Revision of the 'Eurovignette' directive
The IA contains a wealth of information, data and research, both internal and external, but some parts of the complex analysis lack clarity and coherence. The extensive quantitative estimations are not always comparable in structure and thus difficult to relate to each other. The potential contribution of the options to the reduction of CO2 emissions and to the REFIT exercise remains vague, as well as their impact on SMEs. The IA concludes that higher revenues, better road quality and considerable environmental and social benefits would compensate for the regulatory and compliance costs of the initiatives. At the same time, it acknowledges that under all options the impacts of the proposals are uncertain because the introduction of tolls remains voluntary and subject to national policy orientations.
Briefing
Om detta dokument
Publikationstyp
Sökord
- bullerförorening
- EG-direktiv
- EU-förslag
- EU-lagstiftning
- EUROPEISKA UNIONEN
- FINANSER
- fordonsskatt
- FÖRETAG OCH KONKURRENS
- företagsorganisering
- infrastrukturavgift
- konkurrenskraft
- kunskapskontroll
- MILJÖ
- miljöförsämring
- miljöpolitik
- miljöpåverkan
- minskade gasutsläpp
- organisering av utbildningsväsendet
- proportionalitetsprincipen
- samrådsförfarande (konsultation)
- skatteväsen
- stortransportfordon
- subsidiaritetsprincipen
- TRANSPORT
- transportorganisering
- transportpolitik
- UTBILDNING OCH KOMMUNIKATION