A forward-looking and comprehensive European immigration policy, based on solidarity, is a key objective for the European Union. Immigration policy is intended to establish a balanced approach to dealing with both regular and irregular immigration.
Articles 79 and 80 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Regular immigration: the EU is competent to lay down the conditions governing entry into and legal residence in a Member State, including for the purposes of family reunification, for third-country nationals. Member States retain the right to determine volumes of admission for people coming from third countries to seek work.
Integration: the EU may provide incentives and support for measures taken by Member States to promote the integration of legally resident third-country nationals; EU law makes no provision for the harmonisation of national laws and regulations, however.
Combating irregular immigration: the European Union is required to prevent and reduce irregular immigration, in particular by means of an effective return policy, in a manner consistent with fundamental rights.
Readmission agreements: the European Union is competent to conclude agreements with third countries for the readmission to their country of origin or provenance of third-country nationals who do not fulfil or no longer fulfil the conditions for entry into, or presence or residence in, a Member State.
Defining a balanced approach to immigration: the EU aims to set up a balanced approach to managing regular immigration and combating irregular immigration. Proper management of migration flows entails ensuring fair treatment of third-country nationals residing legally in Member States, enhancing measures to combat irregular immigration, including trafficking and smuggling, and promoting closer cooperation with non-member countries in all fields. It is the EU’s aim to establish a uniform level of rights and obligations for regular immigrants, comparable to that for EU citizens.
Principle of solidarity: under the Lisbon Treaty, immigration policies are to be governed by the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, including its financial implications, between the Member States (Article 80 TFEU).
A. Institutional developments brought about by the Lisbon Treaty
The Lisbon Treaty, which entered into force in December 2009 (1.1.5), introduced qualified majority voting on regular immigration and a new legal basis for integration measures. The ordinary legislative procedure now applies to policies on both irregular and regular immigration, making Parliament a co-legislator on an equal footing with the Council. The provisional measures to be taken in the event of a sudden inflow of third-country nationals are adopted by the Council alone, however, after consulting Parliament (Article 78(3) TFEU).
The Lisbon Treaty also made it clear that the EU shares competence in this field with the Member States, in particular as regards the number of migrants allowed to enter a Member State to seek work (Article 79(5) TFEU). Finally, the Court of Justice now has full jurisdiction in the field of immigration and asylum.
B. Recent policy developments
1. The ‘Global Approach to Migration and Mobility’
The ‘Global Approach to Migration and Mobility’ (GAMM) adopted by the Commission in 2011 establishes a general framework for the EU’s relations with third countries in the field of migration. It is based on four pillars: regular immigration and mobility, irregular immigration and trafficking in human beings, international protection and asylum policy, and maximising the impact of migration and mobility on development. The human rights of migrants are a cross-cutting issue in the context of this approach.
2. The June 2014 strategic guidelines
The Stockholm Programme for the area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ), adopted in December 2009 as a successor to the multiannual programmes adopted at Tampere (1999) and The Hague (2004), expired in December 2014 (4.2.1). In March 2014, the Commission published a new communication setting out its vision on the future agenda for the AFSJ, entitled ‘An open and secure Europe: making it happen‘. In accordance with Article 68 TFEU, in its conclusions of 26 and 27 June 2014 the European Council then defined the ‘strategic guidelines for legislative and operational planning within the area of freedom, security and justice’ for the 2014-2020 period. These no longer constitute a programme, but rather guidelines focusing on the objective of transposing, implementing and consolidating the existing legal instruments and measures. The guidelines stress the need to adopt a holistic approach to migration, making the best possible use of regular migration, affording protection to those who need it, combating irregular migration and managing borders effectively.
3. European Agenda on Migration
On 13 May 2015, the Commission published the European Agenda on Migration. The Agenda proposes immediate measures to cope with the crisis in the Mediterranean and measures to be taken over the next few years to manage all aspects of immigration more effectively.
As regards the medium and long term, the Commission proposes guidelines in four policy areas:
The Agenda also launched the idea of setting up EU-wide relocation and resettlement schemes (see fact sheet on asylum policy 4.2.2), announced the ‘Hotspot’ approach (where relevant EU agencies work on the ground with frontline Member States to swiftly identify, register and fingerprint incoming migrants), and proposed a possible common security and defence policy (CSDP) operation in the Mediterranean to dismantle smuggling networks and combat trafficking in persons (which was launched soon afterwards as EUNAVFOR MED – Operation Sophia).
On the basis of this agenda, on 6 April 2016 the Commission published its guidelines on regular migration, as well as on asylum, in a communication. There are four main strands to the guidelines as regards regular migration policies: revising the Blue Card Directive, attracting innovative entrepreneurs to the EU, developing a more coherent and effective model for regular immigration in the EU by assessing the existing framework, and strengthening cooperation with the key countries of origin, with a view to ensuring legal pathways to the EU while at the same time improving returns of those who have no right to stay.
In October 2019, the Commission published a progress report on the implementation of the European Agenda on Migration, which examines progress made and shortcomings in the implementation of the Agenda.
All policy developments are closely monitored by the European Migration Network, established in 2008 as an EU network of migration and asylum experts from all Member States, who work together to provide objective, comparable and policy-relevant information.
