-6
200-756-3
2903 19 10
i(2)
b
1,2-Dibromoethane (Ethylene dibromide)#
106-93-4
203-444-5
2903 30 36
p(1)
b
Please refer
to PIC circular
at www.pic.int/
1,2-Dichloroethane (ethylene dichloride)#
107-06-2
203-458-1
2903 15 00
p(1)
i(2)
b
b
Please refer
to PIC circular
at www.pic.int/
2-Naphtylamine and its salts+
91-59-8 and others
202-080-4 and others
2921 45 00
i(1)
i(2)
b
b
2,4,5-T#
93-76-5
202-273-3
2918 90 90
Please refer
to PIC circular at www.pic.int/
4-Aminobiphenyl and
its salts+
92-67-1 and others
202-177-1 and others
2921 49 90
i(1)
i(2)
b
b
4-Nitrobiphenyl+
92-92-3
202-204-7
2904 20 00
i(1)
i(2)
b
b
Arsenic compounds
p(2)
sr
Asbestos Fibres+:
Crocidolite#
Amosite
Antophyllite
Actinolite
Tremolite
Chrysotile
12001-28-4
12172-73-5
77536-67-5
77536-66-4
77536-68-6
132207-32-0
310-127-6
2524 00
2524 00
2524 00
2524 00
2524 00
2524 00
i(1) – i(2)
i(1) – i(2)
i(1) – i(2)
i(1) – i(2)
i(1) – i(2)
i(1) – i(2)
b - b
b - b
b - b
b - b
b - b
b – b
Please refer
to PIC circular
at www.pic.int/
Azinphos-ethyl
2642-71-9
220-147-6
2933 90 95
p(1)
b
Benzene1
71-43-2
200-753-7
2902 20
i(2)
sr
Benzidine and its salts+
Benzidine derivatives+
92-87-5-
202-199-1
-
2921 59 90
i(1) – i(2)
i(2)
sr - b
b
Binapacryl#
485-31-4
207-612-9
2916 19 80
p(1)
i(2)
b
b
Please refer
to PIC circular
at www.pic.int/
Cadmium and its
Compounds
7440-43-9 and others
231-152-8 and others
8107
3206 30 00 and others
i(1)
sr
Captafol#
2425-06-1
219- 363-3
2930 90 70
p(1) –p(2)
b-b
Please refer
to PIC circular
at www.pic.int/
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
200-262-8
2903 14 00
i(2)
b
Chlordimeform#
6164-98-3
228-200-5
2925 20 00
Please refer
to PIC circular at www.pic.int/
Chlorfenapyr+
122453-73-0
2933 99 90
p(1)
b
Chlorobenzilate#
510-15-6
208-110-2
2918 19 80
Please refer
to PIC circular at www.pic.int/
Chloroform
67-66-3
200-663-8
2903 13 00
i(2)
b
Chlozolinate+
84332-86-5
282-714-4
2934 99 90
p(1)
b
Creosote and Creosote related substances
8001-58-9
61789-28-4
84650-04-4
90640-84-9
65996-91-0
90640-80-5
65996-82-2
8021-39-4
122384-78-5
232-287-5
263-047-8
283-484-8
292-605-3
2266-026-1
292-602-7
266-019-3
232-419-1
310-191-5
2707 91 00
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) i(2)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
b
Cyhalothrine
68085-85-8
268-450-2
2926 90 95
p(1)
b
DBB(Di-µ-oxo-di-n-butylstannio-hydroxyborane)
75113-37-0
401-040-5
2931 00 95
i(1)
b
Dicofol containing < 78% p,p"-Dicofol or 1 g/kg of DDT and DDT related compounds+
115-32-2
204-082-0
2906 29 00
p(1)
b
Dinoseb, its acetate and salts#
88-85-7
and others
201-861-7 and others
2908 90 00
2915 39 90
p(1)
i(2)
b
b
Please refer
to PIC circular
at www.pic.int/
Dinoterb+
1420-07-1
215-813-8
2908 90 00
p(1)
b
DNOC+
534-52-1
208-601-1
2908 90 00
p(1)
b
Ethylene oxide (Oxirane)#
75-21-8
200-849-9
2910 10 00
p(1)
b
Please refer
to PIC circular
at www.pic.int/
Fentin acetate
900-95-8
212-984-0
2931 00 95
p(1)
b
Fentin hydroxide
76-87-9
200-990-0
2931 00 95
p(1)
b
Fenvalerate
51630-58-1
257-326-3
2926 90 95
p(1)
b
Ferbam
14484-64-1
238-484-2
2930 20 00
p(1)
b
Fluoroacetamide#
640-19-7
211-363-1
2924 19 00
Please refer
to PIC circular
at www.pic.int/
HCH containing less than 99.0% of the gamma isomer#
608-73-1
210-168-9
2903 51 00
p(1)
b
Please refer
to PIC circular
at www.pic.int/
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
200-666-4
2903 19 90
i(1)
sr
Lindane (γ-HCH) #
58-89-9
200-401-2
2903 51 10
p(1)
b
Please refer
to PIC circular
at www.pic.int/
Maleic hydrazide, and its salts, other than
choline, potassium and sodium salts;
Choline, potassium and sodium salts of
maleic hydrazide
containing more than 1 mg/kg of free hydrazine expressed on the basis of the acid equivalent
123-33-1
51542-52-0
204-619-9
2933 99 90
p(1)
b
Mercury compounds#
10112-91-1, 21908-53-2 and others
-
p(1)- p(2)
b - sr
Please refer
to PIC circular
at www.pic.int/
Methamidophos
(Soluble liquid formulations of the substance that exceed 600 g active ingredient/l) #
10265-92-6
233-606-0
3808 10 40
Please refer
to PIC circular at www.pic.int/
Methyl-parathion
(emulsifiable concentrates (EC) with 19.5%, 40%, 50%, 60% active ingredient and dusts containing 1.5%, 2% and 3% active ingredient) #
298-00-0
206-050-1
3808 10 40
Please refer to PIC circular at www.pic.int/
Monocrotophos
(Soluble liquid formulations of the substance that exceed 600 g active ingredient/l) #
6923-22-4
230-042-7
3808 10 40
3808 90 90
Please refer to PIC circular at www.pic.int/
Monolinuron
1746-81-2
217-129-5
2928 00 90
p(1)
b
Monomethyl-dibromo-diphenyl methane
Tradename: DBBT+
99688-47-8
401-210-1
2903 69 90
i(1)
b
Monomethyl-Dichloro-Diphenyl methane;
Tradename: Ugilec 121 or Ugilec 21+
-
400-140-6
2903 69 90
i(1) – i(2)
b - b
Monomethyl-Tetrachlorodiphenyl methane;
Tradename: Ugilec 141+
76253-60-6
278-404-3
2903 69 90
i(1) – i(2)
b-b
Nitrofen+
1836-75-5
217-406-0
2909 30 90
p(1)
b
Parathion#+
56-38-2
200-271-7
2920 10 00
p(1)
b
Please refer to PIC circular at www.pic.int/
Pentachlorophenol#
87-86-5
201-778-6
2908 10 00
Please refer to PIC circular at www.pic.int/
Permethrin
52645-53-1
258-067-9
2916 20 00
p(1)
b
Phosphamidon
(Soluble liquid formulations of the substance that exceed 1000 g active ingredient/l) #
* Sub- Category: p(1) – pesticide in the group of plant protection products, p(2) – other pesticide including biocides. i(1) - industrial chemical for professional use and i(2) – industrial chemical for public use
** Use limitation: sr - severe restriction, b – ban (for the sub-category or sub-categories concerned) according to Community legislation
CAS = Chemical Abstracts Service
# Chemical subject or partially subject to the PIC procedure
+ Chemical qualifying for PIC notification
1 Except motor fuels subject to Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 350, 28.12.1998, p. 58).
PART 2: LIST OF CHEMICALS QUALIFYING FOR PIC NOTIFICATION
(Article 10)
This list comprises chemicals qualifying for PIC notification. It generally does not include chemicals that are already subject to the PIC procedure, which are listed in Part 3 of this Annex.
CHEMICAL
CAS No.
