Gunnar BECK
Gunnar BECK
Germany

9th parliamentary term Gunnar BECK

Political groups

  • 02-07-2019 / 22-05-2024 : Identity and Democracy Group - Member
  • 23-05-2024 / 15-07-2024 : Non-attached Members

National parties

  • 02-07-2019 / 15-07-2024 : Alternative für Deutschland (Germany)

Member

  • 02-07-2019 / 19-01-2022 : Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
  • 16-09-2019 / 22-05-2024 : Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee
  • 10-02-2020 / 19-01-2022 : Committee on Legal Affairs
  • 06-10-2021 / 19-01-2022 : Subcommittee on Tax Matters
  • 18-10-2021 / 22-05-2024 : Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership Assembly
  • 20-01-2022 / 22-05-2024 : Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
  • 20-01-2022 / 22-05-2024 : Committee on Legal Affairs
  • 20-01-2022 / 22-05-2024 : Subcommittee on Tax Matters

Substitute

  • 02-07-2019 / 20-01-2020 : Committee on Budgets
  • 02-07-2019 / 09-02-2020 : Committee on Legal Affairs
  • 21-01-2020 / 19-01-2022 : Committee on Constitutional Affairs
  • 14-09-2020 / 05-10-2021 : Subcommittee on Tax Matters
  • 20-01-2022 / 22-05-2024 : Committee on Constitutional Affairs
  • 15-01-2024 / 22-05-2024 : Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly
  • 15-01-2024 / 22-05-2024 : Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly

Main parliamentary activities

Contributions to plenary debates

Speeches made during the plenary session and written declarations relating to plenary debates. Rules Rule 204 and 171(11)

Opinions - as shadow rapporteur

Political groups designate a shadow rapporteur for an opinion to follow progress and negotiate compromise texts with the rapporteur. Rule 215

OPINION on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards the time limits for the adoption of sustainability reporting standards for certain sectors and for certain third-country undertakings

12-01-2024 ECON_AD(2024)757192 PE757.192v02-00 ECON
Jessica POLFJÄRD

OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937

06-03-2023 ECON_AD(2023)736711 PE736.711v03-00 ECON
René REPASI

OPINION on proposals of the European Parliament for the amendment of the Treaties

02-02-2023 ECON_AD(2023)736556 PE736.556v02-00 ECON
Margarida MARQUES

Oral questions

Questions for oral answer with debate, addressed to the European Commission, the Council or the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union can be tabled by a committee, a political group or at least 5% of Parliament’s members. Rule 136

Major interpellations

Major interpellations for written answer with debate, addressed to the European Commission, the Council or the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union, may be tabled by a committee, a political group or at least 5% of Parliament’s component Members. Rule 139, Annex III

Other parliamentary activities

Written explanations of vote

Members can submit a written explanation of their vote in plenary. Rule 194

Composition of the European Parliament (A9-0214/2023 - Loránt Vincze, Sandro Gozi) DE

15-06-2023

Ich habe gegen diesen Bericht gestimmt. Der Bericht fordert die Einführung transnationaler Listen für die Europawahl. Dies ist ein weiterer Schritt zur Delegitimierung nationaler Demokratien und zur weiteren Abschaffung des Nationalstaates und der nationalen Souveränität.

Ukraine’s accession to the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (B9-0267/2023) DE

15-06-2023

Sowohl die EU als auch die Ukraine haben die Urteilsübereinkommen im Jahr 2022 unterzeichnet und ratifiziert. Im Jahr 2023 einigte sich der Rat darauf, vertragliche Beziehungen mit der Ukraine im Rahmen des Urteilsübereinkommens aufzunehmen. Ab dem 1. September 2023 gilt das Urteilsübereinkommen zwischen den beiden Parteien. Der Bericht begrüßt die Entscheidung der Kommission und des Rates, Vertragsbeziehungen mit der Ukraine aufzunehmen, und unterstützt den Beitritt der Ukraine zum Urteilsübereinkommen. Das ist gut für Deutschland, denn es erleichtert deutschen Personen und Unternehmen die Vollstreckung ukrainischer Urteile in Deutschland und umgekehrt. Allerdings macht das Parlament das Abkommen politisch, indem es seine „unerschütterliche Solidarität mit dem Volk und der Führung der Ukraine und der territorialen Integrität der Ukraine“ bekräftigt. Die politische Situation sollte nicht in einen rein rechtlichen Vertrag hineingezogen werden. Deswegen habe ich mich enthalten.

Lessons learnt from the Pandora Papers and other revelations (A9-0095/2023 - Niels Fuglsang) DE

15-06-2023

Ich habe mich enthalten. Obwohl der Bericht einige wichtige Mängel bei der Besteuerung auf EU-Ebene anspricht, bedauere ich, dass der Bericht einige wichtige Enthüllungen aus den Pandora Papers nicht berücksichtigt. Dazu gehören die Rolle von Selenskyj und seinen Offshore-Firmen. Im Kontext sowohl des Krieges als auch des Qatargate-Skandals ist es von entscheidender Bedeutung, dass solche Probleme angegangen werden. Ich bedauere auch, dass spezifische Steuerprobleme in bestimmten Mitgliedstaaten nicht angesprochen werden.

Written questions

Members can submit a specific number of questions to the President of the European Council, the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union, for written answer. Rule 138, Annex III

Questions to the Bureau, the Conference of Presidents and the Quaestors

Members can submit questions to the President concerning the Bureau, the Conference of Presidents and the Quaestors as regards their respective duties. Rule 32(2)

Questions to the ECB and concerning the SSM and the SRM

Members can put questions for written reply to the ECB and questions concerning the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism. Such questions are first submitted to the Chair of the responsible committee.Rule 140, Rule 141, Annex III

Answers to questions to the ECB and concerning the SSM and the SRM

Reply to members’ questions to the ECB and questions concerning the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism. Rule 140, Rule 141, Annex III

Individual motions for resolutions

In accordance with Rule 143 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure, any individual Member may table a motion for resolution on a matter falling within the spheres of activity of the EU. These motions for resolution express the position of the individual Members who tabled them. Admissible motions are referred to the committee responsible, which shall decide whether to follow up the motion for resolution and, if so, which procedure is to be followed. Where a committee has decided to follow-up a motion for resolution, more detailed information is provided on this page, below the resolution in question. Rule 143

Declarations

All declarations below have been signed by the Member, even if the signature is not visible in the online copy.