Protection of workers from exposure to carcinogens or mutagens: Fourth proposal
The impact assessment (IA) defines clearly the problem and its underlying drivers. The IA considers a wide range of options, and those retained for further assessment appear to be reasonable and/or justified. However, the IA would have benefited from providing greater clarity on those components that were either included in (short-term exposure limit values) or excluded (biological limit values) from the preferred options. The analysis of impacts focuses on their economic and social dimension, mainly linked to health. Environmental impacts are found to be limited or small but positive, but the analysis could have been substantiated more thoroughly. A cost-benefit analysis of the transitional occupational exposure limit values included in the preferred options was not performed. Stakeholders' opinions have been satisfactorily reported. Finally, the IA appears to have addressed most of the RSB's recommendations and the legislative proposal seems to be consistent with the analysis carried out in the IA.
Briefing
Apie šį dokumentą
Publikacijos rūšis
Autorius
Politikos sritis
Raktinis žodis
- APLINKA
- aplinkos blogėjimas
- chemija
- cheminių medžiagų teisės aktai
- darbo organizavimas ir darbo sąlygos
- darbo standartas
- darbo teisė ir darbo santykiai
- demografija ir gyventojai
- GAMYBA, TECHNOLOGIJOS IR MOKSLINIAI TYRIMAI
- kancerogeninė medžiaga
- PRAMONĖ
- profesinis mirtingumas
- profesinė liga
- profesinė sveikata
- saugos standartas
- SOCIALINIAI KLAUSIMAI
- sveikata
- sveikatos rizika
- sveikatos sistemos įstatymai
- technologijos ir techniniai reglamentai
- UŽIMTUMAS IR DARBO SĄLYGOS