EC No
CN CODE
CATEGORY*
USE LIMITATION**
2-Naphtylamine and its salts
91-59-8 and others
202-080-4 and others
2921 45 00
i
b
4-Aminobiphenyl and
its salts
92-67-1 and others
202-177-1 and others
2921 49 90
i
b
4-Nitrobiphenyl
92-92-3
202-204-7
2904 20 00
i
b
Asbestos Fibres:
Crocidolite #
Amosite
Antophyllite
Actinolite
Tremolite
Chrysotile
12001-28-4
12172-73-5
77536-67-5
77536-66-4
77536-68-6
132207-32-0
2524 00
2524 00
2524 00
2524 00
2524 00
2524 00
i
i
i
i
i
i
b
b
b
b
b
b
Benzidine and its salts
Benzidine derivatives
912-87-5
-
202-199-1
-
2921 59 90
i
sr
Chlorfenapyr
122453-73-0
p
sr
Chlozolinate
84332-86-5
282-714-4
2934 90 96
p
b
Dicofol containing < 78% p,p"-Dicofol or 1 g/kg of DDT and DDT related compounds
115-32-3
204-082-0
2906 29 00
p
sr
Dinoterb
1420-07-1
215-813-8
2908 90 00
p
b
DNOC
534-52-1
208-601-1
2908 90 00
p
b
Endrin
72-20-8
200-775-7
2910 90 00
p
b
Fentin acetate
900-95-8
212-984-0
2931 00 95
p
b
Fentin hydroxide
76-87-9
200-990-0
2931 00 95
p
b
Monomethyl-dibromo-diphenyl methane
Tradename: DBBT
99688-47-8
401-210-1
2903 69 90
i
b
Monomethyl-Dichloro-Diphenyl methane;
Tradename: Ugilec 121 or
Ugilec 21
-
400-140-6
2903 69 90
i
b
Monomethyl-Tetrachlorodiphenyl methane;
Tradename: Ugilec 141
76253-60-6
278-404-3
2903 69 90
i
b
Nitrofen
1836-75-5
217-406-0
2909 30 90
p
b
Parathion#
56-38-2
200-271-7
2920 10 00
p
sr
Pyrazophos
13457-18-6
236-656-1
2933 59 70
p
b
Quintozene
82-68-8
201-435-0
2904 90 85
p
b
Tecnazene
117-18-0
204-178-2
2904 90 85
p
sr
* Category: p – pesticide s. i - industrial chemical
** Use limitation: sr - severe restriction, b – ban (for the category or categories concerned)
CAS = Chemical Abstracts Service
# Chemical subject or partially subject to the international PIC procedure
PART 3: LIST OF CHEMICALS SUBJECT TO THE PIC PROCEDURE UNDER THE ROTTERDAM CONVENTION
(Articles 12 and 13)
(The categories shown are those referred to in the Convention)
Chemical
Relevant
CAS number(s)
Category
2,4,5-T
93-76-5
Pesticide
Aldrin*
309-00-2
Pesticide
Binapacryl
485-31-4
Pesticide
Captafol
2425-06-1
Pesticide
Chlordane*
57-74-9
Pesticide
Chlordimeform
6164-98-3
Pesticide
Chlorobenzilate
510-15-6
Pesticide
DDT*
50-29-3
Pesticide
Dieldrin*
60-57-1
Pesticide
Dinoseb and dinoseb salts
88-85-7
Pesticide
1,2-dibromoethane (EDB)
106-93-4
Pesticide
Ethylene dichloride
107-06-2
Pesticide
Ethylene oxide
75-21-8
Pesticide
Fluoroacetamide
640-19-7
Pesticide
HCH (mixed isomers)
608-73-1
Pesticide
Heptachlor
76-44-8
Pesticide
Hexachlorobenzene*
118-74-1
Pesticide
Lindane
58-89-9
Pesticide
Mercury compounds, including inorganic mercury compounds, alkyl mercury compounds and alkyloxyalkyl and aryl mercury compounds
Pesticide
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
Pesticide
Toxaphene*
8001-35-2
Pesticide
Methamidophos
(Soluble liquid formulations of the substance that exceed 600 g active ingredient/l)
10265-92-6
Severely hazardous pesticide formulation
Methyl-parathion
(emulsifiable concentrates (EC) with 19.5%, 40%, 50%, 60% active ingredient and dusts containing 1.5%, 2% and 3% active ingredient)
298-00-0
Severely hazardous pesticide formulation
Monocrotophos
(Soluble liquid formulations of the substance that exceed 600 g active ingredient/l)
6923-22-4
Severely hazardous pesticide formulation
Parathion
(all formulations - aerosols, dustable powder (DP), emulsifiable concentrate (EC), granules (GR) and wettable powders (WP) - of this substance are included, except capsule suspensions (CS))
56-38-2
Severely hazardous pesticide formulation
Phosphamidon
(Soluble liquid formulations of the substance that exceed 1000 g active ingredient/l)
13171-21-6 (mixture, (E)&(Z) isomers)
23783-98-4 ((Z)-isomer)
297-99-4 ((E)-isomer)
Severely hazardous pesticide formulation
Crocidolite
12001-28-4
Industrial
Polybrominated biphenyls (PBB)
36355-01-8(hexa-)
27858-07-7(octa-)
13654-09-6 (deca-)
Industrial
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB)*
1336-36-3
Industrial
Polychlorinated terphenyls (PCT)
61788-33-8
Industrial
Tris (2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate
126-72-7
Industrial
* These substances are subject to an export ban in accordance with the provisions of Article 14(2) and Annex V.
ANNEX II
NOTIFICATION OF A BANNED OR SEVERELY RESTRICTED CHEMICAL TO THE SECRETARIAT OF THE CONVENTION
Information requirements for notifications pursuant to Article 10.
Notifications shall include:
1. properties, identification and uses
a)
common name;
b)
chemical name according to an internationally recognised nomenclature (for example International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC)), where such nomenclature exists;
c)
trade names and names of preparations;
d)
code numbers: Chemicals Abstract Service (CAS) number, Harmonised System customs code and other numbers;
e)
information on hazard classification, where the chemical is subject to classification requirements;
f)
use or uses of the chemical:
in the EU elsewhere (if known);
g)
the physico-chemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties;
2. final regulatory action
a) information specific to the final regulatory action:
i)
summary of the final regulatory action;
ii)
reference to the regulatory document;
iii)
date of entry into force of the final regulatory action;
iv)
indication of whether the final regulatory action was taken on the basis of a risk or hazard evaluation and, if so, include information on such an evaluation, covering a reference to the relevant documentation;
v)
reasons for the final regulatory action relevant to human health, including the health of consumers and workers, or the environment;
vi)
summary of the hazards and risks presented by the chemical to human health, including the health of consumers and workers, or the environment and the expected effect of the final regulatory action;
b) category or categories where the final regulatory action has been taken, and for each category:
(i)
Use or uses prohibited by the final regulatory action;
(ii)
Use or uses that remain allowed;
(iii)
Estimation, where available, of quantities of the chemical produced, imported, exported and used;
c) an indication, to the extent possible, of the likely relevance of the final regulatory action to other States and regions;
d) other relevant information that may cover:
i)
assessment of socio-economic effects of the final regulatory action;
ii)
information on alternatives and their relative risks, where available, such as:
–
integrated pest management strategies;
–
industrial practices and processes, including cleaner technology.
ANNEX III
EXPORT NOTIFICATION
Information required pursuant to Article 7
1. Identity of the substance to be exported:
a)
name in nomenclature of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
b)
other names (usual names, trade names, and abbreviations)
(c)
EC number and CAS number
(d)
CUS number and Combined Nomenclature Code
e)
main impurities of the substance, when particularly relevant.
2. Identity of the preparation to be exported:
a)
trade name or designation of the preparation
b)
for each substance listed in Annex I, percentage and details as specified under item 1.
3. Information on the export:
a)
country of destination
b)
country of origin
c)
expected date of first export this year
d)
intended use in the country of destination, if known
e)
name, address and other relevant particulars of the importer or importing company
f)
name, address and other relevant particulars of the exporter or exporting company.
4. Designated National Authorities:
(a)
The name, address, telephone and telex, fax number or E-mail of the designated authority in the European Union from which further information may be obtained.
(b)
The name, address, telephone and telex, fax number or E-mail of the designated authority in the importing country.
5. Information on precautions to be taken, including category of danger and risk and safety advice.
6. A summary on physico-chemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties.
7. Use of the chemical in the European Union:
(a)
Uses, category(ies) under the Rotterdam Convention and Community subcategory(ies) subject to control measure (ban or severe restriction)
(b)
Uses for which the chemical is not severely restricted or banned
(Use categories and subcategories as defined in Annex I of the Regulation)
(c)
Estimation, where available, of quantities of the chemical produced, imported,exported and used.
8. Information on precautionary measures to reduce exposure to, and emission of, the chemical.
9. Summary of regulatory restrictions and reasons for them.
Summary of information given in Annex II under paragraph 2 (a), (c) and (d).
Additional information provided by the exporting party because considered of concern or further information specified in Annex II when requested by the importing party.
ANNEX IV
INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNATED NATIONAL AUTHORITIES OF THE MEMBER STATES TO THE COMMISSION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 9
1. Summary of quantities of chemicals (in the form of substances and preparations) subject to Annex I exported during the previous year.
a. Year of which exports took place
b. Table summarising quantities of exported chemicals( in the form of substances and preparations) as outlined below.
