Jordi SOLÉ
Jordi SOLÉ
Spain

Date of birth : , Caldes de Montbui

9th parliamentary term Jordi SOLÉ

Political groups

  • 23-07-2020 / 10-01-2022 : Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance - Member
  • 11-01-2022 / 15-07-2024 : Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance - Vice-Chair

National parties

  • 03-01-2020 / 15-07-2024 : Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya (Spain)

Vice-Chair

  • 08-09-2022 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community

Member

  • 14-09-2020 / 19-01-2022 : Committee on Foreign Affairs
  • 14-09-2020 / 19-01-2022 : Subcommittee on Human Rights
  • 14-09-2020 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union, including the EU-Morocco, EU-Tunisia and EU-Algeria Joint Parliamentary Committees
  • 14-09-2020 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean
  • 21-05-2021 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation for relations with Israel
  • 20-01-2022 / 15-07-2024 : Committee on Foreign Affairs
  • 20-01-2022 / 15-07-2024 : Subcommittee on Human Rights
  • 17-02-2022 / 07-09-2022 : Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community
  • 17-02-2022 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly

Substitute

  • 23-07-2020 / 19-01-2022 : Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
  • 23-07-2020 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China
  • 20-01-2022 / 15-07-2024 : Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
  • 24-03-2022 / 18-07-2023 : Committee of Inquiry to investigate the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware

Main parliamentary activities

Contributions to plenary debates

Speeches made during the plenary session and written declarations relating to plenary debates. Rules Rule 204 and 171(11)

Reports - as rapporteur

A rapporteur is appointed in the responsible parliamentary committee to draft a report on proposals of a legislative or budgetary nature, or other issues. In drafting their report, rapporteurs may consult with relevant experts and stakeholders. They are also responsible for the drafting of compromise amendments and negotiations with shadow rapporteurs. Reports adopted at committee level are then examined and voted on in plenary. Rule 55

Opinions - as shadow rapporteur

Political groups designate a shadow rapporteur for an opinion to follow progress and negotiate compromise texts with the rapporteur. Rule 215

OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020

18-07-2023 AFET_AD(2023)749074 PE749.074v02-00 AFET
Miriam LEXMANN

OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) and Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste

29-03-2023 ITRE_AD(2023)736732 PE736.732v02-00 ITRE
Tomas TOBÉ

OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts

14-06-2022 ITRE_AD(2022)719801 PE719.801v02-00 ITRE
Eva MAYDELL

Oral questions

Questions for oral answer with debate, addressed to the European Commission, the Council or the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union can be tabled by a committee, a political group or at least 5% of Parliament’s members. Rule 136

The EU’s responsibility to protect local staff targeted due to their working relations with the EU

23-09-2021 O-000062/2021 Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy

Other parliamentary activities

Written explanations of vote

Members can submit a written explanation of their vote in plenary. Rule 194

EU/Mauritania Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement and Implementing Protocol (A9-0148/2022 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)

08-06-2022

EU fisheries partnership agreements with third countries have greatly improved over the last 10 years by increasing its support for local fisheries development, monitoring and control, and human rights requirements. In particular, the EU-Mauritania agreement contains several clauses such as direct support to the local fishing sector with EUR 16.5 million, the obligation of Mauritania to publish its agreements with third countries or payments from EU ship-owners based on the actual amount of fish caught. However, industrial overfishing puts biodiversity, ecosystems and the marine environment at risk, in addition to having a negative impact on local communities that depend on these resources. The European Union must stop fishing overexploitation and not externalising its costs. It should contribute to the stabilisation of species that are highly vulnerable to fishing pressure and at the same time not contribute to the destruction of local jobs that push small-scale fishermen to emigrate. For all the reasons mentioned above, I decided to abstain on the consent vote to the EU-Mauritania Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement and Implementing Protocol.

The situation in Belarus after one year of protests and their violent repression (RC-B9-0482/2021, B9-0482/2021, B9-0483/2021, B9-0485/2021, B9-0488/2021, B9-0494/2021, B9-0496/2021)

07-10-2021

The Joint Motion for Resolution on the situation in Belarus, after one year of protests and their violent repression, is yet another good example of how the European Parliament continues to support the Belarusian democratic opposition and condemns its persecution and repression by Lukashenka’s regime.
The resolution also condemns the Belarusian regime’s instrumentalisation of migrants for political purposes, in breach of international law and Belarus’s bilateral treaties with its EU neighbours. However, as a key amendment tabled by the Greens/EFA – calling for unconditional compliance with EU and international law, also during emergency situations, and for the implementation of ECtHR interim measures and relocation – did not pass, I decided to abstain to the whole resolution, without prejudice to my full support and solidarity with the people of Belarus standing up for freedom and democracy.

European Climate Law (Jytte Guteland - A9-0162/2020)

24-06-2021

. ‒ The EU Climate Law requires that all other EU legislation is in line with the climate target of 52.8% reduction of emissions. Certainly, the approval of such binding legal rules is something that the Greens/EFA group have been fighting for during the last years. However, we as a political Group agreed to vote against the EU Climate Law because its climate target is simply insufficient to limit global temperature rise to 2°C, let alone the 1.5°C that climate scientists say we need to achieve. For this reason, we understand that the end result of the Climate Law is not in line with the Paris Agreement. Nonetheless, we will continue to push for the necessary reduction of emissions in all the other EU climate policies such as the upcoming package ‘Fit for 2030’.

Written questions

Members can submit a specific number of questions to the President of the European Council, the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union, for written answer. Rule 138, Annex III

Armenian detainees in Baku

25-04-2024 E-001345/2024 Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy

Questions to the Bureau, the Conference of Presidents and the Quaestors

Members can submit questions to the President concerning the Bureau, the Conference of Presidents and the Quaestors as regards their respective duties. Rule 32(2)

Questions to the ECB and concerning the SSM and the SRM

Members can put questions for written reply to the ECB and questions concerning the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism. Such questions are first submitted to the Chair of the responsible committee.Rule 140, Rule 141, Annex III

Answers to questions to the ECB and concerning the SSM and the SRM

Reply to members’ questions to the ECB and questions concerning the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism. Rule 140, Rule 141, Annex III

Individual motions for resolutions

In accordance with Rule 143 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure, any individual Member may table a motion for resolution on a matter falling within the spheres of activity of the EU. These motions for resolution express the position of the individual Members who tabled them. Admissible motions are referred to the committee responsible, which shall decide whether to follow up the motion for resolution and, if so, which procedure is to be followed. Where a committee has decided to follow-up a motion for resolution, more detailed information is provided on this page, below the resolution in question. Rule 143

Declarations

All declarations below have been signed by the Member, even if the signature is not visible in the online copy.

Meetings

Reform of the CAP proposed by the European Commission

Member
SOLÉ Jordi
Date, Place:
Online
Capacity:
Member Staff meeting
Meeting with:
Mensa Cívica

Human rights of Baha'is in Iran, Qatar, Yemen and Egypt

Member
SOLÉ Jordi
Date, Place:
Brussels
Capacity:
Member
Code of associated committee or delegation
DROI
Meeting with:
Bahá'í International Community

Current challenges of the Dockers and Dockworkers sector

Member
SOLÉ Jordi
Date, Place:
Brussels
Capacity:
Member
Code of associated committee or delegation
ITRE
Meeting with:
European Dockworkers Council