Banner page The European Parliament The European Parliament
Banner page

Index 
 
 

News report : 20-03-97

Brussels, 20 March, 1997


[Start of Doc] [Previous] [Next]

A NEW DIMENSION FOR EU SPORT


A new dimension for EU sport

19 March - The Committee on Culture (chairman: Peter PEX, EPP, Nl) held a public hearing on 'Sport, youth and the media: should the EU play too?'. The rapporteur, Doris PACK (EPP, D) said in conclusion that the main priorities were clear guarantees on the broadcasting of major sporting events, a Commission Green Paper covering all aspects of sport in EU policy and the creation of a sports task-force to provide a more consistent approach.

The hearing brought out the dual nature of sport. Discussion on the first two themes - giving young people access to sport and the inclusion of sport in the Treaty - highlighted its cultural role, while the debate on sport and the media, showed its economic importance.

Speakers in the first debate put forward a number of arguments to show that sport should not be considered purely from an economic viewpoint. It is an integral part of Europe's cultural heritage and plays a role in promoting health

All the speakers said that, if these values were to be developed in the EU, sport must be given a place in the Treaty.

Speaking on the Bosman judgment, Mostapha OUEZEKHTI (chairman of FC Atlas), welcomed the freedom for players but

thought that the lack of flanking measures would put a number of small clubs at risk as they might no longer have the funds to train young players. Michael SULZBACHER (Austrian Federal Sports Organization) said that the new system of sharing out income from broadcasting rights ought to benefit small clubs.

The sport and the media debate focused on the financial aspects. Jean-Bernard MÜNCH (European Broadcasting Union) said that an exclusive rights system for major sports events would limit the audience and viewers might ultimately lose interest.

There was a need for lists of events that must be accessible to the largest possible number of viewers. He thought a self-regulatory system was not practicable. The B Sky B representative, Vic WAKELING, did not deny that major sporting events attracted the largest audiences but thought a self-regulatory system was possible. Per OMDAL (UEFA) said a balance had to be found between viewers' rights to watch major events and the funding needed for the development of sport. Viewers should have free access to events in which their country was involved.

Further Information - Tel: Patrick BARAGIOLA - Tel: 284.32.51

[Start of Doc] [Previous] [Next]

DUMA DELEGATES STRONGLY OPPOSE ENLARGEMENT OF NATO


DUMA DELEGATES STRONGLY OPPOSE ENLARGEMENT OF NATO

19 March, Brussels - The Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament (chaired by Peter TRUSCOTT, Vice-Chairman, (PES, UK) exchanged views with a delegation from the Duma.

Mikhail YURIEV, Deputy Chairman of the Duma, was strongly opposed to enlargement, which he considered a threat to Russia. This view seems to be held almost unanimously within the Russian Parliament. The Duma now has a 'No' group numbering 300 members out of a parliament of 400. There is no military threat that would justify an extension of NATO eastwards. Enlargement could be met by unilateral measures: the Duma might not sign the START Treaty or it might denounce the existing CFE treaty. Although the economy is not strong, there are ways in which Russia can show its power which cost nothing. Mr YURIEV has no objection to enlargement of the WEU as the United States is not a member.

Speaking of the threat posed by military deployment of NATO troops on the territory of the Central and Eastern European countries, Roman POPKOVICH, a member of the Duma's Committee on Defence, even raised the possibility of another alliance to counterbalance NATO to include Russia, China and Iran. Yuri SEVENARD, Deputy Chairman of the Committee on Industry, thought it naive to believe that Russia would be resigned to joining the minor powers. The EU and the USA have to realize that Russia is still a considerable power.

On the question of whether Russia has security plans to counteract the feeling of insecurity in Central Europe, Mr YURIEV thought that a global security system was impossible. He proposes putting the present situation on hold for ten years, maintaining the dividing line between the countries of Europe, and signing a non-aggression treaty. There is no question of Russia joining NATO while it is dominated by the United States.

Further Information: Etienne BASSOT - Tel: 284.47.41, and Cécile YVAN

[Start of Doc] [Previous] [Next]

A PROTECTION FORCE FOR ALBANIAN HUMANITARIAN AID


A PROTECTION FORCE FOR ALBANIAN HUMANITARIAN AID

The Committee on Foreign Affairs (chairman: Tom SPENCER, EPP, UK) wants humanitarian aid convoys in Albania to be given protection.