Chemical
Importing Country
Quantity
…
…
…
2. List of importers
Chemical
Importing Country
Importer or importing company
Address and other relevant particulars of the importer or the importing company
ANNEX V
CHEMICALS AND ARTICLES SUBJECT TO EXPORT BAN
(Article 14)
Description of Chemicals/Article(s) subject to export ban
Additional details, where relevant (e.g. name of chemical, EC No, CAS No etc)
Persistent Organic Pollutants as listed in Annexes A and B of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants according to the provisions therein
Aldrin
EC No 206-215-8, CAS No 309-00-2, CN No 2903 59 90
OJ 196, 16.8.1967, Special Edition Series I, Chapter 1967, p. 234. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2001/59/EC (OJ L 225, 21.8.2001, p. 1).
Hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade *
200k
28k
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision approving, on behalf of the European Community, the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade (COM(2001) 802 – C5&nbhy;0095/2002 – 2002/0030(CNS))
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2001) 802(1)),
– having regard to the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade,
– having regard to Articles 133 and 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence of the EC Treaty,
– having regard to Council letter of 23 May 2002 on the proposed change of the legal basis and its procedural implications,
– having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty (C5&nbhy;0095/2002),
– having regard to Rule 67 and 97(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market on the proposed legal basis,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (A5&nbhy;0290/2002),
1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
2. Asks the Council to approve and ratify as soon as possible, on behalf of the European Community, the Rotterdam Convention;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendments by Parliament
Amendment 1 Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 175(1), in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
Amendment 2 Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The Commission and the Member States should take the necessary measures to ensure appropriate representation of the Community in the different bodies implementing the Convention. In particular, they should seek to ensure that the Commission receives a seat on the subsidiary bodies established by the Convention.
Amendment 3 Article 2, paragraph 2
2. The person or persons empowered to deposit the instrument of approval shall at the same time deposit a declaration of competence, as required by Article 25(3) of the Convention, stating that the Community is competent in respect of all matters governed by the Convention.
2. The person or persons empowered to deposit the instrument of approval shall at the same time deposit a declaration of competence, as required by Article 25(3) of the Convention, stating the extent of the respective competences of the Community and the Member States in respect of matters covered by the Convention.
– having regard to Articles 21 and 39 of the Treaty on European Union,
– having regard to its recommendation of 5 September 2001 to the Council, pursuant to Article 39(3) of the Treaty on European Union, on the role of the European Union in combating terrorism (2001/2016(INI)(1),
– having regard to its resolution of 4 October 2001 on the extraordinary European Council meeting in Brussels on 21 September 2001(2),
– having regard to its resolution of 29 November 2001 on the draft Council decision setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious organised crime, (12727/1/2001/REV1-C5-0514/2001-2000/0187(CNS))(3),
– having regard to the Council framework decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism and to the Council framework decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between the Member States, and its positions of 29 November 2001(4),
– having regard to its resolution of 15 May 2002 on the Commission Communication to the Council on Reinforcing the Transatlantic Relationship: Focusing on Strategy and Delivering Results (COM (2001) 154-C5-0339/2001-2001/2139(COS))(5),
– having regard to the Declaration of the Seville European Council of 21 and 22 June 2002 on the contribution of the CFSP, including the ESDP, in the fight against terrorism,
– having regard to Resolution 1267 of 15 October 1999 of the United Nations Security Council on the situation in Afghanistan,
– having regard to UN-Security Council Resolution 1269 of 19 October 1999 condemning unequivocally all acts of terrorism as criminal and unjustifiable and calling on Member States to adopt specific measures in this respect, UN-Security Council Resolution 1373 of 28 September 2001 requiring international cooperation to combat threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts, and UN-Security Council Resolution 1390 of 16 January 2002 on the situation in Afghanistan,
A. whereas it is keen to assess the achievements and prospects of the European Union's anti&nbhy;terrorism policy one year after the tragic events of 11 September 2001,
B. whereas, since the 11 September 2001 attacks, the terrorist threat has taken a global dimension and thus calls for a response at the same level,
C. whereas the fight against terrorism blurs the traditional distinction between foreign and domestic policy,
D. whereas there are links between international terrorist networks and the international drugs and weapons mafias,
E. whereas it is aware of the fact that terrorism is often related to long-lasting armed conflicts, recognising that the international mechanisms for civil conflict prevention and civil crisis management have very often failed and expressing the will to draw lessons from this development and to strengthen timely civil conflict prevention,
F. whereas the European Union is committed to the fight against terrorism in all its dimensions, whether its origin or activities occur inside or beyond its borders, and to supporting the efforts undertaken by its Member States through the effective use they must make of all the necessary instruments, within the limits defined by the rule of law and with full respect for human rights,
G. whereas the need of the European Union to protect itself against the threat of terrorism should be reflected in the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the European Security and Defence Policy, alongside the need to confront other international threats,
H. whereas recognition of the threat posed by terrorism shows that European policy must not be restricted to a narrow definition of defence but must be enlarged to accommodate a wider concept of security,
I. whereas measures, whether international or domestic, to combat the threat of terrorism must strengthen and not weaken the rule of law and should, in particular, be fully in line with the Geneva Conventions,
J. whereas European Union action in this area must be based on a strengthening of the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the rule of law set out in Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union, must fully comply with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the constitutional traditions common to the Member States as general principles of Community law, as stipulated by Article 6(2) of the that Treaty, and must also be based on the measures to prevent and combat terrorism laid down in Article 29 thereof,
K. whereas the fundamental rights of individual citizens must be respected, and measures that limit such rights must be avoided, bearing in mind that any restrictions on freedoms and rights resulting from measures to combat terrorism would represent a success for the terrorists because they would impinge on the true values of functioning democracy,
L. whereas no Member State should use anti-terrorism legislation to eliminate or diminish the rights of those who, within organisations and movements, peacefully challenge the government's policies or practise social opposition or civil disobedience,
M. whereas, if terrorism is to be prevented, the provisions laid down in the Treaties concerning effective Union action at internal and international level must be exploited (Articles 21, 34 and 39 of the Treaty on European Union), while ensuring, nonetheless, that a balance between liberty, justice and security is maintained,
N. welcoming, in principle, the global anti-terrorism strategy which the European Council laid down quickly and effectively, on 21 September 2001, by adopting the European action plan to combat terrorism, which, since that meeting, has been updated at the meetings in Ghent (19 October 2001), Laeken (14 December 2001) and Seville (21 and 22 June 2002),
O. deploring the fact that it was not involved in the drafting of that plan and that it has been involved in the framing of only a few of the 64 measures implementing(6) it,
P. whereas the European Council, in the conclusions of its extraordinary session of 21 September 2001, categorically rejected any equation of groups of fanatical terrorists with the Arab and Muslim world,
1. Welcomes the reaffirmation by the European Council in the Seville Declaration that the fight against terrorism will continue to be a priority objective of the European Union and a key plank of its external relations policy, and emphasises the cross-border nature of terrorism;
2. Condemns all terrorist attacks, including those that occurred recently in Bali, the Philippines and Israel, and expresses its condolences to the families of the victims;
3. Underlines that the fight against terrorism can never be won unless combined with a broad alliance aimed at eradicating poverty and installing democracy, respect for the rule of law and human rights worldwide;
4. Takes the view that a global strategy implemented by the Union and its Member States with a view to preventing and combating terrorism must uphold the principle of the rule of law; be subject ex ante and ex post to democratic scrutiny by national parliaments and the European Parliament; include effective measures to prevent and punish terrorist crimes, but also guarantee respect for fundamental rights and civil liberties; as well as promote democratic dialogue and action to further the attainment of social, economic and political justice;
International implications of the fight against terrorism
5. Considers that at international level, this calls, first of all, for the adoption by the United Nations of the World Anti-terrorism Convention(7) and the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Terrorism(8); that adoption is vital if the principles laid down in the dozen or so specific international agreements and in the resolutions of the General Assembly(9) and the Security Council, in particular Resolution 1269/99 and, above all, Resolution 1373/2001, are to be consolidated; in these negotiations the EU will have to defend with a single voice the European model based on the protection of fundamental rights, by seeking to secure a strengthening of those rights in the context of the measures to be taken by the Security Council(10) and the principles of fundamental rights as reflected in the relevant legislative and operational measures(11);
6. Recalls that the principles of the collective security system as embodied in the UN Charter are:
–
a general prohibition on the threat or use of force in international relations, and the peaceful resolution of disputes (according to Article 2(3) and (4) of the UN Charter and the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice (ICJ)),
–
in the event of an armed attack, as was the case on 11 September 2001, the restoration and maintenance of international peace and security is primarily the responsibility of the UN Security Council,
–
the right of self-defence of an attacked state can only be legitimate if it is authorised by the UNSC or otherwise complies with international law and if it is proportionate, necessary and effective (see Article 51 of the UN Charter),
–
