Foreign Affairs and Trade MEPs welcome the new EU-UK agreement as a good deal but demand proper parliamentary scrutiny powers and full access to information.
On 14 January, members on the Foreign Affairs and International Trade committees held the first joint meeting on the new EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, intensifying the parliamentary scrutiny of the deal reached by EU and British negotiators on 24 December.
MEPs welcomed the agreement as a good solution, albeit thin. A no-deal would have been disastrous for citizens and companies in both the EU and the UK, speakers emphasised. However, they stressed that parliamentary scrutiny of this deal must go beyond mere ratification and insisted that Parliament be granted full access to information and a clear role in the implementation and future monitoring of the agreement.
In addition, members also highlighted the importance of fostering a close dialogue between the European Parliament and Westminster on future EU-UK relations.
They regretted that many issues – including the Erasmus programme, foreign policy, security and defence cooperation – were not included in the negotiations on the future partnership. Some expressed concern about the future of environmental standards, as the new UK emissions trading system has only been in place since 1 January and it is unclear how it will work with the EU’s own system.
For all statements and interventions, you can watch the meeting again here. (14.01.2021)
Kati Piri (AFET, S&D, NL) said: “Parliament’s red lines will continue to be central in the scrutiny process. I welcome the fact that the EU managed to secure a single, clear governance framework. This will give EU and British citizens, consumers and businesses legal certainty about the rules that they need to follow and guarantee that the parties to the agreement comply with it fully.
“Yet we must also be frank: we did not want or choose Brexit. So it is with regret and sadness that we acknowledge that this was the democratic choice of the British people. Sadly, the agreement itself falls far short of the Political Declaration that UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson himself signed just months prior to the negotiations.”
Christophe Hansen (INTA, EPP, LU) said: “It is a very thin agreement. However, I welcome the fact that there are no quotas and tariffs, and that we have avoided falling back to WTO rules that would have hurt a lot of our industries, including agriculture and cars.
“I regret very much that the UK decided not to take part in Erasmus. This jeopardises the future of 170,000 Europeans in the UK and 100,000 UK students in the EU. I also regret that future Geographical Indications are not covered, which is contrary to the Political Declaration.
“I would have liked services to be better included in the agreement. Nevertheless, regulatory cooperation on financial services will be negotiated until March.
“It is important not to let the consent process drag on forever. Provisional application is not the legal security that businesses and citizens deserve after all these years.”
In due course, the two committees will vote on the consent proposal prepared by the two standing rapporteurs to allow for a plenary vote before the end of the provisional application of the agreement.
The new Trade and Cooperation agreement has been provisionally applied since 1 January 2021. For it to enter into force permanently, it requires the consent of the Parliament. Parliament has repeatedly stated that it considers the current provisional application to be the result of a unique set of circumstances and an exercise not to be repeated.
MEPs on the International Trade Committee held their first meeting on the new EU-UK deal on Monday 11 January, in which they promised thorough scrutiny of the agreement. Read more here.