The committee called on the Council, which is meeting on 25 March, to take the necessary measures to establish democracy and respect for the rule of law in Albania.

Further information: Etienne BASSOT - Tel: 284.47.41


[Start of Doc] [Previous] [Next]

MAKING THE VALLETTA CONFERENCE A SUCCESS


MAKING THE VALLETTA CONFERENCE A SUCCESS


Speaking on 20 March to the Committee on Foreign Affairs (chairman: Tom SPENCER, PES, UK), Manuel MARIN, Member of the Commission, hoped that the Euro-Mediterranean Conference in Valletta on 15 and 16 April would achieve practical results. Progress had been made on association agreements, for example, but a lot remained to be done.

Mr MARIN expressed hopes of substantial progress in Euro-Mediterranean cooperation. Parliament had a key role to play. There was a need to establish permanent channels for dialogue, especially on issues of vital interest, such as water.

He was in favour of an interparliamentary forum with the Mediterranean. Parliament should of course be a full participant in the EU delegation.

Further Information: Etienne BASSOT - Tel: 284.47.41, and Oliver SCHULZ

[Start of Doc] [Previous] [Next]

COMMISSIONER WARNED: PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY OF FOOD SAFETY WILL CONTINUE


COMMISSIONER WARNED: PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY OF FOOD SAFETY WILL CONTINUE

Parliament's determination to continue its close monitoring of food safety in the Community and to maintain its constitutional preogatives against the Council of Ministers were made crystal-clear to Commissioner Emma BONINO today when she outlined her new food safety role to the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection.

Speaking a year to the day after the UK Parliament learned that there was, after all, a possible link between BSE and CJD, Committee chairman Ken COLLINS (PES, UK) warned Mrs Bonino that the European Parliament had a duty under its rules to be vigilant about food safety, including veterinary legislation and veterinary products. The committee intended to carry out that duty and would monitor developments closely.

In particular, Mr Collins asked Mrs Bonino whether Parliament would have the Commission's support if it took action against the Council for adopting a regulation on beef labelling under Article 43 (agriculture, consultation procedure) of the Treaty instead of Article 100a (internal market, codecision procedure) as demanded by Parliament and accepted by the Commission. Mrs Bonino replied that the text adopted by the Council was very disappointing as regards both content and legal basis.

In fact, the committee has decided to write to the President of Parliament, Mr José María GIL- ROBLES, to ask him to invite the Council to reconsult Parliament on this urgent matter. This follows hot on the heels of a letter on another subject which the committee has just sent to the President of Parliament suggesting that Parliament take the Council to the Court of Justice for refusing to add Article 130s (the implementation of environmental objectives) to the legal basis (Article 43) for forest protection regulations which it recently adopted.

Mr Collins also asked Mrs Bonino whether she agreed with the committee's view that genetically modified products such as soya and maize should be labelled as completely as possible. In reply, while querying the meaning of "as completely as possible", Mrs Bonino said she agreed absolutely with the principle, but the problem was how to implement it in practice.

In her initial address to the committee, Mrs Bonino said she intended to propose the creation of a Scientific Committee responsible for evaluating the risks from genetically modified organisms. Such a committee was "an absolute necessity". As regards genetically modified foodstuffs, she said: "We should be keeping a very close eye on this kind of food."


The bulk of her remarks to the committee, following her appointment as the Commission's food safety supremo, concerned organizational changes made within the Commission in the wake of Commission President Jacques SANTER's speech to Parliament on 18 February this year. This followed severe criticism of the Commission in the report of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry into the BSE crisis. While the committee applauded the speech, some concern was expressed by members about the possible proliferation of committees without clearly defined responsibilities and about whether Parliament's concerns would be supported by less environmentally inclined Commissioners.

Mrs Bonino said that she intended to follow the principles laid down in that report's recommendations concerning scientific consultation, eg the work of the Scientific Committees should be transparent and their results should be published. She also agreed on the need to have high-quality independent scientific experts.

Moreover, she wanted to develop a new approach towards inspection and control so as to ensure control over the whole food chain from the farm to the point of sale and the consumer. " It will be possible to put into effect a system of inspection based on audits with well-defined and approved inspection procedures, " she said. However, the Commission could not replace national control bodies. "It is principally the Member States that are responsible for inspection and control within the European Union," she said.