the humanitarian law principles which distinguish between civilian and military targets and between combatants and non-combatants are also applicable when conducting duly authorised and proportionate military operations under Chapter VII (Articles 39-42) of the UN Charter(12) and, furthermore, at UN level the Security Council and its own member states must respect the non-derogable fundamental rights protected by Article 4(2) of the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights);
7. Confirms the constructive role being played by the European Union and its Member States in international cooperation to combat terrorism consistent with their legal responsibilities in the context of the United Nations, NATO and other international organisations and conventions;
8. Affirms the principle that the response to terrorism must not be disproportionate, bearing in mind that the diplomatic, social and economic turbulence caused by heavy-handed intervention risks causing reactions that may hamper future efforts to secure the peaceful resolution of conflicts;
9. Considers that, although efforts for the peaceful resolution of conflicts and management of crises must have a high priority, it is necessary to be firm in denying terrorists any reward for their crimes, especially in the interests of victims and their families and in squeezing out serious organised crime from globalised trade; reiterates that the EU rejects any attempt to justify, excuse, tolerate or condone acts of terrorism by any act or declaration that does not reject those terrorist activities; underlines that any attempt to pay tribute to members of terrorist groups or to misuse democratic institutions for the benefit of terrorist groups must be condemned;
10. Does not believe that a strategy of pre-emptive strikes is the most effective approach in the fight against terrorism, but rather that it diverts attention and effort away from that priority;
11. Reiterates its concern at rising unilateralism in US foreign policy; emphasises, nevertheless, the need to develop within the transatlantic framework a common and comprehensive approach to security and the risks to security; emphasises as well that such an approach should be established in a balanced way in which both the EU and the USA contribute on an equal footing;
12. Is concerned by the growing distortion of the transatlantic link, and calls on the Council and the Member States to focus their attention on enhancing European unity and cooperating with the US within the new Atlantic Alliance framework; reaffirms that NATO remains a fundamental guarantee for Euro-Atlantic stability;
13. Reiterates the EU's support for India's proposal to draw up in the framework of the UN a Comprehensive Convention against International Terrorism;
14. Recognises the reform efforts of NATO to respond to new global challenges such as the fight against terrorism, and that in this respect the reform of its political and military structures is shifting from collective defence to collective security; underlines that the concept of collective security is based primarily on non-military approaches to conflict prevention aimed at taking away the roots of conflict instead of trying to combat the resulting phenomena;
15. Underlines in this regard that for the EU multilateralism should continue to be the leading approach in external crisis intervention, particularly within the framework of the United Nations;
16. Recalls that with the increased and conscious deployment of its traditional instruments such as aid, development of democracy, trade and diplomacy, the EU stands for a comprehensive notion of security, and is increasingly making conflict prevention the guiding principle of its foreign policy action, thereby tackling not only the symptoms of terrorism, but also its root causes, such as poverty, human rights infringements, oppression and forcible relocation of persons, and lack of education;
17. Recalls that in the post-11 September world the fight against terrorism has become a major objective of the ESDP, which, however, cannot be carried out by military means alone, and that the prevention and repression of terrorism requires a whole range of non-military measures such as intelligence-sharing and police and judicial cooperation, and trade and industry, for which full interinstitutional and inter-pillar cooperation to ensure democratic accountability and respect for civil liberties will be needed, or the building or rebuilding of democratic institutions, infrastructure and civil society in failed or failing states;
18. Considers it essential that the EU give more priority to reducing the phenomenon of failed or failing states, since they often function as states of origin for terrorism and international crime;
19. Asks the European Council and the Member States to continue to denounce infringements of human rights throughout the world, even in countries that are allies in the fight against terrorism;
20. Considers that Member States and candidate countries should share a common definition of terrorism, in accordance with the aforementioned Council framework decision on combating terrorism, which should be part of the acquis;
21. Recalls that the fight against terrorism should not impinge on the political, social and human rights of citizens, and should not be a pretext for supporting massive repressive acts by governments against their citizens; also stresses that the EU's greatest contribution to preventing terrorism will be its capacity to be effective in the building or rebuilding of democratic institutions, social and economic infrastructure, good governance and civil society, and in combating poverty, alienation and the risk of a "clash of civilisations";
22. Points out that governments must safeguard legal certainty under all circumstances, even for persons suspected of terrorism-related crimes;
23. Welcomes the activities and initiatives undertaken at the national and regional level by the candidate countries and other partners in Europe, showing their strong commitment to combating terrorism and their readiness to contribute by concrete means (enhanced exchange of information and intelligence, better cooperation between border, immigration and police services, elimination of terrorist financing sources, etc.) to strengthening European security;
24. Stresses the need to steadily improve the functioning of the judiciary in candidate countries, including the training of judges, prosecutors and investigators in all questions related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters; calls on the Commission to develop further the method of "twinning", which has proved to be efficient in strengthening the capacities required;
25. Considers it important that the European countries which are not part of the present enlargement process should be fully integrated in effective pan-European mechanisms of judicial cooperation;
26. Considers it essential to promote economic and political stability at the external borders of the enlarged Union by making the best possible use of the PHARE, TACIS and INTERREG programmes and developing cross-border cooperation;
27. Emphasises that the solving of the Middle-East conflict in accordance with UN resolutions is an essential element in the fight against terrorism;
28. Believes that the agreements the European Union signs with its partner and associated countries should specify the obligations that bind the parties to those agreements in the field of the fight against terrorism by including an anti-terrorist clause that could be drafted on the basis of the content of the exchange of letters between the EU and the Republic of Lebanon concerning cooperation in the fight against terrorism;
29. Believes that the key role being played by the quartet of the USA, the EU, the Russian Federation and the UN in solving the Middle-East conflict should also carry over into international efforts to combat terrorism in general;
30. Urges that the political dialogue should focus more sharply on particular countries having key regional roles, such as India, Pakistan, Iran and the Arab states, and that relations with these countries be strengthened through appropriate instruments of cooperation and assistance;
31. Agrees with the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council meeting of 22 July 2002 that the development of the ESDP must take further account of capabilities that may be required to combat terrorism, whether for the protection of forces deployed in EU crisis management operations or as regards the protection of civilian populations against the effects of terrorist attacks;
32. Welcomes the agreement in the Council of 25 and 26 March 2002 on implementing the Galileo global satellite navigation and positioning system, and wishes this autonomous European capability success;
33. Believes that the European Union is especially well placed to deploy non-military tools in tasks of social and economic reconstruction, and that such actions help in the long run to reduce the influence of extremist groups liable to promote terrorist crimes;
34. Recalls the appeal of the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Forum of 24-26 June 2002 to give unconditional backing to the convening of an International Conference on Terrorism under the auspices of the United Nations and to adopt a joint approach to the drafting of a general convention on terrorism;
Inside the Union Strengthening the principle of the rule of law
35. Considers that, given that one of the fundamental aims of terrorism is to destabilise or destroy the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation, we must ensure a democratic dialogue between institutions and citizens, thus acting to strengthen the institutional and legal framework guaranteeing peaceful coexistence between peoples and citizens of all communities, whether at international, European, national or local level, and to support all the efforts undertaken through the effective use of all the necessary instruments within the limits defined by the rule of law and in full respect of human rights;
36. Doubts that effective coordination of a European anti-terrorism policy is possible under the present structure of the Union and recognises that the new dimensions of the fight against terrorism demand major changes to the Treaties; to this end, urges the Convention on the Future of Europe to study the proper ways to modify them, notably by exploring how to avoid the present EU three-pillar division and by creating the necessary legal basis to allow the EU to freeze assets and cut off funds of persons, groups and entities of the EU involved in terrorist acts and included in the EU list;
37. Considers that, at the future European level, it is essential to create one single and comprehensible structure for the European Union, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and to underline how important it is for civil liberties to be made an intrinsic part of all Community matters; that in order to secure European democratic scrutiny and judicial control, the importance of which was shown not least in the action that followed 11 September, we need to make sure that a new single structure embraces all European JHA areas that have a direct effect on citizens; that with the Treaties as they currently are, it is essential, at European Union level, that the legal provisions already in place should be strengthened by means, in an external perspective, of the inclusion of anti-terrorist clauses as part of the EU agreements with its partner and associated countries and, in an internal one, of the adoption by the Council of a framework decision on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing assets or evidence(13); Member States should also step up their efforts to prevent and detect the financing of terrorism; and that in addition to any enhanced cooperation between police and judicial authorities, we must ensure that in parallel there are safeguards for the individual; therefore calls on the Commission to present as soon as possible:
–
legislative measures dealing with the protection of the rights of persons facing prosecution based on the Consultation Paper "Procedural safeguards for suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings";
