Antoni COMÍN I OLIVERES
Antoni COMÍN I OLIVERES
Spain

Date of birth : , Barcelona

9th parliamentary term Antoni COMÍN I OLIVERES

Political groups

  • 02-07-2019 / 15-07-2024 : Non-attached Members

National parties

  • 02-07-2019 / 15-07-2024 : Junts per Catalunya - Lliures per Europa (Spain)

Member

  • 10-02-2020 / 19-01-2022 : Committee on Development
  • 12-02-2020 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand
  • 14-09-2020 / 23-03-2022 : Special Committee on Beating Cancer
  • 20-01-2022 / 15-07-2024 : Committee on Development

Substitute

  • 10-02-2020 / 19-01-2022 : Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
  • 12-02-2020 / 15-02-2023 : Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee
  • 12-02-2020 / 13-02-2024 : Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly
  • 15-03-2021 / 14-09-2022 : Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly
  • 20-01-2022 / 15-07-2024 : Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
  • 18-05-2022 / 15-07-2024 : Committee on Petitions
  • 27-09-2022 / 31-12-2023 : Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly
  • 16-02-2023 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community
  • 15-03-2023 / 15-07-2024 : Subcommittee on Public Health
  • 05-01-2024 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly
  • 05-01-2024 / 15-07-2024 : Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly

Main parliamentary activities

Contributions to plenary debates

Speeches made during the plenary session and written declarations relating to plenary debates. Rules Rule 204 and 171(11)

Reports - as shadow rapporteur

Political groups designate a shadow rapporteur for each report in the responsible committee to follow progress and negotiate compromise texts with the rapporteur. Rule 215

Opinions - as rapporteur

Committees may draft an opinion to a report of the responsible committee covering the elements linked to their committee remit. Rapporteurs of such opinions are also responsible for the drafting of compromise amendments and negotiations with shadow rapporteurs of the opinion. Rule 56, Rule 57, Annex VI

OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds for the financial year 2022

25-01-2024 DEVE_AD(2024)756271 PE756.271v03-00 DEVE
Antoni COMÍN I OLIVERES

OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022, section III - Commission

25-01-2024 DEVE_AD(2024)756272 PE756.272v02-00 DEVE
Antoni COMÍN I OLIVERES

Opinion on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the labelling of organic pet food

22-03-2023 ENVI_AL(2023)742634 PE742.634v01-00 ENVI
Antoni COMÍN I OLIVERES

Opinions - as shadow rapporteur

Political groups designate a shadow rapporteur for an opinion to follow progress and negotiate compromise texts with the rapporteur. Rule 215

OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an EU Talent Pool

11-04-2024 DEVE_AD(2024)758160 PE758.160v02-00 DEVE
Tomas TOBÉ

OPINION EU Action Plan: protecting and restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries

27-10-2023 DEVE_AD(2023)751686 PE751.686v02-00 DEVE
Catherine CHABAUD

OPINION on shaping the EU’s position on the UN binding instrument on business and human rights, in particular on access to remedy and the protection of victims

25-10-2023 DEVE_AD(2023)751900 PE751.900v03-00 DEVE
Miguel URBÁN CRESPO

Oral questions

Questions for oral answer with debate, addressed to the European Commission, the Council or the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union can be tabled by a committee, a political group or at least 5% of Parliament’s members. Rule 136

Other parliamentary activities

Written explanations of vote

Members can submit a written explanation of their vote in plenary. Rule 194

Foreign interference in all democratic processes in the European Union, including disinformation (A9-0187/2023 - Sandra Kalniete)

01-06-2023

We fully share the deep concern regarding the interference of Russia and other foreign entities in the democratic processes of the European Union that are detailed in this report.
However, we voted against it because we deplore the inclusion of point 73. This point refers to an alleged wide-ranging Russian interference with secessionist movements in the EU, including in Catalonia, and calls on the relevant authorities to investigate it. The only purpose of this wording, which was incorporated into the file by Spanish MEPs, is misrepresenting a democratic movement as an instrument intended to destabilise the European Union. By doing this, Spanish MEPs seek to present a justification for the relentless repression of the Spanish state against the Catalan independence movement and discourage objections against the fundamental rights violations that Spain is continually committing in Catalonia.
The self-determination aspirations of the Catalan people are not ignited by Russia, but by the national oppression that Spain imposes on Catalonia. The Catalan independence movement seeks to establish a sovereign Catalan state within the European Union, not against the European Union (or the West), and expresses its full solidarity with Ukraine and all the peoples that suffer Russian imperialism and Russian interference.

Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2021 (A9-0271/2022 - Loránt Vincze)

15-12-2022

While overall we agree with the content of the report, we abstained because it fails to mention the unacceptable actions of the Chair of the Committee on Petitions, Ms Dolors Montserrat, throughout the legislative term.
The right to petition is a fundamental component of Union citizenship. For this reason, it is essential that the Committee be able to examine in a rigorous way all requests from citizens related to the competences of the European Union. Nevertheless, Ms Montserrat manipulates this committee and prevents citizens from exerting the right to petition properly by prioritising requests that are either in the interest of the Spanish nationalism, or in that of her party, the Spanish PP.
A clear example of this fact is that Ms Montserrat is wasting time and resources to repeatedly process petitions about the school system in Catalonia, ignoring that the European Commission has already said - on all occasions - that the European Union is not competent on this matter.
It is necessary that the Committee on Petitions stop being the instrument of the national and partisan interests of her president, and return to its original function: a democratic instrument to defend the rights of citizens.

Direction of EU-Russia political relations (A9-0259/2021 - Andrius Kubilius)

15-09-2021

We have voted in favour of this report because we fully share the concern regarding the interference of Russia in the Union’s democracy. However, we deplore the approval by the Plenary of an amendment to this report (S&D’s Amendment 31) which seeks to promote, through the back door, an unfounded claim about the Catalan pro-independence movement. This is only the latest of a series of attempts by the Spanish government, the Spanish state (its police and intelligence services) and its press to push a narrative of supposed ties between the pro-independence movement and Russian intelligence.
The amendment only seeks to misrepresent a democratic movement as an instrument intended to destabilise the European Union, to cover up the relentless repression it is subject to and to isolate it from possible allies that might raise their voice against the fundamental rights violations Spain is continually committing.
The alleged involvement of Russian intelligence in the Catalan independence process is an absolute falsehood (or fake news, as it is now called). The fabrication comes from the profoundly anti-independence Guardia Civil police body and stems from political espionage of private messages obtained illegally (as acknowledged by the Spanish Prosecutor’s Office).
The European Parliament should better guard itself from involuntarily contributing to the spread of fake news, as this very seriously affects its legitimacy to condemn fake news and misinformation campaigns of other countries, not least Russia.

Written questions

Members can submit a specific number of questions to the President of the European Council, the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union, for written answer. Rule 138, Annex III

Questions to the Bureau, the Conference of Presidents and the Quaestors

Members can submit questions to the President concerning the Bureau, the Conference of Presidents and the Quaestors as regards their respective duties. Rule 32(2)

Questions to the ECB and concerning the SSM and the SRM

Members can put questions for written reply to the ECB and questions concerning the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism. Such questions are first submitted to the Chair of the responsible committee.Rule 140, Rule 141, Annex III

Answers to questions to the ECB and concerning the SSM and the SRM

Reply to members’ questions to the ECB and questions concerning the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism. Rule 140, Rule 141, Annex III

Declarations

All declarations below have been signed by the Member, even if the signature is not visible in the online copy.

Meetings

Competitiveness of European ports and workers rights

Member
COMÍN I OLIVERES Antoni
Date, Place:
Brussels
Capacity:
Member Staff meeting
Meeting with:
European Dockworkers Council

Political prisoners in Guatemala

Member
COMÍN I OLIVERES Antoni
Date, Place:
Perpinyà
Capacity:
Member
Meeting with:
Alter Nativa

Freedom of West Papua

Member
COMÍN I OLIVERES Antoni
Date, Place:
Brussels
Capacity:
Member
Meeting with:
International Parlamentarians for West Papua