Further information, Patrick REYNOLDS - tel. 284 4706


[Start of Doc] [Previous] [Next]

GREEN LIGHT FOR ARSENAL OF MEASURES TO COMBAT TRAFFIC POLLUTION


GREEN LIGHT FOR ARSENAL OF MEASURES TO COMBAT TRAFFIC POLLUTION

A massive arsenal of anti-pollution measures intended to clean up road transport in Europe from the start of the next millennium received the green light from the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection in a marathon voting exercise on 19 March involving some 350 amendments.

In adopting four reports calling for a substantial reduction in vehicle emissions from road transport, the committee, chaired by Mr Ken COLLINS (PES, UK), criticized the European Commission for operating behind closed doors and failing to consult widely outside the industries affected. Its closeness to the auto and oil industries, members claimed, had caused it to exaggerate the cost of a clean-up while failing to take account of the resulting health savings and environmental benefits.

In particular, rejecting the Commission's wish for voluntary controls, the committee opted for mandatory instead of indicative limits on the emission of pollutants such as nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, ozone and sulphur. However, one member expressed concern at the effect that a total lead ban might have on the performance of vintage cars.

In its defence, the Commission said that some of the amendments proposed could not be achieved by 2000. As for 2005, the technologies to be evaluated were not available yet. That was why the Commission was suggesting indicative limits.

The adoptions mark the first stage in the legislative process of implementing the so called Auto/Oil Programme, which was developed by the Commission between 1992 and 1996 in collaboration with the car and oil industries. The programme foresees a package of measures to reduce emissions, such as the use of advanced technology in engine design, better car maintenance, servicing and testing and the installation of car-borne diagnostic devices.

Setting the scene, the committee adopted a report by Doeke EISMA (ELDR, NL), under the consultation procedure, on a Commission communication to the European Parliament and the Council on a future strategy for the control of atmospheric emissions from road transport, taking account of the results of the Auto/Oil programme. The report regretted that the Commission had mistakenly based its approach on the principle of cost-effectiveness instead of carrying out a cost-benefit analysis. In addition, the Commission had been guided exclusively by the effects of air pollution on human health, whereas it also caused considerable damage to agricultural crops, ecosystems and the environment generally. Noise nuisance and soil and water pollution had also to be considered. The actual costs of motoring must be passed on to the consumer. Emission standards for existing vehicles should be enforced by regular random tests. Standards should be upgraded in 2000 and again in 2005. The Structural Funds should be used to finance projects for sustainable transport.

As a start to implementing the strategy outlined by Mr EISMA, the committee adopted two reports, under the codecision procedure (first reading), on Commission proposals on:

* measures to be taken against air pollution by emissions from motor vehicles (mainly passenger cars) amending Council Directives 70/156/EEC and 70/220/EEC (rapporteur: Bernd LANGE (PES, D)). This report called for the use of tax incentives to encourage early compliance with tough new emission limits, the replacement or retrofitting of older vehicles, the beefing up of emission test procedures, including cold start emissions, and the encouragement of alternative fuels. Manufacturers should not be able to exclude repairers or breakdown services from access to diagnostic systems. A binding two-stage approach required mandatory emission limits to be imposed from 2000 and 2005. "An adequate normative and fiscal framework should be created as soon as possible to accelerate the introduction into the market of vehicles with innovative propulsion technologies and vehicles which use alternative fuels with a low environmental impact," it said.

* the quality of petrol and diesel fuels, amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC (rapporteur: Noël MAMÈRE (Greens, F)). Calling for minimum environmental fuel specifications for petrol and diesel, the report said that Member States needed the right of differential taxation in order to promote the adoption of more advanced fuels. Low-quality diesel should no longer be sold after 1 January 2005. Special specifications were needed for the fuels (diesel, LPG and NGV) of fleets of buses, taxis and commercial vehicles, which are particularly responsible for urban pollution.

All three reports criticized the Commission's failure to consult experts from outside the industries affected. The LANGE report noted:"there has been absolutely no transparency and no participation by social groupings, political decision-makers or relevant non-governmental organizations".