–
an assessment of the feasibility of mutual recognition of evidence obtained in connection with trials;
–
an EU third-pillar instrument for the protection of personal data specifically in the context of law enforcement, thereby ensuring that there is a balance between data protection and the imperatives of judicial and police cooperation and;
–
appropriate guidelines regarding compensation for victims of terrorist acts;
38. Considers that the fight against terrorism demands more institutional flexibility; recommends, therefore, introducing the rule of enhanced cooperation, including in matters of security and defence policy, and, in particular, with regard to military operations in the fight against terrorism that go beyond the Petersberg tasks;
39. Considers that any decision to restrict the free movement of persons by the reintroduction of internal border checks and the integrated management of visa and border control policies must be justified by exceptional circumstances such as threats to the security of Member States and the European Union as a whole;
40. Considers that at Member State level, there is a very pressing need to ratify the Union conventions governing extradition and judicial cooperation on criminal matters and the protocols thereto(14), and to prepare the implementation of the framework decisions on terrorism and the European arrest warrant(15); in that connection, underlines its concern in the delays in ratifying the Union acts revealed in the Road Map;
Strengthening citizens" motivation and democratic scrutiny
41. Considers that whilst an important line of defence against terrorism is the mobilisation of public opinion against those who pose a threat to the rule of law and fundamental democratic principles, it must be ensured that any measures to counteract this threat do not engender xenophobia or prejudice, and underlines that it is essential that the European Union and the Member States should inform and involve all citizens regarding the implications of current and proposed counter-terrorism measures, so that they are in a better position to endorse these steps;
42. Emphasises the indescribable damage and great suffering that terrorism causes to its victims and to their families; welcomes, therefore, the adoption of measures which take account of the special circumstances that surround them, particularly the approximation of national legislation concerning the compensation of victims of terrorist acts;
43. Emphasises that terrorism constitutes an attack on democratic society and the rule of law as a whole and causes indescribable damage to its victims and great suffering to their families; prevention and the fight against terrorism are, therefore, one of the obligations that are owed to the victims and their families;
44. Welcomes the adoption of the Commission "Green Paper: compensation to crime victims" (COM (2001)536) and urges that the appropriate legal instruments for the approximation of national legislation concerning the compensation of victims of terrorist crimes should be proposed and rapidly adopted, bearing in mind the special circumstances that surround them;
45. Considers that the requirement to inform citizens likewise applies to representative institutions, such as the European Parliament and the national parliaments; it is highly regrettable that, thus far, those parliaments should have been informed only in part about the measures taken by the Council in the context of United Nations and international agreements (common positions and anti&nbhy;terrorism clauses in international agreements)(16) and that the European Parliament should have been unable to debate them;
Strengthening the prevention and punishment of terrorist crimes
46. Considers that the existence of a clear legislative framework and democratic support is not enough if the measures adopted are not implemented and if the bodies responsible for their implementation are not effective; in that connection, the picture which emerges from the most recent version of the Road Map cannot but prompt concerns in the EP regarding, in particular:
–
the problems encountered by Europol in obtaining data from the Member States,
–
the fact that Eurojust is not yet fully operational and the lack of a stable framework for cooperation among all the bodies/individuals in the European institutions involved in the fight against terrorism,
–
the wide array of computer networks set up to process terrorism-related information and the differing levels of data protection the various systems offer,
–
the lack of effective mechanisms to allow democratic scrutiny of the bodies involved (Europol, Eurojust, the Task Force of Police Chiefs, etc.) and the decisions taken by them in the realm of the area of freedom, justice and security;
Future action
47. Takes the view that the fight against terrorism also offers the EU an opportunity to show that it is capable of achieving its ambition of becoming an area of freedom, security and justice; takes the view that the mixed results achieved in the wake of the 11 September tragedy have highlighted the changes needed to the Treaties; in this sense, urges the Convention on the Future of Europe to study the proper ways to modify them, notably by exploring how to avoid the present EU three-pillar division and by creating the necessary legal basis to allow the EU to freeze assets and cut off funds of EU persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts and featuring on the EU terrorist list;
48. States, in this connection, its conviction that the terrorist threat represents a problem for EU&nbhy;wide security and that the new Treaty should therefore prepare for future situations by stipulating that:
–
the Union, acting on the basis of proposals from the Member States and the Commission, should draw up a strategy which is credible at both EU and international level,
–
this should be defended as a European strategy by the Member States in the Security Council, pursuant to Article 19 of the Treaty on European Union,
–
provided that there are suitable legal safeguards for the individual, the principle of the mutual recognition of acts adopted at Member State level should become the norm,
–
any measure taken by the Union or its Member States should be consistent with the Charter of Fundamental Rights proclaimed in Nice in December 2000;
49. Asks the Council and the Commission to forward periodically to Parliament a report on the progress that has been made by the EU in the fight against terrorism and in the implementation of the European Plan of Action, which will allow a global and unitary follow-up by the European Parliament;
o o o
50. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the national parliaments and the President of the Convention on the Future of Europe.
In particular when that body acts pursuant to Chapter VII of the UN Charter and implements preventive measures in connection with the freezing of the assets of terrorist organisations.
See the 1949 Geneva Red Cross Conventions and the additional Protocols of 1977, the ICJ 1966 Advisory Opinion, in which the Court stated : "States must never make civilians the object of attack and must consequently never use weapons that are incapable of distinguishing between civilian and military targets", and the USA Department on Defense Report to Congress on the Conduct of the Persian Gulf War, 31 ILM 612(1992)).
European Parliament resolution on sustainable agricultural policy, agrarian reform and rural development for self-reliance in developing countries (2001/2274(INI))
– having regard to the Commission's Communication on "The European Community's Development Policy" (COM(2000) 212),
– having regard to its resolution of 1 March 2001 on the Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament on the European Community's Development Policy(1),
– having regard to the Statement by the Council and the Commission on "The European Community's Development Policy" of 10 November 2000,
– having regard to the Commission's Policy Orientation Paper "European Policy to Support Rural Development" of 10 February 2000,
– having regard to the Commission's "Guidelines for the Design of a Rural Development Profile and Strategic Framework" of December 2000,
– having regard to the Rome Declaration on World Food Security and the World Food Summit Plan of Action, 1996,
– having regard to the WTO Ministerial Declaration adopted at Doha on 14 November 2001,
– having regard to the Protocol on ACP Sugar(2), annex 3 of Annex V, Cotonou Agreement,
– having regard to the Council Regulation (EC) No 416/2001 of 28 February 2001 amending Regulation (EC) No 2820/98 applying a multiannual scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period 1 July 1999 to 31 December 2001 so as to extend duty-free access without any quantitative restrictions to products originating in the least developed countries(3),
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004(4),
– having regard to Rule 163 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development and Cooperation and the opinion of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A5&nbhy;0316/2002),
A. whereas "Food security and sustainable rural development strategies" is one of the six priorities listed for EU development policy(5),
B. whereas 75% of the 1.2 billion people living below $1 a day live in rural areas(6) and their poverty is largely due to obstacles preventing them realising high added value from their resources,
C. whereas world leaders have committed themselves to halving world hunger by 2015(7),
D. whereas the opening up of agricultural markets requires farmers to produce at international-market prices which are so low that they do not allow farmers from either North or South to produce in a way which is environmentally sound and which generates enough income to enable them to support their families; whereas this state of affairs calls for the entire issue of international agricultural production and trade to be rethought,
E. whereas there is huge diversity between rural areas in developing countries, and in their needs and factors affecting their development,
F. whereas over-reliance on the export of raw agricultural commodities, with current low world prices, together with other causes of their under-development, can hold back development in many developing countries, affecting the rural poor,
G. whereas agriculture policies in developing countries should not promote export products to the exclusion of subsistence farming or vice versa, but should be developed on the basis of their respective production and marketing potential,
H. whereas improved government and administrative systems, along with capacity-building, education and health services, are vital for rural development and especially for attracting investment to rural areas,
I. whereas remote rural areas suffer disproportionately from lack of physical infrastructure for energy supply, transport and telecoms and often have inadequate or unreliable water resources,
J. whereas rural communities particularly face high risks from conflict, natural disasters and other catastrophes,
K. whereas traditional financial institutions tend not to provide credit in rural areas due to the high costs and risks involved, and also due to lack of knowledge about the sector,
L. whereas, in areas where land ownership is very uneven, appropriate land reform can give the rural population access to productive resources and can help to reduce poverty and boost the economic development of States;
1. Calls for the progressive elimination of trade and tariff barriers and increased access to markets for developing countries in order to allow them to benefit from common prosperity and achieve economic growth;
2. Realises, however, that the European Union's food safety standards, and veterinary and phytosanitary standards cannot and should not be adjusted; emphasises that because of the priority given to food safety and recent outbreaks of animal diseases, strict checks are required at the EU's external borders;