C. Recent legislative developments
Since 2008, a number of significant directives on immigration have been adopted and several have already been revised.
1. Regular immigration
Following the difficulties encountered in adopting a general provision covering all labour immigration into the EU, the current approach consists of adopting sectoral legislation, by category of migrants, in order to establish a regular immigration policy at EU level.
Directive 2009/50/EC on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of highly qualified employment created the ‘EU blue card’, a fast-track procedure for issuing a special residence and work permit, on more attractive terms, to enable third-country workers to take up highly qualified employment in the Member States. The first report on the implementation of this directive was published in May 2014 and identified several shortcomings. In June 2016, the Commission proposed a revision of the system, including less stringent admissions criteria, a lower salary threshold/minimum length of the work contract required, better family reunification provisions, and the abolition of parallel national schemes; work on this revision is ongoing in Parliament (the LIBE Committee report was adopted on 15 June 2017) and the Council, although, lately, progress in the Council has stalled, especially on the inclusion of skills and the recognition of professional experience equivalent to education qualifications, as well as on the possibility of maintaining parallel national schemes.
The Single Permit Directive (2011/98/EU) sets out a common, simplified procedure for third-country nationals applying for a residence and work permit in a Member State, as well as a common set of rights to be granted to regular immigrants. The latest implementation report, adopted in March 2019, found that third-country nationals lacking information about their rights hampers the directive’s objective of promoting their integration and non-discrimination.
Directive 2014/36/EU, adopted in February 2014, regulates the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purpose of employment as seasonal workers. Migrant seasonal workers are allowed to stay legally and temporarily in the EU for a maximum period of between five and nine months (depending on the Member State) to carry out an activity dependent on the passing of seasons, while retaining their principal place of residence in a third country. The directive also clarifies the set of rights to which such migrant workers are entitled.
Directive 2014/66/EU on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals in the framework of an intra-corporate transfer was adopted on 15 May 2014. The directive makes it easier for businesses and multinational corporations to temporarily relocate their managers, specialists and trainee employees to their branches or subsidiaries located in the European Union.
Directive (EU) 2016/801 on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies, training, voluntary service, pupil exchange schemes or educational projects and au pairing was adopted on 11 May 2016, and was to be transposed by 23 May 2018. It replaces the previous instruments covering students and researchers, broadening their scope and simplifying their application.
Lastly, the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents in the European Union is still regulated by Council Directive 2003/109/EC, as amended in 2011 to extend its scope to refugees and other beneficiaries of international protection. The March 2019 implementation report found that, rather than actively promote the European long-term residence status, Member States issue mainly national long-term resident permits instead; and only a few third-country nationals use their right to move to other Member States. Current work on the Qualifications Directive (4.2.2) and the Blue Card Directive includes proposed amendments to the Directive on long-term residents.
Therefore, as observed by the Commission’s legal migration fitness check, published in March 2019, categories of regular migration not yet covered by EU legislation include workers who are not highly skilled and who come for periods of more than nine months, as well as investors and self-employed third-country nationals.
2. Integration
Council Directive 2003/86/EC sets out provisions on the right to family reunification, which go beyond the right to respect for private and family life of Article 8 ECHR. Given that the 2008 implementation report concluded that Directive 2003/86/EC had not been fully and correctly applied in the Member States, the Commission published a communication in April 2014 providing guidance to the Member States on how to apply it. The Commission’s legal migration fitness check also covers the family reunification directive.
The EU’s competence in the field of integration is limited. In July 2011, the Commission adopted the European Agenda for the Integration of Third-Country Nationals. More recently, in June 2016, the Commission put forward an action plan, setting out a policy framework and practical steps to help Member States integrate the 20 million non-EU nationals who are legally resident in the EU. Existing instruments include the European Migration Forum; the European Website on Integration; and the European Integration Network.
Specialised funding instruments to support national integration policies were based on the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) and the European Social Fund (ESF); as of 2021, under the new multiannual financial framework (MFF), it has been proposed that these funding instruments fall under the Asylum and Migration Fund (AMF) and ESF+.
3. Irregular immigration
The EU has adopted some major pieces of legislation to combat irregular immigration:
At the same time, the EU is negotiating and concluding readmission agreements with countries of origin and transit with a view to returning irregular migrants and cooperating in the fight against trafficking in human beings. The Joint Readmissions Committees, as foreseen in the readmission agreements, monitor the implementation thereof. These agreements are linked to visa facilitation agreements, which aim to provide the necessary incentive for readmission negotiations in the third country concerned without increasing irregular migration.
Recently, the Commission has also concluded informal arrangements on return and readmission (currently in force with five countries of origin in Africa), which have drawn heavy criticism from Parliament for falling outside of its scrutiny, and raised questions of accountability and transparency.
Since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament has been actively involved, as a full co-legislator, in the adoption of new legislation dealing with both irregular and regular immigration.
Parliament has adopted numerous own-initiative resolutions addressing migration, in particular its resolution of 12 April 2016 on the situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration, which assesses the various policies at stake, and develops a set of recommendations. The LIBE report adopted in plenary was accompanied by the opinions of eight other committees of Parliament. The resolution encompasses Parliament’s position on all relevant EU policies on migration and asylum and is Parliament’s point of reference in this area.
Read more on this topic:
Marion Schmid-Drüner