The committee also adopted a non-legislative report by Laura GONZÁLEZ ÁLVAREZ (GUE/NGL, E) on a Commission communication on a Community strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and improve fuel economy. CO2 emissions were not covered by the Auto/Oil Programme, but CO2 is the main greenhouse gas responsible for global warming. The report said that in the light of the current increase in CO2 "business as usual" was not an option. Rejecting the Commission's proposal for a voluntary agreement with the auto industry, the report calls on the Commission to ensure, through the establishment of graduated limits, that by 2005 the average CO2 emission of all new motor vehicles (diesel and petrol) in the EU is 120g per km.The committee also raises the possibility of linking car purchase tax and/or annual road taxes to emission levels so as to give consumers an incentive to buy less polluting vehicles. Fuel economy labelling and the use of speed limiters and econometers are recommended and the committee calls for a reconsideration of out-of-town shopping centres.

The reports are due to be discussed by the full Parliament at its April session in Strasbourg.

Further Information: Patrick REYNOLDS - Tel: 284.47.06

[Start of Doc] [Previous] [Next]

AGREEMENT WITH PLO APPROVED


AGREEMENT WITH PLO APPROVED

The Foreign Affairs Committee (chairman Tom SPENCER, EPP, UK) has unanimously approved the proposal by its rapporteur (Alexandros ALAVANOS (EUL/NGL, Gr). The interim agreement with the PLO is aimed to provide the necessary legal framework for trade and cooperation with the former occupied territories.

Contrary to other Euro-Mediterranean agreements, the agreement with the PLO is not a mixed one and does not involve the Member States: ratification by the national parliaments is not required will start negotiations with a view to concluding a Euro-Mediterranean association agreement will start no later than 4 May 1999.

Further Information: Etienne BASSOT - Tel: 284.47.41, and Cécile YVAN

[Start of Doc] [Previous] [Next]

BUDGETARY CONTROL: ALL CLEAR FOR EUROPEA DEVELOPMENT FUND, VOCATIONAL TRAINING CE


BUDGETARY CONTROL: ALL CLEAR FOR THE EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUND, THE VOCATIONAL TRAINING CENTRE AND THE DUBLIN FOUNDATION

Although Parliament refused to grant a discharge for the sixth and seventh European Development Funds (EDF) for 1994, the Committee on Budgetary Control (chairman: Diemut THEATO (EPP, D)) is proposing to grant a discharge for the EDF for 1995, despite the fact that no solution had been found to what Parliament regards as the main problem - inclusion of the EDF in the EU budget. The committee has unanimously adopted the report by Herbert BÖSCH (PES, D). It has also noted the Commission's efforts at the IGC to find a satisfactory solution as regards inclusion of the EDF in the budget.

Similarly, although the 1994 discharge for CEDEFOP (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training) in 1994, the Committee on Budgetary Control unanimously approved the report by Edward KELLETT-BOWMAN (EPP, UK) which proposed granting a discharge for 1994 and 1995. The committee has some doubts about the agreement between CEDEFOP and the Greek Government on the construction and purchase of buildings in Thessaloniki. It has also noted that difficulties concerning staff relocation from Berlin to Thessaloniki, for which the Council bore prime responsibility, should be settled during 1997.

The Committee on Budgetary Control also unanimously approved the KELLETT-BOWMAN report on granting a discharge for 1995 to the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions in Dublin.

The committee postponed approval of the WYNN and DANKERT reports on the discharge for the 1995 budget, scheduled for the April plenary session.

Further Information: Georgios GHIATIS - Tel.: 284.22.16

[Start of Doc] [Previous] [Next]

NEED FOR CONCILATION BY THE COUNCIL



NEED FOR CONCILIATION BY THE COUNCIL

Speaking at the invitation of the Committee on Culture (chairman: Peter PEX, EPP, Nl), the President-in-Office of the Council, Aad NUIS, came under a running fire of questions for over an hour, particularly on cultural programmes still at the conciliation stage (Ariane, Raphael and Television without frontiers).

MEPs said they had made several attempts to reach agreement on the two cultural programmes where there are budget difficulties but is not prepared to move.

Mr NUIS said that the Council and Parliament positions were close on one of the main issues relating to Television without frontiers - free access for viewers to major sporting events.

He acknowledged that there was a blockage in the Council in connection with the Guarantee Fund. He would try to get things moving by asking the delegations that had objections to put forward alternative solutions.

Further Information: Patrick BARAGIOLA - Tel: 284.32.51

 
  Legal notice