3. Considers, however, that the EU must ensure both that its people have access to safe food and that the standards used as a means of achieving food safety do not hinder trade in the case of developing countries; calls, therefore, on the EU to offer such countries financial and technical support to help them meet those standards;
4. Stresses that the European Union is, by a wide margin, the world's largest food importer and that, thanks to the CAP-compatible trade concessions granted, 53% of such imports come from developing countries, making it the largest importer of agricultural products from poor countries; notes that the European Union has considerably improved these countries' access to its markets;
5. Regrets the EU subsidised produce dumped on developing country markets which disrupts domestic agricultural production, as with beef in Nigeria and milk powder in Tanzania and Jamaica;
6. Stresses the devastating effects of uncontrolled free world trade for the development of food crops in the poorest countries, which cannot compete with the dumping prices of countries with high agricultural productivity, and stresses the right for each country or group of countries, in the framework of regional agreements, to protect their producers by means of tariff barriers;
7. Regrets the major increase in agriculture subsidies stemming from the USA's Farm Bill (involving subsidies amounting to USD 180 billion over ten years), which is already having a serious effect on agriculture in developing countries;
8. Points out that fair trade between the North and the South entails paying a fair price for the resources and agricultural products of the developing countries, i.e. a price which reflects the internal and external costs, whilst respecting minimum criteria governing the working conditions and wages of the workforce and environmental protection; calls on the Commission and the Member States to play a more active role in international negotiations and prevent trading terms from becoming less favourable;
9. Maintains that action to open up trade to agricultural products from developing countries must be combined with provisions for financial and technical assistance aimed at achieving a sustainable form of development that will enable these countries to effectively combat rural poverty and increase their self-sufficiency in food;
10. Regrets that whilst certain farm sectors in some developing countries have benefited from preferential trading agreements such as the abovementioned ACP-EU Sugar protocol, the specialisation resulting from the policy of giving priority to the export of basic commodities, in conjuction with their continuing under-development, has not allowed these countries to benefit from added value either through processing basic commodities or from diversification of their production;
11. Underlines that EU generalised tariff preferences established by the abovementioned Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 and the Doha commitment to "reductions of, with a view to phasing out, all forms of export subsidies" in agriculture should facilitate food security and rural economic development in developing countries;
12. Expresses support for efforts to make the Doha Round a development round, with special treatment being afforded to developing countries and efforts being made to consolidate an open regionalism which prevents these countries' trade preferences from being eroded and to ensure fuller integration of southern agricultural systems, both among themselves and on world markets;
13. Considers that the EU and the developing countries share the same objective of introducing a multifunctional form of agriculture and achieving sustainable rural development within the framework of the non-trade concerns referred to in the Marrakesh agricultural agreement;
14. Considers that the necessary opening up of EU markets to agricultural products from developing countries should be effected gradually and in tandem with the reform of the CAP support system along multifunctional lines;
15. Considers it necessary to call on the industrialised third countries to follow the European Union's example by opening up their markets increasingly to imports from the poorest countries, in order to spread efforts made more evenly and to promote greater development of those countries" economies;
16. Points out that, just as the eradication of hunger and rural poverty, agricultural development in the poorest countries can only be properly tackled if action is taken at the same time to step up food production, maintain existing jobs and create new jobs in rural areas, where most activities are family-based and carried out by women, and achieve sustainable management of natural resources;
17. Underlines the similarity of the main provisions on which the Cotonou Agreement and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) are based;
18. Underlines the urgent need to facilitate the implementation of the priority activities identified by affected countries under the UNCCD; points out in this connection the need for substantial and predictable financial resources in the context of development cooperation and trade-related measures;
19. Recognises the need to ensure that effective action is taken by the European Union to enhance international efforts to combat desertification and mitigate the effects of drought through the implementation of the action programmes envisaged under the UNCCD, particularly in the context of the implementation of the Cotonou Agreement and the allocation of resources under the ninth European Development Fund;
20. Considers that the European Union must make the issue of fair access to land and water a key priority of its development policy and conflict prevention policy and calls on it to support vigorously countries which undertake agrarian reform and defend small family holdings and peasant and indigenous communities, provided this action is based on the principles of the rule of law and takes place in a transparent and non-discriminatory manner;
21. Calls for technical assistance for developing country farmers to enhance sustainable production and capacity-building by focusing on:
a)
improved conservation and distribution of the vast diversity of existing seeds, while ensuring that control remains in the hands of peasant farmers themselves,
b)
improved selection of livestock resistant to local climate and diseases with comprehensive support for breeding, slaughter, processing and packing primarily for domestic and regional markets directly or indirectly benefiting local agriculture,
c)
research and support in domestication of selected wildlife species such as the eland for meat and meat products for domestic and regional markets,
d)
support in crop diversification and innovative farm products such as citronella for oil,
e)
research and support in sustainable energy including biofuel and electrofarming crops;
22. Calls for land reforms to be based on the principles of the rule of law and to take place in a transparent and non-discriminatory manner, and for the conditions to be created for farmers with very little or no land to work on the land to become self-sufficient and gradually participate in the market;
23. Underlines the importance of research carried out in developing countries and support in developing new plant species which will grow profusely in sandy soil to feed livestock as well as stop desertification;
24. Considers that it is necessary to set up agricultural technology support units which will assist farmers in cultivating the land, promoting knowledge of agricultural methods and thus improve the conditions for productive and sustainable farming;
25. Recognises that it is essential that developing country farmers are offered crops that comply with local conditions and the socio-economic requirements of developing countries; recognises the problems of genetically (GM) modified crops but believes it is essential that developing country farmers are offered the choice of suitable disease resistant GM crops, as well as seed varieties, that will thrive in dry sandy soils with low or zero inputs of fertilisers or pesticides, to achieve domestic food sufficiency;
26. Reiterates the need to respect the principle of food sovereignty, on the basis that each country must have the right to choose freely its own food supply methods, in accordance with national or regional collective interests, without disrupting other countries' markets;
27. Insists that rural economic development depends on the poor having a stake in their communities and this can only be realised through appropriate agrarian reform offering secure land tenure and considers that equitable access to land and biodiversity resources are the basis of guaranteeing rural development, food security and safety;
28. Emphasises that rural economic development requires infrastructure in transport, health and education to attract and retain investment and skilled labour in rural areas;
29. Insists that rural economic development policies must also include non-farm activities such as participation of tribal groups in eco-tourism, arts and crafts, ceramic, metal and wood products;
30. Suggests establishment of rural training centres for health, education, engineering, banking, business, IT and law (offering free legal aid) where graduates should do a year of apprenticeship before being registered for professional work elsewhere in the country;
31. Underlines the usefulness of using radio, and, where appropriate, television as a means to bring education to remote rural communities, especially in such subjects as languages, domestic science, environmental protection and farming techniques;
32. Calls for appropriate students in developing countries to be offered technical training apprenticeships in factories, workshops, laboratories and agricultural enterprises for specified periods in the Member States;
33. Recognises that in most rural areas, grid-supplied electricity is neither feasible nor cost-effective and a serious effort must be made to promote technology of biofuels, wind, solar and thermal power;
34. Calls for an environmentally sound farming based on sustainable use of water at local and regional level and underlines that the current irrigation system designed for large scale agricultural production is a significant cause of water imbalances; insists that access to water in rural areas is most important and appropriate technology must be used to source, purify, store and convey water to meet domestic, agricultural and industrial needs, with minimum water loss at every stage;
35. Underlines the importance of community based initiatives for microfinance, supported by the State and private sector, that offers sustainable micro credit to small and medium-sized enterprises, especially self-employed women, disabled people and young adults who are often unemployed;
36. Stresses the need for benchmarks and a league table of performance and economic efficiency that can help assess good governance at national and provincial levels to ensure an effective implementation of rural development assistance and a healthy investment climate;
37. Regrets that the Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development did not highlight rural development as a means to dovetail the poverty-focus goal of development policy with the environmental goals of the post-Rio process; notes with satisfaction, however, that rural development has been included in the Plan of Implementation accompanying the declaration;
38. Demands that, as proposed at the Monterrey summit, the Member States increase their development aid to 0.33% of their GDP by 2006, paying particular attention to sustainable rural development, the eradication of poverty, proper recognition of the work carried out by women in rural areas and security of supply for local markets;
39. Calls further on Member States, other industrialised countries and oil rich nations to honour their pledge and contribute a minimum of 0.7% of GNP for development assistance so that poverty can be eliminated from rural areas in developing countries;
40. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission.
World Food Summit, Rome, October 1996 and Millennium Summit, New York, September 2000.
