Index 
 Previous 
 Next 
 Full text 
Procedure : 2008/2125(INL)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A6-0467/2008

Texts tabled :

A6-0467/2008

Debates :

PV 18/12/2008 - 3
CRE 18/12/2008 - 3

Votes :

PV 18/12/2008 - 6.22
CRE 18/12/2008 - 6.22
Explanations of votes

Texts adopted :

P6_TA(2008)0637

Verbatim report of proceedings
Thursday, 18 December 2008 - Strasbourg OJ edition

6.22. E-Justice (A6-0467/2008, Diana Wallis) (vote)
PV
  

– After the vote:

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Daniel Caspary (PPE-DE).(DE) Mr President, I refer to the relevant rule of the Rules of Procedure. A few months ago, we voted on the Bauer report, and afterwards I wrote seeking clarification of how we should be voting on amendments to reports.

There is no doubt that we need a qualified majority in the final vote if we are to call on the Commission to take legislative action, but I fail to see why we also need a qualified majority beforehand for amendments. Unfortunately, I have yet to receive a reply.

We have now had another such report on the agenda. I would be grateful if the services could clarify this.

 
  
MPphoto
 

  President. − Mr Caspary, I have just been informed that a reply regarding the Bauer report is on its way to you. I hope that it will reach you before Christmas.

 
Legal notice - Privacy policy