The envisaged EU banking supervision rules must be of good quality and provide for accountability. However the member states' current preferences for establishing them risk sending the wrong message, as well as perpetuating inefficiencies, warned the Parliament in a resolution voted on Thursday.
The resolution, adopted by a show of hands, comes a day after the Commission tabled two proposals to reinforce banking supervision. It sets out some of the key concerns that MEPs want to see addressed in decisions shaping the system.
At last! But a potentially problematic approach
The resolution welcomes the fact that EU countries have now accepted that an integrated bank supervision system is necessary, more than two years after the European Parliament itself called for this. However, it sounds the alarm about governments' apparent intention to avoid developing a system that is transparent and democratically accountable.
Member states, the resolution says, are moreover pre-empting the Commission's role as initiator of legislation by imposing a decision-making process which would exclude the European Parliament from deciding on one of the texts. The Parliament stands ready to adopt negotiating tactics to counter this, the resolution adds.
The resolution also highlights certain points of substance which should be considered in the debate on how to enact banking supervision. An important one concerns bank recapitalisations, which, the resolution suggests, could be carried out by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). A second is the need to devise a system which will be able to address any spillover effects on non-Eurozone members stemming from the creation of a Eurozone banking union.
On Wednesday, MEPs raised these and other issues with the Commissioner responsible, Michel Barnier. Most notably they insisted that they would take care to ensure that the rules provided for sufficient accountability of the supervisor, that there would be clarity on how to deal with failing banks, and that the extra supervision for the Eurozone banks would not in any way hamper the single market.
The two legislative proposals will now be scrutinised by the European Parliament and Member States over the coming months. Parliament has a consultative role for the legislative text conferring Eurozone bank supervisory tasks on the ECB. The Council must await Parliament's opinion before it can adopt this legislation. In the case of the legislative text amending the setup of the European Banking Authority, however, Parliament shares decision-making power with the Council.
Procedure: Motions for resolutions