CITES
112k
31k
European Parliament resolution on the 12th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)
– having regard to the 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) to be held from 3 to 15 November 2002 in Santiago, Chile,
A. whereas CITES is the largest wildlife conservation agreement in existence, preventing the overexploitation through international trade of wild fauna and flora species, with 160 Parties to the Convention, including the 15 Member States,
B. whereas the human consumption of natural resources, the destruction of habitats, climate change, the overexploitation of wild species and the illegal trade in wild fauna and flora are the main causes of the impoverishment of the Earth's biodiversity,
C. whereas the majority of wildlife species and biodiversity are found in less developed countries and their conservation measures are of global importance and deserve international support and cooperation,
D. whereas public awareness in consumer countries has been and remains essential to the control of poaching and illegal international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora,
E. whereas CITES has a complementary role to the FAO and other fisheries bodies, in the conservation of marine fish species of longevity and low reproductive rates in international trade,
F. whereas MIKE, a system for Monitoring of Illegal Killings of Elephants, established by CITES to provide essential data prior to any further ivory trade decisions, is unable to deliver such data before CoP 12,
G. having regard to the worldwide moratorium on commercial whaling decreed by the International Whaling Commission (IWC), recognised by CITES as the authoritative body to regulate whaling,
H. noting that ACCOMABS (the Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans of the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Contiguous Atlantic Area under the Convention on Migratory Species) has recommended that the Black Sea Bottlenose Dolphin, which is subject to live trade for dolphinaria, should be listed on CITES Appendix I,
I. recognising the need for international control of trade under CITES where illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing threatens the population of the Antarctic and Patagonian Toothfish, and undermines legal fisheries and regional fisheries agreements,
J. welcoming the decision by Cuba to withdraw its proposal for trade in Hawksbill Sea Turtle shells, but concerned that registration of the Cayman Islands Turtle Farm as a captive breeding facility for Green Turtles would allow trade in Green Turtle shells and undermine regional conservation efforts for wild populations of sea turtles in the wider Caribbean region,
K. noting the recommendations of CITES regional expert workshops that heavily traded taxa, in particular Asian Freshwater Turtles and all Seahorse species, should be listed in CITES Appendix II,
1. Calls on the Parties to CITES to strengthen international cooperation in the implementation of the Convention by providing additional financial support for training and technical assistance in species identification and enforcement measures;
2. Calls on the Parties to CITES to assist Range States in establishing effective enforcement units to combat wildlife crime by providing technical and financial support;
3. Urges the Parties to CITES to support the following:
-
the listings of the Basking Shark and Whale Shark in CITES Appendix II;
-
the proposal to return all African Elephant populations to CITES Appendix I;
-
the transfer of the Black Sea Bottlenose Dolphin from CITES Appendix II to Appendix I;
-
the listings of Freshwater Turtles in CITES Appendix II;
-
the listings of all Seahorse species in CITES Appendix II;
-
the listing of bigleaf mahogany in CITES Appendix II (proposal 12.50);
4. Urges the Parties to CITES to reject the following:
-
the five proposals that would permit the trade in ivory (so that the Parties do their utmost to prevent illegal international trade in elephants and their parts, including ivory);
-
transfer of Minke and Bryde's Whales from CITES Appendix I to Appendix II in order to allow international trade in whale specimens;
-
the UK's application for registration of the Cayman Islands Turtle Farm as a captive breeding facility;
5. Seeks the particular support of the Commission and Member States in all these matters;
6. Urges those Parties to CITES which have not done so to ratify the Gaborone Amendment which would allow the European Community to become a contracting party to CITES;
7. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, the Parties to CITES, and the CITES Secretariat.
International Criminal Court
70k
36k
European Parliament resolution on the General Affairs Council's position concerning the International Criminal Court
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the International Criminal Court, in particular those of 19 November 1998(1), 18 January 2001(2), 28 February 2002(3), its resolution of 4 July 2002 on the draft American Service Members' Protection Act (ASPA)(4) and its resolution of 26 September 2002 on the International Criminal Court(5),
– having regard to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and in particular Articles 16, 86 and 98 thereof,
– having regard to the declaration of 1 July 2002 on the International Criminal Court by the Council Presidency on behalf of the EU,
– having regard to the Council conclusions on the ICC adopted on 30 September 2002 and to the related guiding principles,
A. whereas all the Member States and most applicant states have ratified the Rome Statute,
B. underlining that the US action from the very beginning was aimed at weakening the credibility of the ICC, exerting pressure on all the signatories and threatening to impose sanctions on states that ratified the Rome Statute in order to prevent its full establishment,
C. highlighting the fact that by supporting the enactment of the American Service Members" Protection Act (ASPA) in 2001 and withdrawing the signature of the US from the Rome Treaty in 2002 the Bush administration has proved openly its hostility to the ICC,
D. whereas the USA seeks to conclude a series of bilateral immunity agreements to prevent its officials, employees, military personnel or nationals from being surrendered to the ICC,
E. whereas the Council, at its meeting on 30 September 2002, adopted four "guiding principles",
1. Is firmly committed to preserving the full integrity of the Rome Statute and the early establishment as an effectively functioning body of the International Criminal Court;
2. Welcomes the initial efforts of the Danish Presidency to preserve a united position of the Member States, but regrets that the General Affairs Council, against the clear will of the European Parliament, has not adopted a clear common position in response to the US Administration's efforts to conclude bilateral agreements with individual Member States and by doing this to undermine the universality of the International Criminal Court;
3. Regrets the vague indications contained in the Council's Decision on the ICC and calls on the Council to undertake further efforts to adopt a truly common EU policy on this issue;
4. Reiterates that no immunity agreement should ever create the possibility of impunity of any individual accused of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide;
5. Calls on the national parliaments in the EU and in the applicant countries to carefully scrutinise any activity their respective governments may undertake in relation to the Rome Statute;
6. Firmly believes that, under the Rome Statute, ICC State Parties must refrain from undermining the full effectiveness of the Court and jeopardising the Court's role as a complementary jurisdiction to State jurisdictions;
7. Recalls its request to the Council to present to the Parliament a progress report on the ICC before the Copenhagen European Council in December 2002, identifying any international agreement relating to the ICC and evaluating their compatibility with the Rome Statute;
8. Urges the Council to make all efforts to start a frank dialogue with the US Government and Congress in order to stop the pressure and the threat of sanctions against the countries which have ratified the Rome Statute and encourage the US administration to approach the ICC in a spirit of cooperation;
9. Recalls that it expects the governments and parliaments of the Member States to refrain from adopting any agreement which undermines the effective implementation of the Rome Statute; considers in consequence that ratifying such an agreement is incompatible with membership of the EU;
10. Addresses the same request to the applicant countries, the countries associated with the EU in the Euro-Mediterranean partnership, the Mercosur, Andean Pact and San José Process countries, the countries involved in the Stabilisation and Association Process and the ACP countries which are parties or signatories to the Statute;
11. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Government and Congress of the United States, the President of the Assembly of the state parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC and the national parliaments of applicant countries and countries associated with the EU under various agreements, in particular the ACP Joint Parliamentary Assembly, which will debate this issue at its upcoming meeting.
