Fittex

Ir-riżultati tiegħek

Qed tara 10 minn 36 riżultati

The impact assessment (IA) sufficiently substantiates the need for a revision of the CTD, and provides a well-evidenced problem definition relying on various data sources. It presents a sufficient range of policy options, which appear to present self-standing alternatives. The IA qualitatively and quantitatively assesses all policy options' economic, social and environmental impacts, and explains the methods used in detail. It openly explains limitations in the analysis, for instance regarding employment ...

The impact assessment (IA) provides a useful information package supporting the 'CountEmissionsEU' proposal. It presents a substantiated problem definition and illustrates the scale of the problems. The analysis relies on an external IA supporting study, stakeholder consultation and independent research. The IA assesses the economic, social and environmental impacts of all six policy options. It openly explains the assessment's limitations, in particular the fact that empirical evidence to underpin ...

The impact assessment (IA) presents a well-evidenced problem definition, and sufficiently explains the need for a revision of the WDD. The IA has been prepared in parallel with the ex-post evaluation; the 'evaluate first' principle was therefore not followed. The IA analysis relies on an external IA supporting study, stakeholder consultation and independent research. The IA presents three policy options; they are, however, incremental, and not entirely self-standing policy alternatives. As seven ...

The impact assessment convincingly explains the need for a revision of the Flag State Directive, and sufficiently describes the problems and their drivers. The analysis draws on the ex-post evaluation, in line with the 'evaluate first' principle, an external IA supporting study, stakeholder consultation and various data sources. The IA presents four policy options, which do not however offer much choice. All policy options are partially identical; they offer alternatives only relating to one objective ...

This briefing provides an initial analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the European Commission's impact assessment (IA) accompanying the above-mentioned proposals, submitted on 7 December 2022 and referred to the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON). The initiative – which would modify the existing framework applying to EU central counterparties (CCPs) and market participants using their services – aims to reduce the over reliance of EU financial markets ...

The IA provides a convincing justification on the need to revise the CLP. It presents a well-evidenced problem definition and describes the scale of the problems. The IA does not provide self-standing policy options addressing all the drivers. Instead, it provides three policy option packages, under which the sub-options are the policy options; however, there are in fact only a few alternative choices. The IA explains the policy options and their impacts in detail in extensive annexes. The comparison ...

Listing Act package

Briefing 28-04-2023

The impact assessment (IA) provides a well-evidenced and useful analysis for decision-making. It draws on several data sources, provides qualitative and quantitative data, and also explains uncertainties and limitations. The IA clearly states that the scope of the initiative is limited; it does not aim to solve all the issues on listing, and notes that a listing decision is influenced by many factors. The problem definition would have benefited from further clarification of the problems and drivers ...

Packaging and packaging waste

Briefing 29-03-2023

The IA provides a good overview of the problems relating to packaging and packaging waste, and the possible impacts of the various measures proposed to address the problems. In its assessment, which is both qualitative and quantitative, the IA relies on a wealth of data sources and modelling. However, it does not clearly indicate the IA supporting studies and their full references; this would have improved transparency. The IA presents three policy options, which are partially incremental and cannot ...

The IA provides a well-evidenced description of the problem and its scale and sufficiently substantiates the need to lower the current EU occupational exposure level for asbestos. However, the IA could have explained the evaluation findings in more detail and clarified the problem drivers further. The IA clearly explains the scientific opinion of the Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC), according to which there is no safe exposure level and therefore the RAC did not recommend any specific OEL. The ...

The IA provides a good information package concerning the revision of the CPR, including a summary of the SME test that was carried out, relying on a wealth of evidence, studies and reports. Yet, while the problem definition is well evidenced, the description of the problems and their scale would have benefited from more detailed explanations. In the extensive stakeholder consultations, stakeholders had different views about the policy options; for example, the preferred option received less support ...