Revision of the EU geographical indications (GIs) systems in agricultural products and foodstuffs, wines and spirit drinks
In “A European Green Deal”
On 31 March 2022, the European Commission put forward a legislative proposal on EU geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products.
The proposal was originally announced in the 2020 Farm to Fork strategy, with a view of improving the contribution of GIs to sustainable production, and to strengthening the position of farmers and producer groups. The initiative was included in the Commission Work Programme 2021 under REFIT initiatives, planned for the fourth quarter of 2021.
A geographical indication (GI) is a distinctive sign used to identify a product whose quality, reputation or other such characteristics relate to its geographical origin. Geographical indications comprise of: PDO – Protected Designation of Origin (food and wine); PGI – Protected Geographical Indication (food and wine); GI – Geographical Indication (spirit drinks and aromatised wines). Products can also be protected under the traditional speciality guaranteed (TGS) quality scheme, used for food and agricultural products that are made in a traditional way, but that can be made anywhere and can use the name provided that they follow the registered recipe.
The Commission’s proposal includes the following elements:
- a single GI system for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products - Instead of each of these sectors being governed by a separate piece of legislation, the proposed regulation would include all of them in its scope with the same rules applying to all;
- expanded role for the European Union Intellectual Property Organisation (EUIPO) - The EUIPO would be tasked with the administration of geographical indications, while the Commission would be empowered to adopt delegated acts to entrust EUIPO with a series of tasks, including as regards the scrutiny of applications, opposition procedure, operation of the register, etc.
- increased online protection - The new legislation would increase the protection of GIs on the internet. Country-code top-level domain name registries established in the EU could, on the request, revoke or transfer a domain name registered to a recognised producer group;
- sustainability undertakings - A producer group would be able to agree on social, environmental or economic sustainability requirements that would be added to product specifications. The Commission would be also empowered to adopt delegated acts defining sustainability standards in different sectors;
- labelling of GI products as ingredients in processed foods - It would be banned to use, in the food name of the processed product, GI designating a product ingredient, except if an agreement with the producer group representing two thirds of the producers would be exist;
- producer groups - Producer groups would be get increase powers and responsibilities. Member States would be allowed to designate ‘recognised producer groups’, representing at least two-thirds of producers of a product bearing a GI, and accounting for at least two-thirds of the production. These groups would have additional powers and responsibilities, such taking enforcement actions or registering a trademark in order to protect the name outside the EU.
In Parliament, the dossier has been assigned to the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI), with Paolo de Castro (S&D, Italy) as rapporteur. The Legal Affairs Committee (JURI) is associated committee under Rule 57 (rapporteur Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Renew, Spain). On 18 October 2022, the rapporteur put forward his draft report. The AGRI Committee adopted the report on 20 April 2023, with the following elements:
- new powers and responsibilities proposed by the Commission would apply only to recognised producer groups, unless no such group has been designated. This would include submitting amendments to the product specification;
- the Commission would not be allowed to define sustainability standards in different sectors;
- the deadline for the Commission’s scrutiny would be shortened to five months and could be extended by a maximum three additional months;
- the Commission would not be allowed to entrust its tasks relating to scrutiny, opposition procedure, amendments, cancellation or the scrutiny of third-country GIs to the EUIPO. It could, however, empower the EUIPO to maintain and keep the EU electronic register of GIs up-to-date and to establish and manage an alert system monitoring the registration of domain names;
- the name of a GI used as an ingredient in a processed product could be referred to in the food name only with an agreement in writing with a recognised producer group. A recognised producer group could lay down rules on the use of the GI products as ingredients, including by requesting a financial contribution.
On 1 June, Parliament adopted the mandate for negotiations and referred the matter back to the AGRI Committee.
In the Council, the examination of the proposal took place in the Working Party on Horizontal Agricultural Questions (Geographical Indications and Designations of Origin) and the Special Committee on Agriculture (SCA). On 8 May 2023, the SCA adopted a mandate detailing the Council position, with the following elements:
- the EUIPO would not be allowed to have any role in the process of the registration, amendments or cancellation of GIs. The Commission would not be able to task the EUIPO with operating the EU register, nor to set up a domain name information and alert system;
- the Commission would not be allowed to define sustainability standards in different sectors;
- a GI used as an ingredient could be used in the name of the processed product under certain conditions. The producer would not be required to seek a written permission to use the GI ingredient in the name of the product from the producer group, but would only have to notify a recognised producer group, if it exists;
- only recognised producer groups would be allowed to apply for amendments.
Trilogues started on 6 June 2023.
References:
- EP Legislative Observatory, Procedure file on Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, 2022/0089(COD)
- European Commission, Proposal for a regulation on European Union geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products, COM(2022) 134
- European Commission, Evaluation support study on geographical indications and traditional specialities guaranteed protected in the EU. Final report, 2 March 2021
- European Parliament, Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development draft report on the proposal for a regulation on European Union geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products, 2022/0089(COD)
- European Parliament, Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development report on the proposal for a regulation on European Union geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products, 2022/0089(COD)
- Council, Mandate for negotiations on the regulation on geographical indications and quality schemes, 8598/2/23
- European Economic and Social Committee, Opinion on the revision of the EU geographical indications (GIs) systems, NAT/845-EESC-2021
- Committee of the Regions, Opinion on the reform of the geographical indications system, CDR 3736/2022
Further reading:
- European Parliament, EPRS, Geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, Pleanary At a Glance, May 2023
- European Parliament, EPRS, Geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, Briefing, EU Legislation in Progress, January 2022
- European Parliament, EPRS, Revising the EU geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, Briefing, Initial Appraisal of Impact Assessment, September 2022
- European Parliament, EPRS, Revision of the EU legislation on geographical indications of agricultural and food products, Briefing, Implementation Appraisal, October 2021
Author: Nikolina Šajn, Members' Research Service, legislative-train@europarl.europa.eu