– having regard to the communication from the Commission on the EU's relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran (COM(2001) 71),
– having regard to its resolution of 13 December 2001(1) on the abovementioned communication,
- calling for a critical dialogue to raise the issue of the human rights situation,
- considering that the readiness expressed by Iran to discuss human rights issues is a positive development with a view to the normalisation of relations,
- proposing to send an ad hoc delegation to Tehran, and to invite the Iranian Parliament to send a delegation to Brussels in return, in order to prepare future parliamentary relations,
– having regard to its resolution of 25 April 2002 on human rights in the world in 2001 and European Union human rights policy(2),
– having regard to the report of the visit of its ad hoc delegation to the Islamic Republic of Iran on 16-21 July 2002,
– having regard to the statement on the EU-Iran Comprehensive Dialogue which took place in Tehran on 10 September 2002,
– having regard to the planned start of EU-Iran negotiations on a cooperation and trade agreement in Brussels on 29 October 2002,
– having regard to the UN's Universal Declaration on Human Rights and to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
A. having regard to the EU's long tradition of systematically opposing the death penalty in countries such as China, Iran, the United States, etc,
B. having regard to the resolution presented to the UN General Assembly by the EU and adopted in December 2001,
C. having regard to the latest report by the UN Special Representative on the human rights situation in Iran, Mr Copithorne, submitted to the UN Human Rights Commission in April 2002,
D. whereas Amnesty International reported in May 2002 that 'two women (were) known to have been stoned to death in Iran in the first half of 2001', and aware that at least four sentences to death by stoning have been issued since, to intimidate the population,
E. whereas this year has seen - according to reports of human rights organisations - an unprecedented increase in death sentences, with over 250 executions, a steep rise from 139 in 2001 and 75 in 2000,
F. whereas the EU-Iran Human Rights Exploratory Experts Mission visited Tehran in October 2002 and noted the readiness expressed by Iran to discuss all human rights issues, including individual cases,
G. noting with dismay that the Council on 22 October 2002 decided not to present a resolution on Iran during the next UN General Assembly,
1. Considers that the human rights situation in Iran remains unacceptable, notably the continuing recourse to cruel, inhuman and degrading punishments, issues that will undoubtedly be on the agenda of future interparliamentary contacts; in particular, condemns all cruel and degrading punishment of women, and expresses support for Iranian women who are being oppressed by discriminatory laws;
2. Strongly condemns capital punishment in general and execution by stoning in particular, demands that the death penalty by stoning be removed from the statute books, and in the meantime insists upon an immediate moratorium on all stonings and calls on the Iranian Government to vacate all stoning sentences already pronounced, including those allegedly imposed against four women: Sima, Ferdows, Shahnaz and Ashraf;
3. Reminds the Iranian authorities that death sentences by stoning form a sharp contrast to the hopes raised by President Khatami concerning an opening to democracy and an improvement in human rights, and calls upon the Council and the Member States to reconsider their decision not to present a resolution during the next UN General Assembly, and demands that the EU submit a strong and substantive draft for the next session of the UN Commission on Human Rights;
4. Notes that the readiness expressed by Iran to discuss human rights issues is a positive development with a view to the normalisation of EU-Iran relations, and expresses the hope that as a consequence of a successful human rights dialogue action will be taken that would alleviate the need for a UN General Assembly resolution in 2004;
5. Asks the Commission and Council to continue to stress respect for human rights and the issue of the death penalty and stoning in the context of EU-Iran relations, notes that any future trade and cooperation agreement with Iran must contain a human rights clause based on the corresponding article in the Cotonou Agreement, and recalls that no agreement can enter into force without the approval of the European Parliament;
6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, and the Government and Parliament of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
– recalling its earlier resolutions on Nepal, in particular that of 13 June 2002(1),
A. deeply dismayed at the new escalation of violence and concerned at the disregard for life repeatedly shown particularly by the Maoist insurgents,
B. whereas the clashes between the army and the guerrilla groups have caused more than 3000 deaths in one year, especially since the lifting of the state of emergency, and whereas the deterioration in the security situation has led to the postponement of the legislative elections,
C. whereas the Maoist rebels are seeking to overturn the constitutional monarchy of the Himalayan state against the will of the majority of the Nepalese people and are demanding an end to the constitutional monarchy as a precondition for any dialogue, and whereas, since the beginning of the conflict in 1996, Nepal's domestic political situation has been further destabilised so that Nepal effectively finds itself in a civil war,
D. whereas the fight against guerrillas must not interfere with respect for human rights, which is the best means of guaranteeing the rule of law,
E. whereas, following a recommendation to the cabinet by Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba, Parliament was dissolved on 22 May 2002 and elections were first called for 13 November 2002, but have been postponed and Prime Minister Deuba has been discharged,
F. whereas the Nepalese King Gyanendra has sworn in the former Prime Minister Lokendra Bahadur Chand, as new Interim Prime Minister under Article 127 of the Constitution, to lead a government which is not representative of the parliamentary majority,
1. Condemns and calls for an end to all acts of violence, in particular those aimed at the civilian population and infrastructure contributing to the country's development;
2. Calls on the Council to appoint a special representative for Nepal in order to offer mediation between the conflicting parties;
3. Calls on the EU to make its financial aid available in the light of progress towards a negotiated peace solution; welcomes the Commission's recently announced efforts to focus future EU assistance more closely on addressing the underlying causes of conflict in Nepal;
4. Reiterates its support for pluralist parliamentary democracy and the rule of law and calls for the promised elections to be held as soon as possible;
5. Underlines that, once peace has been secured, a major effort will have to be made, with the support of the international community, to find sustainable long-term solutions to guarantee internal stability;
6. Urges the Government of Nepal and its security forces to avoid all action which might lead to innocent civilians being victims of the conflict;
7. Believes that the fight against terrorism should go hand in hand with the fight against corruption and policies for sustainable and equitable development of the country;
8. Calls on the Government of Nepal to do all in its power to ascertain that international human rights and humanitarian law standards are being respected and, in particular, to guarantee internationally recognised legal proceedings for those who have been arrested;
9. Calls on the new Nepalese Interim Prime Minister, Lokendra Bahdur Chand, to resume the promised dialogue between the Government and the Maoist rebels, without preconditions from both sides; considers it essential that negotiations with the Maoists take place at an early stage so that they can be brought fully into the political process, and expects the Government to be more specific about the conditions for opening such dialogue;
10. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Secretary-General of the United Nations and the Government of Nepal.
– having regard to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) of December 1997, the application procedures for its implementation that were adopted at the conferences of Bonn (July 2001) and Marrakesh (November 2001), and the forthcoming Eighth Conference of the Parties (COP-8) to be held in New Delhi, India between 23 October and 1 November 2002,
– having regard to its resolutions relating to climate change, notably that of 25 October 2001 on the follow-up to Parliament's opinion on the European Union's strategy for the Marrakesh Conference on Climate Change (COP-7)(1),
– having regard to Oral Question B5-0492/2002 by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy pursuant to Rule 42 of its Rules of Procedure and having regard to the statement by the Commission,
– having regard to its resolution of 25 September 2002 on the Commission communication on the implementation of the first phase of the European Climate Change Programme (ECCP)(2),
A. whereas the Kyoto Protocol was ratified by all the Member States and by the European Union on 31 May 2002, sending out a strong political signal about their commitment to addressing the issue of climate change,
B. whereas not all candidate countries have submitted their instruments of ratification of the Kyoto Protocol,
C. whereas the Kyoto Protocol has now been ratified by 95 countries, which account for over 37 % of total greenhouse gas emissions; however, for the Protocol to enter into force countries accounting for at least 55% of total greenhouse gas emissions would have to ratify it,
D. whereas on 10 October 2002 Parliament adopted its first reading on the proposed directive on establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community(3), and whereas this important step reaffirms the political commitment of the EU and its Member States to focus on domestic actions and encourages other parties to follow suit,
E. whereas the Kyoto Protocol is only a first initiative taken by the international community in the fight against climate change, and whereas this does not mean that the other measures aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions which can be taken at national level should be relegated to a secondary role; on the contrary, they should be considered as complementary,
1. Urges the EU to maintain its leading role in the negotiations at the COP-8 Conference in New Delhi;
2. Takes into account the latest alarming report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC);
3. Believes that COP-8 constitutes not only a good opportunity to build on the decisions taken at Bonn and Marrakesh on implementing the Kyoto Protocol, but also to start a wide-ranging debate on the main issues for the second commitment period;
4. Encourages the COP-8 Conference to adopt a decision on a review system for reinstatement for parties who have dropped out of the scheme;
5. Stresses the importance of the adoption of clear rules on the eligibility of CDM projects, including a fast-track procedure for small-scale projects; concerning sinks, refers to its resolution of 26 October 2000 on the Commission's strategy for The Hague Conference on Climate Change (COP-6)(4), which stated, in particular, that carbon sinks are scientifically questionable and should be used in conjunction with monitoring and to a limited extent only;
6. Calls upon the EU and the other parties present at the COP-8 Conference, and especially the host country, India, to focus their attention on the problems of the developing countries by:
–
continuing the work done on adaptation to climate change, including finance mechanisms,
–
agreeing on criteria for the distribution of the existing climate change funds under the Marrakesh agreements;
7. Stresses the importance for the EU and other Parties present in New Delhi of starting the political debate on post-2012 targets for the second commitment period as soon as possible; reiterates its position in the aforementioned resolution of 26 October 2000 that in the long term the principle of equal rights per world citizen must be applied;
8. Calls on the EU, at the COP-8 Conference, to promote, in particular, measures to improve instruments to measure greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and the emissions of each signatory state so that states and international organisations have as much reliable scientific information as possible at their disposal on which to base their decisions;
9. Calls on the EU to insist, during the COP-8 negotiations, on the fact that action to combat greenhouse effects, in particular against CO2, implies developing renewable energy sources;
10. Urges the EU and all other parties to the UNFCCC to start substantive discussions to incorporate emissions from international flights and shipping into the emission reduction targets of the second commitment period from 2012, as there is more and more evidence that the aviation sector, especially, is playing an increasing role in global warming;
11. Calls, in the meantime, on the states that have not ratified the Kyoto Protocol to do so as soon as possible; welcomes the Russian Government's political willingness to ratify the Protocol, but regrets the uncertainty that continues to cloud the ongoing internal process and the effective date of ratification; calls on the US Government to reconsider its decision not to participate;
12. Believes that the EU should redouble its efforts to meet the Kyoto Protocol targets, and set an example for other parties to the Convention; such EU measures should include: the adoption of an EU emission trading scheme, a set of ambitious EU-wide measures to reduce transport-related CO2 emissions, and the adoption of a proposal to tackle the use of non-CO2 greenhouse gases in the industrial sector;
13. Points out that the Kyoto Protocol will be a completed process and become operational only once the issue of sanction arrangements and the dispute settlement procedure is resolved, and therefore calls on the EU to propose solutions to our COP-8 partners to this end;
14. Encourages all Member States to accept their responsibility to ensure that they meet their burden-sharing targets;
15. Believes that the EU delegation plays an important role in these negotiations on climate change, but finds it unacceptable that the members of the European Parliament delegation were unable to attend the EU coordination meetings at COP-6 and COP-7, and expects that the European Parliament participants will have access to such meetings in New Delhi, on the basis at least of observer status, with or without speaking rights;
16. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, with the request that it be circulated to all non-EU contracting parties.